journal article·2023-12-19Open access

Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Implants: Properties, Challenges, and Surface Modifications with a Focus on Orthopedic Fixation Repair

Kevin Koshy Thomas, Mah Noor Zafar, William G. Pitt, Ghaleb A. Husseini

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Biomedical devices made from high-modulus and hardness materials play a critical role in enhancing the quality of life for people with bone-related ailments. While these materials have been successfully used in orthopedic applications, concerns including stress-shielding have necessitated the exploration of alternative solutions. An ideal biomedical implant requires a delicate balance of mechanical performance, corrosion resistance, tissue biocompatibility, and other properties such as tribological performance and osseointegration. This review explores the suitability of biodegradable magnesium (Mg) alloys as a promising material for biomedical implants. It delves into the essential properties of biomedical implants, emphasizing the importance of matching mechanical characteristics with human bone properties to mitigate stress shielding. The corrosion properties of implant materials are discussed, highlighting the need for controlled degradation to ensure the safety and longevity of implants. The focus then shifts to the potential of magnesium alloys as biomedical implants, examining their benefits, limitations, and the challenges associated with their high degradation rates and less-than-satisfactory mechanical properties. Alloying with elements such as aluminum, zinc, and others is explored to improve magnesium alloys’ mechanical performance and corrosion resistance. Furthermore, this review discusses surface modification techniques, including chemical conversion coatings and biomimetic deposition, as effective strategies to enhance the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of magnesium and its alloys. These modifications offer opportunities to improve the long-term performance of magnesium-based biomedical implants. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the properties, challenges, and potential solutions associated with biodegradable magnesium alloys as a promising material for biomedical implants. It underscores the importance of addressing problems related to mechanical performance, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility to advance the development of safe and effective biomedical implant materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Program, College of Arts and Sciences, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates

Biomedical Engineering Program, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates

Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates

Funding

the Dana Gas Endowed Chair for Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah Faculty Research Grants · Sheikh Hamdan Award for Medical Sciences · Friends of Cancer Patients (FoCP)

