Show source-provided references
1. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses
3. Bin Mat, U., Buniyamin, N., Arsad, P.M., and Kassim, R. (2013, January 4–5). An Overview of Using Academic Analytics to Predict and Improve Students’ Achievement: A Proposed Proactive Intelligent Intervention. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 5th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908316 ↗4. Zhou, J., and Zhang, Q. (2021). A Survey Study on U.S. College Students’ Learning Experience in COVID-19. Educ. Sci., 11.
10.3390/educsci11050248 ↗5. Student and instructor perceptions of engagement after the rapid online transition of teaching due to COVID-19
10.1002/nse2.20038 ↗6. Guzsvinecz, T., and Szűcs, J. (2021). Using Analytics to Identify When Course Materials Are Accessed Relative to Online Exams during Digital Education. Educ. Sci., 11.
10.3390/educsci11100576 ↗7. Comprehensive Methods of Evaluation of Efficiency of Distance Learning System Functioning
9. Learning Performance Prediction with Imbalanced Virtual Learning Environment Students’ Interactions Data
11. Kraiem, M.S., Sánchez-Hernández, F., and Moreno-García, M.N. (2021). Selecting the Suitable Resampling Strategy for Imbalanced Data Classification Regarding Dataset Properties. An Approach Based on Association Models. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11188546 ↗12. Lin, I., Loyola-González, O., Monroy, R., and Medina-Pérez, M. (2021). A Review of Fuzzy and Pattern-Based Approaches for Class Imbalance Problems. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11146310 ↗13. Sekeroglu, B., Abiyev, R., Ilhan, A., Arslan, M., and Idoko, J.B. (2021). Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning and Student Performance Prediction: Critical Gaps and Possible Remedies. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app112210907 ↗14. Zafari, M., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Choi, S.-M., and Esmaeily, A. (2021). A Practical Model for the Evaluation of High School Student Performance Based on Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app112311534 ↗15. Predicting Student Performance and Its Influential Factors Using Hybrid Regression and Multi-Label Classification
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036572 ↗16. Aljohani, N.R., Fayoumi, A., and Hassan, S.-U. (2019). Predicting At-Risk Students Using Clickstream Data in the Virtual Learning Environment. Sustainability, 11.
10.3390/su11247238 ↗18. Wasif, M., Waheed, H., Aljohani, N.R., and Hassan, S.-U. (2019). Understanding Student Learning Behavior and Predicting Their Performance. Cognitive Computing in Technology-Enhanced Learning, IGI Global.
10.4018/978-1-5225-9031-6.ch001 ↗19. Marbouti, F., Diefes-Dux, H., and Strobel, J. (2015, January 14–17). Building Course-Specific Regression-Based Models to Identify At-Risk Students. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, WA, USA. ASEE Conferences.
20. Predicting at-risk university students in a virtual learning environment via a machine learning algorithm
10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.032 ↗22. Predicting Pupil’s Successfulness Factors Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Mathematical Modelling Methods
23. Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores
10.1155/2018/6347186 ↗25. Virtual learning environment to predict withdrawal by leveraging deep learning
10.1002/int.22129 ↗26. Okubo, F., Yamashita, T., Shimada, A., and Ogata, H. (2017, January 13). A Neural Network Approach for Students’ Performance Prediction. Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
10.1145/3027385.3029479 ↗28. Explaining Deep Learning using examples: Optimal feature weighting methods for twin systems using post-hoc, explanation-by-example in XAI
10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107530 ↗29. Designing a Virtual Learning Environment System for Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills to Higher Education Students in ASEAN
10.1007/s10758-017-9310-7 ↗30. Putra, K., Chen, H.-C., Ogiela, M., Chou, C.-L., Weng, C.-E., and Shae, Z.-Y. (2021). Federated Compressed Learning Edge Computing Framework with Ensuring Data Privacy for PM2.5 Prediction in Smart City Sensing Applications. Sensors, 21.
10.3390/s21134586 ↗31. Adaptive boost LS-SVM classification approach for time-series signal classification in epileptic seizure diagnosis applications
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113676 ↗32. Long short-term memory neural network (LSTM-NN) for aquifer level time series forecasting using in-situ piezometric observations
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126800 ↗33. Unbox the black-box for the medical explainable AI via multi-modal and multi-centre data fusion: A mini-review, two showcases and beyond
10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.016 ↗34. Pulse-line intersection method with unboxed artificial intelligence for hesitant pulse wave classification
10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102855 ↗35. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗37. Evaluating XAI: A comparison of rule-based and example-based explanations
39. Shyu, C.-R., Putra, K.T., Chen, H.-C., Tsai, Y.-Y., Hossain, K.S.M.T., Jiang, W., and Shae, Z.-Y. (2021). A Systematic Review of Federated Learning in the Healthcare Area: From the Perspective of Data Properties and Applications. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app112311191 ↗