Robotics in Search and Rescue (SAR) Operations: An Ethical and Design Perspective Framework for Response Phase
Source abstract
Abstract
Every year, especially in urban areas, the population density rises quickly. The effects of catastrophes (i.e., war, earthquake, fire, tsunami) on people are therefore significant and grave. Assisting the impacted people will soon involve human-robot Search and Rescue (SAR) operations. Therefore, it is crucial to connect contemporary technology (i.e., robots and cognitive approaches) to SAR to save human lives. However, these operations also call for careful consideration of several factors, including safety, severity, and resources. Hence, ethical issues with technologies in SAR must be taken into consideration at the development stage. In this study, the most relevant ethical and design issues that arise when using robotic and cognitive technology in SAR are discussed with a focus on the response phase. Among the vast variety of SAR robots that are available nowadays, snake robots have shown huge potential; as they could be fitted with sensors and used for transporting tools to hazardous or confined areas that other robots and humans are unable to access. With this perspective, particular emphasis has been put on snake robotics in this study by considering ethical and design issues. This endeavour will contribute to providing a broader knowledge of ethical and technological factors that must be taken into account throughout the design and development of snake robots.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robot Manipulation and Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Agder (UiA), Jon Lilletuns vei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway
Department of Robotics, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto 525-8577, Japan
Funding
Top Research Centre Mechatronics (TRCM)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Defining disaster: The emergency department perspective10.1080/08998280.2001.11927751 ↗
2. (2022, November 02). INSARAG Guidelines, Volume II Preparedness and Response, Manual A Capacity Building (2020). Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/insarag-guidelines-volume-ii-preparedness-and-response-manual-capacity-building-2020.
3. Bravo, R., and Leiras, A. (2015, January 13–16). Literature review of the application of UAVs in humanitarian relief. Proceedings of the XXXV Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Producao, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
4. De Cubber, G., Serrano, D., Berns, K., Chintamani, K., Sabino, R., Ourevitch, S., Doroftei, D., Armbrust, C., Flamma, T., and Baudoin, Y. (2013, January 1–3). Search and rescue robots developed by the European icarus project. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Robotics for Risky Environments, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.10.1109/SSRR.2013.6719323 ↗
5. Whitman, J., Zevallos, N., Travers, M., and Choset, H. (2018, January 6–8). Snake robot urban search after the 2017 Mexico City earthquake. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue robotics (SSRR), Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1109/SSRR.2018.8468633 ↗
6. Couceiro, M.S. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global.
7. Human-centric wireless sensor networks to improve information availability during urban Search and Rescue activities10.1016/j.inffus.2013.05.009 ↗
8. Schneider, F.E., Wildermuth, D., and Wolf, H.L. (2015, January 6–8). ELROB and EURATHLON: Improving search & rescue robotics through real-world robot competitions. Proceedings of the 2015 10th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo), Poznan, Poland.10.1109/RoMoCo.2015.7219722 ↗
9. Siciliano, B., and Khatib, O. (2008). Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5 ↗
10. Emergency response by robots to Fukushima-Daiichi accident: Summary and lessons learned10.1108/01439911211249715 ↗
11. Cubber, G.D., Doroftei, D., Rudin, K., Berns, K., Serrano, D., Sanchez, J., Govindaraj, S., Bedkowski, J., and Roda, R. (2017). Search and Rescue Robotics-from Theory to Practice, IntechOpen.
12. Co-evolutionary scenarios for creative prototyping of future robot systems for civil protection10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.016 ↗
13. Harbers, M., Greeff, J.D., Kruijff-Korbayová, I., Neerincx, M.A., and Hindriks, K.V. (2017). A World with Robots, Springer.
14. GIS in emergency management
15. (2022, November 10). 2021 Disasters in Numbers. Available online: https://www.cred.be/publications.
16. (2022, November 10). Search and Rescue Robots Market- Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2022–2027). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/search-and-rescue-robots-market.
17. The ethical frontiers of robotics10.1126/science.1164582 ↗
18. (2022, November 11). Ethics in Epidemics, Emergencies and Disasters: Research, Surveillance and Patient Care. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549349.
