journal article·2020-03-11Open access

Identification of Breast Malignancy by Marker-Controlled Watershed Transformation and Hybrid Feature Set for Healthcare

Tariq Sadad, Ayyaz Hussain, Asim Munir, Muhammad Habib, Sajid Ali Khan, Shariq Hussain, Shunkun Yang, Mohammed Alawairdhi

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 6

Abstract

Breast cancer is a highly prevalent disease in females that may lead to mortality in severe cases. The mortality can be subsided if breast cancer is diagnosed at an early stage. The focus of this study is to detect breast malignancy through computer-aided diagnosis (CADx). In the first phase of this work, Hilbert transform is employed to reconstruct B-mode images from the raw data followed by the marker-controlled watershed transformation to segment the lesion. The methods based only on texture analysis are quite sensitive to speckle noise and other artifacts. Therefore, a hybrid feature set is developed after the extraction of shape-based and texture features from the breast lesion. Decision tree, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and ensemble decision tree model via random under-sampling with Boost (RUSBoost) are utilized to segregate the cancerous lesions from the benign ones. The proposed technique is tested on OASBUD (Open Access Series of Breast Ultrasonic Data) and breast ultrasound (BUS) images collected at Baheya Hospital Egypt (BHE). The OASBUD dataset contains raw ultrasound data obtained from 100 patients containing 52 malignant and 48 benign lesions. The dataset collected at BHE contains 210 malignant and 437 benign images. The proposed system achieved promising accuracy of 97% with confidence interval (CI) of 91.48% to 99.38% for OASBUD and 96.6% accuracy with CI of 94.90% to 97.86% for the BHE dataset using ensemble method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Gene expression and cancer classification · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, University of Central Punjab, Sargodha Campus 40100, Pakistan

Department of Computer Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Department of Computer Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Department of Software Engineering, Foundation University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Global cancer statistics10.3322/caac.20107 ↗
2. CDK4/6 Inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in breast cancer: Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.03.006 ↗
3. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y ↗
4. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: Effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.011 ↗
5. Intraobserver interpretation of breast ultrasonography following the BI-RADS classification10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.015 ↗
6. Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.012 ↗
7. Improving classification performance of breast lesions on ultrasonography10.1016/j.patcog.2014.06.006 ↗
8. Fuzzy C-means and region growing based classification of tumor from mammograms using hybrid texture feature10.1016/j.jocs.2018.09.015 ↗
9. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: A review10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.024 ↗
10. Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: A survey10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.012 ↗
11. Shan, J., Cheng, H.D., and Wang, Y. (2008, January 8–11). A novel automatic seed point selection algorithm for breast ultrasound images. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Tampa, FL, USA.10.1109/ICPR.2008.4761336 ↗
12. Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation10.1118/1.3265959 ↗
13. Rivest, J.-F., Soille, P., and Beucher, S. (1992). Morphological gradients. Nonlinear Image Processing III, SPIE.10.1117/12.58373 ↗
14. Robust texture analysis using multi-resolution gray-scale invariant features for breast sonographic tumor diagnosis10.1109/TMI.2013.2279938 ↗
15. Detection and classification of masses in breast ultrasound images10.1016/j.dsp.2009.10.010 ↗
16. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast tumors using textures from intensity transformed sonographic images10.1007/978-3-319-12262-5_35 ↗
17. Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images10.1186/s12938-015-0022-8 ↗
18. Classification of breast lesions in ultrasonography using sparse logistic regression and morphology-based texture features10.1002/mp.13082 ↗
19. Computer-aided US diagnosis of breast lesions by using cell-based contour grouping10.1148/radiol.09090001 ↗
20. Rodriguez-Cristerna, A., Guerrero-Cedillo, C.P., Donati-Olvera, G.A., Gómez-Flores, W., and Pereira, W.C.A. (2017, January 20–22). Study of the impact of image preprocessing approaches on the segmentation and classification of breast lesions on ultrasound. Proceedings of the 2017 14th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control, CCE 2017, Mexico City, Mexico.10.1109/ICEEE.2017.8108826 ↗
21. O’Mahony, N., Campbell, S., Carvalho, A., Harapanahalli, S., Hernandez, G.V., and Krpalkova, L. (2020). Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Vision. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (CVC 2019), Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_10 ↗
22. Discriminant analysis of neural style representations for breast lesion classification in ultrasound10.1016/j.bbe.2018.05.003 ↗
23. Breast mass classification in sonography with transfer learning using a deep convolutional neural network and color conversion10.1002/mp.13361 ↗
24. Wu, S., Gao, Z., Liu, Z., Luo, J., Zhang, H., and Li, S. (2018). Direct reconstruction of ultrasound elastography using an end-to-end deep neural network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_43 ↗
25. Kong, B., Zhan, Y., Shin, M., Denny, T., and Zhang, S. (2016). Recognizing end-diastole and end-systole frames via deep temporal regression network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_31 ↗
26. Open access database of raw ultrasonic signals acquired from malignant and benign breast lesions10.1002/mp.12538 ↗
27. Al-Dhabyani, W., Gomaa, M., Khaled, H., and Fahmy, A. (2020). Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data Br., in press.10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863 ↗
28. Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80115-9 ↗
29. Automated medical image segmentation techniques10.4103/0971-6203.58777 ↗
30. The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization Strategies10.3233/FI-2000-411207 ↗
31. Gonzalez, R., and Woods, R. (2002). Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall.
32. Chen, W.B., and Zhang, X. (2010, January 24–25). A new watershed algorithm for cellular image segmentation based on mathematical morphology. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Machine Vision and Human-Machine Interface, Kaifeng, China.10.1109/MVHI.2010.55 ↗
33. Soille, P. (2004). Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-662-05088-0 ↗
34. Image Feature Extraction Method Based on Shape Characteristics and Its Application in Medical Image Analysis10.1007/978-3-642-23214-5_24 ↗
35. Breast mass classification on sonographic images on the basis of shape analysis10.1007/s10396-010-0278-3 ↗
36. Textural Features for Image Classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
37. Texture analysis of sar sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices10.1109/36.752194 ↗
38. An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization10.5589/m02-004 ↗
39. Predicting radiological panel opinions using a panel of machine learning classifiers10.3390/a2041473 ↗
40. Refaeilzadeh, P., Tang, L., and Liu, H. (2009). Cross Validation, Encyclopedia of Database Systems (EDBS), Arizona State University, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_565 ↗
41. A readers’ guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: Clinical example of sepsis10.1007/s00134-003-1761-8 ↗
42. Ensemble-based classifiers10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 ↗
43. Ensemble Decision Tree Models Using RUSBoost for Estimating Risk of Iron Failure in Drinking Water Distribution Systems10.1007/s11269-017-1595-8 ↗
44. Jankovic, D., Peng, P., Sehmbi, H., and Perlas, A. (2015). Basics of Ultrasound Imaging. Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05131-4 ↗
45. Computer Aided Diagnosis using Margin and Posterior Acoustic Featuresfor Breast Ultrasound Images10.12928/telkomnika.v15i4.5021 ↗
46. Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound images using quantitative tissue clustering10.1118/1.4869264 ↗
47. Adaptive gradient descent backpropagation for classification of breast tumors in ultrasound imaging10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.091 ↗