Structural Damage Detection Based on Real-Time Vibration Signal and Convolutional Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
The traditional methods of structural health monitoring (SHM) have obvious disadvantages such as being time-consuming, laborious and non-synchronizing, and so on. This paper presents a novel and efficient approach to detect structural damages from real-time vibration signals via a convolutional neural network (CNN). As vibration signals (acceleration) reflect the structural response to the changes of the structural state, hence, a CNN, as a classifier, can map vibration signals to the structural state and detect structural damages. As it is difficult to obtain enough damage samples in practical engineering, finite element analysis (FEA) provides an alternative solution to this problem. In this paper, training samples for the CNN are obtained using FEA of a steel frame, and the effectiveness of the proposed detection method is evaluated by inputting the experimental data into the CNN. The results indicate that, the detection accuracy of the CNN trained using FEA data reaches 94% for damages introduced in the numerical model and 90% for damages in the real steel frame. It is demonstrated that the CNN has an ideal detection effect for both single damage and multiple damages. The combination of FEA and experimental data provides enough training and testing samples for the CNN, which improves the practicability of the CNN-based detection method in engineering practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138632, Singapore
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures: A review10.1007/s13349-016-0168-5 ↗
2. Modal-parameter identification and vibration-based damage detection of a damaged steel truss bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.057 ↗
3. Damage identification of a full-scale five-girder bridge using time-series analysis of vibration data10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.008 ↗
4. Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B ↗
5. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6 ↗
6. The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies10.1243/03093247V142049 ↗
7. Applications of different criteria in structural damage identification based on natural frequency and static displacement10.1007/s11431-016-6053-y ↗
8. Structural health monitoring with statistical methods during progressive damage test of S101 Bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.010 ↗
9. Damage detection in bridges using accurate modal parameters10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00227-5 ↗
10. Modal flexibility-based damage detection of cantilever beam-type structures using baseline modification10.1016/j.jsv.2014.04.056 ↗
11. Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Strain Energy and Hybrid Multiobjective Optimization10.1111/mice.12122 ↗
12. Wavelet-Based Approach for Structural Damage Detection10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677) ↗
13. New method for modal identification of super high-rise building structures using discretized synchrosqueezed wavelet and Hilbert transforms10.1002/tal.1312 ↗
14. A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.05.020 ↗
15. Optimization-based method for structural damage detection with consideration of uncertainties- a comparative study
16. Automated inspection of engineering ceramic grinding surface damage based on image recognition10.1007/s00170-012-4338-2 ↗
17. (2019). Screen efficiency comparisons of decision tree and neural network algorithms in machine learning assisted drug design. Sci. China, 62, 110–118.
18. Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.003 ↗
19. Structural damage detection of steel bridge girder using artificial neural networks and finite element models10.12989/scs.2013.14.4.367 ↗
20. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured frf data reduced via principal component projection10.1006/jsvi.2000.3390 ↗
21. Evolutionary artificial neural networks10.1142/S0129065793000171 ↗
22. The Researching Overview of Evolutionary Neural Networks
23. Image recognition with deep neural networks in presence of noise-Dealing with and taking advantage of distortions10.3233/ICA-170551 ↗
24. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
25. Deep Learning-Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks10.1111/mice.12263 ↗
26. Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature extraction through Deep Learning10.1111/mice.12313 ↗
27. Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043 ↗
28. Vibration-based structural state identification by a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network10.1111/mice.12447 ↗
29. Structural damage detection using convolutional neural networks combining strain energy and dynamic response10.1007/s11012-019-01052-w ↗
30. Scherer, D., Müller, A., and Behnke, S. (2010, January 15–18). Evaluation of Pooling Operations in Convolutional Architectures for Object Recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1007/978-3-642-15825-4_10 ↗
31. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
32. Kingma, D., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
33. MOVA/MOSS: Two integrated software solutions for comprehensive Structural Health Monitoring of structures10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106830 ↗
34. Temperature effects on static and dynamic behavior of Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.021 ↗