journal article·2021-06-02Open access

Software Project Management Using Machine Learning Technique—A Review

Mohammed Najah Mahdi, Mohd Hazli Mohamed Zabil, Abdul Rahim Ahmad, Roslan Ismail, Yunus Yusoff, Lim Kok Cheng, Muhammad Sufyian Bin Mohd Azmi, Hayder Natiq, Hushalini Happala Naidu

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Project management planning and assessment are of great significance in project performance activities. Without a realistic and logical plan, it isn’t easy to handle project management efficiently. This paper presents a wide-ranging comprehensive review of papers on the application of Machine Learning in software project management. Besides, this paper presents an extensive literature analysis of (1) machine learning, (2) software project management, and (3) techniques from three main libraries, Web Science, Science Directs, and IEEE Explore. One-hundred and eleven papers are divided into four categories in these three repositories. The first category contains research and survey papers on software project management. The second category includes papers that are based on machine-learning methods and strategies utilized on projects; the third category encompasses studies on the phases and tests that are the parameters used in machine-learning management and the final classes of the results from the study, contribution of studies in the production, and the promotion of machine-learning project prediction. Our contribution also offers a more comprehensive perspective and a context that would be important for potential work in project risk management. In conclusion, we have shown that project risk assessment by machine learning is more successful in minimizing the loss of the project, thereby increasing the likelihood of the project success, providing an alternative way to efficiently reduce the project failure probabilities, and increasing the output ratio for growth, and it also facilitates analysis on software fault prediction based on accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Software Engineering Research · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices · Big Data and Business Intelligence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Informatics and Computing in Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia

College of Computing and Informatics (CCI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia

Department of Computer Technology, Information Technology Collage, Imam Ja’afar Al-Sadiq University, Baghdad 10064, Iraq

