journal article·2019-10-15Open access

Predicting Heating Load in Energy-Efficient Buildings Through Machine Learning Techniques

Hossein Moayedi, Dieu Tien Bui, Anastasios Dounis, Zongjie Lyu, Loke Kok Foong

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 20

Abstract

The heating load calculation is the first step of the iterative heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) design procedure. In this study, we employed six machine learning techniques, namely multi-layer perceptron regressor (MLPr), lazy locally weighted learning (LLWL), alternating model tree (AMT), random forest (RF), ElasticNet (ENet), and radial basis function regression (RBFr) for the problem of designing energy-efficient buildings. After that, these approaches were used to specify a relationship among the parameters of input and output in terms of the energy performance of buildings. The calculated outcomes for datasets from each of the above-mentioned models were analyzed based on various known statistical indexes like root relative squared error (RRSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R2), and relative absolute error (RAE). It was found that between the discussed machine learning-based solutions of MLPr, LLWL, AMT, RF, ENet, and RBFr, the RF was nominated as the most appropriate predictive network. The RF network outcomes determined the R2, MAE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE for the training dataset to be 0.9997, 0.19, 0.2399, 2.078, and 2.3795, respectively. The RF network outcomes determined the R2, MAE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE for the testing dataset to be 0.9989, 0.3385, 0.4649, 3.6813, and 4.5995, respectively. These results show the superiority of the presented RF model in estimation of early heating load in energy-efficient buildings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Wind and Air Flow Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam

Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam

Geographic Information System Group, Department of Business and IT, University of South-Eastern Norway, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway

University of West Attica, Dept. of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, Campus 2, 250 Thivon & P. Ralli, 12244 Egaleo, Greece

