Digital Twin and Reinforcement Learning-Based Resilient Production Control for Micro Smart Factory
Source abstract
Abstract
To achieve efficient personalized production at an affordable cost, a modular manufacturing system (MMS) can be utilized. MMS enables restructuring of its configuration to accommodate product changes and is thus an efficient solution to reduce the costs involved in personalized production. A micro smart factory (MSF) is an MMS with heterogeneous production processes to enable personalized production. Similar to MMS, MSF also enables the restructuring of production configuration; additionally, it comprises cyber-physical production systems (CPPSs) that help achieve resilience. However, MSFs need to overcome performance hurdles with respect to production control. Therefore, this paper proposes a digital twin (DT) and reinforcement learning (RL)-based production control method. This method replaces the existing dispatching rule in the type and instance phases of the MSF. In this method, the RL policy network is learned and evaluated by coordination between DT and RL. The DT provides virtual event logs that include states, actions, and rewards to support learning. These virtual event logs are returned based on vertical integration with the MSF. As a result, the proposed method provides a resilient solution to the CPPS architectural framework and achieves appropriate actions to the dynamic situation of MSF. Additionally, applying DT with RL helps decide what-next/where-next in the production cycle. Moreover, the proposed concept can be extended to various manufacturing domains because the priority rule concept is frequently applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Korea
Digital Factory Solution R&D Center, MICUBE Solution Inc., Seoul 06719, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Smart Factories: South Korean and Swedish examples on manufacturing settings10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.128 ↗
2. Design and implementation of a digital twin application for a connected micro smart factory10.1080/0951192X.2019.1599439 ↗
3. Emerging manufacturing paradigm shifts for the incoming industrial revolution10.1007/s00170-015-8076-0 ↗
4. Customized production based on distributed 3D printing services in cloud manufacturing10.1007/s00170-015-7871-y ↗
5. IoT-based open manufacturing service platform for mass personalization
6. From mass customization to mass personalization: A strategic transformation10.1007/s10696-008-9048-6 ↗
7. Digital-twin-based cyber physical production system architectural framework for personalized production10.1007/s00170-019-04653-7 ↗
8. Understanding customer satisfaction in product customization10.1007/s00170-005-0177-8 ↗
9. VREDI: Virtual representation for a digital twin application in a work-center-level asset administration shell10.1007/s10845-020-01586-x ↗
10. Park, K.T., Son, Y.H., and Noh, S.D. (2020). The architectural framework of a cyber physical logistics system for digital-twin-based supply chain control. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1–22.
11. Operation procedures of a work-center-level digital twin for sustainable and smart manufacturing10.1007/s40684-020-00227-1 ↗
12. Ivanov, D. (2018). Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-69305-7 ↗
13. The impact of digital technology and industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 ↗
14. Modular manufacturing10.1007/BF00123909 ↗
15. Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain10.1080/00207543.2019.1627438 ↗
16. The FaaS system using additive manufacturing for personalized production10.1108/RPJ-11-2016-0195 ↗
17. Ďurica, L., Gregor, M., Vavrík, V., Marschall, M., Grznár, P., and Mozol, Š. (2019). A route planner using a delegate multi-agent system for a modular manufacturing line: Proof of concept. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214515 ↗
18. Kaid, H., Al-Ahmari, A., Li, Z., and Davidrajuh, R. (2020). Automatic supervisory controller for deadlock control in reconfigurable manufacturing systems with dynamic changes. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155270 ↗
19. Park, K.T., Jeon, S.-W., and Noh, S.D. (2021). Digital twin application with horizontal coordination for reinforcement-learning-based production control in a re-entrant job shop. Int. J. Prod. Res.10.1080/00207543.2021.1884309 ↗
20. Wu, J., Wei, Z., Li, W., Wang, Y., Li, Y., and Sauer, D. (2020). Battery thermal- and health-constrained energy management for hybrid electric bus based on Soft Actor-Critic DRL algorithm. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform.10.1109/TII.2020.3014599 ↗
21. Battery-involved energy management for hybrid electric bus based on expert-assistance deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm10.1109/TVT.2020.3025627 ↗
