On BIM Interoperability via the IFC Standard: An Assessment from the Structural Engineering and Design Viewpoint
Source abstract
Abstract
Building information modelling (BIM) plays a prominent role in a good deal of architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) works, envisaging a full transition to digitalization for the construction industry. This is also due to a number of national and international regulations regarding the design, erection, and management of civil engineering constructions. For this reason, full interoperability of software environments such as computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided engineering (CAE) is a necessary requirement, particularly when the exchange of information comes from different disciplines. Users, throughout the years, have faced CAD–CAE interoperability issues despite following the IFC neutral open file format. This inability to share data (CAD to CAD, CAD to CAE) often generates model-interpretation problems as well as a lack of parametric information and a disconnection of elements. This paper addresses issues and mapping mechanisms in the exchange of data for the purpose of defining a baseline for the current status of bidirectional data exchange between AEC CAD/CAE software via the IFC format. A benchmark study, covering three years of software releases is illustrated; the assessment of the software performance was made with reference to criteria associated with the software’s level of suitability for use of the structural models. Four classes of performance, depending on the accuracy of the data transfer and on the associated corrective actions to be taken, were adopted. This confirmed that at the moment, the implementation of the IFC standard by software manufacturers is geared towards an expert class of users. Further efforts are needed in order to ensure its application is adopted by a wider class, thus extending and regulating its use by national, regional, and local authorities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, Italy
StreGa Lab, Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
Napoli Branch, National Research Council, ITC-CNR, Construction Technologies Institute, 80146 Napoli, Italy
L’Aquila Branch, National Research Council, ITC-CNR, Construction Technologies Institute, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Maunula, A., Smeds, R., and Hivernsalo, A. (2008, January 17). Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM)—A process perspective. Proceedings of the APMS 2008 Innovations in Networks, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
2. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
3. Critical success factors for enhancing the building information modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore10.3846/13923730.2017.1374300 ↗
4. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 Laying Down a Procedure for the Provision of Information in the Field of Technical Regulations and of Rules on Information Society Services, Official Journal of the European Union, L241; EU Publications Office.
5. (2021, September 17). Ministerial Decree 27 January 2017, n. 560. Modalità e i Tempi di Progressiva Introduzione dei Metodi e Degli Strumenti Elettronici di Modellazione per l’edilizia e le Infrastrutture. Rome, Italy, Available online: https://www.mit.gov.it/normativa/decreto-ministeriale-numero-560-del-01122017.
6. (2021, September 16). Ministerial Decree 8 August 2021, n. 312. Modifiche al Decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti 1° Dicembre 2017, n. 560 Che Stabilisce le Modalità e i Tempi di Progressiva Introduzione dei Metodi e degli Strumenti Elettronici di Modellazione per l’edilizia e le Infrastrutture. Rome, Italy, Available online: https://www.mit.gov.it/node/16280.
7. Noardo, F., Arroyo Ohori, K., Krijnen, T., and Stoter, J. (2021). An Inspection of IFC Models from Practice. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052232 ↗
8. Bastos Porsani, G., Del Valle de Lersundi, K., Sánchez-Ostiz Gutiérrez, A., and Fernández Bandera, C. (2021). Interoperability between Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Building Energy Model (BEM). Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052167 ↗
9. Chiaia, B., Davardoust, S., and Osello, A. (2015, January 11–13). Structural calculations by horizontal and vertical interoperability for the redevelopment of existing buildings. Proceedings of the XIII International Forum Heritage and Technology, Aversa, Italy.
10. Bianconi, F., Conti, P., and Di Angelo, L. (2006, January 5–7). Interoperability among CAD/CAM/CAE systems: A review of current research trends. Proceedings of the Geometric Modeling and Imaging—New Trends (GMAI’06), London, UK.10.1109/GMAI.2006.30 ↗
11. Xu, X. (2009). Integrating Advanced Computer-Aided Design, Manufacturing, and Numerical Control: Principles and Implementations, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-59904-714-0 ↗
12. Aldegeily, M., Hu, Y., Shao, X., and Zhang, J. (2018, January 18–21). From architectural design to structural analysis: A data-driven approach to study Building Information Modeling (BIM) interoperability. Proceedings of the 54th ASC Annual International Conference, Associated Schools of Construction, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
13. Assessment of model-based data exchange between architectural design and structural analysis10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101589 ↗
14. (2021, September 17). IFC2x3 Coordination View Version 2.0 Certification—Workflow Description. T. Liebich, K. Hausknecht, AEC3 Editors, ver. 1.1. Available online: https://standards.buildingsmart.org/documents/bSI_IFC_Certification_2-0_Workflow_CV-V2.0_Draft1.1.pdf.
