journal article·2022-08-24Open access

A Kernel Extreme Learning Machine-Grey Wolf Optimizer (KELM-GWO) Model to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock

Chuanqi Li, Jian Zhou, Daniel Dias, Yilin Gui

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 17

Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is one of the most important parameters to characterize the rock mass in geotechnical engineering design and construction. In this study, a novel kernel extreme learning machine-grey wolf optimizer (KELM-GWO) model was proposed to predict the UCS of 271 rock samples. Four parameters namely the porosity (Pn, %), Schmidt hardness rebound number (SHR), P-wave velocity (Vp, km/s), and point load strength (PLS, MPa) were considered as the input variables, and the UCS is the output variable. To verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the KELM-GWO model, extreme learning machine (ELM), KELM, deep extreme learning machine (DELM) back-propagation neural network (BPNN), and one empirical model were established and compared with the KELM-GWO model to predict the UCS. The root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), prediction accuracy (U1), prediction quality (U2), and variance accounted for (VAF) were adopted to evaluate all models in this study. The results demonstrate that the proposed KELM-GWO model was the best model for predicting UCS with the best performance indices. Additionally, the identified most important parameter for predicting UCS is the porosity by using the mean impact value (MIV) technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Machine Learning and ELM · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory 3SR, CNRS UMR 5521, Grenoble Alpes University, 38000 Grenoble, France

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation Project of China · Distinguished Youth Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China · Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University · China Scholarship Council

