Evaluation of a Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Applied to Assist Farming Activities in Fruit Orchards
Source abstract
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) is a common occupational injury. Among the occupational injuries of agricultural workers, 93% are related to WMSD, with the shoulder being the second most affected area. This paper presents a passive upper-limb exoskeleton (PULE) with a gas spring and four-bar mechanism developed to aid the daily activities associated with orchard farming. The PULE is used to assist the arm-lifting process, reducing the physical exertion of farmers and the risk of developing WMSD. Electromyography (EMG) measurements of 26 participants were obtained to evaluate the difference in physical exertion with and without the PULE. Two arm activities: fruit thinning, with the arms raised and maintained at 100°, and pesticide spraying, with the hands swinging from 0° to 100° and back, were simulated. Using the PULE decreased muscle tension of the anterior deltoid (AD) by 17.64–19.86%. The PULE also decreased the AD activity by 37.67–39.57% during the actual orchard farming operations. The Qualisys motion capture system indicated that the difference in the lifting angle of the upper limb with and without the PULE was less than 1° and not significant (α > 0.05). Thus, the PULE did not affect the flexibility of the wearer in orchard farming activities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
Funding
Council of Agriculture
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. (2020, September 10). Survey Results of Income of Main Farmers in 2015, Available online: https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2505701.
2. (2020, September 09). The Most Important Workers in Farming and Animal Husbandry Are Classified by Gender and Age, Available online: https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=37583&CtNode=5017&mp=4.
3. (2020, September 11). Announcement Information of Kaohsiung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Available online: https://www.kdais.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=announcement&id=7525.
4. Effects of different overhead work conditions on the neck and shoulder muscles10.1589/jpts.24.197 ↗
5. Understanding the ergonomic risk for musculoskeletal disorders in the United States agricultural sector10.1002/ajim.20479 ↗
6. Priority Risk Factors for Back Injury in Agricultural Field Work10.1300/J096v08n01_05 ↗
7. Musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture
8. Parent-Thirion, A., Biletta, I., Cabrita, J., Vargas, O., Vermeylen, G., Wilczynska, A., and Wilkens, M. (2017). Book Eurofound: Sixth European Working Conditions Survey—Overview Report (2017 Update), Office of the European Union.
9. Neck and shoulder muscle activity during standardized work-related postural tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.012 ↗
10. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies
11. Jaffar, N., Abdul-Tharim, A.H., Mohd-Kamar, I.F., and Lop, N.S. (2011, January 11–12). A literature review of ergonomics risk factors in construction industry. Proceedings of the 2nd International Building Control Conference, Penang, Malaysia.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.142 ↗
12. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 ↗
13. Matthew, R.P., Mica, E.J., Meinhold, W., Loeza, J.A., Tomizuka, M., and Bajcsy, R. (October, January 28). Introduction and initial exploration of an active/passive exoskeleton framework for portable assistance. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany.10.1109/IROS.2015.7354133 ↗
14. Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å., and Gorecky, D. (2016, January 29–31). Towards an operator 4.0 typology: A human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. Proceedings of the international Conference on Computers and industrial Engineering (CIE46), Tianjin, China.
15. Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Gilotta, S., Gastaldi, L., and Cavatorta, M.P. (2017, January 27–30). Investigation into the Applicability of a Passive Upper-limb Exoskeleton in Automotive Industry. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, Modena, Italy.10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.252 ↗
16. Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.008 ↗
17. Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.009 ↗
18. Farmers’ perceptions of exoskeleton use on farms: Finding the right tool for the work (er)10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103036 ↗
19. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity and metabolic cost of energy10.1080/01691864.2019.1707708 ↗
20. Enhancement of human-centered workplace design and optimization with Exoskeleton technology10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.173 ↗
21. Potential exoskeleton uses for reducing low back muscular activity during farm tasks10.1002/ajim.23180 ↗
22. (2020, September 15). Patent Announcement of People’s Republic of China, Available online: https://twpat3.tipo.gov.tw/tipotwoc/tipotwkm?@@175412089.
23. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 ↗
24. Design of a passive, iso-elastic upper limb exoskeleton for gravity compensation10.1186/s40648-016-0051-5 ↗
25. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics10.1123/jab.13.2.135 ↗
26. From cell to movement: To what answers does EMG really contribute?10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.02.001 ↗
27. Nocturnal masseter EMG activity of healthy subjects in a natural environment10.1177/00220345990780080901 ↗
28. Borg, G. (1998). Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales, Human Kinetics.
29. Development of a practical method for measuring body part discomfort
30. Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.004 ↗
31. Hoyos Rodriguez, D. (2019). Realistic Computer Aided Design: Model of an Exoskeleton. [Master’s Thesis, University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science].
32. (2020, September 11). A Brief Introduction to the Development and Current Situation of Japanese Fruit Cultivation Machinery, Available online: https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2508271.
33. Does musculoskeletal discomfort at work predict future musculoskeletal pain?10.1080/00140130701743433 ↗
34. (2020, September 09). The Characteristics of Human Limbs in Taiwan, Available online: https://www.ilosh.gov.tw/menu/1188/1201/.