Prediction of Shield Machine Attitude Based on Various Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Source abstract
Abstract
The shield machine attitude (SMA) is the most important parameter in the process of tunnel construction. To prevent the shield machine from deviating from the design axis (DTA) of the tunnel, it is of great significance to accurately predict the dynamic characteristics of SMA. We establish eight SMA prediction models based on the data of five earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machines. The algorithms adopted in the models are four machine learning (ML) algorithms (KNN, SVR, RF, AdaBoost) and four deep learning (DL) algorithms (BPNN, CNN, LSTM, GRU). This paper obtains the hyperparameters of the models by utilizing grid search and K-fold cross-validation techniques and uses EVS and RMSE to verify and evaluate the prediction performances of the models. The prediction results reveal that the two best algorithms are the LSTM and GRU with EVS > 0.98 and RMSE < 1.5. Then, integrating ML algorithms and DL algorithms, we design a warning predictor for SMA. Through the historical 5-cycle data, the predictor can give a warning in advance if the SMA deviates significantly from DTA. This study indicates that AI technologies have considerable promise in the field of SMA dynamic prediction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
China Railway Engineering Equipment Group Tunnel Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Special Equipment Research Institute, Xinxiang 453000, China
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: An overview10.1016/j.tust.2016.04.002 ↗
2. Study on inner force and dislocation of segments caused by shield machine attitude10.1016/j.tust.2007.06.007 ↗
3. Kinematic behaviour of a Tunnel Boring Machine in soft soil: Theory and observations10.1016/j.tust.2015.03.007 ↗
4. Dynamic coordinated control of attitude correction for the shield tunneling based on load observer10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.017 ↗
5. Pose and trajectory control of shield tunneling machine in complicated stratum10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.020 ↗
6. Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation. I: Theory10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:2(138) ↗
7. Liu, H., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Fei, L., and Zhao, G. (June, January 31). Dynamic modeling and trajectory tracking control of tunnel boring machine. Proceedings of the 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014 CCDC), Changsha, China.10.1109/CCDC.2014.6852986 ↗
8. Effective method for adjusting the uplifting of shield machine tunneling in upper-soft lower-hard strata10.1016/j.tust.2021.104040 ↗
9. Dynamic load prediction of tunnel boring machine (TBM) based on heterogeneous in-situ data10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.030 ↗
10. Recurrent neural networks for real-time prediction of TBM operating parameters10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.013 ↗
11. Prediction of roadheader performance by artificial neural network10.1016/j.tust.2014.07.003 ↗
12. Prediction of disc cutter life during shield tunneling with AI via the incorporation of a genetic algorithm into a GMDH-type neural network10.1016/j.eng.2020.02.016 ↗
13. Machine learning forecasting models of disc cutters life of tunnel boring machine10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103779 ↗
14. Prediction of rock mass parameters in the TBM tunnel based on BP neural network integrated simulated annealing algorithm10.1016/j.tust.2019.103103 ↗
15. Prediction of maximum surface settlement caused by earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling with ANN methods10.1016/j.sandf.2018.11.005 ↗
16. Modeling the relationship between ground surface settlements induced by shield tunneling and the operational and geological parameters based on the hybrid PCA/ANFIS method10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.011 ↗
17. Zhang, N., Zhang, N., Zheng, Q., and Xu, Y. (2021). Real-time prediction of shield moving trajectory during tunnelling using GRU deep neural network. Acta. Geotech., 1–16.10.1007/s11440-021-01319-1 ↗
18. Prediction of axis attitude deviation and deviation correction method based on data driven during shield tunneling10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952649 ↗
19. Dynamic prediction for attitude and position in shield tunneling: A deep learning method10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102840 ↗
20. Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts
21. When machine learning meets medical world: Current status and future challenges10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100280 ↗
22. Swathy, M., and Saruladha, K. (2021). A comparative study of classification and prediction of Cardio-Vascular Diseases (CVD) using Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques. ICT Express.10.1016/j.icte.2021.08.021 ↗
23. Zhang, W., Li, H., Li, Y., Liu, H., Chen, Y., and Ding, X. (2021). Application of deep learning algorithms in geotechnical engineering: A short critical review. Artif. Intell. Rev., 1–41.10.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 ↗
24. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
25. ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019 ↗
26. Robust clustering using a kNN mode seeking ensemble10.1016/j.patcog.2017.11.023 ↗
27. A novel constrained dense convolutional autoencoder and DNN-based semi-supervised method for shield machine tunnel geological formation recognition10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108353 ↗
28. Joachims, T. (1998). Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical (No. 1998, 28), Universität Dortmund. Technical Report.