19. Civaner, M.M., Vatansever, K., and Pala, K. (2017). Ethical problems in an era where disasters have become a part of daily life: A qualitative study of healthcare workers in Turkey. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0174162 ↗
20. Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: A scoping review10.1007/s10676-021-09603-0 ↗
21. Ethical issues in service robotics and artificial intelligence10.1080/02642069.2020.1727892 ↗
22. Nagenborg, M., Capurro, R., Weber, J., and Pingel, C. (2008). Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, Routledge.
23. Robot laws10.1016/S0262-4079(18)31394-0 ↗
24. Nof, S. (1999). Handbook of Robotics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [56th ed.].
25. (2023, January 10). Asimov’s Laws: Do They Work in Modern Robotics?. Available online: https://kassailaw.com/ai/asimovs-laws-do-they-work-in-modern-robotics/.
26. (2023, January 10). Asimov’s Laws of Robotics: Implications for Information Technology. Available online: http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/Asimov.html.
27. Nevejans, N. (2016). European Civil Law Rules in Robotics, European Union.
28. Laws on robots, laws by robots, laws in robots: Regulating robot behaviour by design10.5235/17579961.6.2.193 ↗
29. (2023, January 10). Making My Point for Me: Beyond Asimov. Available online: https://crasar.org/tag/ethics/.
30. The ethical landscape of robotics10.1109/MRA.2011.940275 ↗
31. Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy10.1075/pc.13.3.07has ↗
32. Heuristic methods for computer ethics10.1111/1467-9973.00231 ↗
33. Marino, D., and Tamburrini, G. (2020). Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, Routledge.
34. The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics10.1109/MIS.2006.80 ↗
35. Pal, S.K., and Shiu, S.C. (2004). Foundations of Soft Case-Based Reasoning, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471644676 ↗
36. Honarvar, A.R., and Ghasem-Aghaee, N. (2009, January 15–18). An artificial neural network approach for creating an ethical artificial agent. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation-(CIRA), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1109/CIRA.2009.5423190 ↗
37. Computational models of ethical reasoning: Challenges, initial steps, and future directions10.1109/MIS.2006.67 ↗
38. Designing Search and Rescue robots towards realistic user requirements10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.658.612 ↗
39. Doroftei, D., De Cubber, G., Wagemans, R., Matos, A., Silva, E., Lobo, V., Cardoso, G., Chintamani, K., Govindaraj, S., and Gancet, J. (2017). Search and Rescue Robotics. From Theory to Practice, IntechOpen.
40. Artificial intelligence, robotics, ethics, and the military: A Canadian perspective
41. “We Live on Hope…”: Ethical Considerations of Humanitarian Use of Drones in Post-Disaster Nepal10.1109/MTS.2020.3012332 ↗
42. A method for integrating ethics into the design of robots10.1108/IR-12-2012-451 ↗
43. (2023, January 10). National Search and Rescue Manual, Available online: https://www.amsa.gov.au/national-search-and-rescue-council/manuals-and-publications/national-search-and-rescue-manual.
44. Regulatory challenges of robotics: Some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921 ↗
45. Brodeur, T., Regis, P., Feil-Seifer, D., and Sengupta, S. (2018, January 8–10). Search and Rescue operations with mesh networked robots. Proceedings of the 2018 9th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA.10.1109/UEMCON.2018.8796743 ↗
46. Matsuno, F., and Tadokoro, S. (2004, January 22–26). Rescue robots and systems in Japan. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenyang, China.
47. Schofield, R.T. (2018). Potential Fields Navigation of Lifeguard Assistant Robot for Mass Marine Casualty Response. [Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University].
48. Chandrasekaran, B., and Conrad, J.M. (2015, January 9–12). Human-robot collaboration: A survey. Proceedings of the SoutheastCon 2015, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.10.1109/SECON.2015.7132964 ↗
49. Lahr, D.F. (2014). Design and Control of a Humanoid Robot, SAFFiR. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech].
