journal article·2020-03-02Open access

Factor Identification and Prediction for Teen Driver Crash Severity Using Machine Learning: A Case Study

Ciyun Lin, Dayong Wu, Hongchao Liu, Xueting Xia, Nischal Bhattarai

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 5

Abstract

Crashes among young and inexperienced drives are a major safety problem in the United States, especially in an area with large rural road networks, such as West Texas. Rural roads present many unique safety concerns that are not fully explored. This study presents a complete machine leaning pipeline to find the patterns of crashes involved with teen drivers no older than 20 on rural roads in West Texas, identify factors that affect injury levels, and build four machine learning predictive models on crash severity. The analysis indicates that the major causes of teen driver crashes in West Texas are teen drivers who failed to control speed or travel at an unsafe speed when they merged from rural roads to highways or approached intersections. They also failed to yield on the undivided roads with four or more lanes, leading to serious injuries. Road class, speed limit, and the first harmful event are the top three factors affecting crash severity. The predictive machine learning model, based on Label Encoder and XGBoost, seems the best option when considering both accuracy and computational cost. The results of this work should be useful to improve rural teen driver traffic safety in West Texas and other rural areas with similar issues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Vehicle emissions and performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Traffic Information and Control Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China

Texas A & M Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA

Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Youth Scientific Research Fund of Jilin

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. TxDOT (2019, July 30). TxDOT Crash Report Information System (CRIS). Available online: https://cris.dot.state.tx.us/public/Query/app/welcome.
2. Development of a supplementary driver education tool for teenage drivers on rural roads10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.014 ↗
3. Compton, R.P., and Ellison-Potter, P. (2008). Teen Driver Crashes: A Report to Congress.
4. Ankem, G., Gorman, T., Klauer, C., Ehsani, J.P., Simons-Morton, B., Gershon, P., and Dingus, T. (2018, January 7–11). An Objective Evaluation of Novice Teen Driver Speeding Behavior. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
5. Ferguson, S.A. (2013). Speeding-Related Fatal Crashes among Teen Drivers and Opportunities for Reducing the Risks, Governors Highway Safety Association.
6. Distracted driving, visual inattention, and crash risk among teenage drivers10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.024 ↗
7. Teens’ distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.002 ↗
8. Adolescent drivers: A developmental perspective on risk, proficiency, and safety10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.026 ↗
9. Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015 ↗
10. The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014 ↗
11. Covariability in three dimensions of teenage driving risk behavior: Impaired driving, risky and unsafe driving behavior, and secondary task engagement10.1080/15389588.2015.1107183 ↗
12. The situational risks of young drivers: The influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00060-2 ↗
13. Peer passenger norms and pressure: Experimental effects on simulated driving among teenage males10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.007 ↗
14. Micucci, A., Mantecchini, L., and Sangermano, M. (2019). Analysis of the Relationship between Turning Signal Detection and Motorcycle Driver’s Characteristics on Urban Roads; A Case Study. Sensors, 19.10.20944/preprints201903.0070.v1 ↗
15. Modeling crash injury severity by road feature to improve safety10.1080/15389588.2017.1335396 ↗
16. Understanding the role of alcohol and drugs on bicyclist injury severity
17. Estimating factors contributing to frequency and severity of large truck–Involved crashes10.1061/JTEPBS.0000060 ↗
18. Mixed logit model-Based driver injury severity investigations in single-And multi-Vehicle crashes on rural two-Lane highways10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.014 ↗
19. A comparative analysis of factors affecting the frequency and severity of freight-Involved and non-Freight crashes on a major freight corridor freeway10.1177/0361198118776815 ↗
20. Fan, W.D., Gong, L., Washing, E.M., Yu, M., and Haile, E. (2016, January 10–14). Identifying and Quantifying Factors Affecting Vehicle Crash Severity at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings: Models and Their Comparison. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
21. Prediction and Factor Identification for Crash Severity: Comparison of Discrete Choice and Tree-Based Models10.1177/0361198119844456 ↗
22. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity under different weather conditions10.1080/15389588.2016.1207762 ↗
23. Machine learning methods to analyze injury severity of drivers from different age and gender groups10.1177/0361198118794292 ↗
24. Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.016 ↗
25. Application of support vector machine for crash injury severity prediction: A model comparison approach
26. Modeling nonlinear relationship between crash frequency by severity and contributing factors by neural networks
27. Sameen, M., and Pradhan, B. (2017). Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060476 ↗
28. Lee, D., Warner, J., and Morgan, C. (2019, January 10–12). Discovering Crash Severity Factors of Grade Crossing With a Machine Learning Approach. Proceedings of the 2019 Joint Rail Conference, Snowbird, UT, USA.10.1115/JRC2019-1231 ↗
29. Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008 ↗
30. (2019, July 30). Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Texas.
31. Estimating Traffic Control Risk Associated with Merging Vehicles on a Highway Merge Section10.3141/2236-07 ↗
32. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019, July 30). Traffic Safety Facts 2016 data: Alcohol-Impaired Driving, Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812630.
33. Tefft, B.C. (2015). Teen Driver Crashes: 1994–2013, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
34. NHTSA (2019, July 30). Teen Distracted Driver Data, Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812667.