Field Reconnaissance and Earthquake Vulnerability of the RC Buildings in Adıyaman during 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes
Source abstract
Abstract
The 6th February 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan earthquakes (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6) caused great destruction in many cities and were the disaster of the century for Türkiye. The greatest destruction was caused in the provinces of Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Adıyaman during these earthquakes, which were independent of each other and occurred on the same day. Information about earthquakes and strong ground motion records is given within the scope of this study. Reinforced concrete (RC) structures which constitute a large part of the urban building stock in the earthquake region were exposed to structural damage at different levels. The structural damage in the RC structures in the city center, Gölbaşı, and Kahta districts of the province of Adıyaman was evaluated within the scope of earthquake and civil engineering after field investigations. Insufficient RC, low-strength concrete reinforcement problems, RC frame failure, heavy overhang, short columns, soft story, and pounding effect are the main causes of the earthquake damage. The presence of these factors that reduce the earthquake resistance of RC structures increased the damage level. In addition, the fact that the earthquakes occurred nine hours apart and the continuation of aftershocks during that period negatively affected the damage levels. It has been observed that structures that receive the necessary engineering services during the construction and project phases ensure the safety of life and property, even if the structure is slightly damaged. In this study, we also tried to reveal whether the target displacements were satisfactorily represented by numerical analysis for a sample RC structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis 13100, Türkiye
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06410, Türkiye
Çan Vocational School, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale 17400, Türkiye
Department of Civil Engineering, Epoka University, 1001 Tirana, Albania
Institute of Structural Mechanics (ISM), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
Department of Architecture, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis 13100, Türkiye
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Seismic vulnerability of low-rise residential buildings based on damage data from three earthquakes (Mw6. 5, 6.5 and 6.3)10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.008 ↗
2. Seismic vulnerability assessment of an old historical masonry building in Osijek, Croatia, using Damage Index10.1016/j.culher.2017.05.012 ↗
3. Performance of RC buildings after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: Lessons toward performance based design10.1007/s11803-023-2206-8 ↗
4. Rapid assessment of earthquake risk for Bosnia and Herzegovina10.1007/s10518-019-00775-1 ↗
5. Local site amplification maps for the volcanic area of Trecastagni, south-eastern Sicily (Italy)10.1007/s10518-023-01834-4 ↗
6. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings and wooden structures during the 2015 Mw 6.0 Sabah earthquake in Malaysia10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.056 ↗
7. Learning from failure: Damage and failure of masonry structures, after the 2017 Lesvos earthquake (Greece)10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104803 ↗
8. Building damages during the September 19, 2017 earthquake in Mexico City and seismic retrofitting of existing first soft-story buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109977 ↗
9. Field reconnaissance on seismic performance of RC buildings after the January 24, 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake10.1007/s11069-020-04340-x ↗
10. Reflection on earthquake damage of buildings in 2015 Nepal earthquake and seismic measures for post-earthquake reconstruction10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.089 ↗
11. Damage Observation of Reinforced Concrete Buildingsafter 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake, Türkiye
12. Failures of structures during the January 24, 2020, Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake in Türkiye10.1007/s11069-021-04764-z ↗
13. Buildings Damages after Elazığ, Türkiye Earthquake on January 24, 202010.1007/s11069-021-04831-5 ↗
14. 24 January 2020 Sivrice-Elazığ, Türkiye earthquake: Geotechnical evaluation and performance of structures10.1007/s10518-020-01018-4 ↗
15. Structural damages observed in buildings after the January 24, 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake in Türkiye
16. Damages and Failures of Structures in İzmir (Türkiye) during the October 30, 2020 Aegean Sea Earthquake10.1080/13632469.2022.2086186 ↗
17. Lesson learned after the Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 20–29 May 2012 earthquakes: A limit analysis insight on three masonry churches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.001 ↗
18. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016 ↗
19. Monaco, P., Totani, G., Barla, G.B., Cavallaro, A., Costanzo, A., Donofrio, A., Evangelista, L., Foti, S., Grasso, S., and Lanzo, G. (2010). Special Topics in Earthquake Engineering, Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Springer.
