Integrating Virtual, Mixed, and Augmented Reality into Remote Robotic Applications: A Brief Review of Extended Reality-Enhanced Robotic Systems for Intuitive Telemanipulation and Telemanufacturing Tasks in Hazardous Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
There is an increasingly urgent need for humans to interactively control robotic systems to perform increasingly precise remote operations, concomitant with the rapid development of space exploration, deep-sea discovery, nuclear rehabilitation and management, and robotic-assisted medical devices. The potential high value of medical telerobotic applications was also evident during the recent coronavirus pandemic and will grow in future. Robotic teleoperation satisfies the demands of the scenarios in which human access carries measurable risk, but human intelligence is required. An effective teleoperation system not only enables intuitive human-robot interaction (HRI) but ensures the robot can also be operated in a way that allows the operator to experience the “feel” of the robot working on the remote side, gaining a “sense of presence”. Extended reality (XR) technology integrates real-world information with computer-generated graphics and has the potential to enhance the effectiveness and performance of HRI by providing depth perception and enabling judgment and decision making while operating the robot in a dynamic environment. This review examines novel approaches to the development and evaluation of an XR-enhanced telerobotic platform for intuitive remote teleoperation applications in dangerous and difficult working conditions. It presents a strong review of XR-enhanced telerobotics for remote robotic applications; a particular focus of the review includes the use of integrated 2D/3D mixed reality with haptic interfaces to perform intuitive remote operations to remove humans from dangerous conditions. This review also covers primary studies proposing Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR) solutions where humans can better control or interact with real robotic platforms using these devices and systems to extend the user’s reality and provide a more intuitive interface. The objective of this article is to present recent, relevant, common, and accessible frameworks implemented in research articles published on XR-enhanced telerobotics for industrial applications. Finally, we present and classify the application context of the reviewed articles in two groups: mixed reality–enhanced robotic telemanipulation and mixed reality–enhanced robotic tele-welding. The review thus addresses all elements in the state of the art for these systems and ends with recommended research areas and targets. The application range of these systems and the resulting recommendations is readily extensible to other application areas, such as remote robotic surgery in telemedicine, where surgeons are scarce and need is high, and other potentially high-risk/high-need scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Teleoperation and Haptic Systems · Augmented Reality Applications · Robotics and Automated Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
Shien-Ming Wu School of Intelligent Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 511436, China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Enhanced Teleoperation through Virtual Reality Techniques10.1007/978-3-540-71364-7_10 ↗
2. Ismet Can Dede, M., Selvi, Ö., Bilgincan, T., and Kant, Y. (2009, January 11–14). Design of a Haptic Device for Teleoperation and Virtual Reality Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346857 ↗
3. Enhancing Scientific Exploration of the Deep Sea through Shared Autonomy in Remote Manipulation10.1126/scirobotics.adi5227 ↗
4. Vagvolgyi, B., Niu, W., Chen, Z., Wilkening, P., and Kazanzides, P. (2017, January 24–28). Augmented Virtuality for Model-Based Teleoperation. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2017.8206233 ↗
5. Scene Modeling and Augmented Virtuality Interface for Telerobotic Satellite Servicing10.1109/LRA.2018.2864358 ↗
6. Augmented Reality-Assisted Gesture-Based Teleoperated System for Robot Motion Planning10.1108/IR-11-2022-0289 ↗
