journal article·2021-11-18Open access

Forecasting the Bearing Capacity of the Driven Piles Using Advanced Machine-Learning Techniques

Mohammed Amin Benbouras, Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, Hamma Zedira, Laala Ghelani, Lina Lefilef

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 22

Abstract

Estimating the bearing capacity of piles is an essential point when seeking for safe and economic geotechnical structures. However, the traditional methods employed in this estimation are time-consuming and costly. The current study aims at elaborating a new alternative model for predicting the pile-bearing capacity based on eleven new advanced machine-learning methods in order to overcome these limitations. The modeling phase used a database of 100 samples collected from different countries. Additionally, eight relevant factors were selected in the input layer based on the literature recommendations. The optimal inputs were modeled using the machine-learning methods and their performance was assessed through six performance measures using a K-fold cross-validation approach. The comparative study proved the effectiveness of the DNN model, which displayed a higher performance in predicting the pile-bearing capacity. This elaborated model provided the optimal prediction, i.e., the closest to the experimental values, compared to the other models and formulae proposed by previous studies. Finally, a reliable and easy-to-use graphical interface was generated, namely “BeaCa2021”. This will be very helpful for researchers and civil engineers when estimating the pile-bearing capacity, with the advantage of saving time and money.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Technology Department, École Normale Supérieure d’Enseignement Technologique de Skikda (ENSET), Skikda 21001, Algeria

Central Public Works Laboratory (LCTP), Algiers 16006, Algeria

Doctoral School of Urban Planning, “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, 010014 Bucharest, Romania

National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, 50741 Bucharest, Romania

Civil Engineering Department, University of Abbes Laghrour, Khenchela 40051, Algeria

Department of English Language and Literature, Mohamed Seddik Ben Yahia University, Jijel 18000, Algeria