Uniten R&D Sdn Bhd, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia

Funding

Universiti Tenaga Nasional

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. An enterprise-wide knowledge management approach to project management
2. Maimone, C. (August, January 28). Good Enough Project Management Practices for Researcher Support Projects. Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (Learning), Chicago, IL, USA.
3. Saleem, N. (2019, January 25–26). Empirical analysis of critical success factors for project management in global software development. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICGSE.2019.00025 ↗
4. Success factors of global new product development programs, the definition of project success, knowledge sharing, and special issues of project management journal10.1002/pmj.21480 ↗
5. Measuring project success in the construction industry
6. Project Management Institute (2013). Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Pmbok Guide), Project Management Institute.10.1002/pmj.21345 ↗
7. Kirsch, L.J. (2000). Software project management: An integrated perspective for an emerging paradigm. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future... Through the Past, Pinnaflex Educational Resources inc.
8. Aladwani, A.M. (2002). IT project uncertainty, planning and success. Inf. Technol. People, 210–226.10.1108/09593840210444755 ↗
9. The project assessment by simulation technique
10. Project performance: How to assess the early stages
11. Root-cause analysis of construction-cost overruns10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000789 ↗
12. Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, H., and Wang, H. (2012, January 19–22). A simulation approach for impact analysis of requirement volatility considering dependency change. Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, Essen, Germany.10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_6 ↗
13. Understanding the effects of requirements volatility in software engineering by using analytical modeling and software process simulation10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.014 ↗
14. The one-minute risk assessment tool10.1145/1029496.1029497 ↗
15. Sommerville, I. (2011). Software Engineering, Pearson. [9th ed.].
16. Ali, N., Hwang, S., and Hong, J.E. (2019). Your Opinions Let us Know: Mining Social Network Sites to Evolve Software Product Lines. Ksii Trans. Internet Inf. Syst., 13.10.3837/tiis.2019.08.021 ↗
17. Software maintainability: Systematic literature review and current trends10.1142/S0218194016500431 ↗
18. Sharma, P., and Singh, J. (2017, January 11–12). Systematic literature review on software effort estimation using machine learning approaches. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Next Generation Computing and Information Systems (ICNGCIS), Jammu, India.10.1109/ICNGCIS.2017.33 ↗
19. Alsalemi, A.M., and Yeoh, E.-T. (2017, January 8–9). A Systematic Literature Review of Requirements Volatility Prediction. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Current Trends in Computer, Electrical, Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC), Mysore, India.10.1109/CTCEEC.2017.8455174 ↗
20. A systematic literature review of machine learning techniques for software maintainability prediction10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106214 ↗
21. Idri, A., Abnane, I., and Abran, A. (2015, January 1–3). Systematic mapping study of missing values techniques in software engineering data. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Takamatsu, Japan.10.1109/SNPD.2015.7176280 ↗
22. Pillai, S.P., Madhukumar, S., and Radharamanan, T. (2017, January 5–8). Consolidating evidence based studies in software cost/effort estimation—A tertiary study. Proceedings of the TENCON 2017 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Penang, Malaysia.10.1109/TENCON.2017.8227974 ↗
23. Sangwan, O.P. (2017, January 12–13). Software effort estimation using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering-Confluence, Noida, India.
24. Stewart, C.A., Hancock, D.Y., Wernert, J., Furlani, T., Lifka, D., Sill, A., Berente, N., McMullen, D.F., Cheatham, T., and Apon, A. (August, January 28). Assessment of financial returns on investments in cyberinfrastructure facilities: A survey of current methods. Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning), Chicago, IL, USA.
25. Project control and computational intelligence: Trends and challenges10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.22 ↗
26. Raharjo, T., and Purwandari, B. (2020, January 12–15). Agile Project Management Challenges and Mapping Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1145/3378936.3378949 ↗
27. Cleland-Huang, J., Czauderna, A., Gibiec, M., and Emenecker, J. (2010, January 2–8). A machine learning approach for tracing regulatory codes to product specific requirements. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Cape Town, South Africa.10.1145/1806799.1806825 ↗
28. Zhang, D., Dang, Y., Lou, J.-G., Han, S., Zhang, H., and Xie, T. (2011, January 12). Software analytics as a learning case in practice: Approaches and experiences. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning Technologies in Software Engineering, Lawrence, KS, USA.10.1145/2070821.2070829 ↗
29. Pospieszny, P. (2017, January 25–27). Software estimation: Towards prescriptive analytics. Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1145/3143434.3143459 ↗
30. ManikReddy, P., and Iyer, J. (2018, January 6). Effective collaboration across the globe through digital dash boards and machine learning. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1145/3196369.3196391 ↗
31. Moharreri, K., Sapre, A.V., Ramanathan, J., and Ramnath, R. (2016, January 10–14). Cost-effective supervised learning models for software effort estimation in agile environments. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/COMPSAC.2016.85 ↗
32. Hosni, M., Idri, A., Nassif, A.B., and Abran, A. (2016, January 23–25). Heterogeneous ensembles for software development effort estimation. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI), Dubai, United Arab Emirates.10.1109/ISCMI.2016.15 ↗
33. Samath, S., Udalagama, D., Kurukulasooriya, H., Premarathne, D., and Thelijjagoda, S. (2017, January 6–8). Collabcrew—An intelligent tool for dynamic task allocation within a software development team. Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), Malabe, Sri Lanka.10.1109/SKIMA.2017.8294131 ↗
34. Evaluating data filter on cross-project defect prediction: Comparison and improvements10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2771460 ↗
35. Ni, A., and Li, M. (2018, January 3). Poster: ACONA: Active Online Model Adaptation for Predicting Continuous Integration Build Failures. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion (ICSE-Companion), Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1145/3183440.3195012 ↗
36. Sharma, P., and Singh, J. (2018, January 29). Machine Learning Based Effort Estimation Using Standardization. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON), Greater Noida, India.10.1109/GUCON.2018.8674908 ↗
