Analysis of Shielding Performance of Radiation-Shielding Materials According to Particle Size and Clustering Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
In the field of medical radiation shielding, there is an extensive body of research on process technologies for ecofriendly shielding materials that could replace lead. In particular, the particle size and arrangement of the shielding material when blended with a polymer material affect shielding performance. In this study, we observed how the particle size of the shielding material affects shielding performance. Performance and particle structure were observed for every shielding sheet, which were fabricated by mixing microparticles and nanoparticles with a polymer material using the same process. We observed that the smaller the particle size was, the higher both the clustering and shielding effects in the high-energy region. Thus, shielding performance can be improved. In the low-dose region, the effect of particle size on shielding performance was insignificant. Moreover, the shielding sheet in which nanoparticles and microsized particles were mixed showed similar performance to that of the shielding sheet containing only microsized particles. Findings indicate that, when fabricating a shielding sheet using a polymer material, the smaller the particles in the high-energy region are, the better the shielding performance is. However, in the low-energy region, the effect of the particles is insignificant.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Radiation Dose and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Daegu 42601, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization10.1148/radiol.2303021726 ↗
2. Use of artificial intelligence in computed tomography dose optimization10.1177/0146645320940827 ↗
3. Evaluation of flow pattern recognition and void fraction measurement in two phase flow independent of oil pipeline’s scale layer thickness10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.043 ↗
4. Proposing a gamma radiation based intelligent system for simultaneous analyzing and detecting type and amount of petroleum by-products10.1016/j.net.2020.09.015 ↗
5. Radiation dose in CT: Are we meeting the challenge?10.1259/bjr.75.889.750001 ↗
6. The risk of cumulative radiation exposure in chest imaging and the advantage of bedside ultrasound
7. A Study on the Use of Radiation-Protective Apron among Interventionists in Radiology10.4103/jcis.JCIS_34_18 ↗
8. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99 m-Technetium radiation10.1093/rpd/ncm176 ↗
9. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures10.1093/rpd/ncn244 ↗
10. Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.024 ↗
11. Lead poisoning risk assessment of radiology workers using lead shields10.1080/19338244.2018.1553843 ↗
12. The absorption properties of lead-free garments for use in radiation protection
13. Tungsten-based material as promising new lead-free gamma radiation shielding material in nuclear medicine10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.017 ↗
14. Development of air pressure mirroring particle dispersion method for producing high-density tungsten medical radiation shielding film
15. Polymer-Composite Materials for Radiation Protection10.1021/am300783d ↗
16. Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers10.1118/1.3260839 ↗
17. Monaco, M.G.L., Carta, A., Tamhid, T., and Porru, S. (2020). Anti-X Apron Wearing and Musculoskeletal Problems among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17165877 ↗
18. Effect of particle size on gamma radiation shielding property of gadolinium oxide dispersed epoxy resin matrix composite
19. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
20. Effects of WO3 Particle Size in WO3/Epoxy Resin Radiation Shielding Material
21. Kim, S.C., and Cho, S.H. (2019). Analysis of the Correlation between Shielding Material Blending Characteristics and Porosity for Radiation Shielding Films. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9091765 ↗
22. Study of the effect of using nanomaterial in radiological shielding
23. Effectiveness evaluation of self-produced micro- and nanosized tungsten materials for radiation shielding with diagnostic X-ray imaging system10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.07.107 ↗
24. Study of the shielding properties for some composite materials manufactured from polymer epoxy supported by cement, aluminum, iron and lead against gamma rays of the cobalt radioactive source (Co-60)
25. X-ray transmission through nanostructured and microstructured CuO materials10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.11.002 ↗
26. Investigation of barium borate glasses for radiation shielding applications
27. Conventional and new lead-free radiation shielding materials for radiation protection in nuclear medicine: A review10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108439 ↗
28. Investigation on sintering mechanism of nanoscale tungsten powder based on atomistic simulation10.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.033 ↗
29. Nanocrystalline/nanoparticle ZnO synthesized by high energy ballmilling process10.1016/j.matlet.2012.07.041 ↗
30. Comparison of radiation shielding ratios of nano-sized bismuth trioxide and molybdenum10.1080/10420150.2015.1080703 ↗
31. Natural fibre high-density polyethylene and lead oxide composites for radiation shielding10.1016/S0969-806X(02)00470-X ↗
32. Protection evaluation of non-lead radiation-shielding fabric: Preliminary exposure-dose study10.1007/s11282-018-0338-8 ↗
33. Comparison of Lead-free and Conventional x-ray aprons for Diagnostic Radiology10.1007/978-3-642-03902-7_155 ↗
34. Effect of clustering on particle pushing and solidification behaviour in TiB2 reinforced aluminium PMMCs10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.027 ↗
35. Simple empirical correction functions to cross sections of the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, pair and triplet production for carbon radiation shields for intermediate and high photon energies10.1088/2399-6528/aab408 ↗
36. Atomic Photoelectric Effect at High Energies10.1103/PhysRev.117.1017 ↗
37. Impact of photoelectric effect on X-ray density logging and its correction10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.06.031 ↗
38. Transparent polymers embedding nanoparticles for X-rays attenuation
39. Kalkornsurapranee, E., Kothan, S., Intom, S., Johns, J., Kaewjaeng, S., Kedkaew, C., Chaiphaksa, W., Sareein, T., and Kaewkhao, J. (2020). Wearable and flexible radiation shielding natural rubber composites: Effect of different radiation shielding fillers. Rad. Phys. Chem., 179.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109261 ↗
40. Characterisation of micro-sized and nano-sized tungsten oxide-epoxycomposites for radiation shielding of diagnostic X-rays10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.023 ↗