journal article·2022-07-19Open access

Density Prediction in Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Machine Learning-Based Techniques

Meet Gor, Aashutosh Dobriyal, Vishal Wankhede, Pankaj Sahlot, Krzysztof Grzelak, Janusz Kluczyński, Jakub Łuszczek

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is one of the artificial intelligence tools which uses past data to learn the relationship between input and output and helps to predict future trends. Powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBF-AM) is extensively used for a wide range of applications in the industry. The AM process establishment for new material is a crucial task with trial-and-error approaches. In this work, ML techniques have been applied for the prediction of the density of PBF-AM. Density is the most vital property in evaluating the overall quality of the AM building part. The ML techniques, namely, artificial neural network (ANN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and linear regression (LR), are used to develop a model for predicting the density of the stainless steel (SS) 316L build part. These four methods are validated using R-squared values and different error functions to compare the predicted result. The ANN and SVM model performed well with the R-square value of 0.95 and 0.923, respectively, for the density prediction. The ML models would be beneficial for the prediction of the process parameters. Further, the developed ML model would also be helpful for the future application of ML in additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar 382007, India

Institute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, 2 Gen. S. Kaliskiego St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland

Funding

Military University of Technology

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Multiple material additive manufacturing—Part 1: A review10.1080/17452759.2013.778175 ↗
2. Jyothish Kumar, L., Pandey, P.M., and Wimpenny, D.I. (2018). 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0305-0 ↗
3. Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models
4. Data-driven modeling of thermal history in additive manufacturing
5. High cycle fatigue life prediction of laser additive manufactured stainless steel: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105194 ↗
6. Razvi, S.S., Feng, S., Narayanan, A., Lee, Y.T.T., and Witherell, P. (2019, January 18–21). A review of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1115/DETC2019-98415 ↗
7. Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Review10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y ↗
8. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives
9. Additive manufacturing: A machine learning model of process-structure-property linkages for machining behavior of Ti-6Al-4V10.18063/msam.v1i1.6 ↗
10. Monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion using physics-informed meltpool signatures and machine learning10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117550 ↗
11. Toward in-situ flaw detection in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing through layerwise imagery and machine learning10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.008 ↗
12. A physics-informed machine learning model for porosity analysis in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1007/s00170-021-06640-3 ↗
13. An application of ANN for modeling and optimisation of process parameters of manufacturing process: A review
14. Multiple regression models and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) as prediction tools of changes in overall quality during the storage of spreadable processed Gouda cheese10.1007/s00217-019-03369-y ↗
15. Effects of Distance Measure Choice on K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier Performance: A Review10.1089/big.2018.0175 ↗
16. Predictive modelling of surface roughness in fused deposition modelling using data fusion10.1080/00207543.2018.1505058 ↗
17. Controlling the porosity of 316L stainless steel parts manufactured via the powder bed fusion process10.1108/RPJ-11-2017-0226 ↗
18. Density prediction model of selective laser sintering parts
19. Density and mechanical properties in selective laser melting of Invar 36 and stainless steel 316L10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.006 ↗
20. Selective laser melting of stainless steel 316L with low porosity and high build rates10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.035 ↗
21. Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS316L10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.098 ↗
22. Influence of basic process parameters on mechanical and internal properties of 316l steel in slm process for renishaw AM40010.17973/MMSJ.2019_03_2018127 ↗
23. Influence of process parameters on part quality and mechanical properties for DMLS and SLM with iron-based materials10.1007/s00170-011-3643-5 ↗
24. Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting10.1007/s00170-014-6297-2 ↗
25. Evaluation of machine learning based models to predict the bulk density in the flash sintering process10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102220 ↗
26. Machine-learning assisted laser powder bed fusion process optimization for AlSi10Mg: New microstructure description indices and fracture mechanisms10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010 ↗
27. Generalised Additive Models and Random Forest Approach as effective methods for predictive species density and functional species richness10.1007/s10651-020-00445-5 ↗
28. A hybrid deep learning model of process-build interactions in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.001 ↗
