Bioconservation of Historic Stone Buildings—An Updated Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Cultural heritage buildings of stone construction require careful restorative actions to maintain them as close to the original condition as possible. This includes consolidation and cleaning of the structure. Traditional consolidants may have poor performance due to structural drawbacks such as low adhesion, poor penetration and flexibility. The requirement for organic consolidants to be dissolved in volatile organic compounds may pose environmental and human health risks. Traditional conservation treatments can be replaced by more environmentally acceptable, biologically-based, measures, including bioconsolidation using whole bacterial cells or cell biomolecules; the latter include plant or microbial biopolymers and bacterial cell walls. Biocleaning can employ microorganisms or their extracted enzymes to remove inorganic and organic surface deposits such as sulfate crusts, animal glues, biofilms and felt tip marker graffiti. This review seeks to provide updated information on the innovative bioconservation treatments that have been or are being developed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Av. Agustín Melgar s/n. C.P., 24039 Campeche, Mexico
Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Oklahoma University, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Microbial deterioration of stone monuments—An updated overview10.1016/S0065-2164(08)00805-8 ↗
2. Rubrobacter-related bacteria associated with rosy discolouration of masonry and lime wall paintings10.1007/s002030100333 ↗
3. Biogenic black crusts on buildings in unpolluted environments10.1007/s00284-006-0432-8 ↗
4. Succession of fungi colonizing porous and compact limestone exposed to subtropical environments10.1016/j.funbio.2012.07.010 ↗
5. Orientation affects Trentepohlia-dominated biofilms on Mayan monuments of the Rio Bec style10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.07.014 ↗
6. Basu, S., Orr, S.A., and Aktas, Y.D. (2020). A geological perspective on climate change and building stone deterioration in London: Implications for urban stone-built heritage research and management. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11080788 ↗
7. Blue-Biotechnology and Biocleaning of Historic-Artistic Artifacts
8. Ziegenbalg, G., Brummer, K., and Pianski, J. (2010, January 22–24). Nano-Lime—A new material for the consolidation and conservation of historic mortars. Proceedings of the 2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC10 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop, Prague, Czech Republic.
9. Effect of the addition of hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane to TEOS-based stone consolidants10.1016/j.culher.2009.07.002 ↗
10. Favaro, M., Ossola, F., Toamsin, P., Vigato, P.A., Rossetto, G., El Habra, N., and Casarin, M. (2008, January 15–20). A novel approach to compatible and durable consolidation of limestone. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Torun, Poland.
11. Performance evaluation of commercial nanolime as a consolidant for friable lime-based plaster10.1080/01971360.2018.1486126 ↗
12. Nanolime- and nanosilica-based consolidants applied on heated granite and limestone: Effectiveness and durability10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.213 ↗
13. Nanoscience and nanomaterials for the knowledge and conservation of cultural heritage10.3389/fmats.2020.606076 ↗
14. Comparison of the performance of a novel nanolime doped with ZnO quantum dots with common consolidants for historical carbonate stone buildings10.1016/j.clay.2020.105732 ↗
15. Price, C.A., and Doehne, E. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research, Getty Conservation Institute. [2nd ed.].
16. Delgado-Rodrigues, J. (2010, January 26–28). Stone consolidation: Research and practice. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Works of Art and Conservation Science Today, Thessaloniki, Greece.
17. Evaluation of Escobilla’s mucilago treatments in the archaeological sites of Joya de Ceren (El Salvador)
18. Kita, Y. (2013, January 11–14). The functions of vegetable mucilage in lime and earth mortars—A review. Proceedings of the HMC2013-3rd Historic Mortars Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
