Conventional and Deep Learning Methods for Skull Stripping in Brain MRI
Source abstract
Abstract
Skull stripping in brain magnetic resonance volume has recently been attracting attention due to an increased demand to develop an efficient, accurate, and general algorithm for diverse datasets of the brain. Accurate skull stripping is a critical step for neuroimaging diagnostic systems because neither the inclusion of non-brain tissues nor removal of brain parts can be corrected in subsequent steps, which results in unfixed error through subsequent analysis. The objective of this review article is to give a comprehensive overview of skull stripping approaches, including recent deep learning-based approaches. In this paper, the current methods of skull stripping have been divided into two distinct groups—conventional or classical approaches, and convolutional neural networks or deep learning approaches. The potentials of several methods are emphasized because they can be applied to standard clinical imaging protocols. Finally, current trends and future developments are addressed giving special attention to recent deep learning algorithms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Air University, Sector E-9, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
School of Electrical Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Sugimori, H., and Kawakami, M. (2019). Automatic Detection of a Standard Line for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183849 ↗
2. Du, X., and He, Y. (2019). Gradient-Guided Convolutional Neural Network for MRI Image Super-Resolution. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224874 ↗
3. Kapellou, O., Counsell, S.J., Kennea, N., Dyet, L., Saeed, N., Stark, J., Maalouf, E., Duggan, P., Ajayi-Obe, M., and Hajnal, J. (2006). Abnormal Cortical Development after Premature Birth Shown by Altered Allometric Scaling of Brain Growth. PLoS Med., 3.10.1371/journal.pmed.0030265 ↗
4. Common genetic variants and risk of brain injury after preterm birth10.1542/peds.2013-3011 ↗
5. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics of Magnetic Resonance Images to Assess Disease and Treatment Effects in Perinatal Asphyxial Encephalopathy10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181e9f1ba ↗
6. The Role of Neuroimaging in Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Neonates10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.003 ↗
7. A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/R97 ↗
8. Improved Brain Tumor Segmentation via Registration-Based Brain Extraction10.3390/forecast1010005 ↗
9. Automatic Whole Brain MRI Segmentation of the Developing Neonatal Brain10.1109/TMI.2014.2322280 ↗
10. AdaPT: An adaptive preterm segmentation algorithm for neonatal brain MRI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.009 ↗
11. Mapping Longitudinal Development of Local Cortical Gyrification in Infants from Birth to 2 Years of Age10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3976-13.2014 ↗
12. Zhou, F., Zhuang, Y., Gong, H., Zhan, J., Grossman, M., and Wang, Z. (2016). Resting State Brain Entropy Alterations in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0146080 ↗
13. Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: A structural MRI study10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00253.x ↗
14. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in schizophrenia and other psychoses in the Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.022 ↗
15. Reconstruction of white matter fibre tracts using diffusion kurtosis tensor imaging at 1.5T: Pre-surgical planning in patients with gliomas10.1016/j.ejro.2018.01.002 ↗
16. Cortical reconstruction using implicit surface evolution: Accuracy and precision analysis10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.061 ↗
17. Statistical parametric mapping of brain morphology: Sensitivity is dramatically increased by using brain-extracted images as inputs10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.054 ↗
18. The impact of skull-stripping and radio-frequency bias correction on grey-matter segmentation for voxel-based morphometry10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.051 ↗
19. The benefits of skull stripping in the normalization of clinical fMRI data10.1016/j.nicl.2013.09.007 ↗
20. Normalized accurate measurement of longitudinal brain change10.1097/00004728-200105000-00022 ↗
21. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease: Cross-validation of BSI, SIENA and SIENAX10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.035 ↗
22. An open, multi-vendor, multi-field-strength brain MR dataset and analysis of publicly available skull stripping methods agreement10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.021 ↗
23. Beers, A., Brown, J., Chang, K., Hoebel, K., Gerstner, E., Rosen, B., and Kalpathy-Cramer, J. (2018). DeepNeuro: An open-source deep learning toolbox for neuroimaging. arXiv.