20. Damage during the 6–24 February 2017 Ayvacık (Çanakkale) earthquake swarm
21. Cavallaro, A., Capilleri, P.P., and Grasso, S. (2018). Site characterization by dynamic in situ and laboratory tests for liquefaction potential evaluation during Emilia Romagna earthquake. Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8070242 ↗
22. Piccinini, F., Gorreja, A., Di Stefano, F., Pierdicca, R., Sanchez Aparicio, L.J., and Malinverni, E.S. (2022). Preservation of Villages in Central Italy: Geomatic Techniques’ Integration and GIS Strategies for the Post-Earthquake Assessment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 11.10.3390/ijgi11050291 ↗
23. Pan, Z., Lang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Yu, C., and Wu, C. (2023). Geological Hazard Assessment of Secondary Collapses Due to Volcanic Earthquakes on Changbai Mountain in China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 12.10.3390/ijgi12080307 ↗
24. Işık, E. (2023). Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158937 ↗
25. Zengin, B., and Aydin, F. (2023). The effect of material quality on buildings moderately and heavily damaged by the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131910668 ↗
26. Vuran, E., Serhatoğlu, C., Timurağaoğlu, M.Ö., Smyrou, E., Bal, İ.E., and Livaoğlu, R. (2024). Damage observations of RC buildings from 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence and discussion on the seismic code regulations. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1–30.10.1007/s10518-023-01843-3 ↗
27. Karasin, I.B. (2023). Comparative Analysis of the 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan Earthquakes in Diyarbakır. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13102474 ↗
28. Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city10.1007/s11069-023-06314-1 ↗
29. Structural Damage Evaluation of Mosques and Minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107345 ↗
30. Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 202310.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405 ↗
31. Structural damage assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Adıyaman after Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) Earthquakes on 6 February 202310.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107799 ↗
32. Structural damage observed in reinforced concrete buildings in Adiyaman during the 2023 Turkiye Kahramanmaras Earthquakes10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105578 ↗
33. The East Anatolian fault system: Thoughts on its development
34. Duman, T.Y., and Emre, Ö. (2013). The East Anatolian Fault: Geometry, Segmentation and Jog Characteristics, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.10.1144/SP372.14 ↗
35. Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S., Elmacı, H., Olgun, Ş., and Şaroğlu, F. (2013). Active Fault Map of Türkiye with Explanatory Text, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration.
36. Active fault database of Türkiye10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2 ↗
37. Akar, F., Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., and İzol, R. (2024). Geotechnical and structural damages caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman). Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052165 ↗
38. (2023, April 30). Available online: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jllz/executive.
39. (2023, April 30). Available online: https://www.afad.gov.tr/.
40. Damage evaluation of masonry buildings during Kahramanmaras (Turkiye) earthquakes on February 06, 2023
41. (2023, April 20). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, Available online: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-Kahramanmaras-ve-Hatay-Depremleri-Raporu.pdf.
42. The effect of errors in structural system design on the structure damaged in 2023 Turkey earthquakes: A case study10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107923 ↗
43. Structural evaluations of reinforced concrete buildings damaged by Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2001)6:3(119) ↗
44. Damages on reinforced concrete buildings due to consecutive earthquakes in Van10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.06.006 ↗
45. Varum, H., Dumaru, R., Furtado, A., Barbosa, A.R., Gautam, D., and Rodrigues, H. (2018). Impacts and Insights of the Gorkha Earthquake, Elsevier.
46. Experimental evaluation of buildings damaged in recent earthquakes in Turkey10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.02.007 ↗
47. October 23, 2011 Türkiye/Van–Ercis earthquake: Structural damages in the residential buildings10.1007/s11069-012-0478-9 ↗
48. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9 ↗
49. Seismic rehabilitation of short rectangular RC columns10.1080/13632460409350480 ↗
50. A case study of reinforced concrete short column under earthquake using experimental and theoretical investigations10.12989/sem.2010.36.2.197 ↗
51. Işık, E., Ulutaş, H., Harirchian, E., Avcil, F., Aksoylu, C., and Arslan, M.H. (2023). Performance-based assessment of RC building with short columns due to the different design principles. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13030750 ↗
52. Evaluation of different cases of soft story formation for mid-rise RC buildings
53. Investigation of effect of infilled wall on soft story irregularity
54. Tezcan, S., Yazıcı, A., Özdemir, Z., and Erkal, A. (2007, January 17–22). Zayıf kat- yumuşak kat düzensizliği. Proceedings of the Altıncı Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, İstanbul, Turkey.
55. Özmen, H.B., İnel, M., and Bilgin, H. (2007, January 17–22). Yumuşak kat davranışının duvar etkisi dikkate alınarak incelenmesi. Proceedings of the Altıncı Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, İstanbul, Turkey.
56. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl earthquake in Türkiye10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.005 ↗
57. Performance of structures in İzmir after the Samos island earthquake10.1007/s10518-021-01226-6 ↗
58. Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Türkiye10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.012 ↗
59. Strong-column–weak-beam criterion for reinforced concrete frames subjected to biaxial seismic excitation10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112481 ↗
60. TBEC (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code, T.C. Resmi Gazete.
61. Işık, E., Harirchian, E., Bilgin, H., Kaya, B., and Karaşin, İ.B. (2021, January 10). The effect of insufficient cover thickness on structural performance of reinforced concrete buildings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Organization and Technology of Maintenance, Osijek, Croatia.10.1007/978-3-030-92851-3_20 ↗
62. Seismosoft (2024, February 10). SeismoStruct 2022—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. Available online: http://www.seismosoft.com.
63. Antoniou, S., and Pinho, R. (2022). Seismostruct–Seismic Analysis Program by Seismosoft, Seismosoft. Technical Manual and User Manual.
64. Menegotto, M., and Pinto, P.E. (1973). Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
65. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
66. Optimal lateral load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures
67. Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures10.1080/13632460409350498 ↗
68. Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: Comparative results10.1080/13632460609350590 ↗
69. (2005). Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistanc—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3).
70. Pinto, P.E., and Franchin, P. (2011, January 10–11). Eurocode 8—Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Proceedings of the Eurocode 8 Background and Applications, Dissemination of Information for Training, Lisbon, Portugal.