Cervical Cancer Diagnostics Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Class Balancing Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives: Cervical cancer is present in most cases of squamous cell carcinoma. In most cases, it is the result of an infection with human papillomavirus or adenocarcinoma. This type of cancer is the third most common cancer of the female reproductive organs. The risk groups for cervical cancer are mostly younger women who frequently change partners, have early sexual intercourse, are infected with human papillomavirus (HPV), and who are nicotine addicts. In most cases, the cancer is asymptomatic until it has progressed to the later stages. Cervical cancer screening rates are low, especially in developing countries and in some minority groups. Due to these facts, the introduction of a tentative cervical cancer screening based on a questionnaire can enable more diagnoses of cervical cancer in the initial stages of the disease. Methods: In this research, publicly available cervical cancer data collected on 859 female patients are used. Each sample consists of 36 input attributes and four different outputs Hinselmann, Schiller, cytology, and biopsy. Due to the significant unbalance of the data set, class balancing techniques were used, and these are the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, the ADAptive SYNthetic algorithm (ADASYN), SMOTEEN, random oversampling, and SMOTETOMEK. To obtain the mentioned target outputs, multiple artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods are proposed. In this research, multiple classification algorithms such as logistic regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and several naive Bayes methods were used. Results: From the achieved results, it can be seen that the highest performances were achieved if MLP and KNN are used in combination with Random oversampling, SMOTEEN, and SMOTETOMEK. Such an approach has resulted in mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC¯) and mean Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC¯) scores of higher than 0.95, regardless of which diagnostic method was used for output vector construction. Conclusions: According to the presented results, it can be concluded that there is a possibility for the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques for the development of a tentative cervical cancer screening method, which is based on a questionnaire and an AI-based algorithm. Furthermore, it can be concluded that by using class balancing techniques, a certain performance boost can be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · AI in cancer detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Cervical cancer10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X ↗
2. A review of cervical cancer: Incidence and disparities
3. Cervical cancer worldwide10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.06.003 ↗
4. Cervical cancer10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13778-6 ↗
5. Cervical cancer: Prevention and treatment
6. Cervical adenocarcinoma: Moving towards better prevention10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.115 ↗
7. Adenocarcinoma: A unique cervical cancer10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.040 ↗
8. Human papillomaviruses and cervical cancer10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60102-5 ↗
9. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer10.1128/CMR.16.1.1-17.2003 ↗
10. Expressions of cervical cancer-related signs and symptoms10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.003 ↗
11. Effect of pre-procedural state-trait anxiety on pain perception and discomfort in women undergoing colposcopy for cervical cytological abnormalities10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4053 ↗
12. The effect of topical lignocaine gel in pain relief for colposcopic assessment and biopsy: Is it useful?10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01780.x ↗
13. Effects of Orally Administered Preliminary Analgesic Therapy in Diagnostic Colposcopy Patients: A Prospective Questionnaire Study10.2174/1874220302108010001 ↗
14. Addressing anxiety and fear during the female pelvic examination10.1177/2150132721992195 ↗
15. Cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.06.05 ↗
16. Cervical cancer screening: Past, present, and future10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.09.005 ↗
17. Guimarães, Y.M., Godoy, L.R., Longatto-Filho, A., and Reis, R.D. (2022). Management of early-stage cervical cancer: A literature review. Cancers, 14.10.3390/cancers14030575 ↗
18. Primary HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Europe: Implementation status, challenges, and future plans10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.006 ↗
19. Trends over time in Pap and Pap-HPV cotesting for cervical cancer screening10.1089/jwh.2018.7380 ↗
20. Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–201410.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.010 ↗
21. Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013
22. Lifetime prevalence of cervical cancer screening in 55 low-and middle-income countries10.1001/jama.2020.16244 ↗
23. Fernandes, K., Cardoso, J.S., and Fernandes, J. (2017, January 20–23). Transfer learning with partial observability applied to cervical cancer screening. Proceedings of the Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Faro, Portugal.10.1007/978-3-319-58838-4_27 ↗
24. Cervical cancer identification with synthetic minority oversampling technique and PCA analysis using random forest classifier10.1007/s10916-019-1402-6 ↗
25. Classification and diagnosis of cervical cancer with stacked autoencoder and softmax classification10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.050 ↗
26. Deng, X., Luo, Y., and Wang, C. (2018, January 23–25). Analysis of risk factors for cervical cancer based on machine learning methods. Proceedings of the 2018 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), Nanjing, China.10.1109/CCIS.2018.8691126 ↗
27. Machine learning-based statistical analysis for early stage detection of cervical cancer10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104985 ↗
28. Cervical cancer diagnosis using random forest classifier with SMOTE and feature reduction techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874063 ↗
29. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection: A triumph and a tragedy10.1001/jama.1989.03420050087046 ↗
30. Cytological screening for cervical cancer prevention10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.08.001 ↗
31. Papillomavirus and HPV typing10.1016/S0738-081X(96)00164-2 ↗
32. The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer
33. Liquid based cytology in cervical cancer screening10.1136/bmj.39262.506528.47 ↗
34. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer10.1056/NEJMoa073204 ↗
35. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer10.1056/NEJMoa071430 ↗
36. The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology
37. Cafforio, P., Palmirotta, R., Lovero, D., Cicinelli, E., Cormio, G., Silvestris, E., Porta, C., and D’oronzo, S. (2021). Liquid biopsy in cervical cancer: Hopes and pitfalls. Cancers, 13.10.3390/cancers13163968 ↗
38. Factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1080/08941939.2020.1850944 ↗
39. Deep learning based cervical screening by the cross-modal integration of colposcopy, cytology, and HPV test10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104675 ↗
40. Cervical cancer prediction by merging features of different colposcopic images and using ensemble classifier10.4103/jmss.JMSS_16_20 ↗
41. Photodynamic therapy for early-stage cervical cancer treatment10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102620 ↗
42. A review on classification of imbalanced data for wireless sensor networks10.1177/1550147720916404 ↗
43. An embedded feature selection method for imbalanced data classification10.1109/JAS.2019.1911447 ↗
44. Computational prediction of cervical cancer diagnosis using ensemble-based classification algorithm10.1093/comjnl/bxaa198 ↗
45. Xin, L.K., and Rashid, N.b.A. (2021, January 30–31). Prediction of depression among women using random oversampling and random forest. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference of Women in Data Science at Taif University (WiDSTaif), Taif, Saudi Arabia.10.1109/WiDSTaif52235.2021.9430215 ↗
46. Kumar, V., Lalotra, G.S., Sasikala, P., Rajput, D.S., Kaluri, R., Lakshmanna, K., Shorfuzzaman, M., Alsufyani, A., and Uddin, M. (2022). Addressing binary classification over class imbalanced clinical datasets using computationally intelligent techniques. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10071293 ↗
47. SMOTETomek-based resampling for personality recognition10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940061 ↗
48. Anđelić, N., Baressi Šegota, S., Lorencin, I., and Glučina, M. (2022). Detection of Malicious Websites Using Symbolic Classifier. Future Internet, 14.10.3390/fi14120358 ↗
49. Logistic regression in medical research10.1213/ANE.0000000000005247 ↗
50. Using multi-layer perceptron with Laplacian edge detector for bladder cancer diagnosis10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101746 ↗
51. A comprehensive survey and taxonomy of the SVM-based intrusion detection systems10.1016/j.jnca.2021.102983 ↗
52. Classifying promotion images using optical character recognition and Naïve Bayes classifier10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.033 ↗
53. Lorencin, I., Anđelić, N., Mrzljak, V., and Car, Z. (2019). Genetic algorithm approach to design of multi-layer perceptron for combined cycle power plant electrical power output estimation. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12224352 ↗
54. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