37. A hybrid software cost estimation approach utilizing decision trees and fuzzy logic10.1142/S0218194012500106 ↗
38. Hongming, Z., Bin, F., Xizhu, M., Lijun, S., Xiangzhou, X.Z., and Yong, H. (2013, January 25–26). A Cost-sensitive Intelligent Prediction Model for Outsourced Software Project Risk. Proceedings of the WHICEB 2013 Proceedings, Wuhan, China.
39. Reasoning with Noisy Software Effort Data
40. Wu, J.H., and Keung, J. (2016, January 26–28). Decision support for global software development with pattern discovery. Proceedings of the 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSESS.2016.7883044 ↗
41. Rahman, M.T., and Islam, M.M. (2019, January 7–9). A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Effort in Varying Sized Software. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), Kolkata, India.10.1109/TENSYMP46218.2019.8971150 ↗
42. Enhanced binary moth flame optimization as a feature selection algorithm to predict software fault prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964321 ↗
43. Lopez-Martin, C., Chavoya, A., and Meda-Campaña, M.E. (July, January 30). A machine learning technique for predicting the productivity of practitioners from individually developed software projects. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
44. Han, W., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., and Li, W. (2014, January 20–23). A Neural Network Based Algorithms for Project Duration Prediction. Proceedings of the 2014 7th International Conference on Control and Automation, Hainan, China.10.1109/CA.2014.21 ↗
45. Basgalupp, M.P., Barros, R.C., da Silva, T.S., and de Carvalho, A.C. (2013, January 18–22). Software effort prediction: A hyper-heuristic decision-tree based approach. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Coimbra, Portugal.10.1145/2480362.2480571 ↗
46. Ensemble missing data techniques for software effort prediction10.3233/IDA-2010-0423 ↗
47. Song, L., Minku, L.L., and Yao, X. (2013, January 9). The impact of parameter tuning on software effort estimation using learning machines. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1145/2499393.2499394 ↗
48. Minku, L.L., and Yao, X. (June, January 31). How to make best use of cross-company data in software effort estimation?. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad, India.
49. Song, L., Minku, L.L., and Yao, X. (2014, January 17). The potential benefit of relevance vector machine to software effort estimation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Torino, Italy.10.1145/2639490.2639510 ↗
50. Scott, E., and Pfahl, D. (2018, January 26–27). Using developers’ features to estimate story points. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Software and System Process, Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1145/3202710.3203160 ↗
51. Benala, T.R., and Bandarupalli, R. (2016, January 23–25). Least square support vector machine in analogy-based software development effort estimation. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), Jaipur, India.10.1109/ICRAIE.2016.7939524 ↗
52. Minku, L.L., and Hou, S. (2017, January 8). Clustering Dycom: An online cross-company software effort estimation study. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3127005.3127007 ↗
53. Brady, A., and Menzies, T. (2010, January 12–13). Case-based reasoning vs parametric models for software quality optimization. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Timisoara, Romania.10.1145/1868328.1868333 ↗
54. Borges, R., and Menzies, T. (2012, January 21–22). Learning to change projects. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Lund, Sweden.10.1145/2365324.2365328 ↗
55. Jiang, Y., and Cukic, B. (2009, January 18–19). Misclassification cost-sensitive fault prediction models. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Predictor Models in Software Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1540438.1540466 ↗
56. Weld, D.S., and Dai, P. (2011, January 16–19). Execution control for crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium Adjunct on User Interface Software and Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.10.1145/2046396.2046421 ↗
57. Shepperd, M. (2012, January 21–22). The scientific basis for prediction research. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Lund, Sweden.10.1145/2365324.2365326 ↗
58. Karim, M.R., Alam, S.D.A., Kabeer, S.J., Ruhe, G., Baluta, B., and Mahmud, S. (2016, January 17). Applying data analytics towards optimized issue management: An industrial case study. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI), Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/2896839.2896845 ↗
59. Castro-Herrera, C., and Cleland-Huang, J. (2009, January 1). A machine learning approach for identifying expert stakeholders. Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/MARK.2009.1 ↗
60. Abdellatif, T.M. (2018, January 16). A Comparison Study Between Soft Computing and Statistical Regression Techniques for Software Effort Estimation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE), Quebec, QC, Canada.
61. Mendes, E., Turhan, B., Rodríguez, P., and Freitas, V. (2015, January 21). Estimating the value of decisions relating to managing and developing software-intensive Products and Projects. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering, Beijing, China.10.1145/2810146.2810154 ↗
62. A Novel Case Base Reasoning and Frequent Pattern Based Decision Support System for Mitigating Software Risk Factors10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999036 ↗
63. Qu, Y., and Yang, T.-Z. (2016, January 13). Research on occurrence frequency of IT projects risk based on fuzzy influence diagram. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), Jeju, Korea.10.1109/ICMLC.2016.7860895 ↗
64. Sree, S.R., and Ramesh, S. (2016). Analytical Structure of a Fuzzy Logic Controller for Software Development Effort Estimation. Computational Intelligence in Data Mining—Volume 1, Springer.
65. Raza, M.B., Kirkham, T., Harrison, R., Monfared, R., Haq, I., and Wood, S. (2009, January 27–30). Evolving knowledge based product lifecycle management from a digital ecosystem to support automated manufacturing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, Lyon, France.10.1145/1643823.1643904 ↗
66. Yang, G., Zhang, T., and Lee, B. (2014, January 28). Utilizing a multi-developer network-based developer recommendation algorithm to fix bugs effectively. Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Gyeongju, Korea.10.1145/2554850.2555008 ↗
67. Amasaki, S., and Lokan, C. (2017, January 28). A Virtual Study of Moving Windows for Software Effort Estimation Using Finnish Datasets. Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Innsbruck, Austria.10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_6 ↗
68. Qahtani, A.M. (2020, January 17). An Empirical Study of Agile Testing in A Distributed Software Development Project. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Geoinformatics and Data Analysis, Marseille, France.10.1145/3397056.3397085 ↗