19. Wheeler, G. (2005). Alkoxysilanes and the Consolidation of Stone, The Getty Conservation Institute.
20. Negri, A., Nervo, M., Di Marcello, S., and Castelli, D. (2021). Consolidation and Adhesion of Pictorial Layers on a Stone Substrate. The Study Case of the Virgin with the Child from Palazzo Madama, in Turin. Coatings, 11.10.3390/coatings11060624 ↗
21. Alisi, C., Bacchetta, L., Bojorquez, E., Falconieri, M., Gagliardi, S., Insaurralde, M., and Tatì, A. (2021). Mucilages from Different Plant Species Affect the Characteristics of Bio-Mortars for Restoration. Coatings, 11.10.3390/coatings11010075 ↗
22. Fierascu, R.C., Doni, M., and Fierascu, I. (2020). Selected aspects regarding the restoration/conservation of traditional wood and masonry building materials: A short overview of the last decade findings. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10031164 ↗
23. Effect of bio-stabilizers on capillary absorption and water vapour transfer into raw earth
24. Protection and consolidation of stone heritage by self-inoculation with indigenous carbonatogenic bacterial communities10.1038/s41467-017-00372-3 ↗
25. Whiting events and the formation of aragonite in Mediterranean karstic marine lakes: New evidence on its biologically induced inorganic origin10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01090.x ↗
26. Carbonate precipitation through microbial activities in natural environment, and their potential in biotechnology: A review10.3389/fbioe.2016.00004 ↗
27. Application of calcifying bacteria for remediation of stones and cultural heritages10.3389/fmicb.2014.00304 ↗
28. Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications10.1186/s40064-016-1869-2 ↗
29. Bioconsolidation of stone monuments. An overview
30. Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and its potential in bioconcrete: Microbiological and molecular concepts10.3389/fmats.2019.00126 ↗
31. Bacterial calcium carbonate mineralization in situ strategies for conservation of stone artworks: From cell components to microbial community10.3389/fmicb.2020.01386 ↗
32. Stone-isolated carbonatogenic bacteria as inoculants in bioconsolidation treatments for historical limestone10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.059 ↗
33. Calcium carbonate precipitation by heterotrophic bacteria isolated from biofilms formed on deteriorated ignimbrite stones: Influence of calcium on EPS production and biofilm formation by these isolates10.1080/08927014.2014.888715 ↗
34. Castanier, S., Le Métayer-Levrel, G., Orial, G., Loubière, J.F., and Perthuisot, J.P. (2000). Bacterial carbonatogenesis and applications to preservation and restoration of historic property. Of Microbes and Art, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-4239-1_14 ↗
35. Applications of bacterial carbonatogenesis to the protection and regeneration of limestones in buildings and historic patrimony10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00029-9 ↗
36. Diversity and biomineralization potential of the epilithic bacterial communities inhabiting the oldest public stone monument of Cluj-Napoca (Transylvania, Romania)10.3389/fmicb.2017.00372 ↗
37. Bio-consolidation of cracks in masonry cement mortars by Acinetobacter sp. SC4 isolated from a karst cave10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.03.008 ↗
38. Calcium carbonates: Induced biomineralization with controlled macromorphology10.5194/bg-14-4867-2017 ↗
39. Novel method to achieve crystallinity of calcite by Bacillus subtilis in coupled and non-coupled calcium-carbon sources10.1186/s13568-020-01111-6 ↗
40. Tanul, S. (2017). Biomineralization Using Synechococcus Pevalleikii and Its Applications in Building Material. [Master’s Thesis, Thapar University].