15. ISO 10303-21:2016 (International Organization for Standardization) (2016). Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange, Part 21, International Organization for Standardization.
16. Osello, A. (2017). Implementation of BIM Methodology for District Data Visualization. [Master’s Thesis, Politecnico di Torino]. Available online: https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/6408/1/tesi.pdf.
17. (2021, September 17). buildingSMART International. Available online: https://technical.buildingsmart.org/standards/ifc/ifc-schema-specifications/ifc-release-notes/.
18. buildingSMART International (2021, September 17). Certified Software. Available online: https://www.buildingsmart.org/compliance/software-certification/certified-software/.
19. buildingSMART International (2021, September 17). IFC Specifications Database. Available online: https://technical.buildingsmart.org/standards/ifc/ifc-schema-specifications/.
20. Golabchi, A., and Kamat, V.R. (2013, January 11–15). Evaluation of industry foundation classes for practical building information modeling interoperability. Proceedings of the 30th ISARC, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.22260/ISARC2013/0003 ↗
21. Metrics for Quantifying the Similarities and Differences between IFC Files10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000077 ↗
22. (2021, September 17). buildingSMART International, Coordination View Version 2.0 Summary. Available online: http://technical.buildingsmart.org/certification/ifc2x3-program.
23. Interpretation of structural analytical models from the coordination view in Building information models10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.025 ↗
24. (2021, September 17). buildingSMART International, Structural Analysis View Summary. Available online: https://standards.buildingsmart.org/MVD/RELEASE/IFC2x3/TC1/Structural/StructuralAnalysisView.zip.
25. (2021, September 17). buildingSMART International, Model View Definition Summary. Available online: https://technical.buildingsmart.org/standards/ifc/mvd/.
26. Assessment of conformance and interoperability testing methods used for construction industry product models10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.011 ↗
27. Interoperability in practice: Geometric data exchange using the IFC standard
28. Benchmark tests for BIM data exchanges of precast concrete10.1016/j.autcon.2008.11.001 ↗
29. Nizam, R.S., and Zhang, C. (November, January 29). Current State of Information Exchange between the two most popular BIM software: Revit and Tekla. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Building and Structures, Sustainable Building and Structures, Suzhou, China.
30. Sibenik, G. (2016, January 13–15). Building information modelling based interdisciplinary data exchange: A case study. Proceedings of the 1st International UK BIM Academic Forum Conference, Glasgow, UK.
31. Taher, A.A. (2016). BIM Software Capability and Interoperability Analysis. [Master’s Thesis, KTH School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE)]. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:917005/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
32. Interpreted information exchange: Systematic approach for BIM to engineering analysis information transformations10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000591 ↗
33. Data interoperability assessment though IFC for BIM in structural design—A five-year gap analysis10.3846/13923730.2017.1341850 ↗
34. Interoperability analysis of IFC-based data exchange between heterogeneous BIM software10.3846/jcem.2018.6132 ↗
35. Marcolin, G. (2017). Structural Information Modeling Proposta di Sviluppo di Standard Informative Open BIM per l’integrazione di Analisi Strutturali. [Master’s Thesis, University of Padua, Department of Civil, Environment and Architectural Engineering]. Available online: http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/56332.
36. (2020). Revit 2021, Computer Software, Autodesk Inc.
37. (2020). Allplan 2020, Computer Software, Allplan GmbH.
38. (2020). ArchiCAD 24, Computer Software, Graphisoft.
39. (2020). Edificius 14, Computer Software, Acca Software, S.p.A.
40. (2020). Robot Structural Analysis 2021, Computer Software, Autodesk Inc.
41. (2020). Tekla Structures 2020, Computer Software, Trimble Solutions Corporation.
42. (2020). ModeSt 8.23, Computer Software, Tecnisoft s.a.s.
43. (2020). RFEM 5.23, Computer Software, Dlubal Software GmbH.
44. (2020). SAP2000 22, Computer Software, Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSIAMERICA).
45. (2020). Edilus 44, Computer Software, Acca Software, S.p.A.
46. Gerbino, S., and Brondi, A. (2004, January 18–21). Interoperability issues among cad systems: A benchmarking study of 7 commercial MCAD software. Proceedings of the 8th International Design Conference—Design, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
47. (2020). BIMvision 2.24, Computer Software, Datacomp Sp. z.o.o.
48. Lipman, R. (2017). IFC File Analyzer Software. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 122.10.6028/jres.122.015 ↗