Using a Random Forest Model to Predict the Location of Potential Damage on Asphalt Pavement
Source abstract
Abstract
Potential damage, eventually demonstrated as moisture damage on inner and in-situ road structures, is the most complex problem to predict, which costs lots of money, time, and natural resources for maintenance and even leads to safety problems. Traditional linear regression analysis cannot fit well with this multi-factor task in such in-field circumstances. Random Forest (RF) is a progressive nonlinear algorithm, which can combine all relative factors to gain accurate prediction and good explanation. In this study, an RF model is constructed for the prediction of potential damage. In addition, relative variable importance is analyzed to obtain the correlations between factors and potential damage separately. The results show that, through the optimization, the model achieved a good average accuracy of 83.33%. Finally, the controlling method for moisture damage is provided by combining the traditional analysis method and the RF model. In a word, RF is a prospective method in predictions and data mining for highway engineering. Trained with effective data, it can be multifunctional and powerful to solve hard problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Transportation Research Board (2003, January 4–6). Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements: A National Seminar. Proceedings of the TRB Committee on Bituminous–Aggregate Combinations to Meet Surface Requirements, San Diego, FL, USA.
2. Hicks, R.G., and Program, N.C.H.R. (1991). Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete, Transportation Research Board.
3. Estimation of Pavement Routine Maintenance Costs
4. Increased Costs to US Pavement Infrastructure from Future Temperature Rise10.1038/nclimate3390 ↗
5. Pavement Maintenance Programming Considering Two Objectives: Maintenance Costs and User Costs10.1080/10298436.2012.727994 ↗
6. Use of Surface Free Energy Properties to Predict Moisture Damage Potential of Asphalt Concrete Mixture in Cyclic Loading Condition10.1007/BF02895836 ↗
7. Use of Surface Free Energy Properties of the Asphalt-Aggregate System to Predict Moisture Damage Potential (with Discussion)
8. Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device to Predict Moisture Damage in Hot-Mix Asphalt
9. An Overview of Moisture Damage in Asphalt Mixtures
10. Effects of Moisture Damage on Asphalt Mixtures
11. Effect of Moisture on Modulus Values of Base and Subgrade Materials10.3141/1716-03 ↗
12. Laboratory Evaluation of Resistance to Moisture Damage in Asphalt Mixtures10.1016/j.asej.2012.10.009 ↗
13. Road Evaluation with Ground Penetrating Radar10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00052-X ↗
14. Aavik, A., and Talvik, O. (2021). Use of Falling Weight Deflectometer (Fwd) Measurement Data for Pavement Structural Evaluation and Repair Design.
15. Chen, D.-H., Xie, J., and Scullion, T. (2011, January 9–11). Using GPR and FWD to Assist in Selecting the Optimal Pavement Rehabilitation Strategy. Proceedings of the GeoHunan International Conference 2011, Hunan, China.10.1061/47623(402)8 ↗
16. Khan, Z., Ahmed, M., and Tarefder, R. (2018, January 27–29). Evaluation of Pavement Performance under FWD Test through Instrumented Pavement Section. Proceedings of the NDE/NDT for Highways & Bridges: SMT 2018, New Brunswick, OH, USA.
17. A Novel Method for Asphalt Pavement Crack Classification Based on Image Processing and Machine Learning10.1007/s00366-018-0611-9 ↗
18. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A., and Pal, C. (2011). Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Elsevier.
19. Zhang, X.-D. (2020). Machine Learning. A Matrix Algebra Approach to Artificial Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-2770-8 ↗
20. Machine Learning Algorithms—A Review
21. El Naqa, I., Li, R., and Murphy, M.J. (2015). What Is Machine Learning?. Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3 ↗
22. Automatically Detect and Classify Asphalt Pavement Raveling Severity Using 3D Technology and Machine Learning10.1007/s42947-020-0138-5 ↗
23. Moisture Damage Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures by Considering Both Moisture Diffusion and Repeated-Load Conditions10.3141/1832-06 ↗
24. Evaluating Structural Damage of Flexible Pavements Using Cracking and Falling Weight Deflectometer Data
25. Estimation of Flexible Pavement Structural Capacity Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1007/s11709-020-0654-z ↗
26. Evaluation of Influence of Pavement Data on Measurement of Deflection on Asphalt Surfaced Pavements Utilizing Traffic Speed Deflection Device10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121842 ↗
27. Machine Learning Approach for Pavement Performance Prediction10.1080/10298436.2019.1609673 ↗
28. Improving Accuracy of Rutting Prediction for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide with Deep Neural Networks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.087 ↗
29. Gradient Boosted Models for Enhancing Fatigue Cracking Prediction in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide10.1061/JPEODX.0000121 ↗
30. Utilization of State Performance Indices to Correlate National Performance Measures for Asphalt Pavements in Tennessee10.1177/0361198119837500 ↗
31. Investigation of the Random Forest Framework for Classification of Hyperspectral Data10.1109/TGRS.2004.842481 ↗
32. Improved Random Forest for Classification10.1109/TIP.2018.2834830 ↗
33. Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling10.1021/ci034160g ↗
34. A Random Forest Guided Tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
35. A Comparison of Random Forest Variable Selection Methods for Classification Prediction Modeling10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.028 ↗
36. Investigating Impacts of Asphalt Mixture Properties on Pavement Performance Using LTPP Data through Random Forests10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.198 ↗
37. Predicting Compressive Strength of Sustainable Self-Consolidating Concrete Using Random Forest10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.744.141 ↗
38. Use of Random Forests Regression for Predicting IRI of Asphalt Pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.017 ↗
39. How Many Trees in a Random Forest?10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 ↗
40. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
41. Parmar, A., Katariya, R., and Patel, V. (2018, January 7–8). A Review on Random Forest: An Ensemble Classifier. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things, Coimbatore, India.10.1007/978-3-030-03146-6_86 ↗
42. Classification and Regression by RandomForest
43. Grant, T.P. (2001). Determination of Asphalt Mixture Healing Rate Using the Superpave Indirect Tensile Test, University of Florida.
44. Christensen, D.W., and Bonaquist, R.F. (2006). Volumetric Requirements for Superpave Mix Design, Transportation Research Board.