journal article·2022-03-09Open access

Measuring Urban Infrastructure Resilience via Pressure-State-Response Framework in Four Chinese Municipalities

Min Chen, Yu Jiang, Endong Wang, Yi Wang, Jun Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 6

Abstract

Urban infrastructure (UI), subject to ever-increasing stresses from artificial activities of human beings and natural disasters due to climate change, assumes a key role in modern cities for maintaining their functional operations. Therefore, understanding UI resilience turns essential. Based on the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model, this paper built a comprehensive evaluation index system for urban infrastructure resilience evaluation. Four municipalities, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing in China, were selected for the case study, given their specific significance in terms of geographical location and urban infrastructure scale. Temporal differences of UI resilience in those four cities during 2002–2018 were explored. The results showed that: (1) The various stages of PSR relative importance for the urban infrastructure resilience development in the four cities were different. The infrastructure status, primarily resource environmental benefit, had the most significant effect on urban infrastructure resilience, accounting for 38.73%. (2) While Shanghai ranked first, the levels of urban infrastructure resilience in four cities were generally poor in 2002–2018 with continuously low resilience. (3) Significant differences were found in the resilience levels associated with the three stages of pressure, state and response failing to form a positive development cycle, with the poorest pressure resilience. This paper puts forward some recommendations for providing scientific support for urban resilient infrastructure development in four municipalities in China.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Disaster Management and Resilience · Flood Risk Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China

Sustainable Construction Engineering Program, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

Funding

the Practice and Innovation Fund for University Students of Jiangsu Province · the Ministry of Housing Urban-Rural Development of China

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Chinese urbanization 2050: SD modeling and process simulation10.1007/s11430-016-9022-2 ↗
2. Study on innovation models of balanced development of metropolis in China
3. Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001 ↗
4. Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.007 ↗
5. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social ecological systems analyses10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 ↗
6. Probabilistic assessment of civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes10.1111/mice.12092 ↗
7. On the definition of resilience in systems10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01216.x ↗
8. Davidson-Hunt, I.J. (2004). Journeys, plants and dreams: Adaptive learning and social-ecological resilience. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Manitoba].
9. Ecological resilience—in theory and application10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425 ↗
10. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale10.1007/s100219900002 ↗
11. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., and Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
12. Engineering resilience quantification and system design implications: A literature survey10.1115/1.4034223 ↗
13. Defining urban resilience: A review10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 ↗
14. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395 ↗
15. Urban resilience: A conceptual framework10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625 ↗
16. Urban and infrastructure resilience: Diverging concepts and the need for cross-boundary learning10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008 ↗
17. Civil infrastructure resilience: State-of-the-art on transportation network systems
18. Measuring the resilience of the trans-oceanic telecommunication cable system10.1109/JSYST.2009.2022570 ↗
19. Jackson, S. (2010). The principles of infrastructure resilience. DomPrep J (2010b), online.
20. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities10.1193/1.1623497 ↗
21. Radvanovsky, R., and Mcdougall, A. (2018). Critical Infrastructure: Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, CRC Press.10.4324/9781315164687 ↗
22. Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities10.1193/1.1775796 ↗
23. A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane10.1002/prs.10437 ↗
24. Investigating the impacts of urban densification on buried water infrastructure through DPSIR framework10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120897 ↗
25. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 ↗
26. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004 ↗
27. Explanation of Resilience Urban Infrastructure Principles in Approach to Sustainability
28. Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: The state of the art10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663 ↗
29. A framework for evaluating the persistence of urban drainage risk management systems10.1016/j.jher.2014.04.004 ↗
30. A secure tri-level planner-disaster-risk-averse replanner model for enhancing the resilience of energy systems10.1016/j.energy.2020.117916 ↗
31. Analyzing the coupling coordination among economic, social, and environmental benefits of urban infrastructure: Case study of four Chinese autonomous municipalities
32. Evaluation of Infrastructure Resilience of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration--Based on TOPSIS Entropy Weight Method
33. Resilient City Planning Theory and Method and Its Practice in China: A Case Study of the Improvement Planning of Hefei Infrastructure’s Resilience
34. Infrastructure ecology: An evolving paradigm for sustainable urban development10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.010 ↗
35. Economic perspective-based analysis on urban infrastructures carrying capacity—A China study10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106381 ↗
36. Tao, Z. (2019). Research on the degree of coupling between the urban public infrastructure system and the urban economic, social, and environmental system: A case study in Beijing, China. Math. Probl. Eng., 2019.10.1155/2019/8206902 ↗
37. Linster, M. (2015, March 30). OECD environmental indicators: Development, measurement and use. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/24993546.pdf.
38. Identification of indicators for sustainable urban water development planning10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105691 ↗
39. Ecological security assessment of Beijing based on PSR model10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.094 ↗
40. Landscape ecological safety assessment and landscape pattern optimization in arid inland river basin: Take Ganzhou District as an example10.1080/10807039.2018.1536521 ↗
41. Urban landscape ecological security assessment based on remote sensing and PSR model: A case study in Longyan City, Fujian Province
42. Watershed health assessment using the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework10.1002/ldr.3420 ↗
43. Integrated evaluation of the carrying capacities of mineral resource-based cities considering synergy between subsystems10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105701 ↗
44. Spatial-Temporal Variation of Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity in West Part of China on the PSR Framework—A Case Study of Xinjiang
45. Huang, J., Yuan, X., Wang, H., and Sun, D. (2018). Urban Resilience Assessment to Flood Risk Using PSR Model and System Dynamics, American Geophysical Union.
46. An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093 ↗
47. Evaluation of water quality with application of Bayes’ rule and entropy weight method10.1080/19648189.2016.1150895 ↗
48. Ecological resilience assessment of an arid coal mining area using index of entropy and linear weighted analysis: A case study of Shendong Coalfield, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105843 ↗
49. Spatial and temporal dynamics of social-ecological resilience in Nepal from 2000 to 201510.1016/j.pce.2020.102894 ↗
50. Deng, J., Jiao, L., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., and Song, X. (2021). Evaluation of Urban Resilience Based on Entropy Weight Cloud Model—31 Provinces in China. Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_101 ↗
51. Study on risk assessment of water security of drought periods based on entropy weight methods10.1108/03684921011046627 ↗
52. Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation10.1029/WR018i001p00014 ↗
53. Marine ecological and environmental health assessment using the pressure-state-response framework at different spatial scales, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106965 ↗
54. Hazard degree assessment of urban earthquake disaster in China
55. Min, C., and Hui, C. (2012). Combined Evaluation of Sustainable Development Level of Urban Infrastructure. Urban Problems, 15–21.
56. Does a partnership need partners? Assessing partnerships for critical infrastructure protection10.1177/0275074013494754 ↗
57. Modeling vulnerability and resilience to climate change: A case study of India and Indian states10.1007/s10584-005-5930-3 ↗
58. Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.019 ↗
59. Beijing’s water resources: Challenges and solutions10.1111/1752-1688.12315 ↗