Visual Attention Software: A New Tool for Understanding the “Subliminal” Experience of the Built Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Eye-tracking technology is a biometric tool that has found many commercial and research applications. The recent advent of affordable wearable sensors has considerably expanded the range of these possibilities to fields such as computer gaming, education, entertainment, health, neuromarketing, psychology, etc. The Visual Attention Software by 3M (3M-VAS) is an artificial intelligence application that was formulated using experimental data from eye-tracking. It can be used to predict viewer reactions to images, generating fixation point probability maps and fixation point sequence estimations, thus revealing pre-attentive processing of visual stimuli with a very high degree of accuracy. We have used 3M-VAS software in an innovative implementation to analyze images of different buildings, either in their original state or photographically manipulated, as well as various geometric patterns. The software not only reveals non-obvious fixation points, but also overall relative design coherence, a key element of Christopher Alexander’s theory of geometrical order. A more evenly distributed field of attention seen in some structures contrasts with other buildings being ignored, those showing instead unconnected points of splintered attention. Our findings are non-intuitive and surprising. We link these results to both Alexander’s theory and Neuroscience, identify potential pitfalls in the software’s use, and also suggest ways to avoid them.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Visual Attention and Saliency Detection · Visual perception and processing mechanisms · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Eurac Research, Institute for Biomedicine, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Via Galvani 31, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Department of Mathematics and Architecture, The University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
The Human Architecture & Planning Institute, Inc., 43 Bradford St., Concord, MA 01742, USA
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 3M (2021, July 03). “Visual Attention Software”. 3M Corporation: Saint Paul, MN, USA. Available online: https://vas.3m.com.
2. Salingaros, N.A., and Sussman, A. (2020). Biometric Pilot-Studies Reveal the Arrangement and Shape of Windows on a Traditional Façade to Be Implicitly “Engaging”, Whereas Contemporary Façades Are Not. Urban Sci., 4.10.3390/urbansci4020026 ↗
3. Alexander, C. (2001). The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life, Center for Environmental Structure.
4. Self-Similarity and Recursion as Default Modes in Human Cognition10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.016 ↗
5. Fractal Image Perception Provides Novel Insights into Hierarchical Cognition10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.064 ↗
6. Fractal Art and Architecture Reduce Physiological Stress
7. Reduction of Physiological Stress Using Fractal Art and Architecture10.1162/leon.2006.39.3.245 ↗
8. Taylor, R.P. (2021). The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020823 ↗
9. Eye-Tracking Boston City Hall to Better Understand Human Perception and the Architectural Experience
10. Sussman, A., and Ward, J.M. (2021, July 03). Planning for the Subconscious. Planning. Available online: https://www.planning.org/planning/2016/jun/subconscious/.
11. Sussman, A., and Ward, J.M. (2017). Game-Changing Eye-Tracking Studies Reveal How We Actually See Architecture. Common Edge, Available online: https://commonedge.org/game-changing-eye-tracking-studies-reveal-how-we-actually-see-architecture/.
12. (2021, July 03). iMotions, “Eye Tracking”, Copenhagen, Denmark & Boston. MA, USA. Available online: https://imotions.com.
13. Life and complexity in architecture from a thermodynamic analogy10.4006/1.3028694 ↗
14. The Sensory Value of Ornament
15. Sussman, A., and Hollander, J.B. (2021). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment, Routledge. [2nd ed.].10.4324/9781003031543 ↗
16. The biophilic healing index predicts effects of the built environment on our wellbeing
17. Salingaros, N.A. (2016). Biophilia & Healing Environments. Off the Common Books, Terrapin Bright Green LLC. Available online: https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/biophilia-healing-environments/.
18. Architectural Lessons from Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305 ↗
19. EyeQuant (2021). Data Driven Design, EyeQuant. Available online: https://www.eyequant.com.
20. Expoze (2021). AI-Based Eye Tracking, Expoze. Available online: https://www.expoze.io.
21. Quantifying Human Experience in Architectural Spaces with Integrated Virtual Reality and Body Sensor Networks10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000812 ↗
22. Zou, Z., and Ergan, S. (2019, January 22–26). A Framework towards Quantifying Human Restorativeness in Virtual Built Environments. Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA 50) Conference, Sustainable Urban Environments, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05208.pdf.
23. Mutis, I., and Hartmann, T. (2019). Where Do We Look? An Eye-Tracking Study of Architectural Features in Building Design. Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering, Proceedings of the 35th CIB W78 2018 Conference: IT in Design, Construction, and Management, Chicago, IL, USA, 1–3 October 2018, Springer. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328144080.
24. Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings10.1089/cyber.2009.0308 ↗
25. Computational Modelling of Visual Attention10.1038/35058500 ↗
26. Banich, M.T., and Compton, R.J. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316664018 ↗
27. McFadyen, J. (2019). Investigating the Subcortical Route to the Amygdala across Species and in Disordered Fear Responses. J. Exp. Neurosci., 13.10.1177/1179069519846445 ↗
28. Tollner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Gramann, K., and Muller, H.J. (2011). Stimulus Saliency Modulates Pre-Attentive Processing Speed in Human Visual Cortex. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0016276 ↗
29. Ellard, C. (2015). Places of the Heart: The Psychogeography of Everyday Life, Perseus Books.
30. Characterizing the Psychophysiological Signature of Boredom10.1007/s00221-013-3755-2 ↗
31. Connecting to the World: Christopher Alexander’s Tool for Human-Centered Design10.1016/j.sheji.2020.08.005 ↗
32. Ruggles, D.H. (2018). Beauty, Neuroscience, and Architecture: Timeless Patterns and Their Impact on Our Well-Being, Fibonacci Press.
33. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman.
34. A Complex-Network Perspective on Alexander’s Wholeness10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.038 ↗
35. Wholeness as a Hierarchical Graph to Capture the Nature of Space10.1080/13658816.2015.1038542 ↗
36. Höfflinger, B. (2007). High-Dynamic-Range (Hdr) Vision: Microelectronics, Image Processing, Computer Graphics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-44433-6 ↗
37. Lesser, S. (2021, July 03). Notes on the Nature of Order. Available online: http://nature-of-order.stefan-lesser.com/.
38. Salingaros, N.A. (2013). Unified Architectural Theory: Form, Language, Complexity, Sustasis Press.
39. The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.011 ↗
40. Kandel, E.R. (2012). The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present, Random House.
41. Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Human Responses to Traditional Neighborhood Designs10.1080/02697459.2020.1768332 ↗
42. Analyzing Walkability Through Biometrics: Insights into Sustainable Transportation Through the Use of Eye-Tracking Emulation Software10.1123/jpah.2020-0127 ↗
43. Hollander, J.B., Sussman, A., Lowitt, P., Angus, N., and Situ, M. (2021). Eye-tracking emulation software: A promising urban design tool. Archit. Sci. Rev.10.1080/00038628.2021.1929055 ↗
44. Sussman, A., and Ward, J.M. (2021). How Biometric Software Is Changing How We Understand Architecture—And Ourselves. Common Edge, Available online: https://commonedge.org/how-biometric-software-is-changing-how-we-understand-architecture-and-ourselves/.