7. Wang, Z., Reed, I., and Fey, A.M. (2018, January 21–25). Toward Intuitive Teleoperation in Surgery: Human-Centric Evaluation of Teleoperation Algorithms for Robotic Needle Steering. Proceedings of the Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460729 ↗
8. Martin, E.J., Erwin, B., Katija, K., Phung, A., Gonzalez, E., Thun, S., Von Cullen, H., and Haddock, S.H.D. (2021, January 20–23). A Virtual Reality Video System for Deep Ocean Remotely Operated Vehicles. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2021: San Diego–Porto, San Diego, CA, USA.10.23919/OCEANS44145.2021.9705810 ↗
9. Hedayati, H., Walker, M., and Szafir, D. (2018, January 5–8). Improving Collocated Robot Teleoperation with Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/3171221.3171251 ↗
10. Nonlinear Bilateral Teleoperators with Non-Collocated Remote Controller over Delayed Network10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.05.005 ↗
11. Smart Augmented Reality Instructional System for Mechanical Assembly towards Worker-Centered Intelligent Manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.010 ↗
12. Walker, M.E., Hedayati, H., and Szafir, D. (2019, January 11–14). Robot Teleoperation with Augmented Reality Virtual Surrogates. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Daegu, Republic of Korea.10.1109/HRI.2019.8673306 ↗
13. Remote Human—Robot Collaboration: A Cyber—Physical System Application for Hazard Manufacturing Environment10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.11.001 ↗
14. Stotko, P., Krumpen, S., Schwarz, M., Lenz, C., Behnke, S., Klein, R., and Weinmann, M. (2019, January 3–8). A VR System for Immersive Teleoperation and Live Exploration with a Mobile Robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Macao, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968598 ↗
15. Almeida, L., Menezes, P., and Dias, J. (2017, January 6–8). Improving Robot Teleoperation Experience via Immersive Interfaces. Proceedings of the 2017 4th Experiment at International Conference: Online Experimentation, Faro, Portugal.10.1109/EXPAT.2017.7984414 ↗
16. Pace, F., De Gorjup, G., Bai, H., Sanna, A., Liarokapis, M., and Billinghurst, M. (2021, January 5). Leveraging Enhanced Virtual Reality Methods and Environments for Efficient, Intuitive, and Immersive Teleoperation of Robots. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9560757 ↗
17. Intuitive Robot Teleoperation for Civil Engineering Operations with Virtual Reality and Deep Learning Scene Reconstruction10.1016/j.aei.2020.101170 ↗
18. Master-Slave System with Teleoperation for Rehabilitation10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01410 ↗
19. A Dynamics-Based Adaptive Control for Master-Slave System in Teleoperation10.1016/S1474-6670(17)35180-7 ↗
20. Adaptive Neural Network Based Position Tracking Control for Dual-Master/Single-Slave Teleoperation System under Communication Constant Time Delays10.1016/j.isatra.2019.03.019 ↗
21. Haptic Based Teleoperation with Master-Slave Motion Mapping and Haptic Rendering for Space Exploration10.1016/j.cja.2018.07.009 ↗
22. Jin, H., Zhang, L., Rockel, S., Zhang, J., Hu, Y., and Zhang, J. (October, January 28). A Novel Optical Tracking Based Tele-Control System for Tabletop Object Manipulation Tasks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany.
23. Teleoperation of the SCHUNK S5FH Under-Actuated Anthropomorphic Hand Using Human Hand Motion Tracking10.1016/j.robot.2016.12.004 ↗
24. Suligoj, F., Jerbic, B., Svaco, M., Sekoranja, B., Mihalinec, D., and Vidakovic, J. (October, January 28). Medical Applicability of a Low-Cost Industrial Robot Arm Guided with an Optical Tracking System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany.
25. Sensorless Force Feedback Joystick Control for Teleoperation of Construction Equipment10.1007/s12541-017-0113-5 ↗
26. Force Reflecting Joystick Control for Applications to Bilateral Teleoperation in Construction Machinery10.1007/s12541-017-0038-z ↗
27. Towards the Development of an Intuitive Teleoperation System for Human Support Robot Using a VR Device10.1080/01691864.2020.1813623 ↗
28. Meeker, C., Rasmussen, T., and Ciocarlie, M. (2018, January 21–25). Intuitive Hand Teleoperation by Novice Operators Using a Continuous Teleoperation Subspace. Proceedings of the Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460506 ↗