41. Assessment of cyanobacterial species for carbonate precipitation on mortar surface under different conditions10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.038 ↗
42. Calcification on mortar by live and UV-killed biofilm-forming cyanobacterial Gloeocapsa PCC10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.026 ↗
43. Calcium carbonate precipitation induced by calcifying bacteria in culture experiments: Influence of the medium on morphology and mineralogy10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.08.006 ↗
44. Bacteria from black crusts on stone monuments can precipitate CaCO3 allowing the development of a new bio-consolidation protocol for ornamental stone10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105031 ↗
45. Biocalcifying Bacillus subtilis cells effectively consolidate deteriorated Globigerina limestone10.1007/s10295-016-1768-0 ↗
46. Effect of culture medium on biocalcification by Pseudomonas putida, Lysinibacillus sphaericus and Bacillus subtilis10.1590/S1517-83822011000200014 ↗
47. Pseudomonas, Pantoea and Cupriavidus isolates induce calcium carbonate precipitation for biorestoration of ornamental stone10.1111/jam.12234 ↗
48. Isolation and potential biocementation of calcite precipitation inducing bacteria from Colombian buildings10.1007/s00284-017-1373-0 ↗
49. Golovkina, D.A., Zhurishkina, E.V., Ivanova, L.A., Baranchikov, A.E., Sokolov, A.Y., Bobrov, K.S., Masharsky, A.E., Tsvigun, N.V., Kopitsa, G.P., and Kulminskaya, A.A. (2020). Calcifying bacteria flexibility in induction of CaCO3 mineralization. Life, 10.10.3390/life10120317 ↗
50. Development of ecological biodesign products by bacterial biocalcification
51. Carbonate crystals precipitated by freshwater bacteria and their use as a limestone consolidant10.1128/AEM.02079-08 ↗
52. Role of fungal-mediated mineralization in biocementation of sand and its improved compressive strength10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.07.013 ↗
53. Biomineralization induced by Colletotrichum acutatum: A potential strategy for cultural relic bioprotection10.3389/fmicb.2018.01884 ↗
54. Biomineralization of carbonates induced by the fungi Paecilomyces inflatus and Plectosphaerella cucumerina10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.03.005 ↗
55. Chuo, S.C., Mohamed, S.F., Mohd Setapar, S.H., Ahmad, A., Jawaid, M., Wani, W.A., Yaqoob, A.A., and Ibrahim, M.N.M. (2020). Insights into the current trends in the utilization of bacteria for microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214993 ↗
56. Assessing ureolytic bacteria with calcifying abilities isolated from limestone caves for biocalcification
57. Biomineralization of calcium carbonate by marine bacterial strains isolated from calcareous deposits10.1051/mattech/2020027 ↗
58. Jennings, D.H. (1993). Oligotrophic growth of fungi: Stress or natural state?. Stress Tolerance of Fungi, Marcel Dekker.
59. Bioweathering potential of cultivable fungi associated with semi-arid surface microhabitats of Mayan buildings
60. Bull, A. (2004). Culture-Dependent Microbiology. Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting, ASM Press.
61. Profile of microbial communities on carbonate stones of the medieval church of San Leonardo di Siponto (Italy) by Illumina-based deep sequencing10.1007/s00253-016-7656-8 ↗
62. Bacillus subtilis gene cluster involved in calcium carbonate biomineralization10.1128/JB.01450-06 ↗
63. Involvement of etfA gene during CaCO3 precipitation in Bacillus subtilis biofilm10.1080/01490451.2016.1248254 ↗
64. Bacillus subtilis fadB (ysiB) gene encodes an enoyl-CoA hydratase10.1007/s13213-010-0121-5 ↗
65. Factors affecting formation of large calcite crystals (=1 mm) in Bacillus subtilis 168 biofilm10.1080/01490451.2017.1377788 ↗
66. Enhanced calcium carbonate-biofilm complex formation by alkali-generating Lysinibacillus boronitolerans YS11 and alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. AK1310.1186/s13568-019-0773-x ↗
67. Microbially induced calcite precipitation through urolytic organisms—A review
68. The optimal formulation of bio-carbonate and bio-magnesium phosphate cement to reduce ammonia emission10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118156 ↗
69. Micrographical, minerological and nano-mechanical characterisation of microbial carbonates from urease and carbonic anhydrase producing bacteria10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.013 ↗
70. Consolidation of quarry calcarenite by calcium carbonate precipitation induced by bacteria activated among the microbiota inhabiting the stone10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.03.002 ↗