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Estimating the strength of rock materials
2. A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock10.1016/j.engappai.2003.11.006 ↗
3. Influence of water on mechanical behavior of surrounding rock in hard-rock tunnels: An experimental simulation10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105816 ↗
4. Challenges in the characterisation of intact rock bridges in rock slopes10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.014 ↗
5. Model tree approach for predicting uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks10.1007/s10064-016-0931-1 ↗
6. Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools10.1016/j.tust.2020.103514 ↗
7. Uniaxial compressive strength prediction through a new technique based on gene expression programming10.1007/s00521-017-2939-2 ↗
8. Ying, J., Han, Z., Shen, L., and Li, W. (2020). Influence of Parent Concrete Properties on Compressive Strength and Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Concrete with Strengthened Recycled Aggregates. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13204631 ↗
9. Tensile strength prediction of rock material using non-destructive tests: A comparative intelligent study10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100652 ↗
10. Introducing stacking machine learning approaches for the prediction of rock deformation10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100756 ↗
11. Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9 ↗
12. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Modulus of Elasticity in Calcareous Mudstones Using Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems, and Regression Analysis
13. Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.006 ↗
14. Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey)10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00041-8 ↗
15. Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity10.1007/s10064-008-0158-x ↗
16. A correlation between P-wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength10.1007/s10064-007-0109-y ↗
17. Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with P-wave velocity10.1016/j.coal.2009.01.004 ↗
18. The determination of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength for pyroclastic rocks10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.12.009 ↗
19. Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: A PSO-based ANN approach10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0 ↗
20. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for Travertine samples using regression and artificial neural networks
21. Application of genetic programming to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.004 ↗
22. Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00007-8 ↗
23. Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.02.003 ↗
24. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.009 ↗
25. An Example of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Application for Indirect Estimation of Rock Parameters10.1007/s00603-007-0138-7 ↗
26. Estimation of strength parameters of rock using artificial neural networks10.1007/s10064-010-0301-3 ↗
27. Models to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity for Ankara Agglomerate10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.01.011 ↗
28. Estimating the uniaxial compressive strength of some clay-bearing rocks selected from Turkey by nonlinear multivariable regression and rule-based fuzzy models10.1111/j.1468-0394.2009.00475.x ↗
29. Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials by index tests using regression analysis and fuzzy inference system10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.004 ↗
30. An intelligent approach to predict unconfined compressive strength of rock surrounding access tunnels in longwall coal mining10.1007/s00521-012-1221-x ↗
31. Application of support vector machines and relevance vector machines in predicting uniaxial compressive strength of volcanic rocks10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.08.006 ↗
32. Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of travertine rocks, Case study: Azarshahr area, NW Iran10.1007/s40808-016-0132-8 ↗
33. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks from nondestructive tests using multivariate regression and LS-SVM methods10.1007/s12517-019-4307-2 ↗
34. Artificial intelligence forecasting models of uniaxial compressive strength10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100499 ↗
35. Variable selection and prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity by random forest10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.030 ↗
36. An ensemble tree-based machine learning model for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of travertine rocks10.1007/s00521-019-04418-z ↗
37. Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.09.002 ↗
38. An application of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for estimating the uniaxial compressive strength of certain granitic rocks from their mineral contents10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.048 ↗
39. Experimental study to evaluate the effect of travertine structure on the physical and mechanical properties of the material10.1007/s12517-015-1910-8 ↗
40. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Different Quarried Rocks Using Metaheuristic Algorithm10.1007/s13369-019-04046-8 ↗
41. Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of Gaziantep basalts via neural networks and gene expression programming10.1007/s00521-008-0208-0 ↗
42. Estimating uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using genetic expression programming10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.05.006 ↗
43. Selection of regression models for predicting strength and deformability properties of rocks using GA10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.07.006 ↗
44. Indirect estimation of unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using extreme learning machine10.1007/s11440-014-0316-1 ↗
45. Zeng, J., Roy, B., Kumar, D., Mohammed, A.S., Armaghani, D.J., Zhou, J., and Mohamad, E.T. (2021). Proposing several hybrid PSO-extreme learning machine techniques to predict TBM performance. Eng. Comput., 1–17.10.1007/s00366-020-01225-2 ↗
46. ORELM: A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Prediction of Flyrock in Mine Blasting
47. A Novel Intelligent ELM-BBO Technique for Predicting Distance of Mine Blasting-Induced Flyrock
48. Li, C., Zhou, J., Khandelwal, M., Zhang, X., Monjezi, M., and Qiu, Y. (2022). Six Novel Hybrid Extreme Learning Machine–Swarm Intelligence Optimization (ELM–SIO) Models for Predicting Backbreak in Open-Pit Blasting. Nonrenew. Resour., 1–23.10.1007/s11053-022-10082-3 ↗
49. A novel approach for forecasting of ground vibrations resulting from blasting: Modified particle swarm optimization coupled extreme learning machine10.1007/s00366-020-00997-x ↗
50. Hybrid ensemble soft computing approach for predicting penetration rate of tunnel boring machine in a rock environment10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.015 ↗
51. Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
52. Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2168604 ↗
53. An improved backpropagation algorithm to avoid the local minima problem10.1016/j.neucom.2003.08.006 ↗
54. Optimizing an ANN model with ICA for estimating bearing capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil10.1007/s00366-017-0545-7 ↗
55. A combination of artificial bee colony and neural network for approximating the safety factor of retaining walls10.1007/s00366-018-0625-3 ↗
56. Rock strength estimation: A PSO-based BP approach10.1007/s00521-016-2728-3 ↗
57. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock samples using hybrid particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural networks10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.075 ↗
58. Design and implementation of a new tuned hybrid intelligent model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock using SFS-ANFIS10.1007/s00366-020-00977-1 ↗
59. A Reliable PSO-based ANN Approach for Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength of Sandstones10.2174/1874836802014010237 ↗
60. Application of hybrid intelligent systems in predicting the unconfined compressive strength of clay material mixed with recycled additive10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100627 ↗
61. Cao, J., Gao, J., Rad, H.N., Mohammed, A.S., Hasanipanah, M., and Zhou, J. (2021). A novel systematic and evolved approach based on XGBoost-firefly algorithm to predict Young’s modulus and unconfined compressive strength of rock. Eng. Comput., 1–17.10.1007/s00366-020-01241-2 ↗
62. Zhou, J., Huang, S., Wang, M., and Qiu, Y. (2021). Performance evaluation of hybrid GA–SVM and GWO–SVM models to predict earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil: A multi-dataset investigation. Eng. Comput., 1–19.10.1007/s00366-021-01418-3 ↗
63. Optimization of support vector machine through the use of metaheuristic algorithms in forecasting TBM advance rate10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104015 ↗
64. Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: A comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.020 ↗
65. Application of neural networks for the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) from Equotip hardness10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00173-9 ↗
66. Fuzzy and Multiple Regression Modelling for Evaluation of Intact Rock Strength Based on Point Load, Schmidt Hammer and Sonic Velocity10.1007/s00603-005-0050-y ↗
67. Correlation between P-wave velocity and some mechanical properties for sedimentary rocks
68. Prediction of compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.050 ↗
69. Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of granite through an expert artificial neural network10.1007/s12517-015-2057-3 ↗
70. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Some Sedimentary Rocks by Fuzzy and Regression Models10.1007/s10706-017-0334-5 ↗
71. Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Using New Hybrid Intelligent Models
72. Development of a new empirical model and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems in predicting unconfined compressive strength of weathered granite grade III10.1007/s10064-020-02071-8 ↗
73. Application of Various Nonlinear Models to Predict the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Weakly Cemented Jurassic Rocks
74. Grey wolf optimization evolving kernel extreme learning machine: Application to bankruptcy prediction10.1016/j.engappai.2017.05.003 ↗
75. Extreme learning machine: RBF network case
76. Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in engineering software10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
77. A novel hybrid extreme learning machine–grey wolf optimizer (ELM-GWO) model to predict compressive strength of concrete with partial replacements for cement10.1007/s00366-020-01081-0 ↗
78. Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.006 ↗
79. Application of Multiboost-KELM algorithm to alleviate the collinearity of log curves for evaluating the abundance of organic matter in marine mud shale reservoirs: A case study in Sichuan Basin, China10.1007/s11600-018-0180-8 ↗
80. Stability analysis of underground mine hard rock pillars via combination of finite difference methods, neural networks, and Monte Carlo simulation techniques10.1016/j.undsp.2020.05.005 ↗
81. Stochastic assessment of hard rock pillar stability based on the geological strength index system10.1007/s40948-021-00243-8 ↗
82. Optimized neural network using beetle antennae search for predicting the unconfined compressive strength of jet grouting coalcretes10.1002/nag.2891 ↗
83. Prediction of rock mass parameters in the TBM tunnel based on BP neural network integrated simulated annealing algorithm10.1016/j.tust.2019.103103 ↗
84. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mixture proportions using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119208 ↗
85. Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of Power Plant Energy Sustainability for IoT Enabled Smart Cities Empowered with Deep Extreme Learning Machine10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976452 ↗
86. Big data and machine learning in geoscience and geoengineering: Introduction10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.006 ↗
87. A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9 ↗
88. Prediction of flyrock induced by mine blasting using a novel kernel-based extreme learning machine10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.007 ↗
89. Predicting rock size distribution in mine blasting using various novel soft computing models based on meta-heuristics and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.005 ↗
90. Predicting roof displacement of roadways in underground coal mines using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system optimized by various physics-based optimization algorithms10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.005 ↗
91. An optimized system of GMDH-ANFIS predictive model by ICA for estimating pile bearing capacity10.1007/s10462-021-10065-5 ↗
92. Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.046 ↗
93. A Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network10.1007/s00366-019-00726-z ↗
94. Use of Intelligent Methods to Design Effective Pattern Parameters of Mine Blasting to Minimize Flyrock Distance
95. A framework to predict the load-settlement behavior of shallow foundations in a range of soils from silty clays to sands using CPT records10.1007/s00500-021-06485-8 ↗
96. Analysis of high-dimensional genomic data employing a novel bio-inspired algorithm10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.007 ↗
97. Neuro-fuzzy technique to predict air-overpressure induced by blasting10.1007/s12517-015-1984-3 ↗
98. A Novel Approach to Active Compounds Identification Based on Support Vector Regression Model and Mean Impact Value10.1111/cbdd.12111 ↗
99. Multifactor-influenced energy consumption forecasting using enhanced back-propagation neural network10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.094 ↗
100. Complex lithology prediction using mean impact value, particle swarm optimization, and probabilistic neural network techniques10.1007/s11600-020-00504-2 ↗