State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China

School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Nguyen, T.N., Tran, T.P., Hung, H.D., Voznak, M., Tran, P.T., Minh, T., and Thanh-Long, N. (2018). Hybrid TSR-PSR alternate energy harvesting relay network over Rician fading channels: Outage probability and SER analysis. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18113839 ↗
2. Najafi, B., Ardabili, S.F., Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., and Rabczuk, T. (2018). An intelligent artificial neural network-response surface methodology method for accessing the optimum biodiesel and diesel fuel blending conditions in a diesel engine from the viewpoint of exergy and energy analysis. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11040860 ↗
3. The influence of rainfall intensity on soil loss mass from cellular confined slopes10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.007 ↗
4. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 ↗
5. Rizeei, H.M., Pradhan, B., and Saharkhiz, M.A. (2019). Allocation of emergency response centres in response to pluvial flooding-prone demand points using integrated multiple layer perceptron and maximum coverage location problem models. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 101205.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101205 ↗
6. Urban object extraction using Dempster Shafer feature-based image analysis from worldview-3 satellite imagery10.1080/01431161.2018.1524173 ↗
7. Mezaal, M., Pradhan, B., and Rizeei, H. (2018). Improving landslide detection from airborne laser scanning data using optimized Dempster–Shafer. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10071029 ↗
8. Aal-shamkhi, A.D.S., Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., and Abdullahi, S. (2017). Extraction and modeling of urban sprawl development in Karbala City using VHR satellite imagery. Spatial Modeling and Assessment of Urban Form, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54217-1_12 ↗
9. Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.024 ↗
10. A new design chart for estimating friction angle between soil and pile materials10.12989/gae.2016.10.3.315 ↗
11. Tight independent set neighborhood union condition for fractional critical deleted graphs and ID deleted graphs
12. Bui, D.T., Moayedi, H., Gör, M., Jaafari, A., and Foong, L.K. (2019). Predicting slope stability failure through machine learning paradigms. ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8090395 ↗
13. An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs
14. Moayedi, H., Bui, D.T., Gör, M., Pradhan, B., and Jaafari, A. (2019). The feasibility of three prediction techniques of the artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and hybrid particle swarm optimization for assessing the safety factor of cohesive slopes. ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8090391 ↗
15. Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.049 ↗
16. Multi-fractal scaling law for split strength of concrete cubes10.1680/macr.15.00070 ↗
17. Study of biological networks using graph theory10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.022 ↗
18. Early predicting cooling loads for energy-efficient design in office buildings by machine learning10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.004 ↗
19. Bi-level energy-efficient occupancy profile optimization integrated with demand-driven control strategy: University building energy saving10.1016/j.scs.2019.101539 ↗
20. A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.080 ↗
21. Energy efficient HVAC control for an IPS-enabled large space in commercial buildings through dynamic spatial occupancy distribution10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.060 ↗
22. Advances and challenges in building engineering and data mining applications for energy-efficient communities10.1016/j.scs.2015.12.001 ↗
23. Zhang, H., Yuan, C., Yang, G., Wu, L., Peng, C., Ye, W., Shen, Y., and Moayedi, H. (2019). A novel constitutive modelling approach measured under simulated freeze–thaw cycles for the rock failure. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00856-4 ↗
24. Predicting heating and cooling loads in energy-efficient buildings using two hybrid intelligent models10.3390/app9173543 ↗
25. Moayedi, H., Nguyen, H., and Rashid, A.S.A. (2019). Comparison of dragonfly algorithm and Harris hawks optimization evolutionary data mining techniques for the assessment of bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00834-w ↗
26. Applications of rice husk ash as green and sustainable biomass10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117851 ↗
27. Huang, X.X., Moayedi, H., Gong, S., and Gao, W. (2019). Application of metaheuristic algorithms for pressure analysis of crude oil pipeline. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Effects.10.1080/15567036.2019.1661550 ↗
28. Comprehensive preference learning and feature validity for designing energy-efficient residential buildings using machine learning paradigms10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105748 ↗
29. Bui, D.T., Moayedi, H., Kalantar, B., Osouli, A., Pradhan, B., Nguyen, H., and Rashid, A.S.A. (2019). Harris hawks optimization: A novel swarm intelligence technique for spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19163590 ↗
30. Prediction of residential building energy consumption: A neural network approach10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.066 ↗
31. Assessment of deep recurrent neural network-based strategies for short-term building energy predictions10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.004 ↗
32. The effect of size on the splitting strength of cubic concrete members10.1111/str.12127 ↗
33. Construction failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.503 ↗
34. Optimised design of energy efficient building facades via evolutionary neural networks10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.006 ↗
35. Modeling heating and cooling loads by artificial intelligence for energy-efficient building design10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.036 ↗
36. Sunarno, I., Sasmito, A.P., and Hong, L.P. (2018). Activity based smart lighting control for energy efficient building by neural network model. Astechnova 2017 International Energy Conference, EDP Sciences.
37. Malik, S., and Kim, D. (2018). Prediction-learning algorithm for efficient energy consumption in smart buildings based on particle regeneration and velocity boost in particle swarm optimization neural networks. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11051289 ↗
38. Comparison of linear regression and artificial neural networks models to predict heating and cooling energy demand, energy consumption and CO2 emissions10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.022 ↗
39. Forecasting diurnal cooling energy load for institutional buildings using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.050 ↗
40. Predicting hourly cooling load in the building: A comparison of support vector machine and different artificial neural networks10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.033 ↗
41. A validated methodology for the prediction of heating and cooling energy demand for buildings within the Urban Heat Island: Case-study of London10.1016/j.solener.2010.08.002 ↗
42. Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response
43. Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.003 ↗
44. Atkeson, C.G., Moore, A.W., and Schaal, S. (1997). Locally weighted learning for control. Lazy Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-2053-3_3 ↗
45. Frank, E., Mayo, M., and Kramer, S. (2015, January 13–17). Alternating model trees. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Salamanca, Spain.10.1145/2695664.2695848 ↗
46. Hamilton, C.R. (2016). Hourly Solar Radiation Forecasting through Neural Networks and Model Trees. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia].10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_63 ↗
47. Machine learning in the prediction of cardiac epicardial and mediastinal fat volumes10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.02.010 ↗
48. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
49. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth International Group.
50. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests10.1109/34.709601 ↗
51. Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling10.1021/ci034160g ↗
52. Diaz-Uriarte, R., and de Andres, S.A. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinform., 7.10.1186/1471-2105-7-3 ↗
53. Random forests for classification in ecology10.1890/07-0539.1 ↗
54. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
55. Buhmann, M.D. (2003). Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511543241 ↗