journal article·2020-12-01Open access

Monitoring of Ground Movement and Groundwater Changes in London Using InSAR and GRACE

Vivek Agarwal, Amit Kumar, Rachel L. Gomes, Stuart Marsh

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 23

Abstract

Groundwater-induced land movement can cause damage to property and resources, thus its monitoring is very important for the safety and economics of a city. London is a heavily built-up urban area and relies largely on its groundwater resource and thus poses the threat of land subsidence. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) can facilitate monitoring of land movement and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity anomalies can facilitate groundwater monitoring. For London, no previous study has investigated groundwater variations and related land movement using InSAR and GRACE together. In this paper, we used ENVISAT ASAR C-band SAR images to obtain land movement using Persistent Scatterer InSAR (PSInSAR) technique and GRACE gravity anomalies to obtain groundwater variations between December 2002 and December 2010 for central London. Both experiments showed long-term, decreasing, complex, non-linear patterns in the spatial and temporal domain. The land movement values varied from −6 to +6 mm/year, and their reliability was validated with observed Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, by conducting a two-sample t-test. The average groundwater loss estimated from GRACE was found to be 9.003 MCM/year. The ground movement was compared to observed groundwater values obtained from various boreholes around central London. It was observed that when large volumes of groundwater is extracted then it leads to land subsidence, and when groundwater is recharged then surface uplift is witnessed. The results demonstrate that InSAR and GRACE complement each other and can be an excellent source of monitoring groundwater for hydrologists.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Funding

