journal article·2023-02-28Open access

Academic Teaching Quality Framework and Performance Evaluation Using Machine Learning

Ahmad Almufarreh, Khaled Mohammed Noaman, Muhammad Noman Saeed

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 5

Abstract

Higher education institutions’ principal goal is to give their learners a high-quality education. The volume of research data gathered in the higher education industry has increased dramatically in recent years due to the fast development of information technologies. The Learning Management System (LMS) also appeared and is bringing courses online for an e-learning model at almost every level of education. Therefore, to ensure the highest level of excellence in the higher education system, finding information for predictions or forecasts about student performance is one of many tasks for ensuring the quality of education. Quality is vital in e-learning for several reasons: content, user experience, credibility, and effectiveness. Overall, quality is essential in e-learning because it helps ensure that learners receive a high-quality education and can effectively apply their knowledge. E-learning systems can be made more effective with machine learning, benefiting all stakeholders of the learning environment. Teachers must be of the highest caliber to get the most out of students and help them graduate as academically competent and well-rounded young adults. This research paper presents a Quality Teaching and Evaluation Framework (QTEF) to ensure teachers’ performance, especially in e-learning/distance learning courses. Teacher performance evaluation aims to support educators’ professional growth and better student learning environments. Therefore, to maintain the quality level, the QTEF presented in this research is further validated using a machine learning model that predicts the teachers’ competence. The results demonstrate that when combined with other factors particularly technical evaluation criteria, as opposed to strongly associated QTEF components, the anticipated result is more accurate. The integration and validation of this framework as well as research on student performance will be performed in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Online and Blended Learning · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Deanship of eLearning and Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Design of English Learning Effectiveness Evaluation System Based on K-Means Clustering Algorithm
2. Teacher evaluation
3. Cheniti-Belcadhi, L., Henze, N., and Braham, R. (2004, January 4–6). An Assessment Framework for eLearning in the Semantic Web. Proceedings of the LWA 2004: Lernen-Wissensentdeckung-Adaptivität, Berlin, Germany.
4. New Trends in Teacher Evaluation. Educational leadership
5. Exploration on the teaching reform measure for machine learning course system of artificial intelligence specialty
6. Martin, F., and Kumar, S. (2018). Leading and Managing E-Learning: What the E-Learning Leader Needs to Know, Springer.
7. Martin, F., and Kumar, S. (2018). Quality Framework on Contextual Challenges in Online Distance Education for Developing Countries, Computing Society of the Philippines.
8. (2023, January 25). The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework and the Five Pillars. Available online: http://www.mit.jyu.fi/OPE/kurssit/TIES462/Materiaalit/Sloan.pdf.
9. Kear, K., Rosewell, J., Williams, K., Ossiannilsson, E., Rodrigo, C., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., and Mellar, H. (2016). Quality Assessment for E-Learning: A Benchmarking Approach, European Association of Distance Teaching Universities.
10. Phipps, R., and Merisotis, J. (2000). Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education, Institute for Higher Education Policy.
11. (2023, January 26). Benchmarking Guide. Available online: https://www.acode.edu.au/pluginfile.php/550/mod_resource/content/8/TEL_Benchmarks.pdf.
12. (2023, January 28). The Nadeosa Quality Criteria for Distance Education in South Africa. Available online: https://www.nadeosa.org.za/documents/NADEOSAQCSection2.pdf.
13. (2023, January 25). OSCQR Course Design Review. Available online: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/oscqr-course-design-review/.
14. Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z ↗
15. Using learning analytics to enhance student learning in online courses based on quality matters standards10.1177/0047239516656369 ↗
16. (2023, January 26). iNACOL Blended Learning Teacher Competency Framework, Available online: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561318.pdf.
17. (2023, January 29). Quality Assurance Framework–Asian Association of Open Universities. Available online: https://www.aaou.org/quality-assurance-framework/.
18. Can teacher evaluation improve teaching
19. E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-learning and Digital Media10.1177/2042753018785180 ↗
20. Shifting the education paradigm amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Nursing students’ attitude to E learning
21. Patterns of students’ utilization of flexibility in online academic courses and their relation to course achievement
22. Factors affecting the quality of online learning during COVID-19: Evidence from a developing economy10.3389/feduc.2022.847571 ↗
23. Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
24. (2022, December 21). Teaching and Learning Frameworks. Available online: https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/BackwardDesign.
25. (2022, December 17). An Overview of Key Criteria. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10707/chapter/5.
26. (2022, December 03). Evaluating E-Learning: A Framework for Quality Assurance. Available online: https://www.elearningguild.com/articles/articles-detail.cfm?articleid=158.
27. (2022, December 11). Evaluating the Quality of Online Courses. Available online: https://www.onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/.
28. Evaluating e-learning: An analytical framework and research directions for management education
29. Didactic and technical considerations when developing e-learning and CME10.1007/s10639-014-9364-2 ↗
30. E-learning evaluation: A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning systems
31. Evaluating e-learning effectiveness: A review of the literature
32. An empirical investigation of the factors influencing e-learning effectiveness
33. Deep learning: The impact on future elearning10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11435 ↗
34. El Naqa, I., and Murphy, M.J. (2015). Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3 ↗
35. Jović, J.O.V.A.N.A., Milić, M., Cvetanović, S.V.E.T.L.A.N.A., and Chandra, K.A.V.I.T.H.A. (2019, January 26–27). Implementation of machine learning based methods in elearning systems. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Elearning (eLearning-2019), Belgrade, Serbia.
36. Analysis of student motivation behavior on e-learning based on association rule mining
37. Intelligent learning model based on significant weight of domain knowledge concept for adaptive e-learning10.18517/ijaseit.7.4-2.3408 ↗
38. Zhang, Y. (2007). New Advances in Machine Learning, InTech.
39. A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning10.38094/jastt1457 ↗
40. Draper, N., and Smith, H.L. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons. [3rd ed.].10.1002/9781118625590 ↗
41. Glantz, S.A., Slinker, B.K., and Neilands, T.B. (1990). Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance, McGraw-Hill.
42. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization10.21105/joss.03021 ↗
43. Hall, M.A. (1999). Correlation-Based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Waikato].
44. pandas: A foundational Python library for data analysis and statistics
45. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
46. Google Colab and Virtual Simulations: Practical e-Learning Tools to Support the Teaching of Thermodynamics and to Introduce Coding to Students10.1021/acsomega.2c00362 ↗
47. (2023, January 02). Correlation vs. Causation. Available online: https://www.jmp.com/en_au/statistics-knowledge-portal/what-is-correlation/correlation-vs-causation.html.