Show source-provided references
1. Large-scale triaxial testing and numerical modeling of rounded and angular rockfill materials
4. Marachi, N.D. (1969). Strength and Deformation. Characteristics of Rockfill Materials. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of California].
5. Venkatachalam, K. (1993). Prediction of Mechanical Behaviour of Rockfill Materials. [Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology].
7. Application of in situ direct shear device to shear strength measurement of rockfill materials
8. Linero, S., Palma, C., and Apablaza, R. (2007). Geotechnical characterisation of waste material in very high dumps with large scale triaxial testing. Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
10.36487/ACG_repo/708_2 ↗9. Honkanadavar, N., and Gupta, S. (2010, January 16–18). Prediction of shear strength parameters for prototype riverbed rockfill material using index properties. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference, Mumbai, India.
11. A hybrid approach for evaluating CPT-based seismic soil liquefaction potential using Bayesian belief networks
10.1007/s11771-020-4312-3 ↗12. Ahmad, M., Tang, X.-W., Qiu, J.-N., and Ahmad, F. (2019). Evaluating Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential Using Bayesian Belief Network and C4. 5 Decision Tree Approaches. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9204226 ↗13. Ahmad, M., Tang, X., Qiu, J., Ahmad, F., and Gu, W. (2019, January 14–16). LLDV-a Comprehensive framework for assessing the effects of liquefaction land damage potential. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 14th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), Dalian, China.
10.1109/ISKE47853.2019.9170336 ↗14. A step forward towards a comprehensive framework for assessing liquefaction land damage vulnerability: Exploration from historical data
10.1007/s11709-020-0670-z ↗15. Ahmad, M., Tang, X., and Ahmad, F. (2020). Evaluation of liquefaction-induced settlement using random forest and REP tree models: Taking Pohang earthquake as a case of illustration. Natural Hazards-Impacts, Adjustments & Resilience, IntechOpen.
10.5772/intechopen.94274 ↗16. Ahmad, M., Al-Shayea, N.A., Tang, X.-W., Jamal, A., Al-Ahmadi, H.M., and Ahmad, F. (2020). Predicting the pillar stability of underground mines with random trees and C4. 5 decision trees. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10186486 ↗17. Pirhadi, N., Tang, X., Yang, Q., and Kang, F. (2019). A new equation to evaluate liquefaction triggering using the response surface method and parametric sensitivity analysis. Sustainability, 11.
10.3390/su11010112 ↗18. Pirhadi, N., Tang, X., and Yang, Q. (2019). Energy evaluation of triggering soil liquefaction based on the response surface method. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9040694 ↗19. Towards an ensemble machine learning model of random subspace based functional tree classifier for snow avalanche susceptibility mapping
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014816 ↗20. Mosavi, A., Golshan, M., Janizadeh, S., Choubin, B., Melesse, A.M., and Dineva, A.A. (2020). Ensemble models of GLM, FDA, MARS, and RF for flood and erosion susceptibility mapping: A priority assessment of sub-basins. Geocarto Int., 1–20.
10.1080/10106049.2020.1829101 ↗22. Mosavi, A., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., Choubin, B., Taromideh, F., Rahi, G., and Dineva, A.A. (2020). Susceptibility mapping of soil water erosion using machine learning models. Water, 12.
10.3390/w12071995 ↗23. Mosavi, A., Hosseini, F.S., Choubin, B., Abdolshahnejad, M., Gharechaee, H., Lahijanzadeh, A., and Dineva, A.A. (2020). Susceptibility Prediction of Groundwater Hardness Using Ensemble Machine Learning Models. Water, 12.
10.3390/w12102770 ↗27. Lovrić, M., Pavlović, K., Žuvela, P., Spataru, A., Lučić, B., Kern, R., and Wong, M.W. (2021). Machine learning in prediction of intrinsic aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds: Generalization, complexity, or predictive ability?. J. Chemom., e3349.
10.26434/chemrxiv.12746948 ↗28. Parasitic resistance as a predictor of faulty anodes in electro galvanizing: A comparison of machine learning, physical and hybrid models
29. Gupta, A.K. (2000). Constitative Modelling of Rockfill Materials. [Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology].
30. Prediction of shear strength parameter of prototype rockfill material
34. Zhou, J., Li, E., Wei, H., Li, C., Qiao, Q., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). Random forests and cubist algorithms for predicting shear strengths of rockfill materials. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9081621 ↗35. Stock price prediction using k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm
36. Study of data mining algorithms for prediction and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
37. Thongkam, J., Xu, G., and Zhang, Y. (2008, January 1–8). AdaBoost algorithm with random forests for predicting breast cancer survivability. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Hong Kong, China.
10.1109/IJCNN.2008.4634231 ↗39. Support vector machines-based modelling of seismic liquefaction potential
10.1002/nag.509 ↗40. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., and Vapnik, V.N. (1992, January 27–29). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
10.1145/130385.130401 ↗41. Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines
10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065 ↗42. Identification of large-scale goaf instability in underground mine using particle swarm optimization and support vector machine
10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.08.014 ↗44. Seo, D.K., Kim, Y.H., Eo, Y.D., Park, W.Y., and Park, H.C. (2017). Generation of radiometric, phenological normalized image based on random forest regression for change detection. Remote. Sens., 9.
10.3390/rs9111163 ↗46. Chomboon, K., Chujai, P., Teerarassamee, P., Kerdprasop, K., and Kerdprasop, N. (2015, January 28–30). An empirical study of distance metrics for k-nearest neighbor algorithm. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering, Kitakyushu, Japan.
10.12792/iciae2015.051 ↗47. Prasath, V., Alfeilat, H.A.A., Hassanat, A., Lasassmeh, O., Tarawneh, A.S., Alhasanat, M.B., and Salman, H.S.E. (2017). Distance and similarity measures effect on the performance of K-nearest neighbor classifier—A review. arXiv.
48. Farooq, F., Nasir Amin, M., Khan, K., Rehan Sadiq, M., Faisal Javed, M., Aslam, F., and Alyousef, R. (2020). A comparative study of random forest and genetic engineering programming for the prediction of compressive strength of High Strength Concrete (HSC). Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10207330 ↗50. Nhu, V.-H., Shahabi, H., Nohani, E., Shirzadi, A., Al-Ansari, N., Bahrami, S., Miraki, S., Geertsema, M., and Nguyen, H. (2020). Daily water level prediction of Zrebar Lake (Iran): A comparison between M5P, random forest, random tree and reduced error pruning trees algorithms. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf., 9.
10.3390/ijgi9080479 ↗53. Quantifying hourly suspended sediment load using data mining models: Case study of a glacierized Andean catchment in Chile
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.015 ↗54. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations
10.13031/2013.23153 ↗56. Asteris, P.G., Tsaris, A.K., Cavaleri, L., Repapis, C.C., Papalou, A., Di Trapani, F., and Karypidis, D.F. (2016). Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks. Comput. Intell. Neurosci.
10.1155/2016/5104907 ↗57. Applying various hybrid intelligent systems to evaluate and predict slope stability under static and dynamic conditions
10.1007/s00500-018-3253-3 ↗59. A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks
10.1007/BF01045717 ↗60. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction
10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗61. A new design of evolutionary hybrid optimization of SVR model in predicting the blast-induced ground vibration
10.1007/s00366-019-00895-x ↗63. Ahmad, M., Hu, J.-L., Ahmad, F., Tang, X.-W., Amjad, M., Iqbal, M.J., Asim, M., and Farooq, A. (2021). Supervised learning methods for modeling concrete compressive strength prediction at high temperature. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14081983 ↗