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopedic implants—A review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
2. Biocompatibility of Ti-alloys for long-term implantation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.014 ↗
3. Dobrzański, L.A., Dobrzańska-Danikiewicz, A.D., and Dobrzański, L.B. (2021). Effect of Biomedical Materials in the implementation of a long and healthy life policy. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9050865 ↗
4. Martinez-Marquez, D., Delmar, Y., Sun, S., and Stewart, R.A. (2020). Exploring macroporosity of additively manufactured titanium metamaterials for bone regeneration with quality by design: A systematic literature review. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214794 ↗
5. 3D-Printed Ti6Al4V Scaffolds with Graded Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Structure for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1007/s11665-021-05580-z ↗
6. Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049 ↗
7. Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of a biomedical Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn alloy10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.024 ↗
8. Biomaterials in orthopaedics10.1098/rsif.2008.0151 ↗
9. Singh, H., Singh, S., and Prakash, C. (2019). Biomanufacturing, Springer.
10. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—A materials science perspective10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
11. In Vitro Biodegradation and Biocompatibility of Mg–HA-Based Composites for Orthopaedic Applications: A Review10.1007/s41745-019-00124-w ↗
12. A review on biomedical titanium alloys: Recent progress and prospect10.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
13. Review on titanium and titanium-based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064 ↗
14. State of the art of bioimplants manufacturing: Part I10.1007/s40436-017-0207-4 ↗
15. Finite element analysis of thermal behavior in maraging steel during SLM process10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.164128 ↗
16. Modelling and Optimisation of Hardness Behaviour of Sintered Al/SiC Composites Using RSM and ANN: A Comparative Study10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.087 ↗
17. Review of Magnesium-Based Biomaterials and Their Applications10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003 ↗
18. Yuan, B., Zhu, M., and Chung, C.Y. (2018). Biomedical Porous Shape Memory Alloys for Hard-Tissue Replacement Materials. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11091716 ↗
19. Biomaterials in Spinal Implants: A Review10.14245/ns.1938296.148 ↗
20. Effect of Sintering Techniques on Microstructural, Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Al-SiC Composites10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100598 ↗
21. Alam, M.A., Ya, H.H., Yusuf, M., Sivraj, R., Mamat, O.B., Sapuan, S.M., Masood, F., Parveez, B., and Sattar, M. (2021). Modeling, Optimization and Performance Evaluation of TiC/Graphite Reinforced Al 7075 Hybrid Composites Using Response Surface Methodology. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14164703 ↗
22. Tissue-Biomaterial Interactions10.1007/BF01161439 ↗
23. Mechanical Properties of Biomedical Titanium Alloys10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X ↗
24. Zhang, T., Wang, W., Liu, J., Wang, L., Tang, Y., and Wang, K. (2022). A Review on Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344 ↗
25. Knee Arthroplasty Registers
26. Titanium in Medicine
27. Venkatesan, J., Kim, S.-K., and Wong, T.W. (2015). Nanotechnology Applications for Tissue Engineering, Elsevier.
28. Mechanical Properties and Osteoconductivity of Porous Bioactive Titanium10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.019 ↗
29. Fracture Analysis of a Total Hip Prosthesis Based on Reverse Engineering10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.003 ↗
30. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of an Mg-Zn-Ca Alloy via High Pressure Torsion and Annealing for Use in Bone Implantation
31. Review of Bioresorbable AZ91, AZ31 and Mg–Zn–Ca Implants and Their Manufacturing Methods10.1080/02670836.2022.2153207 ↗
32. Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption in Shoulder Arthroplasty10.1067/mse.2003.22 ↗
33. Long-Term Implant Fixation and Stress-Shielding in Total Hip Replacement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.021 ↗
34. Analysis of a Femoral Hip Prosthesis Designed to Reduce Stress Shielding10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00110-X ↗
35. Developments in Metallic Biodegradable Stents10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.006 ↗
36. The History of Biodegradable Magnesium Implants: A Review10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028 ↗