69. Bruegge, B., David, J., Helming, J., and Koegel, M. (2009, January 18–19). Classification of tasks using machine learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Predictor Models in Software Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1540438.1540455 ↗
70. Software effort estimation as a multiobjective learning problem10.1145/2522920.2522928 ↗
71. Shivhare, J., and Rath, S.K. (2014, January 21). Software effort estimation using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the 7th India Software Engineering Conference, Noida, Chennai, India.10.1145/2590748.2590767 ↗
72. Ramaswamy, V., Suma, V., and Pushphavathi, T. (2012, January 21). An approach to predict software project success by cascading clustering and classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Mobile Application Modelling and Development (ICSEMA 2012), Chennai, India.10.1049/ic.2012.0137 ↗
73. Iwata, K., Nakashima, T., Anan, Y., and Ishii, N. (2016, January 14). Effort estimation for embedded software development projects by combining machine learning with classification. Proceedings of the 2016 4th Intl Conf on Applied Computing and Information Technology/3rd Intl Conf on Computational Science/Intelligence and Applied Informatics/1st Intl Conf on Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (ACIT-CSII-BCD), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/ACIT-CSII-BCD.2016.058 ↗
74. Ionescu, V.-S. (2017, January 9). An approach to software development effort estimation using machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania.10.1109/ICCP.2017.8117004 ↗
75. BaniMustafa, A. (2018, January 12). Predicting software effort estimation using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (CSIT), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/CSIT.2018.8486222 ↗
76. Menzies, T., Bird, C., Zimmermann, T., Schulte, W., and Kocaganeli, E. (2011, January 12). The inductive software engineering manifesto: Principles for industrial data mining. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning Technologies in Software Engineering, Lawrence, KS, USA.10.1145/2070821.2070824 ↗
77. Dehghan, A., Blincoe, K., and Damian, D. (2016, January 13). A hybrid model for task completion effort estimation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Analytics, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/2989238.2989242 ↗
78. Tollin, I., Fontana, F.A., Zanoni, M., and Roveda, R. (2017, January 15–16). Change prediction through coding rules violations. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Karlskrona, Sweden.10.1145/3084226.3084282 ↗
79. Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, X., Liu, M., and Du, J. (2009, January 27). An intelligent model for software project risk prediction. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICIII.2009.157 ↗
80. Manalif, E., Capretz, L.F., Nassif, A.B., and Ho, D. (2012, January 15). Fuzzy-ExCOM software project risk assessment. Proceedings of the 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Boca Raton, FL, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2012.193 ↗
81. Rana, R., and Staron, M. (2015, January 25). Machine learning approach for quality assessment and prediction in large software organizations. Proceedings of the 2015 6th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSESS.2015.7339243 ↗
82. Tariq, S., Usman, M., Wong, R., Zhuang, Y., and Fong, S. (2015, January 9). On learning software effort estimation. Proceedings of the 2015 3rd International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI), Bali, Indonesia.10.1109/ISCBI.2015.21 ↗
83. Kumar, L., Rath, S., and Sureka, A. (2017, January 8). An empirical analysis on effective fault prediction model developed using ensemble methods. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Turin, Italy.10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.53 ↗
84. Cost-sensitive and ensemble-based prediction model for outsourced software project risk prediction10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.003 ↗
85. An effective approach for software project effort and duration estimation with machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.066 ↗
86. Lochmann, K., Ramadani, J., and Wagner, S. (2013, January 9). Are comprehensive quality models necessary for evaluating software quality?. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1145/2499393.2499404 ↗
87. Software process evaluation: A machine learning framework with application to defect management process10.1007/s10664-013-9254-z ↗
88. A machine learning based software process model recommendation method10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.002 ↗
89. Fitzgerald, C., Letier, E., and Finkelstein, A. (2011, January 2). Early failure prediction in feature request management systems. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference, Trento, Italy.10.1109/RE.2011.6051658 ↗
90. Joseph, H.R. (2015, January 24). Poster: Software Development Risk Management: Using Machine Learning for Generating Risk Prompts. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Florence, Italy.10.1109/ICSE.2015.271 ↗
91. Performance tuning for machine learning-based software development effort prediction models
92. I-Competere: Using applied intelligence in search of competency gaps in software project managers10.1007/s10796-012-9369-6 ↗
93. Neural network models for software development effort estimation: A comparative study10.1007/s00521-015-2127-1 ↗
94. Desai, V.S., and Mohanty, R. (2018, January 28). ANN-Cuckoo Optimization Technique to Predict Software Cost Estimation. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT), Jabalpur, India.10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2018.8722380 ↗
95. Schleier-Smith, J. (2015, January 13). An architecture for Agile machine learning in real-time applications. Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1145/2783258.2788628 ↗
96. Volf, Z., and Shmueli, E. (2017, January 8). Screening heuristics for project gating systems. Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, Paderborn, Germany.10.1145/3106237.3117766 ↗
97. Liyi, M., Shiyu, Z., and Jian, G. (2010, January 18). A project risk forecast model based on support vector machine. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences, Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSESS.2010.5552331 ↗
98. Lopez-Martin, C., Banitaan, S., Garcia-Floriano, A., and Yanez-Marquez, C. (2017, January 21). Support vector regression for predicting the enhancement duration of software projects. Proceedings of the 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-101 ↗
99. Forecasting enterprise resource planning software effort using evolutionary support vector machine inference model10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.02.003 ↗
100. Software effort interval prediction via Bayesian inference and synthetic bootstrap resampling10.1145/3295700 ↗