A Social Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Additive Manufacturing Products
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive Manufacturing (AM) is viewed as a disruptive technology with the potential to replace many manufacturing processes. With its rapid proliferation in recent years, it is crucial to understand how to measure this technology’s social impacts. There are many studies available in the existing literature regarding the economic and environmental impacts of AM technology. However, research regarding the social impacts of this technology is still scarce. To this end, this research has developed a framework based on Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) methodology to measure AM products’ social impacts throughout their life cycle stages. The proposed framework includes an underlying mathematical model that was developed to allow for the aggregation of indicator scores. Additionally, cut-off scores were determined to differentiate between positive and negative social impacts. This framework can be applied to case studies, which provides a final score that quantifies the social impacts of an AM product throughout all its life cycle stages. It also provides scores for each stakeholder category and life cycle stage, which facilitates the identification of hotspots that require attention from organizations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang, R., Kleer, R., and Piller, F.T. (2017). Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.006 ↗
2. Ford, S., and Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J. Clean. Prod.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 ↗
3. Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
4. Matos, F., and Jacinto, C. (2019). Additive manufacturing technology: Mapping social impacts. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag.10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0263 ↗
5. UNEP/SETAC (2019). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, United Nations Environment Programme.
6. Ma, J., Harstvedt, J.D., Dunaway, D., Bian, L., and Jaradat, R. (2018). An exploratory investigation of Additively Manufactured Product life cycle sustainability assessment. J. Clean. Prod.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.249 ↗
7. An analytic framework for social life cycle impact assessment—Part 1: Methodology10.1007/s11367-016-1114-9 ↗
8. Sureau, S., Mazijn, B., Garrido, S.R., and Achten, W.M.J. (2017). Social life-cycle assessment frameworks: A review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 1–17.10.1007/s11367-017-1336-5 ↗
9. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008 ↗
11. Additive manufacturing as a disruptive technology: Implications of three-dimensional printing10.3727/194982413X13608676060655 ↗
12. Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact
13. environmental performance and key characteristics in additive manufacturing: A literature review10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.141 ↗
14. Environmental impact of additive manufacturing processes: Does am contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing?10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.153 ↗
15. Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J.G., and Thiede, S. (2015). Direct digital manufacturing: Definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J. Clean. Prod.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009 ↗
16. Ribeiro, A. (2017). Additive Manufacturing Social Impacts: A Conceptual Model. [Master’s Thesis, Nova University of Lisbon].
17. Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: State of the art and the way forward10.1007/s11367-016-1169-7 ↗
18. Singh, R.K., and Gupta, U. (2017). Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: A case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.10.1007/s11367-017-1427-3 ↗
19. A social LCA framework to assess the corporate social profile of companies: Insights from a case study10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.003 ↗
20. Social life cycle assessment of three companies of the furniture sector10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.191 ↗
21. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Just in time!10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8 ↗
22. UNEP/SETAC (2020, June 16). The Methodological Sheets for Sub-Categories in Social Life Cycle assessment in S Ocial L Ife C Ycle a Ssessment (S-LCA). Available online: https://www.safenano.org/knowledgebase/guidance/life-cycle-assessment/.
23. Traverso, M., Bell, L., Saling, P., and Fontes, J. (2016). Towards social life cycle assessment: A quantitative product social impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 597–606.10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8 ↗
24. Petti, L., Serreli, M., and Di Cesare, S. (2016). Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 422–431.10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4 ↗
25. Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies10.1007/s11367-016-1162-1 ↗
26. Kühnen, M., and Hahn, R. (2017). Indicators in social life cycle assessment: A review of frameworks, theories, and empirical experience. J. Ind. Ecol.10.1111/jiec.12663 ↗
27. Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius10.1007/s11367-012-0447-2 ↗
28. Ciroth, A., and Franze, J. (2011). LCA of an Ecolabeled Notebook. Consideration of Social and Environmental Impacts along the Entire Life Cycle, GreenDeltaTC GmbH.
29. Methodologies for social life cycle assessment10.1065/lca2007.11.367 ↗
30. Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8 ↗
31. Modeling Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for the Italian wine sector10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.137 ↗
32. Eurostat (2013). European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW)—Summary Methodology, Publications Office of the European Union.
33. Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., and Thrän, D. (2018). Social life cycle assessment indices and indicators to monitor the social implications of wood-based products. J. Clean. Prod.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.146 ↗
34. Leythienne, D., and Ronkowski, P. (2018). A Decomposition of the Unadjusted Gender Pay Gap Using Structure of Earnings Survey Data, Publications Office of the European Union.
35. Characterisation of social impacts in LCA: Part 1: Development of indicators for labour rights10.1007/s11367-009-0148-7 ↗
36. Building theories from case research10.2307/258557 ↗
37. Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., and Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.10.1108/01443570210414329 ↗
38. Environmental analysis of selective laser melting in the manufacturing of aeronautical turbine blades10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119068 ↗