24. The preprocessed connectomes project repository of manually corrected skull-stripped T1-weighted anatomical MRI data10.1186/s13742-016-0150-5 ↗
25. Fast robust automated brain extraction10.1002/hbm.10062 ↗
26. A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods10.1109/TST.2014.6961028 ↗
27. Methods on skull stripping of MRI head scan images—A review10.1007/s10278-015-9847-8 ↗
28. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 ↗
29. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–8). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
30. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
31. Guest Editorial Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique10.1109/TMI.2016.2553401 ↗
32. The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress report and future plans10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.007 ↗
33. Impact of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative, 2004 to 201410.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.005 ↗
34. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1769 ↗
35. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3: Continued innovation for clinical trial improvement10.1016/j.jalz.2016.10.006 ↗
36. Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498 ↗
37. Open access series of imaging studies: Longitudinal MRI data in nondemented and demented older adults10.1162/jocn.2009.21407 ↗
38. OASIS-3: Longitudinal neuroimaging, clinical, and cognitive dataset for normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease
39. FreeSurfer10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 ↗
40. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031 ↗
41. Image similarity and tissue overlaps as surrogates for image registration accuracy: Widely used but unreliable
42. MRBrainS challenge: Online evaluation framework for brain image segmentation in 3T MRI scans10.1155/2015/813696 ↗
43. Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets10.1109/42.232244 ↗
44. Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI10.1109/42.668699 ↗
45. Automated histogram-based brain segmentation in T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetic resonance head images10.1006/nimg.2002.1287 ↗
46. An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017 ↗
47. Fully automatic brain extraction algorithm for axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.08.004 ↗
48. Automatic brain extraction methods for T1 magnetic resonance images using region labeling and morphological operations10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.008 ↗
49. Gambino, O., Daidone, E., Sciortino, M., Pirrone, R., and Ardizzone, E. (September, January 30). Automatic skull stripping in MRI based on morphological filters and fuzzy c-means segmentation. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091248 ↗
50. Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model10.1006/nimg.2000.0730 ↗
51. BrainSuite: An automated cortical surface identification tool10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00054-3 ↗
52. Automatic Brain Portion Segmentation From Magnetic Resonance Images of Head Scans Using Gray Scale Transformation and Morphological Operations10.1097/RCT.0000000000000249 ↗
53. Skull stripping using graph cuts10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.050 ↗
54. Smart histogram analysis applied to the skull-stripping problem in T1-weighted MRI10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.01.004 ↗
55. Statistical morphological skull stripping of adult and infant MRI data10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.04.001 ↗
56. An accurate and robust skull stripping method for 3-D magnetic resonance brain images10.1016/j.mri.2018.07.014 ↗
57. Kavitha Srinivasan, N.N. (2018). An intelligent skull stripping algorithm for MRI image sequences using mathematical morphology. Int. J. Med Sci.10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-18-949 ↗
58. Bhadauria, A.S., Bhateja, V., Nigam, M., and Arya, A. (2020). Skull Stripping of Brain MRI Using Mathematical Morphology. Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-9282-5_75 ↗
59. Anatomical Skull-Stripping Template and Improved Boundary-Oriented Quantitative Segmentation Evaluation Metrics10.1166/jmihi.2020.2920 ↗
60. Two-dimensional fast magnetic resonance brain segmentation10.1109/51.940054 ↗
61. Atkins, M.S., Siu, K., Law, B., Orchard, J.J., and Rosenbaum, W.L. (2002, January 23–28). Difficulties of T1 brain MRI segmentation techniques. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.467158 ↗
62. Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.019 ↗
63. Accurate and robust extraction of brain regions using a deformable model based on radial basis functions10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.05.011 ↗
64. A Fast 3D Brain Extraction and Visualization Framework Using Active Contour and Modern OpenGL Pipelines10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948621 ↗
65. Heckemann, R.A., Ledig, C., Gray, K.R., Aljabar, P., Rueckert, D., Hajnal, J.V., and Hammers, A. (2015). Brain Extraction Using Label Propagation and Group Agreement: Pincram. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0135746 ↗
66. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 ↗
67. Automated cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volume measurement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.018 ↗
68. Brain MAPS: An automated, accurate and robust brain extraction technique using a template library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.067 ↗
69. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032 ↗
70. BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.012 ↗
71. Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.018 ↗
72. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development: Performance of a population based sample of healthy children aged 6 to 18 years on a neuropsychological battery10.1017/S1355617707070841 ↗
73. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: Theory and rationale for its development. The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM)10.1006/nimg.1995.1012 ↗
74. The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008 ↗
75. Nonlocal intracranial cavity extraction10.1155/2014/820205 ↗
76. Multi-Atlas Skull-Stripping10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.010 ↗
77. (2019, December 28). Pincram. Available online: http://soundray.org/pincram.