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Developing a hybrid PSO–ANN model for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles10.1007/s00521-015-2072-z ↗
2. A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9 ↗
3. CPTu-based enhanced UniCone method for pile capacity10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.07.010 ↗
4. Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations10.1061/AJGEB6.0000243 ↗
5. New Design Correlations for Piles in Sand10.1061/AJGEB6.0001172 ↗
6. Intelligent computing for modeling axial capacity of pile foundations10.1139/T09-094 ↗
7. Reliability assessment of CPTU-based pile capacity predictions in soft clay deposits10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.05.006 ↗
8. Assessment of direct CPT and CPTU methods for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.010 ↗
9. Relevant data-based approach upon reliable safety factor for pile axial capacity10.1080/1064119X.2020.1841861 ↗
10. Prediction of pile bearing capacity using a hybrid genetic algorithm-based ANN10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.007 ↗
11. D18 Committee (2008). Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic Testing of Deep Foundations, ASTM International.
12. Berezantzev, V.G. (1965, January 11–13). Design of deep foundations. Proceedings of the Proc. 5th ICSMFE, Montreal, QC, Canada.
13. Simple statical computation of permissible pileloads
14. Etude des fondations sur pilotis et des fondations directes
15. Vesic, A.S. (1977). Design of pile foundations. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice, Transportation Research Board.
16. Assessment of Direct Cone Penetration Test Methods for Predicting the Ultimate Capacity of Friction Driven Piles10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:9(935) ↗
17. Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.001 ↗
18. Maizir, H., Suryanita, R., and Jingga, H. (2016, January 28–29). Estimation of pile bearing capacity of single driven pile in sandy soil using finite element and artificial neural network methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology, Computer, Basic and Applied Sciences ECBA, Osaka, Japan.10.20469/ijaps.2.50003-2 ↗
19. 3D failure envelope of a rigid pile embedded in a cohesive soil using finite element limit analysis10.1002/nag.3152 ↗
20. A Simple Approach for Evaluating the Bearing Capacity of Piles Subjected to Inclined Loads10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002215 ↗
21. Use of GIS systems to analyze soil compressibility, swelling and bearing capacity under superficial foundations inalgiers region, ALGERIA
22. Estimation of modified expansive soil CBR with multivariate adaptive regression splines, random forest and gradient boosting machine10.1007/s41062-021-00568-z ↗
23. State of the art of artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering
24. Dry density in relation to other geotechnical proprieties of Algiers clay
25. Artificial intelligence techniques for the design and analysis of deep foundations
26. Mahesh, P. (2011, January 15–17). Modeling pile capacity using generalized regression neural network. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference, Kochi, India. No. N-027.
27. New method for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of driven piles by using Flap number10.1007/s12205-013-0315-z ↗
28. Optimization of ANFIS with GA and PSO estimating α ratio in driven piles10.1007/s00366-018-00694-w ↗
29. Applying several soft computing techniques for prediction of bearing capacity of driven piles10.1007/s00366-018-0674-7 ↗
30. A new development of ANFIS–GMDH optimized by PSO to predict pile bearing capacity based on experimental datasets10.1007/s00366-019-00849-3 ↗
31. Optimizing an ANN model with ICA for estimating bearing capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil10.1007/s00366-017-0545-7 ↗
32. Estimation of Bearing Capacity of Piles in Cohesionless Soil Using Optimised Machine Learning Approaches10.1007/s10706-019-01085-8 ↗
33. Optimizing an ANN model with genetic algorithm (GA) predicting load-settlement behaviours of eco-friendly raft-pile foundation (ERP) system10.1007/s00366-019-00767-4 ↗
34. Estimation of ultimate bearing capacity of driven piles in c-φ soil using MLP-GWO and ANFIS-GWO models: A comparative study10.1007/s00500-020-05435-0 ↗
35. Alavi, A.H., Gandomi, A.H., Mollahasani, A., and Bazaz, J.B. (2013). Linear and tree-based genetic programming for solving geotechnical engineering problems. Metaheuristics in Water, Geotechnical and Transport Engineering, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-398296-4.00012-X ↗
36. Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of soft grounds using computational intelligence techniques: A comparative study10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.03.006 ↗
37. A new genetic programming model for predicting settlement of shallow foundations10.1139/T07-063 ↗
38. Stockard, D.M. (1979). Case Histories-Pile Driving in the Gulf of Mexico, OnePetro.10.4043/3443-MS ↗
39. Stockard, D.M. (1986). Case Histories: Pile Driving Offshore India, OnePetro.10.4043/5227-MS ↗
40. Tucker, L.M., and Briaud, J.-L. (1988). Analysis of the Pile Load Test Program at the Lock and Dam 26 Replacement Project, Texas A&M University College Station Dept of Civil Engineering.
41. Estimating Bearing Capacity Factors and Cone Tip Resistance
42. Fellenius, B.H., and Altaee, A. (2012). Pile dynamics in geotechnical practice—six case histories. Deep Foundations 2002: International Perspective Theory Design, Construction Perform, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/40601(256)44 ↗
43. A new approach to predict the Compression Index using Artificial Intelligence Methods10.1080/1064119X.2018.1484533 ↗
44. Comparing Nonlinear Regression Analysis And Artificial Neural Networks To Predict Geotechnical Parameters From Standard Penetration Test
45. Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
46. A random forest guided tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
47. Awad, M., and Khanna, R. (2015). Support vector regression. Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9 ↗
48. Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., and Wang, H. (2010). Editorial: Perspectives on partial least squares. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Springer. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics.10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8 ↗
49. How Correlations Influence Lasso Prediction10.1109/TIT.2012.2227680 ↗
50. Kernel ridge regression with active learning for wind speed prediction10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.055 ↗
51. Ridge Regression—1980: Advances, Algorithms, and Applications
52. Application of Stepwise Regression to Non-Linear Estimation10.1080/00401706.1968.10490535 ↗
53. Klempous, R., Nikodem, J., Jacak, W., and Chaczko, Z. (2014). Architecture and design of the HeuristicLab optimization environment. Advanced Methods and Applications in Computational Intelligence, Springer International Publishing. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics.10.1007/978-3-319-01436-4 ↗
54. Monthly evapotranspiration estimation using optimal climatic parameters: Efficacy of hybrid support vector regression integrated with whale optimization algorithm10.1007/s10661-020-08659-7 ↗
55. Amin Benbouras, M., and Petrisor, A.-I. (2021). Prediction of Swelling Index Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Cohesive Soils. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020536 ↗
56. Submodel Selection and Evaluation in Regression. The X-Random Case10.2307/1403680 ↗
57. Model development and validation for intelligent data collection for lateral spread displacements10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000050 ↗
58. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.007 ↗
59. Predicting Shear Stress Parameters in Consolidated Drained Conditions Using Artificial Intelligence Methods
60. River Stage Forecasting in Bangladesh: Neural Network Approach10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:1(1) ↗
61. Contribution of two artificial intelligence techniques in predicting the secondary compression index of fine-grained soils10.1007/s41062-020-00348-1 ↗