Analysis and Prediction Model of Fuel Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the alarming rate of climate change, fuel consumption and emission estimates are critical in determining the effects of materials and stringent emission control strategies. In this research, an analytical and predictive study has been conducted using the Government of Canada dataset, containing 4973 light-duty vehicles observed from 2017 to 2021, delivering a comparative view of different brands and vehicle models by their fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Based on the findings of the statistical data analysis, this study makes evidence-based recommendations to both vehicle users and producers to reduce their environmental impacts. Additionally, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and various regression models have been built to estimate fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions for future vehicle designs. This study reveals that the Univariate Polynomial Regression model is the best model for predictions from one vehicle feature input, with up to 98.6% accuracy. Multiple Linear Regression and Multivariate Polynomial Regression are good models for predictions from multiple vehicle feature inputs, with approximately 75% accuracy. Convolutional Neural Network is also a promising method for prediction because of its stable and high accuracy of around 70%. The results contribute to the quantifying process of energy cost and air pollution caused by transportation, followed by proposing relevant recommendations for both vehicle users and producers. Future research should aim towards developing higher performance models and larger datasets for building APIs and applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle emissions and performance · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Air Quality and Health Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3HF, UK
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. The indirect effect of the built environment on travel mode choice: A focus on recent movers10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102983 ↗
2. Straka, W., Kondragunta, S., Wei, Z., Zhang, H., Miller, S.D., and Watts, A. (2021). Examining the economic and environmental impacts of covid-19 using earth observation data. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13010005 ↗
3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2019). The Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC, IPCC.
4. European Environment Agency (2015). Final Energy Consumption by Sector and Fuel.
5. Yang, Z., and Bandivadekar, A. (2017). Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards, International Council on Clean Transportation.
6. Guensler, R. (1993). Data Needs for Evolving Motor Vehicle Emission Modeling Approaches, The University of California Transportation Center.
7. Microscale emission models incorporating acceleration and deceleration10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:3(348) ↗
8. Kan, Z., Tang, L., Kwan, M.P., and Zhang, X. (2018). Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions using GPS big data. Int. J. Environ. Res., 15.10.3390/ijerph15040566 ↗
9. Zhao, Q., Chen, Q., and Wang, L. (2019). Real-Time Prediction of Fuel Consumption Based on Digital Map API. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9071369 ↗
10. Vehicle fuel consumption prediction method based on driving behavior data collected from smartphones10.1155/2020/9263605 ↗
11. A machine learning model for average fuel consumption in heavy vehicles10.1109/TVT.2019.2916299 ↗
12. In-use vs. type-approval fuel consumption of current passenger cars in Europe10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.013 ↗
13. (2021, November 30). UN Environment, Electric Light Duty Vehicles. UNEP. Available online: https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/transport/what-we-do/electric-mobility/electric-light-duty-vehicles.
14. European Commission (2021, November 30). 2030 Climate and Energy Framework. Climate Action. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2030-climate-energy-frameworken.
15. European Commission (2021, November 30). 2050 Long-Term Strategy. Climate Action. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en.
16. Government of Canada (2021, November 30). Net-Zero Emissions by 2050, Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/net-zero-emissions-2050.html.
17. Lederer, P.R. (2001). Analysis and Prediction of Individual Emissions-Producing Vehicle Activity for Light-Duty Vehicles and Light-Duty Trucks on Freeway Entrance Ramps, University of Louisville.
18. Cappiello, A., Chabini, I., Nam, E.K., Lue, A., and Abou Zeid, M. (2002, January 6). A statistical model of vehicle emissions and fuel consumption. Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Singapore.
19. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2020). Latest Version of MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES), Technical Report.
20. Rakha, H., Ahn, K., Moran, K., Saerens, B., and Van den Bulck, E. (2011). Simple Comprehensive Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions Model Based on Instantaneous Vehicle Power, TRIB. Technical Report.
21. Estimating emissions based on the integration of microscopic traffic simulation and vehicle dynamics model10.1080/15568318.2017.1363328 ↗
22. A modal approach to vehicular emissions and fuel consumption model development10.1080/10473289.2005.10464747 ↗
23. Fomunung, I., Washington, S., and Guensler, R. (2000). Comparison of MEASURE and MOBILE5a predictions using laboratory measurements of vehicle emission factors. Transportation Planning and Air Quality IV: Persistent Problems and Promising Solutions, American Society of Civil Engineers.
24. Ntziachristos, L., Gkatzoflias, D., Kouridis, C., and Samaras, Z. (2009). COPERT: A European road transport emission inventory model. Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-88351-7_37 ↗
25. Ntziachristos, L., Samaras, Z., Eggleston, S., Gorissen, N., Hassel, D., and Hickman, A. (2000). Copert iii, Computer Programme to Calculate Emissions from Road Transport, Methodol. Emiss. Factors (Version 2.1), Eur. Energy Agency (EEA), Cph.
26. Further validation of artificial neural network-based emissions simulation models for conventional and hybrid electric vehicles10.1080/10473289.2006.10464513 ↗
27. Modelling of instantaneous emissions from diesel vehicles with a special focus on NOx: Insights from machine learning techniques10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139625 ↗
28. A machine learning approach for light-duty vehicle idling emission estimation based on real driving and environmental information
29. Barth, M. (2010). The comprehensive modal emission model (CMEM) for predicting light-duty vehicle emissions. Transportation Planning and Air Quality IV: Persistent Problems and Promising Solutions, ASCE.
30. Analytic modeling of vehicle fuel consumption10.3390/en6010117 ↗
31. A methodology to develop macro-fuel consumption models for the urban transportation system
32. Abukhalil, T., AlMahafzah, H., Alksasbeh, M., and Alqaralleh, B.A. (2020). Fuel consumption using OBD-II and support vector machine model. J. Robot., 2020.10.1155/2020/9450178 ↗
33. Services, E.E. (2015). Data Science and Big Data Analytics: Discovering, Analyzing, Visualizing and Presenting Data, Wiley.
34. Government of Canada (2021, November 30). Fuel Consumption Ratings, Available online: https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/98f1a129-f628-4ce4-b24d-6f16bf24dd64.
35. Government of Canada (2021, November 30). Fuel Consumption Testing, Available online: https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy-efficiency/transportation-alternative-fuels/fuel-consumption-guide/understanding-fuel-consumption-ratings/fuel-consumption-testing/21008.
36. Pounis, G. (2018). Analysis in Nutrition Research: Principles of Statistical Methodology and Interpretation of the Results, Academic Press.
37. Albawi, S., Mohammed, T.A., and Al-Zawi, S. (2017, January 21–23). Understanding of a convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), Antalya, Turkey.10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186 ↗
38. Quality of Urban Air Review Group (1993). Diesel Vehicle Emissions and Urban Air Quality, University of Birmingham, Institute of Public and Environmental Health, School of Biological Sciences.
39. Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., and Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5 ↗
40. Tallarida, R., and Murray, R. (1987). Chi-Square Test. Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4974-0_43 ↗
41. Automatic plant image identification of vietnamese species using deep learning models10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V68I4P205S ↗
42. Artwork Style Transfer Model using Deep Learning Approach10.35470/2226-4116-2021-10-3-127-137 ↗
43. Web crawler: Design and implementation for extracting article-like contents10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-3-144-151 ↗