22. Smart manufacturing scheduling with edge computing using Multiclass Deep Q Network10.1109/TII.2019.2908210 ↗
23. Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: State of the art and new trends10.1080/00207543.2019.1636321 ↗
24. A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.008 ↗
25. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 ↗
26. Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005 ↗
27. Sztipanovits, J., and Ying, S. (2013). Foundations for Innovation: Strategic R&D Opportunities for the 21th Century Cyber-Physical Systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
28. Cyber physical energy system for saving energy of the dyeing process with industrial Internet of Things and manufacturing big data
29. Transitioning from standard automation solutions to cyber-physical production systems: An assessment of critical conceptual and technical challenges10.1109/JSYST.2017.2771139 ↗
30. Ribeiro, L. (2017, January 19–21). Cyber-physical production systems’ design challenges. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Edinburgh, UK.10.1109/ISIE.2017.8001414 ↗
31. Industrial artificial intelligence for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.002 ↗
32. Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance & service innovation10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.026 ↗
33. Automatic parameter estimation for reusable software components of modular and reconfigurable cyber-physical production systems in the domain of discrete manufacturing10.1109/TII.2017.2718729 ↗
34. Crawley, E., de Weck, O., Eppinger, S., Magee, C., Moses, J., Seering, W., Schindall, J., Wallace, D., and Whitney, D. (2004). The influence of architecture in engineering system. Monograph, 3.
35. Level of modularity and different levels of system granularity10.1115/1.4005069 ↗
36. Grieves, M. (2014). Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication, Dassault Systèmes.
37. Cyber-physical integration for moving digital factories forward towards smart manufacturing: A survey10.1007/s00170-018-2001-2 ↗
38. Digital twin and big data towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265 ↗
39. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art10.1109/TII.2018.2873186 ↗
40. Digital twin-driven rapid individualised designing of automated flow-shop manufacturing system10.1080/00207543.2018.1471243 ↗
41. Defining a digital twin-based cyber-physical production system for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors10.1080/00207543.2019.1566661 ↗
42. Smart manufacturing process and system automation—A critical review of the standards and envisioned scenarios10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.010 ↗
43. Dorst, W. (2015). Umsetzungsstrategie Industrie 4.0: Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0, Bitkom Research GmbH.
44. Adolphs, P., Auer, S., Bedenbender, H., Billmann, M., Hankel, M., Heidel, R., Hoffmeister, M., Huhle, H., Jochem, M., and Kiele-Dunsche, M. (2016). Structure of the Administration Shell, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.
45. Hankel, M., and Rexroth, B. (2015). Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0), Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.
46. Suri, K., Cadavid, J., Alferez, M., Dhouib, S., and Tucci-Piergiovanni, S. (2017, January 12–15). Modeling Business Motivation and Underlying Processes for RAMI 4.0-Aligned Cyber-physical Production Systems. Proceedings of the 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Limassol, Cyprus.10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247702 ↗
47. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., and Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry: Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0, Acatech.
48. ZVEI (2017). Examples of the Asset Administration Shell for Industrie 4.0 Components—Basic Part, German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers’ Association.
49. Developing a BOM management system for personal manufacturing10.7315/CDE.2017.352 ↗
50. Wang, Z., Schaul, T., Hessel, M., van Hasselt, H., Lanctot, M., and de Freitas, N. (2015). Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. arXiv.
51. A reinforcement learning approach to robust scheduling of semiconductor manufacturing facilities
52. Adaptive reactive job-shop scheduling with reinforcement learning agents
53. Reinforcement learning: A tutorial survey and recent advances10.1287/ijoc.1080.0305 ↗
54. Van Hasselt, H., Guez, A., and Silver, D. (2016, January 12–17). Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10295 ↗
55. Nair, A., Srinivasan, P., Blackwell, S., Alcicek, C., Fearon, R., de Maria, A., Panneershelvam, V., Suleyman, M., Beattie, C., and Petersen, S. (2015). Massively parallel methods for deep reinforcement learning. arXiv.