29. Ellis, S.R., Adelstein, B.D., and Welch, R.B. (2002, January 1). Kinesthetic Compensation for Misalignment of Teleoperator Controls through Cross-Modal Transfer of Movement Coordinates. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.10.1177/154193120204601705 ↗
30. Incomplete Orientation Mapping for Teleoperation with One DoF Master-Slave Asymmetry10.1109/LRA.2020.3006796 ↗
31. Mixed Reality Interface for Improving Mobile Manipulator Teleoperation in Contamination Critical Applications10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.087 ↗
32. Study of Multimodal Interfaces and the Improvements on Teleoperation10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990080 ↗
33. Immersive Augmented Reality Environment for the Teleoperation of Maintenance Robots10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.183 ↗
34. Free Viewpoint Image Generation System Using Fisheye Cameras and a Laser Rangefinder for Indoor Robot Teleoperation10.1186/s40648-020-00163-4 ↗
35. Ribeiro, L.G., Suominen, O.J., Durmush, A., Peltonen, S., Morales, E.R., and Gotchev, A. (2021). Retro-Reflective-Marker-Aided Target Pose Estimation in a Safety-Critical Environment. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010003 ↗
36. Illing, B., Westhoven, M., Gaspers, B., Smets, N., Bruggemann, B., and Mathew, T. (September, January 31). Evaluation of Immersive Teleoperation Systems Using Standardized Tasks and Measurements. Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020, Naples, Italy.10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223497 ↗
37. Chen, J., Glover, M., Yang, C., Li, C., Li, Z., and Cangelosi, A. (2017, January 9–21). Development of an Immersive Interface for Robot Teleoperation. Proceedings of the Annual Conference towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, Guildford, UK.10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_1 ↗
38. Cody, G., Brian, R., Allison, W., Miller, M., and Stoytchev, A. (2009, January 19–20). An Effective and Intuitive Control Interface for Remote Robot Teleoperation with Complete Haptic Feedback. Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies Conference-ETC, Islamabad, Pakistan.
39. Kaplish, A., and Yamane, K. (2019, January 15–17). Motion Retargeting and Control for Teleoperated Physical Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/Humanoids43949.2019.9035060 ↗
40. Rakita, D., Mutlu, B., and Gleicher, M. (2017, January 6–9). A Motion Retargeting Method for Effective Mimicry-Based Teleoperation of Robot Arms. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Part. F127194, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2909824.3020254 ↗
41. Il Multimodal Feedback for Teleoperation of Multiple Mobile Robots in an Outdoor Environment10.1007/s12193-016-0230-y ↗
42. Wang, X., and Dunston, P.S. (2006, January 5–8). Mixed Reality—Enhanced Operator Interface for Teleoperation Systems in Unstructured Environment. Proceedings of the 10th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments—Earth and Space 2006, Houston, TX, USA.10.1061/40830(188)93 ↗
43. Teleoperation Control Based on Combination of Wave Variable and Neural Networks10.1109/TSMC.2016.2615061 ↗
44. Haptic and Visual Feedback Assistance for Dual-Arm Robot Teleoperation in Surface Conditioning Tasks10.1109/TOH.2020.3004388 ↗
45. Motion Polytopes in Virtual Reality for Shared Control in Remote Manipulation Applications10.3389/frobt.2021.730433 ↗
46. Motion Mappings for Continuous Bilateral Teleoperation10.1109/LRA.2021.3068924 ↗
47. Ferre, M., Cobos, S., Aracil, R., and Urán, M.A.S. (2007, January 22–27). 3D-Image Visualization and Its Performance in Teleoperation. Proceedings of the Second International Conference, ICVR 2007, Held as part of HCI International 2007, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_3 ↗
48. Arévalo Arboleda, S., Dierks, T., Rücker, F., and Gerken, J. (September, January 28). Exploring the Visual Space to Improve Depth Perception in Robot Teleoperation Using Augmented Reality: The Role of Distance and Target’s Pose in Time, Success, and Certainty. Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, York, UK.