71. Bacterial diversity evolution in Maya plaster and stone following a bio-conservation treatment10.3389/fmicb.2020.599144 ↗
72. An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part I: Effectiveness and compatibility in comparison with ethyl silicate10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.026 ↗
73. Durability assessment to environmental impact of nano-structured consolidants on Carrara marble by field exposure tests10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.004 ↗
74. A Bacillus subtilis cell fraction (BCF) inducing calcium carbonate precipitation: Biotechnological perspectives for monumental stone reinforcement10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.001 ↗
75. Mineral formation by bacteria in natural microbial communities10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00494.x ↗
76. Calcium carbonate mineralization: Involvement of extracellular polymeric materials isolated from calcifying bacteria10.1017/S1431927612000426 ↗
77. Spatio-temporal assembly of functional mineral scaffolds within microbial biofilms10.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.31 ↗
78. Sites of metal deposition in the cell wall of Bacillus subtilis10.1128/jb.141.2.876-887.1980 ↗
79. Overview of biopolymer-induced mineralization: What goes on in biofilms?10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.01.003 ↗
80. Assessment of the potential role of Streptomyces in cave moonmilk formation10.3389/fmicb.2017.01181 ↗
81. Ortega-Villamagua, E., Gudiño-Gomezjurado, M., and Palma-Cando, A. (2020). Microbiologically induced carbonate precipitation in the restoration and conservation of cultural heritage materials. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25235499 ↗
82. Influence of pore structure on the effectiveness of a biogenic carbonate surface treatment for limestone conservation10.1128/AEM.00219-11 ↗
83. Bacterially mediated mineralization of vaterite10.1016/j.gca.2006.11.031 ↗
84. Calcite biomineralization by bacterial isolates from the recently discovered pristine karstic herrenberg cave10.1128/AEM.06568-11 ↗
85. Synergistic role of bacterial urease and carbonic anhydrase in carbonate mineralization10.1007/s12010-013-0694-0 ↗
86. Microbiological precipitation of CaCO10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00082-6 ↗
87. Optimum conditions for microbial carbonate precipitation10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.066 ↗
88. Consolidation of archaeological gypsum plaster by bacterial biomineralization of calcium carbonate10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.007 ↗
89. Proto-calcite and proto-vaterite in amorphous calcium carbonates10.1002/anie.201003220 ↗
90. Biomineralization of calcium carbonate polymorphs by the bacterial strains isolated from calcareous sites10.4014/jmb.1212.11087 ↗
91. Microbial diversity and mineralogical-mechanical properties of calcitic cave speleothems in natural and in vitro biomineralization conditions10.3389/fmicb.2018.00040 ↗
92. A review of the nature, role and control of lithobionts on stone cultural heritage: Weighing-up and managing biodeterioration and bioprotection10.1007/s11274-020-02878-3 ↗
93. In situ long-term monitoring of recolonization by fungi and lichens after innovative and traditional conservative treatments of archaeological stones in Fiesole (Italy)10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.05.003 ↗
94. Jroundi, F., Gonzalez-Muñoz, M.T., Sterflinger, K., and Piñar, G. (2015). Molecular tools for monitoring the ecological sustainability of a stone bio-consolidation treatment at the Royal Chapel, Granada. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0132465 ↗
95. Susceptibility of biocalcite-modified fiber cement to biodeterioration10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.04.003 ↗
96. Palla, F., and Barresi, G. (2017). Biocleaning. Biotechnology and Conservation of Cultural Heritage, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-46168-7 ↗
97. The safety of biocleaning technologies for cultural heritage
98. Biodeterioration of stone: A review10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00109-8 ↗
99. Gauri, K.L., Parks, L., Jaynes, J., and Atlas, R. (1992, January 14–16). Removal of sulfated-crust from marble using sulfate-reducing bacteria. Proceedings of the International Conference Stone Cleaning and the Nature, Soiling and Decay Mechanisms of Stone, Edinburgh, UK.
100. Effect of quorum sensing on the ability of Desulfovibrio vulgaris to form biofilms and to biocorrode carbon steel in saline conditions10.1128/AEM.01664-19 ↗