journal article·2019-10-31Open access

Machine-Learning-Based Classification Approaches toward Recognizing Slope Stability Failure

Hossein Moayedi, Dieu Tien Bui, Bahareh Kalantar, Loke Kok Foong

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 21

Abstract

In this paper, the authors investigated the applicability of combining machine-learning-based models toward slope stability assessment. To do this, several well-known machine-learning-based methods, namely multiple linear regression (MLR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function regression (RBFR), improved support vector machine using sequential minimal optimization algorithm (SMO-SVM), lazy k-nearest neighbor (IBK), random forest (RF), and random tree (RT), were selected to evaluate the stability of a slope through estimating the factor of safety (FOS). In the following, a comparative classification was carried out based on the five stability categories. Based on the respective values of total scores (the summation of scores obtained for the training and testing stages) of 15, 35, 48, 15, 50, 60, and 57, acquired for MLR, MLP, RBFR, SMO-SVM, IBK, RF, and RT, respectively, it was concluded that RF outperformed other intelligent models. The results of statistical indexes also prove the excellent prediction from the optimized structure of the ANN and RF techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam

Geographic Information System Group, Department of Business and IT, University of South-Eastern Norway, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway

RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Goal-Oriented Technology Research Group, Disaster Resilience Science Team, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan

Centre of Tropical Geoengineering (Geotropik), School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, 81310 Johor, Malaysia

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2 ↗
2. Strength measurement and textural characteristics of tropical residual soil stabilised with liquid polymer10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.029 ↗
3. Optimization of tension absorption of geosynthetics through reinforced slope
4. Foundation size Effect on modulus of subgrade Reaction on sandy soils
5. Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.024 ↗
6. Tight independent set neighborhood union condition for fractional critical deleted graphs and ID deleted graphs
7. Settlement of shallow foundations near reinforced slopes
8. The influence of rainfall intensity on soil loss mass from cellular confined slopes10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.007 ↗
9. Simplified probabilistic slope stability design charts for cohesive and cohesive-frictional (c-ϕ) soils10.1139/cgj-2013-0385 ↗
10. State of the art: Limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:7(577) ↗
11. Slope stability evaluation using Gaussian processes with various covariance functions10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.011 ↗
12. Geostatistical modeling of spatial variability of SPT data for a borax stockpile site10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.04.012 ↗
13. Secci, R., Foddis, M.L., Mazzella, A., Montisci, A., and Uras, G. (2015). Artificial Neural Networks and Kriging Method for Slope Geomechanical Characterization. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory-Volume 2, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_239 ↗
14. Lateral deflection of piles in a multilayer soil medium. Case study: The Terengganu seaside platform10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.068 ↗
15. An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs10.3934/dcdss.2019058 ↗
16. Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.049 ↗
17. Preliminary discussion regarding SVM kernel function selection in the twofold rock slope prediction model10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000499 ↗
18. The feasibility of three prediction techniques of the artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and hybrid particle swarm optimization for assessing the safety factor of cohesive slopes10.3390/ijgi8090391 ↗
19. Study of biological networks using graph theory10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.022 ↗
20. Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.027 ↗
21. Predicting slope stability failure through machine learning paradigms10.3390/ijgi8090395 ↗
22. Constrained particle swarm optimization algorithm applied to slope stability10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001019 ↗
23. Slope Stability Analysis Based on Real-time Displacement Measurements10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.019 ↗
24. Prediction of Surface Grinding Quality Based on SMO-SVM
25. Predicting Cancer-Related Proteins in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks using Network Approach and SMO-SVM Algorithm
26. Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers10.1017/S0016672310000157 ↗
27. A logistic radial basis function regression method for discrimination of cover crops in olive orchards10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.035 ↗
28. Panigrahi, P.K. (2012, January 3–5). A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Spam E-Mail Filtering. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Mathura, India.10.1109/CICN.2012.14 ↗
29. Michel, J., Malik, J., and Inglada, J. (2010, January 25–30). Lazy yet efficient land-cover map generation for HR optical images. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5653286 ↗
30. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 ↗
31. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: Conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine10.1007/s12665-009-0394-9 ↗
32. Krabbenhoft, K., Lyamin, A., and Krabbenhoft, J. (2015, September 01). Optum Computational Engineering (Optum G2). Available online: https://www. optumce. com.
33. Optimizing Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation technique in predicting factor of safety of slopes after two-dimensional OptumG2 analysis
34. Kalantar, B., Al-Najjar, H.A., Pradhan, B., Saeidi, V., Halin, A.A., Ueda, N., and Naghibi, S.A. (2019). Optimized Conditioning Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques for Groundwater Potential Mapping. Water, 11.10.3390/w11091909 ↗
35. Selecting a classification method by cross-validation10.1007/BF00993106 ↗
36. Naji, H., and Ali, R.H. (2018, January 10–11). Qualitative Analysis of Cost Risk Using WEKA Program. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Engineering Sciences—3rd Scientific Conference of Engineering Science, Diyala, Iraq.10.1109/ISCES.2018.8340566 ↗
37. A Comparative Study of Data Mining Algorithms for Decision Tree Approaches using WEKA Tool
38. Novel approach for dam break flow modeling using computational intelligence10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.001 ↗
39. The WEKA data mining software: An update10.1145/1656274.1656278 ↗
40. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S.C., and Hyndman, R.J. (2008). Forecasting Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons.
41. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
42. ASCE Task Committee (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124–137.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124) ↗
43. Moayedi, H., and Hayati, S. (2018). Artificial intelligence design charts for predicting friction capacity of driven pile in clay. Neural Comput. Appl., 1–17.10.1007/s00521-018-3555-5 ↗
44. An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z ↗
45. Broomhead, D.S., and Lowe, D. (1988). Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks, Royal Signals and Radar Establishment Malvern (United Kingdom).
46. Multivariate interpolation by polynomials and radial basis functions10.1007/s00365-004-0585-2 ↗
47. Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: A review
48. Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks10.1126/science.247.4945.978 ↗
49. Kernel methods on Riemannian manifolds with Gaussian RBF kernels10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2414422 ↗
50. A stable method for the evaluation of Gaussian radial basis function solutions of interpolation and collocation problems10.1016/j.camwa.2016.04.048 ↗
51. A multiquadric RBF–FD scheme for simulating the financial HHW equation utilizing exponential integrator10.1007/s10092-018-0294-z ↗
52. Thin-plate spline radial basis function scheme for advection-diffusion problems
53. Thin plate spline radial basis functions for vibration analysis of clamped laminated composite plates10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.012 ↗
54. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification
55. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001 ↗
56. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
57. Vapnik, V. (2013). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.
58. Cherkassky, V.S., and Mulier, F. (2006). Learning from Data: Concepts, Theory, and Methods, John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9780470140529 ↗
59. Identification of growth rate of plant based on leaf features using digital image processing techniques
60. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines
61. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗
62. Performance Evaluation of different data mining classification algorithm using WEKA
63. Bin Othman, M.F., and Yau, T.M.S. (2006, January 11–14). Comparison of Different Classification Techniques Using WEKA for Breast Cancer. Proceedings of the 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Biomed 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_131 ↗
64. A tutorial review on Text Mining Algorithms
65. Comparative analysis of classification function techniques for heart disease prediction
66. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1007/BF00153759 ↗
67. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
68. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (2007). Classification and Regression Trees, CRC Press.
69. Neural network ensembles10.1109/34.58871 ↗
70. Breiman, L., and Cutler, A. (2001). Random Forests Machine Learning, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
71. Pfahringer, B. (2010). Random Model Trees: An Effective and Scalable Regression Method, Department of Computer Science, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105.