University of Nottingham

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Tiwari, V.M., Wahr, J., and Swenson, S. (2009). Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36.10.1029/2009GL039401 ↗
2. Urban Water Resources Toolbox—Integrating Groundwater into Urban Water Management10.2166/9781780402437 ↗
3. Zheng, M., Deng, K., Fan, H., and Du, S. (2018). Monitoring and analysis of surface deformation in mining area based on InSAR and GRACE. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10091392 ↗
4. Karl, T. (1943). Theory of consolidation. Theor. Soil Mech., 265–296.10.1002/9780470172766.ch13 ↗
5. Analysis of Borehole Extensometer Data from Central California
6. One-dimensional simulation of aquifer system compaction near Pixley, California: 1. Constant parameters10.1029/WR011i003p00465 ↗
7. BGS (2013). Industrial and Urban Pollution of Groundwater. UK Groundw. Forum, Available online: http://www.groundwateruk.org/downloads/industrial_and_urban_pollution_of_groundwater.pdf.
8. Characterisation of hydraulic head changes and aquifer properties in the London Basin using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry ground motion data10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.068 ↗
9. Geology of London, UK10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.07.005 ↗
10. Groundwater resource modelling for public water supply management in London10.1144/SP364.8 ↗
11. EA (2010). Management of the London Basin Chalk Aquifer. Status Report 2010. Environ. Agency Engl. Wales Thames Reg. Rep., Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/735451/2018_Final.pdf.
12. An improved pixel-tracking method for monitoring mining subsidence10.1080/2150704X.2016.1183177 ↗
13. The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations10.1029/2001GL013174 ↗
14. Wang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., and Yang, T. (2015, January 26–31). Investigation of snow cover change using multi-temporal PALSAR InSAR data at Dagu Glacier, China. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Milan, Italy.10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325872 ↗
15. Monitoring mining subsidence using a combination of phase-stacking and offset-tracking methods10.3390/rs70709166 ↗
16. Extracting vertical displacement rates in Shanghai (China) with multi-platform SAR images10.3390/rs70809542 ↗
17. Subsidence monitoring using D-InSAR and robability integral prediction modelling in eep mining areas10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000153 ↗
18. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India10.1038/nature08238 ↗
19. Ramillien, G., Frappart, F., and Seoane, L. (2016). Space Gravimetry Using GRACE Satellite Mission: Basic Concepts. Microwave Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces: Techniques and Methods, Elsevier BV.10.1016/B978-1-78548-159-8.50006-2 ↗
20. Assimilation of GRACE terrestrial water storage data into a land surface model: Results for the Mississippi River basin10.1175/2007JHM951.1 ↗
21. Wang, X., De Linage, C., Famiglietti, J., and Zender, C.S. (2011). Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) detection of water storage changes in the Three Gorges Reservoir of China and comparison with in situ measurements. Water Resour. Res., 47.10.1029/2011WR010534 ↗
22. Guo, J., Zhou, L., Yao, C., and Hu, J. (2016). Surface subsidence analysis by multi-temporal InSAR and GRACE: A case study in Beijing. Sensors (Switzerland), 16.10.3390/s16091495 ↗
23. A spaceborne multisensor approach to monitor the desiccation of Lake Urmia in Iran10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.006 ↗
24. GRACE water storage estimates for the middle east and other regions with significant reservoir and lake storage10.5194/hess-17-4817-2013 ↗
25. Groundwater depletion in Central Mexico: Use of GRACE and InSAR to support water resources management10.1002/2015WR018211 ↗
26. Du, Z., Ge, L., Ng, A.H.M., and Li, X. (2016, January 10–15). Time series interferometry integrated with groundwater depletion measurement from grace. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China.10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729295 ↗
27. A geological model of London and the Thames Valley, southeast England10.1016/j.pgeola.2014.09.001 ↗
28. Geological 3D modelling: Scientific discovery and enhanced understanding of the subsurface, with examples from the UK
29. UK Groundwater forum (1998). Groundwater of hidden assest. Thames Groundw. Scheme. Inst. Civ. Eng. Lond., Available online: http://www.groundwateruk.org/.
30. Thames Water (2015). Final Water Resources Management Plan. Exec. Summ., Available online: https://www.thameswater.co.uk/media-library/home/about-us/regulation/water-resources/technical-report/executive-summary.pdf.
31. Geology; its principles, practice and potential for Geotechnics10.1144/1470-9236/09-014 ↗
32. Some relationships between lithology, basin form and hydrology: A case study from the Thames basin, UK10.1002/hyp.8024 ↗
33. Fluid flow in the Chalk of England10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.034.01.10 ↗
34. The Hydrogeology of the Chalk of North-West Europe10.2307/622666 ↗
35. Chalk Pore-Size Measurements and their Significance
36. Regional trends in matrix porosity and dry density of the Chalk of England
37. European Commission (2020, September 18). Mapping Guide for a European Urban Atlas. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/urban-atlas-mapping-guide.
38. Hooper, A.J. (2008). A multi-temporal InSAR method incorporating both persistent scatterer and small baseline approaches. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35.10.1029/2008GL034654 ↗
39. Natural and Anthropogenic Geohazards in Greater London Observed from Geological and ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT Persistent Scatterers Ground Motion Data: Results from the EC FP7-SPACE PanGeo Project10.1007/s00024-014-0927-3 ↗
40. Sarmap (2020, September 30). PS Tutorial. Available online: http://www.sarmap.ch/tutorials/PS_Tutorial_V_0_9.pdf.
41. Sarmap (2020, September 30). SARscape Help Manual. Available online: https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/docs/pdf/sarscape_5.1_help.pdf.
42. Tapley, B.D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M., and Reigber, C. (2004). The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31.10.1029/2004GL019920 ↗
43. Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE10.1029/98JB02844 ↗
44. Dahle, C., and Murböck, M. (2020). Post-processed GRACE/GRACE-FO Geopotential GSM Coefficients COST-G RL01 (Level-2B Product). GFZ Data Serv.
45. Horvath, A., Murböck, M., Pail, R., and Horwath, M. (2018). Decorrelation of GRACE time variable gravity field solutions using full covariance information. Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8090323 ↗
46. A new high-resolution model of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean mass variability for de-aliasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL0610.1093/gji/ggx302 ↗
47. Ek, M.B., Mitchell, K.E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J.D. (2003). Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J. Geophys. Res. D Atmos., 108.10.1029/2002JD003296 ↗
48. The common land model10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013 ↗
49. Koster, R.D., and Suarez, M.J. (1996). Energy and Water Balance Calculations in the Mosaic LSM, NASA.
50. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models10.1029/94JD00483 ↗
51. Ellison, R.A., Woods, M.A., Allen, D.J., Forster, A., Pharaoh, T.C., and King, C. (2004). Geology of London. Special Memoir for 1:50 000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales). Geol. Mag., Available online: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509917/.
52. Kusche, J., and Schrama, E.J.O. (2005). Surface mass redistribution inversion from global GPS deformation and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity data. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 110.10.1029/2004JB003556 ↗
53. Water in the balance10.1126/science.1236460 ↗
54. Standing, J., and Selman, R. (2001). Building Response to Tunnelling—Case studies from construction of the Jubilee Line Extension, London. Ciria, Available online: https://www.ciria.org//ProductExcerpts/SP200.aspx.
55. Bringing GRACE Down to Earth10.1111/gwat.12379 ↗