49. Guzsvinecz, T., Kovacs, C., Reich, D., Szucs, V., and Sik-Lanyi, C. (2018, January 22–24). Developing a Virtual Reality Application for the Improvement of Depth Perception. Proceedings of the 2018 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/CogInfoCom.2018.8639935 ↗
50. Chenf, F., Gao, B., Selvaggio, M., Li, Z., Caldwell, D., Kershaw, K., Masi, A., Di Castro, M., and Losito, R. (2016, January 7–10). A Framework of Teleoperated and Stereo Vision Guided Mobile Manipulation for Industrial Automation. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, IEEE ICMA 2016, Harbin, China.10.1109/ICMA.2016.7558810 ↗
51. McHenry, N., Spencer, J., Zhong, P., Cox, J., Amiscaray, M., Wong, K.C., and Chamitoff, G. (2021, January 6–13). Predictive XR Telepresence for Robotic Operations in Space. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438161 ↗
52. Stereoscopic First Person View System for Drone Navigation10.3389/frobt.2017.00011 ↗
53. Stereo Viewing and Virtual Reality Technologies in Mobile Robot Teleguide10.1109/TRO.2009.2028765 ↗
54. A Stereoscopic Eye-in-Hand Vision System for Remote Handling in ITER10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.036 ↗
55. Applications of Virtual Reality in Maintenance during the Industrial Product Lifecycle: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.007 ↗
56. Haptic Augmentation for Teleoperation through Virtual Grasping Points10.1109/TOH.2018.2809746 ↗
57. Abi-Farrajl, F., Henze, B., Werner, A., Panzirsch, M., Ott, C., and Roa, M.A. (2018, January 1–5). Humanoid Teleoperation Using Task-Relevant Haptic Feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2018, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8593521 ↗
58. Haptic-Guided Teleoperation of a 7-DoF Collaborative Robot Arm with an Identical Twin Master10.1109/TOH.2020.2971485 ↗
59. A Visuo-Haptic Extended Reality–Based Training System for Hands-on Manual Metal Arc Welding Training10.1007/s00170-022-09328-4 ↗
60. Nuzzi, C., Ghidini, S., Pagani, R., Pasinetti, S., Coffetti, G., and Sansoni, G. (2020, January 22–26). Hands-Free: A Robot Augmented Reality Teleoperation System. Proceedings of the 2020 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots, UR, Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/UR49135.2020.9144841 ↗
61. Yuan, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Li, D., and Zhang, T. (November, January 31). Distributed Teleoperation System for Controlling Heterogeneous Robots Based on ROS. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, ARSO 2019, Beijing, China.10.1109/ARSO46408.2019.8948758 ↗
62. Modular Design of a Teleoperated Robotic Control System for Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery Based on ROS & RT-Middleware10.1108/IR-12-2016-0351 ↗
63. Lee, D., and Park, Y.S. (2018, January 1–5). Implementation of Augmented Teleoperation System Based on Robot Operating System (ROS). Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2018, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8594482 ↗
64. Mortimer, M., Horan, B., and Joordens, M. (2016, January 12–16). Kinect with ROS, Interact with Oculus: Towards Dynamic User Interfaces for Robotic Teleoperation. Proceedings of the 2016 11th Systems of Systems Engineering Conference, SoSE 2016, Kongsberg, Norway.10.1109/SYSOSE.2016.7542940 ↗
65. Deng, Y., Tang, Y., Yang, B., Zheng, W., Liu, S., and Liu, C. (2021, January 3–5). A Review of Bilateral Teleoperation Control Strategies with Soft Environment. Proceedings of the 2021 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics, ICARM 2021, Chongqing, China.10.1109/ICARM52023.2021.9536056 ↗
66. Robust Adaptive Control Scheme for Teleoperation Systems with Delay and Uncertainties10.1109/TCYB.2019.2891656 ↗
67. Combined Perception, Control, and Learning for Teleoperation: Key Technologies, Applications, and Challenges10.1049/ccs.2020.0005 ↗
68. A New Mixed-Reality-Based Teleoperation System for Telepresence and Maneuverability Enhancement10.1109/THMS.2019.2960676 ↗
69. Telemedicine Practice: Review of the Current Ethical and Legal Challenges10.1089/tmj.2019.0158 ↗
70. Singh, S.K., Sharma, J., Joshua, L.M., Huda, F., Kumar, N., Basu, S., Singh, S.K., Sharma, J., Joshua, L.M., and Huda, F. (2022). Telesurgery and Robotics: Current Status and Future Perspectives, IntechOpen.