29. An integrated parameter prediction framework for intelligent TBM excavation in hard rock10.1016/j.tust.2021.104196 ↗
30. Prediction of TBM advance rate based on Bootstrap method and SVR-ANN algorithm
31. Yang, H., Wang, Z., and Song, K. (2020). A new hybrid grey wolf optimizer-feature weighted-multiple kernel-support vector regression technique to predict TBM performance. Eng. Comput. Ger., 1–17.10.1007/s00366-020-01217-2 ↗
32. Unsupervised learning with random forest predictors10.1198/106186006X94072 ↗
33. Real-time analysis and regulation of EPB shield steering using Random Forest10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102860 ↗
34. Friction stir welding tool condition monitoring using vibration signals and Random forest algorithm–A Machine learning approach
35. SPT based determination of undrained shear strength: Regression models and machine learning10.1007/s11709-019-0591-x ↗
36. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
37. Prediction model of rock mass class using classification and regression tree integrated AdaBoost algorithm based on TBM driving data10.1016/j.tust.2020.103595 ↗
38. A Joint Long Short-Term Memory and AdaBoost regression approach with application to remaining useful life estimation10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108707 ↗
39. Drucker, H. (1997, January 8–12). Improving regressors using boosting techniques. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, USA.
40. Modelling the performance of EPB shield tunnelling using machine and deep learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101177 ↗
41. Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1992). Theory of the backpropagation neural network. Neural Networks for Perception, Academic Press.
42. LeCun, Y. (2021, June 22). LeNet-5, Convolutional Neural Networks. Available online: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/lenet/.
43. Face recognition: A convolutional neural-network approach10.1109/72.554195 ↗
44. Deep learning in medical image analysis10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442 ↗
45. Condition-CNN: A hierarchical multi-label fashion image classification model10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115195 ↗
46. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
47. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM10.1162/089976600300015015 ↗
48. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv.
49. Adaptive Detrending to Accelerate Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Training for Contextual Video Recognition10.1016/j.neunet.2018.05.009 ↗
50. A review on the long short-term memory model10.1007/s10462-020-09838-1 ↗
51. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
52. Hu, M., Wu, B., and Bai, X. (2019, January 20–22). A Real-time Shield Attitude Deviation Prediction Method Based on Data Drive. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chengdu, China.10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997715 ↗
53. Study and application of threshold de-noising in seismic signals of blasting based on wavelet transform
54. Mesostructural characteristic and random reconstruction of soil-rock particles based on plural Fourier analysis
55. Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering10.1109/78.492552 ↗
56. Bianchi, G., and Sorrentino, R. (2007). Electronic Filter Simulation & Design, McGraw Hill Professional.
57. García, S., Luengo, J., and Herrera, F. (2015). Data Preprocessing in Data Mining, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-10247-4 ↗
58. Estimating torque, thrust and other design parameters of different type TBMs with some criticism to TBMs used in Turkish tunneling projects10.1016/j.tust.2013.09.004 ↗
59. A hybrid data mining method for tunnel engineering based on real-time monitoring data from tunnel boring machines10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994115 ↗
60. Automatic trajectory tracking control of shield tunneling machine under complex stratum working condition10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.002 ↗
61. Prediction of tunnel boring machine operating parameters using various machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.tust.2020.103699 ↗
62. Chollet, F. (2017). Deep learning with Python, Simon and Schuster.
63. Géron, A. (2019). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, O’Reilly Media.
64. Automatic segmentation of TBM muck images via a deep-learning approach to estimate the size and shape of rock chips10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103685 ↗