50. The role of robots in firefighting10.1108/IR-10-2020-0222 ↗
51. Hutter, M., Gehring, C., Jud, D., Lauber, A., Bellicoso, C.D., Tsounis, V., Hwangbo, J., Bodie, K., Fankhauser, P., and Bloesch, M. (2016, January 3–7). Anymal-a highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IROS.2016.7758092 ↗
52. Remote mobile manipulation with the centauro robot: Full-body telepresence and autonomous operator assistance10.1002/rob.21895 ↗
53. How UGVs physically fail in the field10.1109/TRO.2004.838027 ↗
54. Kakogawa, A., and Ma, S. (2019, January 3–8). An in-pipe inspection module with an omnidirectional bent-pipe self-adaptation mechanism using a joint torque control. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968221 ↗
55. Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks10.1080/10400435.2017.1396565 ↗
56. Charalambous, G., and Fletcher, S.R. (2022). The 21st Century Industrial Robot: When Tools Become Collaborators, Springer.
57. The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101726 ↗
58. Lindholm, V. (2022). Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Urban Military Operations: A Case Study Exploring What the Potential End Users Want. [Master’s Thesis, Linköping University].
59. Four kinds of ethical robots
60. Lindsay, B.R., Kapp, L., Shields, D.A., Stubbs, M., Lister, S.A., McCarty, M., Kirk, R.S., Bearden, D.M., Bracmort, K., and Cowan, T. (2012). Federal emergency management: A brief introduction, Library of Congress.
61. Hannaford, B., and Okamura, A.M. (2016). Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer.
62. Snake robots to the rescue!10.1109/MRA.2002.1035210 ↗
63. Experimental investigation of obstacle-aided locomotion with a snake robot10.1109/TRO.2011.2134150 ↗
64. Sanfilippo, F., Azpiazu, J., Marafioti, G., Transeth, A.A., Stavdahl, Ø., and Liljebäck, P. (2016, January 13–15). A review on perception-driven obstacle-aided locomotion for snake robots. Proceedings of the 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Phuket, Thailand.10.1109/ICARCV.2016.7838565 ↗
65. Sanfilippo, F., Azpiazu, J., Marafioti, G., Transeth, A.A., Stavdahl, Ø., and Liljebäck, P. (2017). Perception-driven obstacle-aided locomotion for snake robots: The state of the art, challenges and possibilities. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7040336 ↗
66. Ponte, H., Queenan, M., Gong, C., Mertz, C., Travers, M., Enner, F., Hebert, M., and Choset, H. (June, January 31). Visual sensing for developing autonomous behavior in snake robots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China.
67. Wright, C., Buchan, A., Brown, B., Geist, J., Schwerin, M., Rollinson, D., Tesch, M., and Choset, H. (2012, January 14–18). Design and architecture of the unified modular snake robot. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Paul, MN, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225255 ↗
68. Melo, K., Paez, L., and Parra, C. (2012, January 14–18). Indoor and outdoor parametrized gait execution with modular snake robots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Paul, MN, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2012.6224768 ↗
69. Combining Grasping with Adaptive Path Following and Locomotion for Modular Snake Robots10.18178/ijmerr.11.2.59-65 ↗
70. A review on modelling, implementation, and control of snake robots10.1016/j.robot.2011.08.010 ↗
71. Liu, X., Gasoto, R., Jiang, Z., Onal, C., and Fu, J. (2020, January 25–29). Learning to locomote with artificial neural-network and cpg-based control in a soft snake robot. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340763 ↗
72. Kanda, T., Glas, D.F., Shiomi, M., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2008, January 21–24). Who will be the customer? A social robot that anticipates people’s behavior from their trajectories. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1145/1409635.1409686 ↗
73. Satake, S., Kanda, T., Glas, D.F., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2009, January 11–13). How to approach humans? Strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, La Jolla, CA, USA.10.1145/1514095.1514117 ↗
74. Proactive robots with the perception of nonverbal human behavior: A review10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921986 ↗
