journal article·2020-03-02Open access

Investigating the Applications of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Rock Brittleness Index

Deliang Sun, Mahshid Lonbani, Behnam Askarian, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Reza Tarinejad, Binh Thai Pham, Van Van Huynh

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 5

Abstract

Despite the vast usage of machine learning techniques to solve engineering problems, a very limited number of studies on the rock brittleness index (BI) have used these techniques to analyze issues in this field. The present study developed five well-known machine learning techniques and compared their performance to predict the brittleness index of the rock samples. The comparison of the models’ performance was conducted through a ranking system. These techniques included Chi-square automatic interaction detector (CHAID), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and artificial neural network (ANN). This study used a dataset from a water transfer tunneling project in Malaysia. Results of simple rock index tests i.e., Schmidt hammer, p-wave velocity, point load, and density were considered as model inputs. The results of this study indicated that while the RF model had the best performance for training (ranking = 25), the ANN outperformed other models for testing (ranking = 22). However, the KNN model achieved the highest cumulative ranking, which was 37. The KNN model showed desirable stability for both training and testing. However, the results of validation stage indicated that RF model with coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.971 provides higher performance capacity for prediction of the rock BI compared to KNN model with R2 of 0.807 and ANN model with R2 of 0.860. The results of this study suggest a practical use of the machine learning models in solving problems related to rock mechanics specially rock brittleness index.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Key Laboratory of GIS Application Research, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China

Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor 81310, Malaysia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Modeling Evolutionary Algorithms Simulation and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, 29 Bahman Blvd, 51666 Tabriz, Iran

Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. The impact of mechanical stratigraphy on hydraulic fracture growth and design considerations for horizontal wells
2. What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks?–Part I: Strength and Young’s modulus10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.028 ↗
3. Brittleness of rock and stability assessment in hard rock tunneling10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00100-1 ↗
4. Bursting liability indices of coal10.1016/0148-9062(81)91194-3 ↗
5. Brittleness and the mechanical winning of coal10.1016/S0167-9031(86)90305-1 ↗
6. Burst energy release index10.1007/BF01043119 ↗
7. Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.011 ↗
8. Application of fuzzy inference system and nonlinear regression models for predicting rock brittleness10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.046 ↗
9. Reply to the Discussion by Yagiz on “Assessment of Some Brittleness Indexes in Rock-Drilling Efficiency” by Altindag10.1007/s00603-009-0079-4 ↗
10. Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test10.1016/j.tust.2008.04.002 ↗
11. Morley, A. (1944). Strength of Material, Longmans.
12. Folding and fracturing of rocks
13. Obert, L., and Duvall, W.I. (1967). Rock Mechanics and the Design of Structures in Rock, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Predicting the relationships between brittleness and mechanical properties (UCS, TS and SH) of rocks
15. Study of borehole stability of Marcellus shale wells in longwall mining areas10.1007/s13202-013-0083-9 ↗
16. Koopialipoor, M., Noorbakhsh, A., Noroozi Ghaleini, E., Jahed Armaghani, D., and Yagiz, S. (2019). A new approach for estimation of rock brittleness based on non-destructive tests. Nondestruct. Test. Eval., 1–22.10.1080/10589759.2019.1623214 ↗
17. Function development for appraising brittleness of intact rocks using genetic programming and non-linear multiple regression models10.1007/s00366-016-0452-3 ↗
18. A new brittleness index for estimation of rock fracture toughness
19. Hajihassani, M., Abdullah, S.S., Asteris, P.G., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). A Gene Expression Programming Model for Predicting Tunnel Convergence. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214650 ↗
20. Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using Artificial Neural Networks
21. Zhou, J., Bejarbaneh, B.Y., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Forecasting of TBM advance rate in hard rock condition based on artificial neural network and genetic programming techniques. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-019-01626-8 ↗
22. Yong, W., Zhou, J., Armaghani, D.J., Tahir, M.M., Tarinejad, R., Pham, B.T., and Van Huynh, V. (2020). A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9 ↗
23. Zhou, J., Guo, H., Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2020). Investigating the effective parameters on the risk levels of rockburst phenomena by developing a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00908-9 ↗
24. Mahdiyar, A., Jahed Armaghani, D., Koopialipoor, M., Hedayat, A., Abdullah, A., and Yahya, K. (2020). Practical Risk Assessment of Ground Vibrations Resulting from Blasting, Using Gene Expression Programming and Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020472 ↗
25. Evaluation method of rockburst: State-of-the-art literature review10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.029 ↗
26. Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.046 ↗
27. Utilizing gradient boosted machine for the prediction of damage to residential structures owing to blasting vibrations of open pit mining10.1177/1077546314568172 ↗
28. Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of hard rock pillar stability prediction10.1007/s11069-015-1842-3 ↗
29. Investigation on the cracking character of jointed rock mass beneath TBM disc cutter10.1007/s00603-017-1395-8 ↗
30. Effects of joints on the cutting behavior of disc cutter running on the jointed rock mass10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.023 ↗
31. Chen, H., Asteris, P.G., Jahed Armaghani, D., Gordan, B., and Pham, B.T. (2019). Assessing Dynamic Conditions of the Retaining Wall: Developing Two Hybrid Intelligent Models. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061042 ↗
32. Liu, B., Yang, H., and Karekal, S. (2019). Effect of Water Content on Argillization of Mudstone during the Tunnelling process. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.10.1007/s00603-019-01947-w ↗
33. Soft computing-based techniques for concrete beams shear strength10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.123 ↗
34. Compressive strength of natural hydraulic lime mortars using soft computing techniques10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.122 ↗
35. Xu, H., Zhou, J.G., Asteris, P., Jahed Armaghani, D., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Supervised Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rate. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183715 ↗
36. Huang, L., Asteris, P.G., Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Invasive Weed Optimization Technique-Based ANN to the Prediction of Rock Tensile Strength. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245372 ↗
37. Asteris, P.G., and Mokos, V.G. (2019). Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput. Appl.10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2 ↗
38. Asteris, P.G., and Nikoo, M. (2019). Artificial bee colony-based neural network for the prediction of the fundamental period of infilled frame structures. Neural Comput. Appl.10.1007/s00521-018-03965-1 ↗
39. Asteris, P.G., Moropoulou, A., Skentou, A.D., Apostolopoulou, M., Mohebkhah, A., Cavaleri, L., Rodrigues, H., and Varum, H. (2019). Stochastic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Structures: Concepts, Modeling and Restoration Aspects. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9020243 ↗
40. Prediction of rock brittleness using nondestructive methods for hard rock tunneling10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.03.002 ↗
41. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data
42. Brown, G. (2010). Ensemble Learning. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_252 ↗
43. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
44. Top 10 algorithms in data mining10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 ↗
45. Akbulut, Y., Sengur, A., Guo, Y., and Smarandache, F. (2017). NS-k-NN: Neutrosophic set-based k-nearest neighbors classifier. Symmetry, 9.10.3390/sym9090179 ↗
46. Comparing machine learning classifiers for object-based land cover classification using very high resolution imagery10.3390/rs70100153 ↗
47. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
48. Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.019 ↗
49. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN)10.1080/19475705.2017.1407368 ↗
50. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
51. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Suichuan area (China)10.1080/19475705.2016.1250112 ↗
52. A survey on image classification approaches and techniques
53. Forecast of water demand in Weinan City in China using WDF-ANN model10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00026-3 ↗
54. Prediction of flyrock in boulder blasting using artificial neural network
55. Simulation of blasting-induced air overpressure by means of Artificial Neural Networks
56. Asteris, P., Roussis, P., and Douvika, M. (2017). Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061344 ↗
57. Apostolopoulour, M., Douvika, M.G., Kanellopoulos, I.N., Moropoulou, A., and Asteris, P.G. (2018, January 10–13). Prediction of Compressive Strength of Mortars using Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference TMM_CH, Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modelling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage, Athens, Greece.
58. Asteris, P.G., Argyropoulos, I., Cavaleri, L., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Thomas, J., and Lourenço, P.B. (2018). Masonry compressive strength prediction using artificial neural networks. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-12960-6_14 ↗
59. Development of hybrid intelligent models for predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.009 ↗
60. Application of artificial neural network for predicting shaft and tip resistances of concrete piles10.15446/esrj.v19n1.38712 ↗
61. Ulusay, R., and Hudson, J.A. (2007). ISRM (2007) The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Commission on Testing Methods.
62. Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods10.1016/0148-9062(74)91109-7 ↗
63. Salaria, S., Drozd, A., Podobas, A., and Matsuoka, S. (2018, January 10–13). Predicting performance using collaborative filtering. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), Belfast, UK.10.1109/CLUSTER.2018.00066 ↗
64. Rockburst prediction method based on case reasoning pattern recognition