71. Telesurgery Robot Based on 5G Tactile Internet10.1007/s11036-018-1110-3 ↗
72. Augmented Reality in Real-Time Telemedicine and Telementoring: Scoping Review10.2196/45464 ↗
73. Telemedicine, Telementoring, and Telesurgery for Surgical Practices10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.100986 ↗
74. Liu, K., Miao, J., Liao, Z., Luan, X., and Meng, L. (High-Speed Railw., 2023). Dynamic Constraint and Objective Generation Approach for Real-Time Train Rescheduling Model under Human-Computer Interaction, High-Speed Railw.10.1016/j.hspr.2023.10.002 ↗
75. Emotion Assessment and Application in Human–Computer Interaction Interface Based on Backpropagation Neural Network and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120857 ↗
76. Real-Time Human-Computer Interaction Using Eye Gazes10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.07.024 ↗
77. Social Robots as Health Promoting Agents: An Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Human-Robot Interaction at the Workplace10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103124 ↗
78. Adaptive Technique for Physical Human–Robot Interaction Handling Using Proprioceptive Sensors10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107141 ↗
79. Spontaneous Humanization of Robots in Passive Observation of Human-Robot Interaction: A Path toward Ethical Consideration and Human-Robot Cooperation10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100012 ↗
80. Ratclife, J., Soave, F., Bryan-Kinns, N., Tokarchuk, L., and Farkhatdinov, I. (2021, January 8–13). Extended Reality (XR) Remote Research: A Survey of Drawbacks and Opportunities. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3411764.3445170 ↗
81. Doolani, S., Wessels, C., Kanal, V., Sevastopoulos, C., Jaiswal, A., Nambiappan, H., and Makedon, F. (2020). A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training. Technologies, 8.10.3390/technologies8040077 ↗
82. Morimoto, T., Kobayashi, T., Hirata, H., Otani, K., Sugimoto, M., Tsukamoto, M., Yoshihara, T., Ueno, M., and Mawatari, M. (2022). XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11020470 ↗
83. Zwolinski, G., Kaminska, D., Laska-Lesniewicz, A., Eric Haamer, R., Vairinhos, M., Raposo, R., Urem, F., and Reisinho, P. (2022). Extended Reality in Education and Training: Case Studies in Management Education. Electron, 11.10.3390/electronics11030336 ↗
84. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays
85. Han, X., Chen, Y., Feng, Q., and Luo, H. (2022). Augmented Reality in Professional Training: A Review of the Literature from 2001 to 2020. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031024 ↗
86. Makhataeva, Z., and Varol, H.A. (2020). Augmented Reality for Robotics: A Review. Robotics, 9.10.3390/robotics9020021 ↗
87. Li, C., Fahmy, A., and Sienz, J. (2019). An Augmented Reality Based Human-Robot Interaction Interface Using Kalman Filter Sensor Fusion. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19204586 ↗
88. Wonsick, M., and Padir, T. (2020). A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Interfaces for Controlling and Interacting with Robots. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249051 ↗
89. Prati, E., Villani, V., Peruzzini, M., and Sabattini, L. (2021). An Approach Based on VR to Design Industrial Human-Robot Collaborative Workstations. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411773 ↗
90. Concept of a Mixed-Reality Learning Environment for Collaborative Robotics10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.034 ↗
91. Mobile Mixed-Reality Interfaces That Enhance Human-Robot Interaction in Shared Spaces10.3389/frobt.2017.00020 ↗
92. Collaborative Robot and Mixed Reality Assisted Microgravity Assembly for Large Space Mechanism10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.007 ↗
93. An Integrated Mixed Reality System for Safety-Aware Human-Robot Collaboration Using Deep Learning and Digital Twin Generation10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102258 ↗
94. Human-Robot Contactless Collaboration with Mixed Reality Interface10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102030 ↗
95. Palma, G., Perry, S., and Cignoni, P. (2021). Augmented Virtuality Using Touch-Sensitive 3D-Printed Objects. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13112186 ↗
96. Gralak, R. (2020). A Method of Navigational Information Display Using Augmented Virtuality. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8040237 ↗
97. Interactive Robots Control Using Mixed Reality
98. Review on Existing VR/AR Solutions in Human–Robot Collaboration10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.259 ↗
99. Suzuki, R., Karim, A., Xia, T., Hedayati, H., and Marquardt, N. (May, January 29). Augmented Reality and Robotics: A Survey and Taxonomy for AR-Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction and Robotic Interfaces. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Orleans, LA, USA.
100. Coronado, E., Itadera, S., and Ramirez-Alpizar, I.G. (2023). Integrating Virtual, Mixed, and Augmented Reality to Human–Robot Interaction Applications Using Game Engines: A Brief Review of Accessible Software Tools and Frameworks. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031292 ↗