78. A New MRI Masking Technique Based on Multi-Atlas Brain Segmentation in Controls and Schizophrenia: A Rapid and Viable Alternative to Manual Masking10.1111/jon.12313 ↗
79. (2020, January 30). Automatic Registration Toolbox (ART). Available online: http://www.nitrc.org/projects/art/.
80. Accurate Learning with Few Atlases (ALFA): An algorithm for MRI neonatal brain extraction and comparison with 11 publicly available methods10.1038/srep23470 ↗
81. Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.017 ↗
82. Robust deformable-surface-based skull-stripping for large-scale studies
83. Interactive 3D segmentation of MRI and CT volumes using morphological operations10.1097/00004728-199203000-00019 ↗
84. Justice, R., Stokely, E., Strobel, J., Ideker, R., and Smith, W. (1997). Medical Image Segmentation Using 3D Seeded Region Growing, SPIE.10.1117/12.274179 ↗
85. Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.047 ↗
86. MARGA: Multispectral adaptive region growing algorithm for brain extraction on axial MRI10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.015 ↗
87. Level set segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on local Gaussian distribution fitting energy10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.004 ↗
88. Somasundaram, K., and Shankar, R.S. (2010). Skull Stripping of MRI Using Clustering and 2D Region Growing Method. Image Process. NCIMP, 1–12.
89. Hahn, H.K., and Peitgen, H.-O. (2000). The Skull Stripping Problem in MRI Solved by a Single 3D Watershed Transform. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-40899-4_14 ↗
90. Mie, S., Lakare, S., Ming, W., Kaufman, A., and Nakajima, M. (2000, January 10–13). A gradient magnitude based region growing algorithm for accurate segmentation. Proceedings of the Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
91. Fennema-Notestine, C., Ozyurt, I., Brown, G., Clark, C., Morris, S., Bischoff-Grethe, A., Bondi, M., and Jernigan, T.L. (2003, January 8–12). Bias correction, puls sequence, and neurodegeneration influence performance of automated skull-stripping methods. Proceedings of the Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, New Orleans, LA, USA.
92. Quantitative evaluation of automated skull-stripping methods applied to contemporary and legacy images: Effects of diagnosis, bias correction, and slice location10.1002/hbm.20161 ↗
93. Hwang, H., Rehman, H.Z.U., and Lee, S. (2019). 3D U-Net for skull stripping in brain MRI. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030569 ↗
94. Bauer, S., Fejes, T., and Reyes, M. (2012). A skull-stripping filter for ITK. Insight J., 70–78.10.54294/dp4mfp ↗
95. Bauer, S., Nolte, L.-P., and Reyes, M. (2012). Skull-stripping for tumor-bearing brain images. arXiv.10.54294/dp4mfp ↗
96. A meta-algorithm for brain extraction in MRI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.019 ↗
97. Ward, B.D. (1999). Intracranial Segmentation, Biophysics Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin.
98. Huang, A., Abugharbieh, R., Tam, R., and Traboulsee, A. (2006, January 27–30). MRI Brain Extraction with Combined Expectation Maximization and Geodesic Active Contours. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ISSPIT.2006.270779 ↗
99. Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods10.1109/TMI.2011.2138152 ↗
100. Iglesias, J.E. (2019, December 31). ROBEX 1.2. Available online: https://www.nitrc.org/projects/robex.