37. Recent Progress in Materials Used towards Corrosion Protection of Mg and Its Alloys
38. Influence of Test Solutions on In Vitro Studies of Biomedical Magnesium Alloys10.1149/1.3421651 ↗
39. (2023, December 09). Failure Mechanisms in Total-Joint and Dental Implants—Biomaterials for Osseointegration and Novel Engineering. Available online: http://danieli.wikidot.com/2-failure-mechanisms-in-total-joint-and-dental-implants.
40. Biomedical Implants: Corrosion and Its Prevention—A Review10.2174/1877610801002010040 ↗
41. Metallurgical Failure Analysis of Various Implant Materials Used in Orthopedic Applications10.1007/s11668-996-0007-9 ↗
42. In-Body Corrosion Fatigue Failure of a Stainless Steel Orthopaedic Implant with a Rare Collection of Different Damage Mechanisms10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.037 ↗
43. An Overview of the Corrosion Aspect of Dental Implants (Titanium and Its Alloys)10.4103/0970-9290.49068 ↗
44. Crevice Corrosion – A Newly Observed Mechanism of Degradation in Biomedical Magnesium10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.013 ↗
45. Ratner, B.D., Hoffman, A.S., Schoen, F.J., and Lemons, J.E. (2013). Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
46. Landau, S.I. (2023, December 13). International Dictionary of Medicine and Biology (In Three Volumes). Available online: https://books.google.com/books/about/International_Dictionary_of_Medicine_and.html?id=7LxpAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
47. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
48. Ratner, B.D. (2015). Host Response to Biomaterials, Elsvier Inc.
49. Oshida, Y., Tuna, E.B., Aktören, O., and Gençay, K. (2010). Dental Implant Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11.10.3390/ijms11041580 ↗
50. Stress-Absorbing Elements in Dental Implants10.1016/0022-3913(90)90179-G ↗
51. The Influence of Small Variations in Composition on the Corrosion of Cobalt–Chromium Alloys
52. The Design and Manufacture of Biomedical Surfaces10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.001 ↗
53. Characteristics of Metals Used in Implants10.1089/end.1997.11.383 ↗
54. Allergy to Surgical Implants10.1007/s12016-018-8707-y ↗
55. Effects of Soluble Metals on Human Peri-Implant Cells10.1002/jbm.a.30345 ↗
56. Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys for Orthopaedic Applications: A Review on Corrosion, Biocompatibility and Surface Modifications10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020 ↗
57. Tipan, N., Pandey, A., and Mishra, P. (2022). Magnesium Based Alloys For Biodegradable Implants Applications Using Additive Manufacturing Technique: A Review. J. Mech. Med. Biol., 22.10.1142/S0219519422500427 ↗
58. Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloys for Medical Application: A Review10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.022 ↗
59. Advances in Degradation Behavior of Biomedical Magnesium Alloys: A Review10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164600 ↗
60. Zhang, J., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Lin, W., and Zhang, S. (2021). Magnesium Promotes the Regeneration of the Peripheral Nerve. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 9.10.3389/fcell.2021.717854 ↗
61. The Importance of Magnesium in Clinical Healthcare10.1155/2017/4179326 ↗
62. In Vitro Evaluation of the Surface Effects on Magnesium-Yttrium Alloy Degradation and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Adhesion10.1002/jbm.a.33290 ↗
63. Progress in Research on Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys: A Review10.1002/adem.202000213 ↗
64. Mechanical, Corrosion, and Biocompatibility Properties of Mg-Zr-Sr-Sc Alloys for Biodegradable Implant Applications10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.001 ↗
65. Microalloying Design of Biodegradable Mg-2Zn-0.05Ca Promises Improved Bone-Implant Applications10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00218 ↗
66. Pekguleryuz, M.O., Kainer, K., and Kaya, A. (2013). Fundamentals of Magnesium Alloy Metallurgy, Elsevier.10.1533/9780857097293 ↗
67. Biocompatibility of Magnesium Implants in Primary Human Reaming Debris-Derived Cells Stem Cells in Vitro10.1007/s10195-015-0364-9 ↗
68. Banerjee, P.C., Al-Saadi, S., Choudhary, L., Harandi, S.E., and Singh, R. (2019). Magnesium Implants: Prospects and Challenges. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12010136 ↗
69. In Vivo Corrosion of Four Magnesium Alloys and the Associated Bone Response10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
70. Gu, X.N., Zheng, Y.F., and Chen, L.J. (2009). Influence of Artificial Biological Fluid Composition on the Biocorrosion of Potential Orthopedic Mg-Ca, AZ31, AZ91 Alloys. Biomed. Mater., 4.10.1088/1748-6041/4/6/065011 ↗
