journal article·2022-01-11Open access

Fermatean Fuzzy DEMATEL and MMDE Algorithm for Modelling the Barriers of Implementing Education 4.0: Insights from the Philippines

Gamaliel Gonzales, Felix Costan, Decem Suladay, Roselyn Gonzales, Lynne Enriquez, Emily Costan, Nadine May Atibing, Joerabell Lourdes Aro, Samantha Shane Evangelista, Fatima Maturan, Egberto Selerio, Lanndon Ocampo

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

Technological transitions in the education sector of developing economies are faced with a range of barriers, involving resource scarcity, socio-cultural concerns, and issues related to management and policy. The popularity of Industry 4.0 has prompted Education 4.0 (EDUC4), an approach to learning that involves transformation using advanced technologies. While a recent work reported a comprehensive list of barriers to EDUC4 implementation, particularly in developing economies, further analysis to identify those priority barriers remains a gap. Thus, this work addresses this gap by introducing a novel methodological extension of the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method following the integration of Fermatean fuzzy sets (FFS). The FFS, compared to other fuzzy environments, could capture higher levels of uncertainties that are associated when eliciting judgments necessary for the DEMATEL. Such integration is aided by the maximum mean de-entropy (MMDE) algorithm, which analytically determines the threshold value crucial for constructing the prominence-relation map of the DEMATEL. Following its application in evaluating the implementation of EDUC4 in Philippine universities, the critical barriers are the lack of training resources, costs, insufficiency of available technologies, skills gap of human resources, knowledge gap, and the complexity of the learning platforms. Among this set, barriers related to cost and lack of training resources are deemed the most prominent ones. The statistical test on the impact of addressing the two prominent barriers shows that addressing the barrier related to costs yields statistically more favorable results regarding the mitigation of other EDUC4 implementation barriers. Although these insights may contain idiosyncrasies, they can serve as starting points of discussion in other relevant developing economies. These methodological and practical contributions advance the development of analytical tools under uncertainty that can handle pressing problems such as the EDUC4 implementation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies · Internet of Things and AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Education at Danao Campus, Cebu Technological University, Danao 6004, Philippines

Educational Research and Resource Center, Cebu Technological University, Danao 6004, Philippines

Center for Applied Mathematics and Operations Research, Cebu Technological University, Cebu City 6000, Philippines

Department of Industrial Engineering, Cebu Technological University, Cebu City 6000, Philippines

