Study on the Thermospheric Density Distribution Pattern during Geomagnetic Activity
Source abstract
Abstract
The atmospheric density of the thermosphere is a fundamental parameter for spacecraft launch and orbit control. Under magnetic storm conditions, the thermospheric atmospheric density experiences significant fluctuations, which have a negative impact on spacecraft control. Exploring thermospheric density during geomagnetic storms can help to mitigate the effects of such events. Research on the inversion of accelerometer measurements for different satellites and the variations of atmospheric density under extreme conditions is still in its infancy. In this paper, the distribution of atmospheric density during three geomagnetic storms is investigated from the inversion results of the Swarm-C accelerometer. Three major geomagnetic storms and their recovery phases are selected as case studies. The thermospheric density obtained by Swarm-C is separated into day and night regions. The empirical orthogonal function analysis method is used to study the spatiotemporal distribution of thermospheric density during geomagnetic storms. The results indicate that storms have a more significant impact on nighttime thermospheric density. The impact of magnetic storms on the temporal distribution of thermospheric density is considerable. The first-order empirical orthogonal function (EOF) time coefficient value on the day after the storm is the largest, reaching 2–3 times that before the magnetic storm. The impact of magnetic storms on atmospheric density is mainly reflected in the time distribution. The spatial distribution of atmospheric density is less affected by magnetic storms and is relatively stable in the short term. The impact of magnetic storms on the spatial distribution of nighttime thermospheric density is more significant than that of daytime regions, and the response of daytime regions to magnetic storms is slower.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
School of Automation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
College of Resource and Environment Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
School of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325000, China
Funding
Sichuan Science and Technology Program
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Doornbos, E. (2012). Thermospheric Density and Wind Determination from Satellite Dynamics, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-25129-0 ↗
2. An empirical model of the Earth’s horizontal wind fields: HWM0710.1029/2008JA013668 ↗
3. Yin, L., Wang, L., Tian, J., Yin, Z., Liu, M., and Zheng, W. (2023). Atmospheric Density Inversion Based on Swarm-C Satellite Accelerometer. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063610 ↗
4. An auroral model for the NCAR thermospheric general circulation model (TGCM)
5. A methodology for reduced order modeling and calibration of the upper atmosphere10.1002/2017SW001642 ↗
6. Impact of CME and HSSW driven geomagnetic storms on thermosphere and ionosphere as observed from mid-latitudes10.1016/j.asr.2021.03.027 ↗
7. Ground-Based GNSS and C/NOFS Observations of Ionospheric Irregularities Over Africa: A Case Study of the 2013 St. Patrick’s Day Geomagnetic Storm10.1029/2020SW002631 ↗
8. Thermospheric mass density: A review10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.038 ↗
9. Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field10.1186/BF03351933 ↗
10. Yin, L., Wang, L., Zheng, W., Ge, L., Tian, J., Liu, Y., Yang, B., and Liu, S. (2022). Evaluation of empirical atmospheric models using Swarm-C satellite data. Atmosphere, 13.10.3390/atmos13020294 ↗
11. Total densities derived from accelerometer data10.2514/2.3937 ↗
12. Sutton, E.K. (2008). Effects of Solar Disturbances on the Thermosphere Densities and Winds from CHAMP and GRACE Satellite Accelerometer Data. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder].
13. Drag coefficient modeling for grace using Direct Simulation Monte Carlo10.1016/j.asr.2013.08.033 ↗
14. Semiempirical model for satellite energy-accommodation coefficients10.2514/1.49330 ↗
15. Comparative analysis of satellite aerodynamics and its application to space-object identification10.2514/1.A33482 ↗
16. CHAMP mission status10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00276-4 ↗
17. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system10.1126/science.1099192 ↗
18. New density estimates derived using accelerometers on board the CHAMP and GRACE satellites10.1002/2016SW001562 ↗
19. Attribution of interminima changes in the global thermosphere and ionosphere10.1002/2013JA019484 ↗
20. Thermospheric density and wind retrieval from Swarm observations10.5047/eps.2013.08.003 ↗
21. Lühr, H., and Marker, S. (2013). Climate and Weather of the Sun-Earth System (CAWSES), Springer.
22. Altitude and solar activity dependence of 1967–2005 thermospheric density trends derived from orbital drag10.1002/2015JA021047 ↗
23. The delayed time response of geomagnetic activity to the solar wind10.1002/2016JA023793 ↗
24. Correlations between solar activity and thermospheric density10.11728/cjss2014.01.073 ↗
25. Low latitude thermospheric responses to magnetic storms10.1002/jgra.50212 ↗
26. Variability of solar/stellar activity and magnetic field and its influence on planetary atmosphere evolution10.5047/eps.2011.04.002 ↗
27. The geomagnetic Kp index and derived indices of geomagnetic activity10.1029/2020SW002641 ↗
28. Menvielle, M., Iyemori, T., Marchaudon, A., and Nosé, M. (2010). Geomagnetic Observations and Models, Springer.
29. Matzka, J., Bronkalla, O., Tornow, K., Elger, K., and Stolle, C. (2021). Geomagnetic Kp Index, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.
30. The influence of geomagnetic and solar variabilities on lower thermosphere density10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00066-3 ↗
31. Temmer, M., Krauss, S., Veronig, A., Baur, O., and Lammer, H. (2015, January 12–17). Statistical results for the thermospheric and geomagnetic response to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2015, Vienna, Austria.
32. Thermospheric heating and cooling times during geomagnetic storms, including extreme events10.1029/2019GL085120 ↗
33. Defining scale thresholds for geomagnetic storms through statistics
34. Multiday thermospheric density oscillations associated with variations in solar radiation and geomagnetic activity10.1002/2014JA020830 ↗
35. What is a geomagnetic storm?10.1029/93JA02867 ↗
36. Statistical studies of geomagnetic storms with peak Dst ≤ −50 nT from 1957 to 200810.1016/j.jastp.2011.04.021 ↗
37. Radasky, W. (2011, January 14–19). Overview of the impact of intense geomagnetic storms on the US high voltage power grid. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/ISEMC.2011.6038326 ↗
38. Large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances observed by GPS total electron content during the magnetic storm of 29–30 October 200310.1029/2006JA012013 ↗
39. Plunkett, S. (2005). The Extreme Solar Storms of October to November 2003, Naval Research Lab Washington DC Space Science Division.
40. Empirical orthogonal functions and related techniques in atmospheric science: A review10.1002/joc.1499 ↗
41. Thermosphere densities derived from Swarm GPS observations10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.004 ↗
42. Calibration of accelerometers aboard GRACE satellites by comparison with POD-based nongravitational accelerations10.1016/j.jog.2010.05.001 ↗
43. The role of accelerometer data calibration within GRACE gravity field recovery: Results from ITSG-Grace201610.1016/j.asr.2016.08.007 ↗
44. Sentman, L.H. (1961). Free Molecule Flow Theory and Its Application to the Determination of Aerodynamic Forces, Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., Inc.10.21236/AD0265409 ↗
45. Navarra, A., and Simoncini, V. (2010). A Guide to Empirical Orthogonal Functions for Climate Data Analysis, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-90-481-3702-2 ↗
46. Theoretical foundation of cyclostationary EOF analysis for geophysical and climatic variables: Concepts and examples10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.06.003 ↗
47. Precise science orbits for the Swarm satellite constellation10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.002 ↗
48. A comparison of the effects of CIR-and CME-induced geomagnetic activity on thermospheric densities and spacecraft orbits: Statistical studies10.1002/2014JA019831 ↗