journal article·2022-02-18Open access

Ergonomic Design of a Workplace Using Virtual Reality and a Motion Capture Suit

Ilona Kačerová, Jan Kubr, Petr Hořejší, Jana Kleinová

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 4

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders are some of the most frequent manual work disorders. Employers worldwide pay high costs for their treatment and prevention. We present an innovative method for designing an ergonomic workplace. This method uses new technologies and supports not only ergonomics, but also a general improvement in the designing of the manufacturing process. Although many researchers claim that there is a huge potential for using new disruptive technologies like virtual reality and motion capture in ergonomics, there is still a lack of a comprehensive methodological basis for implementing these technologies. Our approach was designed using the expert group method. We can validate the manufacturing process and the ergonomics using a motion capture (MoCap) suit and a head-mounted display (HMD). There are no legislative restrictions for the tools which are used for ergonomic analyses, so we can use our outputs for workplace scoring. Firstly, we measure the anthropometrics of the proband. Then the proband is immersed in virtual reality and they go through a manufacturing process during which ergonomics data are collected. The design of a particular workplace or multiple workplaces can be validated based on the reactions, measurements, and input in real-time. After processing the data, the workplace can be adjusted accordingly. The proposed method has a time and economic benefit for workplace design, optimisation of workplace ergonomics, and shortens the time required for designing the production line layout. It also includes optional steps for validation using conventional methods. These steps were used for method validation on a representative workplace using on-site experiments. We validated it on a group of 20 healthy operators working in automotive production (age 22 to 35). A comparison study describes the classic methods of workplace ergonomics evaluation, compares the classic evaluation using biomechanical analysis, modern evaluation using a MoCap suit, and connection with virtual reality. We have proved the validity of the method using the comparison study. The results also showed other potential issues which can be further examined: like the role of peripheral vision or haptic feedback.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of West Bohemia, 301 00 Plzeň, Czech Republic