Funding

Cebu Technological University

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Technology enhanced learning for Industry 4.0 engineering education
2. Oke, A., and Fernandes, F.A.P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6.10.3390/joitmc6020031 ↗
3. The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278 ↗
4. Science and education in the form 4.0: Public policy and organization based on human and artificial intellectual capital10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0274 ↗
5. Ciolacu, M.I., and Svasta, P. (2021, January 21–23). Education 4.0: AI empowers smart blended learning process with Biofeedback. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453959 ↗
6. Educating for twenty-first century competencies and future-ready learners: Research perspectives from Singapore10.1080/02188791.2017.1405475 ↗
7. University 4.0 in developing countries: A case of Indonesia10.4018/IJSKD.2021070103 ↗
8. Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., Loaiza-Aguirre, M.I., Zúñiga-Ojeda, A., and Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Characterization of the Teaching Profile within the Framework of Education 4.0. Future Internet, 13.10.20944/preprints202103.0091.v1 ↗
9. The cultural barriers to a low-carbon future: A review of six mobility and energy transitions across 28 countries10.1016/j.rser.2019.109569 ↗
10. Costan, E., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Enriquez, L., Costan, F., Suladay, D., Atibing, N.M., Aro, J.L., Evangelista, S.S., and Maturan, F. (2021). Education 4.0 in Developing Economies: A Systematic Literature Review of Implementation Barriers and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132212763 ↗
11. Thorell, M., Fridorff-Jens, P.K., Lassen, P., Lange, T., and Kayser, L. (2015). Transforming students into digital academics: A challenge at both the individual and the institutional level. BMC Med. Educ., 15.10.1186/s12909-015-0330-5 ↗
12. Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1972). World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL, Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
13. Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the World Problematic: Communication Procedure, Communicating with Those Bearing Collective Responsibility. DEMATEL Report No. 1, Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
14. Fermatean fuzzy sets10.1007/s12652-019-01377-0 ↗
15. Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073 ↗
16. The insight of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the higher education system
17. Industrial Internet of Things as a Challenge for Higher Education
18. World Economic Forum (2021, November 08). The Future of Jobs Report 2018. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf.
19. The pedagogical model of Philippine STEAM education: Drawing implications for the reengineering of Philippine STEAM learning ecosystem10.13189/ujer.2019.071213 ↗
20. Schwab, K. (2021, November 08). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf.
21. The Efficacy of Matching Learning Modality in the Teaching-Learning Process: A Case of Teaching Hypothesis Testing10.4018/IJVPLE.285597 ↗
22. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., and Aharon, D. (2015). Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things, McKinsey Global Institute.
23. Esperanza, P.J., Himang, C., Bongo, M., Selerio, E., and Ocampo, L. (2021). The utility of a flipped classroom in secondary Mathematics education. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol.10.1080/0020739X.2021.1957166 ↗
24. Cheok, M.L., and Wong, S.L. (2016). Frog Virtual Learning Environment for Malaysian Schools: Exploring Teachers’ Experience. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-0373-8_10 ↗
25. Education and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Lessons from COVID-19
26. Rethinking Thai higher education for Thailand 4.010.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0072 ↗
27. Puthiyamadam, T. (2021, September 20). How the Meaning of Digital Transformation Has Evolved. Available online: https://hbr.org/2017/05/how-the-meaning-of-digital-transformation-has-evolved.
28. O’Halloran, D., and Kvochko, E. (2021, November 10). Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected. WEFUSA Industrial Internet Report. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/press/2015/01/industrial-internet-of-things-unleashing-the-potential-of-connected-products-and-services/.
29. Building CDIO approach training programmes against challenges of Industrial revolution 4.0 for engineering and technology development
30. De Vries, P., Klaassen, R., and Kamp, A. (2017, January 18–22). Emerging technologies in engineering education: Can we make it work?. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.
31. Education 4.0: The impact of computer architecture and organization course on students’ computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy10.30534/ijatcse/2019/57862019 ↗
32. Veletsianos, G. (2016). The Phenomenal MOOC: Sociocultural Effects of a Marginal Learning Model. Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning: Foundations and Applications, Athabasca University Press.
33. What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5 ↗
34. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010 ↗
35. Orientation for an Education 4.0: A New Vision for Future Education in Vietnam
36. Education and industrial revolution 4.0
37. Philippine higher education vis-à-vis education 4.0: A scoping review
38. Terrazola, V.E. (2021, November 10). PH Internet ‘Slowly Getting’ to Top of World Rankings—DICT. Manila Bulletin. Available online: https://mb.com.ph/2021/09/20/ph-internet-slowly-getting-to-top-of-world-rankings-dict/.
39. On the complex causal relationship of barriers to sustainable urban water management: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis10.1080/1573062X.2020.1846064 ↗
40. The inclusion of sustainability in management education institutions: Assessing critical barriers using the DEMATEL method10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0100 ↗
41. Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods10.1007/s12597-014-0186-1 ↗
42. A DEMATEL method in identifying design requirements for mobile environments: Students’ perspectives10.1007/s12528-018-9176-2 ↗
43. Utilizing DEMATEL for value-embedded e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1155/2021/9575076 ↗
44. DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications10.1155/2018/3696457 ↗
46. A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012 ↗
47. Çelikbilek, Y., and Tüylü, A.N.A. (2019). Prioritizing the components of e-learning systems by using fuzzy DEMATEL and ANP. Interact. Learn. Environ.10.1080/10494820.2019.1655065 ↗
48. Thavi, R.R., Narwane, V.S., Jhaveri, R.H., and Raut, R.D. (2021). To determine the critical factors for the adoption of cloud computing in the educational sector in developing countries–a fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Kybernetes.10.1108/K-12-2020-0864 ↗
49. Analysing determinants of student relationship management implementation: Integration of fuzzy DEMATEL and AHP techniques10.1504/IJEED.2021.114369 ↗
50. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 ↗
51. Yager, R.R. (2013, January 24–28). Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375 ↗
52. Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 ↗
53. An intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL methodology for prioritising the components of SWOT matrix in the Iranian insurance industry10.1504/IJOR.2014.063152 ↗
54. Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030 ↗
55. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy information for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness in GSD projects10.1504/IJICA.2015.073006 ↗
56. Decision making method based on Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to solid waste management10.1007/s40747-019-0100-9 ↗
57. A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.006 ↗
58. Zeleny, M. (1981). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw Hill.
59. Robust contingency plans for transportation investment planning10.1109/21.214763 ↗
60. Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method10.1007/s40747-021-00407-9 ↗
61. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Vol I): What Students Know and Can Do, OECD Publishing.
62. Bernardo, A.B., Cordel, M.O., Lucas, R.I.G., Teves, J.M.M., Yap, S.A., and Chua, U.C. (2021). Using machine learning approaches to explore non-cognitive variables influencing reading proficiency in English among Filipino learners. Educ. Sci., 11.10.3390/educsci11100628 ↗
63. Hanna, N.K., and Knight, P.T. (2012). National Strategies to Harness Information Technology: Seeking Transformation in Singapore, Finland, the Philippines, and South Africa, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2086-6 ↗
64. Cloudification of my.eskwela for e-Governance in Philippine Education10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.376 ↗
65. The relationship between knowledge management and organizational learning with academic staff readiness for education 4.010.14689/ejer.2020.85.8 ↗