71. Effect of the Addition of Low Rare Earth Elements (Lanthanum, Neodymium, Cerium) on the Biodegradation and Biocompatibility of Magnesium10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.041 ↗
72. Multifunctional MgF2/Polydopamine Coating on Mg Alloy for Vascular Stent Application10.1016/j.jmst.2015.02.002 ↗
73. Characterization of Calcium-Modified Zinc Phosphate Conversion Coatings and Their Influences on Corrosion Resistance of AZ31 Alloy10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.11.027 ↗
74. Study of Ionization-Induced Radiation Damage in MgO10.1103/PhysRev.154.842 ↗
75. The Effect of PEO Parameters on the Properties of Biodegradable Mg Alloys: A Review10.1680/jsuin.20.00057 ↗
76. Study on surface modification and fabrication of surface composites of magnesium alloys by friction stir processing: A review10.1186/s44147-022-00073-9 ↗
77. Surface Modification of Magnesium Alloys Using Thermal and Solid-State Cold Spray Processes: Challenges and Latest Progresses10.1016/j.jma.2022.07.012 ↗
78. Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Implants in Orthopedics—A General Review and Perspectives10.1002/advs.201902443 ↗
79. Jung, O., Porchetta, D., Schroeder, M.L., Klein, M., Wegner, N., Walther, F., Feyerabend, F., Barbeck, M., and Kopp, A. (2019). In Vivo Simulation of Magnesium Degradability Using a New Fluid Dynamic Bench Testing Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20194859 ↗
80. Chin, P.Y.Y., Cheok, Q., Glowacz, A., and Caesarendra, W. (2020). A Review of In-Vivo and In-Vitro Real-Time Corrosion Monitoring Systems of Biodegradable Metal Implants. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093141 ↗
81. The Potential of Magnesium-Based Materials for Engineering and Biomedical Applications10.1007/s41745-021-00274-w ↗
82. Improvement of Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Applications10.1515/corrrev-2015-0007 ↗
83. Metalloid Substitution Elevates Simultaneously the Strength and Ductility of Face-Centered-Cubic High-Entropy Alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117571 ↗
84. Biofunctional Mg Coating on PEEK for Improving Bioactivity
85. Microstructure, Mechanical and Corrosion Properties of Magnesium Alloy Bone Plate Treated by High-Energy Shot Peening10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65071-5 ↗
86. Corrosion Protection of Magnesium and Its Alloys by Metal Phosphate Conversion Coatings10.1179/1743294413Y.0000000235 ↗
87. Meng, L., Liu, X., Liu, L., Hong, Q., Cheng, Y., Gao, F., Chen, J., Zhang, Q., and Pan, C. (2022). Comparative Investigation of the Corrosion Behavior and Biocompatibility of the Different Chemical Conversion Coatings on the Magnesium Alloy Surfaces. Metals, 12.10.3390/met12101644 ↗
88. Advances in Coatings on Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys10.1016/j.jma.2019.09.008 ↗
89. Preparation and Characterization of Dopamine-Induced Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Coatings on the AZ31 Magnesium Alloy10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.09.033 ↗
90. Recent Progress in Surface Modification of Mg Alloys for Biodegradable Orthopedic Applications10.3389/fmats.2022.848980 ↗
91. A Polydopamine-Based Calcium Phosphate/Graphene Oxide Composite Coating on Magnesium Alloy to Improve Corrosion Resistance and Biocompatibility for Biomedical Applications10.1016/j.mtla.2022.101315 ↗
92. Effect of Ca/P Ratio on the Structural and Corrosion Properties of Biomimetic CaP Coatings on ZK60 Magnesium Alloy10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.132 ↗
93. Wandelt, K. (2018). Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry: Surface Science and Electrochemistry, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809739-7.05001-3 ↗
94. Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Coatings with Particle Additions—A Review10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.055 ↗
95. Comparative Study of Fluoride Conversion Coatings Formed on Biodegradable Powder Metallurgy Mg: The Effect of Chlorides at Physiological Level10.1016/j.msec.2011.01.010 ↗
96. Controlling Initial Biodegradation of Magnesium by a Biocompatible Strontium Phosphate Conversion Coating10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.016 ↗
97. Micro-Arc Oxidation Behavior of Fly Ash Cenospheres/Magnesium Alloy Degradable Composite and Corrosion Resistance of Coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125693 ↗
98. Liu, W., Liu, S., and Wang, L. (2019). Surface Modification of Biomedical Titanium Alloy: Micromorphology, Microstructure Evolution and Biomedical Applications. Coatings, 9.10.3390/coatings9040249 ↗
99. Fluoride Conversion Coating on Biodegradable AZ31B Magnesium Alloy10.1016/j.jmst.2013.12.015 ↗
100. In Vitro Degradation Behavior and Biocompatibility of Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr Alloy by Hydrofluoric Acid Treatment10.1016/j.msec.2012.08.036 ↗