Funding

University of West Bohemia · European Union

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Kačerová, I., and Bureš, M. (2018, January 15–18). Ergonomic Workplace Optimisation. Proceedings of the Conference of Industrial Engineering, Moscow, Russia.
2. Influence of the upper limb position on the forearm EMG activity—Preliminary results
3. Ergonomics—Costs and Benefits Revisited10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00068-1 ↗
4. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ergonomics Programs10.1080/15428119791012991 ↗
5. Kába, M., and Kačerová, I. (2019, January 7–8). Effect of Elbow and Wrist Position on EMG Results—Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Scientific Conference Manufacturing Systems Today and Tomorrow, Liberec, Czech Republic.
6. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002 ↗
7. Isusi, I. (2020). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders—Facts and figures (Syntesis of 10 national reports). European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Publications Office of the European Union.
8. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5 ↗
9. (2022, January 23). European Occupational Diseases Statistics (EODS)—Experimental Statistics—Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/experimental-statistics/european-occupational-diseases-statistics.
10. Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: Evidence, implications and research needs10.1080/00140139.2016.1208848 ↗
11. Integrating mocap system and immersive reality for efficient human-centred workstation design
12. Connecting a Virtual Production and a Plc10.17973/MMSJ.2021_6_2021007 ↗
13. Soliman, K.S. (2015, January 7–8). Case Study: Motion Capture for Ergonomics. Proceedings of the Innovation Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
14. Kee, D. (2022). Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19010595 ↗
15. Investigation of work-related disorders in truck drivers using RULA method10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00052-8 ↗
16. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads—Evaluation of NIOSH criterion10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110024 ↗
17. The use of the Nordic questionnaire in an industrial setting: A case study10.1016/0003-6870(94)90017-5 ↗
18. Seo, J., Starbuck, R., Han, S., Lee, S., and Armstrong, T.J. (2015). Motion Data-Driven Biomechanical Analysis during Construction Tasks on Sites. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 29.10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000400 ↗
19. 3D Visualization-Based Ergonomic Risk Assessment and Work Modification Framework and Its Validation for a Lifting Task10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001412 ↗
20. Development of Computerized Human Static Strength Simulation Model for Job Design10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199723)7:4<305::AID-HFM3>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
21. Sensing Construction Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs)
22. Real-time construction worker posture analysis for ergonomics training10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.011 ↗
23. Using Kinect Technology Equipment for Ergonomics10.17973/MMSJ.2013_03_201302 ↗
24. Validation of an ergonomic assessment method using Kinect data in real workplace conditions10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.015 ↗
25. Gesture Detection towards Real-Time Ergonomic Analysis for Intelligent Automation Assistance10.1007/978-3-319-41697-7_20 ↗
26. Computer vision techniques for construction safety and health monitoring10.1016/j.aei.2015.02.001 ↗
27. Seo, J., Lee, S., Armstrong, T.J., and Han, S. (2013, January 11–15). Dynamic Biomechanical Simulation for Identifying Risk Factors for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders During Construction Tasks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.22260/ISARC2013/0118 ↗
28. A vision-based motion capture and recognition framework for behavior-based safety management10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.001 ↗
29. Using motion capture to study human standing accessibility: Comparison between physical experiment, static model and virtual ergonomic evaluations10.1007/s12008-016-0304-9 ↗
30. Colombo, G., Regazzoni, D., and Rizzi, C. (2013). Markerless Motion Capture Integrated with Human Modeling for Virtual Ergonomics. International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-39182-8_37 ↗
31. Which is the most ergonomic mop? A comparison of three domestic mopping systems10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103669 ↗
32. Menolotto, M., Komaris, D.-S., Tedesco, S., O’Flynn, B., and Walsh, M. (2020). Motion Capture Technology in Industrial Applications: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20195687 ↗
33. Polcar, J., Horejsi, P., Kopecek, P., and Latif, M. (2017, January 8–11). Using Unity3D as an Elevator Simulation Tool. Proceedings of the Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium, Zadar, Croatia.10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.073 ↗
34. Whitman, L., Jorgensen, M., Hathiyari, K., and Malzahn, D. (2004, January 5–8). Virtual Reality: Its Usefulness for Ergonomic Analysis. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
35. Designing Virtual Workplace Using Unity 3d Game Engine10.22306/atec.v7i1.101 ↗
36. Coll (2021, November 14). Government Regulation Laying Down Conditions for Occupational Health Protection. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2007-361.
37. (2021, November 14). SN EN 1005-1 + A1 (833503)—Technical Norm ČSN. Available online: http://www.technicke-normy-csn.cz/833503-csn-en-1005-1-a1_4_83059.html.
38. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S ↗
39. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X ↗
40. Poitras, I., Dupuis, F., Bielmann, M., Campeau-Lecours, A., Mercier, C., Bouyer, L.J., and Roy, J.-S. (2019). Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19071555 ↗
41. Kába, M. (2020). Effect of Working Position on Local Muscle Loading of the Forearm in an Aging Population in Industrial Manufacturing, University of West Bohemia. Disertation Work.
42. Comparison of Biomechanical Systems for Evaluation of Local Muscular Load
43. Effects of shoulder rotation combined with elbow flexion on discomfort and EMG activity of ECRB muscle10.1016/j.ergon.2013.10.010 ↗
44. Assessing ergonomic risk factors using combined data envelopment analysis and conventional methods for an auto parts manufacturer10.3233/WOR-203257 ↗
45. Application of Virtual Reality Techniques in Design of Ergonomic Manufacturing Workplaces10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.035 ↗
46. Innovative system for real-time ergonomic feedback in industrial manufacturing10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.008 ↗
47. A multimeasure-based methodology for the ergonomic effective design of manufacturing system workstations10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.004 ↗
48. A methodological framework to integrate motion capture system and virtual reality for assembly system 4.0 workplace design10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105561 ↗