29. 316L Stainless Steel with Gradient Porosity Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting10.1007/s11665-009-9535-2 ↗
30. Processing and mechanical properties of porous 316L stainless steel for biomedical applications10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60117-4 ↗
31. Machine Learning for Advanced Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.023 ↗
32. A review on machine learning in 3D printing: Applications, potential, and challenges10.1007/s10462-020-09876-9 ↗
33. Cui, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, L., and Liou, F. (2020). Metal Additive Manufacturing Parts Inspection Using Convolutional Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020545 ↗
34. Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
35. Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
36. A multi-scale convolutional neural network for autonomous anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
37. Application of supervised machine learning for defect detection during metallic powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using high resolution imaging
38. Prediction of melt pool temperature in directed energy deposition using machine learning
39. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
40. Optimization of the production processes of powder-based additive manufacturing technologies by means of a machine learning model for the temporal prognosis of the build and cooling phase10.1007/s11740-020-00987-4 ↗
41. Simple method to construct process maps for additive manufacturing using a support vector machine
42. Using machine learning to aid in the parameter optimisation process for metal-based additive manufacturing10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0213 ↗
43. Optimization of Process Parameters for Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing by Combination of Machine Learning and Finite Element Method: A Conceptual Framework10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
44. Machine learning-driven optimization in powder manufacturing of Ni-Co based superalloy10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109290 ↗
45. A Framework for Optimizing Process Parameters in Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) Process Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.214 ↗
46. Optimization of selective laser melting process parameters for Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufacturing using deep learning10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.014 ↗
47. Data-driven stochastic optimization on manifolds for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109750 ↗
48. Afrasiabi, M., Lüthi, C., Bambach, M., and Wegener, K. (2021). Multi-Resolution SPH Simulation of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11072962 ↗
49. Deep learning-based tensile strength prediction in fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.011 ↗
50. Prediction of thermal conductivity of various nanofluids using artificial neural network10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.03.008 ↗
51. Tobergte, D.R., and Curtis, S. (2013). Machine Learning with R—Learn How to Use R to Apply Powerful Machine Learning Methods and Gain an Insight into Real-World Applications, Packt Publishing.
52. A hybrid machine learning approach for additive manufacturing design feature recommendation10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0041 ↗
53. Desai, P.S., and Higgs, C.F. (2019). Spreading Process Maps for Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing Derived from Physics Model-Based Machine Learning. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9111176 ↗
54. A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure10.1007/s00366-016-0442-5 ↗
55. Obtaining of copper nanoparticles in combined RF+DC discharge plasma10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.070 ↗
56. Comparison between KNN and ANN Classification in Brain Balancing Application via Spectrogram Image10.20967/jcscm.2012.04.004 ↗
57. A novel hybrid Harris hawks optimization and support vector machines for drug design and discovery10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106656 ↗
58. Thanh Noi, P., and Kappas, M. (2018). Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010018 ↗
59. Application and performance of machine learning techniques in manufacturing sector from the past two decades: A review10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.209 ↗
60. Joshi, M.S., Flood, A., Sparks, T., and Liou, F.W. (2019, January 12–14). Applications of supervised machine learning algorithms in additive manufacturing: A review. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication 2019: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2019, Austin, TX, USA.
61. A review on applications of ANN and SVM for building electrical energy consumption forecasting10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.069 ↗
62. Using a Support Vector Machine for building a Quality Prediction Model for Center-less Honing process10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.086 ↗
63. Rodríguez-Martín, M., Fueyo, J.G., Gonzalez-Aguilera, D., Madruga, F.J., García-Martín, R., Muñóz, A.L., and Pisonero, J. (2020). Predictive Models for the Characterization of Internal Defects in Additive Materials from Active Thermography Sequences Supported by Machine Learning Methods. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20143982 ↗
64. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
65. A dimensionless number for predicting universal processing parameter boundaries in metal powder bed additive manufacturing10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.12.002 ↗