75. Destephe, M., Brandao, M., Kishi, T., Zecca, M., Hashimoto, K., and Takanishi, A. (2014, January 25–29). Emotional gait: Effects on humans’ perception of humanoid robots. Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Edinburgh Gate, UK.10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926263 ↗
76. Snakes represent emotionally salient stimuli that may evoke both fear and disgust10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01085 ↗
77. Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the world trade center10.1109/TSMCB.2003.811794 ↗
78. Trial by fire [rescue robots]10.1109/MRA.2004.1337826 ↗
79. Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826267 ↗
80. A networking framework for teleoperation in safety, security, and rescue robotics10.1109/MWC.2009.4804363 ↗
81. Mobile robots in mine rescue and recovery10.1109/MRA.2009.932521 ↗
82. Liljebäck, P., Pettersen, K.Y., Stavdahl, Ø., and Gravdahl, J.T. (2013). Snake Robots: Modelling, Mechatronics, and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-2996-7 ↗
83. Design and realize a snake-like robot in complex environment
84. Development of practical 3-dimensional active cord mechanism ACM-R410.20965/jrm.2006.p0305 ↗
85. Huang, C.W., Huang, C.H., Hung, Y.H., and Chang, C.Y. (2018). Sensing pipes of a nuclear power mechanism using low-cost snake robot. Adv. Mech. Eng., 10.10.1177/1687814018781286 ↗
86. Snake robots: A review of research, products and applications10.1108/IR-02-2014-0309 ↗
87. Duivon, A., Kirsch, P., Mauboussin, B., Mougard, G., Woszczyk, J., and Sanfilippo, F. (2022). The Redesigned Serpens, a Low-Cost, Highly Compliant Snake Robot. Robotics, 11.10.3390/robotics11020042 ↗
88. Sanfilippo, F., Helgerud, E., Stadheim, P.A., and Aronsen, S.L. (2019, January 19–22). Serpens, a low-cost snake robot with series elastic torque-controlled actuators and a screw-less assembly mechanism. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICCAR.2019.8813482 ↗
89. Sanfilippo, F., Hua, T.M., and Bos, S. (2020, January 7–10). A comparison between a two feedback control loop and a reinforcement learning algorithm for compliant low-cost series elastic actuators. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2020), Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2020.110 ↗
90. Dynamic analysis of three snake robot gaits10.1109/TRO.2017.2704581 ↗
91. Experimental investigation of locomotion efficiency and path-following for underwater snake robots with and without a caudal fin10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.10.001 ↗
92. Matsuno, F., and Sato, H. (2005, January 18–22). Trajectory tracking control of snake robots based on dynamic model. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Ieee, Barcelona, Spain.
93. Ma, S. (1999, January 10–15). Analysis of snake movement forms for realization of snake-like robots. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 99CH36288C), Detroit, MI, USA.
94. An ethical evaluation of human–robot relationships10.1007/s12369-016-0368-5 ↗
95. (2022, November 10). CMU Biorobotics Lab Deployment Report: EVN Zwentendorf Nuclear Power Plant, Zwentendorf, Austria, May 2013. Available online: http://biorobotics.ri.cmu.edu/applications/images/SnakeRobotZwentendorfReport.pdf.
96. Ansari, A., Whitman, J., Saund, B., and Choset, H. (2017, January 5–9). Modular platforms for advanced inspection, locomotion, and manipulation. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Waste Management Conference (WM2017), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
97. Bae, J., Kim, M., Song, B., Jin, M., and Yun, D. (2020). Snake robot with driving assistant mechanism. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217478 ↗
98. Autonomous navigation for reconfigurable snake-like robots in challenging, unknown environments10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.010 ↗
99. Two types of snake-like robots for complex environment exploration: Design, development, and experiment10.1177/1687814017721854 ↗
100. Wright, C., Johnson, A., Peck, A., McCord, Z., Naaktgeboren, A., Gianfortoni, P., Gonzalez-Rivero, M., Hatton, R., and Choset, H. (November, January 29). Design of a modular snake robot. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.