journal article·2020-03-28Open access

Study on the Carbon Emissions in the Whole Construction Process of Prefabricated Floor Slab

Aisan Kong, Haibo Kang, Siyuan He, Na Li, Wei Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 7

Abstract

The construction industry is characterized by high energy consumption and high carbon emissions. With growing concern about climate change, environmental protection is becoming increasingly important. In this paper, the whole construction process of prefabricated floor slab (PFS) is divided into three stages: production, transportation, and construction stages. Carbon emissions are calculated based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. A case study of PFS construction in Shaoxing city, China, was examined, and the calculation results were compared and evaluated with the traditional construction methods, which showed that in the production stage, carbon emissions increased due to mechanical operations during the prefabrication process. In the transportation stage, carbon emissions also increased due to the heavier prefabricated components during the transportation process. During the on-site construction stage, carbon emissions considerably decreased due to the lower hoisting frequency and less on-site pouring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · BIM and Construction Integration · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shaoxing Vocational & Technical College, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China

School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Quantitative assessment of carbon dioxide emissions in construction projects: A case study in Shenzhen10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.134 ↗
2. Kwak, Y., Kang, J.-A., Huh, J.-H., Kim, T.-H., and Jeong, Y.-S. (2019). An analysis of the effectiveness of greenhouse gas reduction policy for office building design in South Korea. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11247172 ↗
3. Wang, F., Gao, M.N., Liu, J., Qin, Y.H., Wang, G., Fan, W.N., and Ji, L.X. (2019). An empirical study on the impact path of urbanization to carbon emissions in the China Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061116 ↗
4. Lu, K., Jiang, X., Tam, V.W.Y., Li, M., Wang, H., Xia, B., and Chen, Q. (2019). Development of a carbon emissions analysis framework using building information modeling and life cycle assessment for the construction of hospital projects. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11226274 ↗
5. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009). Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers, UNEP DTIE Sustainable Consumption & Production Branch.
6. Edenhofer, O., Seyboth, K., and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013). Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00128-5 ↗
7. Statistical analysis of embodied carbon emission for building construction10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.058 ↗
8. Mitigating CO2 emissions from energy use in the world’s buildings10.1080/09613210701325883 ↗
9. Low-carbon building assessment and multi-scale input–output analysis10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.02.026 ↗
10. Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.048 ↗
11. Miles, J., and Whitehouse, N. (2013). Offsite Housing Review, Business, Innovation & Skills and the Construction Industry Council.
12. Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.013 ↗
13. Economic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:11(864) ↗
14. Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: A China study10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.005 ↗
15. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.049 ↗
16. Social and environmental benefits of precast concrete technology10.15554/pcij.05012001.14.19 ↗
17. Prefabrication and barriers to entry—A case study of public housing and institutional buildings in Hong Kong10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.12.004 ↗
18. Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015 ↗
19. Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: A case study in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.023 ↗
20. Comparative embodied carbon analysis of the prefabrication elements compared with in-situ elements in residential building development of Hong Kong
21. Dong, L., Wang, Y., Li, H.X., Jiang, B., and Mohamed, A.H. (2018). Carbon reduction measures-based LCA of prefabricated temporary housing with renewable energy systems. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10030718 ↗
22. A production line-based carbon emission assessment model for prefabricated components in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.172 ↗
23. Penadés-Plà, V., Martí, J.V., García-Segura, T., and Yepes, V. (2017). Life-cycle assessment: A comparison between two optimal post-tensioned concrete box-girder road bridges. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9101864 ↗
24. Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: An input–output-based hybrid model10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.030 ↗
25. Paik, I., and Na, S. (2019). Evaluation of carbon dioxide emissions amongst alternative slab systems during the construction phase in a building project. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204333 ↗
26. International Organization for Standardization (2006). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, British Standards Institution.
27. Assessment of the embodied carbon in precast concrete wall panels using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach in Malaysia10.1016/j.scs.2013.06.002 ↗
28. Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.021 ↗
29. Effect of nano-MgO on mechanical performance of cement stabilized silty clay10.1080/1064119X.2018.1564406 ↗
30. Characterisation of nano magnesia–cement-reinforced seashore soft soil by direct-shear test10.1080/1064119X.2018.1515283 ↗
31. Paik, I., Na, S., and Yoon, S. (2019). Assessment of CO2 Emissions by Replacing an Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Slab with the Void Slab System in a High-Rise Commercial Residential Complex Building in South Korea. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11010082 ↗
32. Wang, W., Fu, Y., Zhang, C., Li, N., and Zhou, A. (2020). Mathematical Models for Stress–strain Behavior of Nano Magnesia-Cement-Reinforced Seashore Soft Soil. Mathematics, 8.10.3390/math8030456 ↗
33. Lee, J., Tae, S., and Kim, R. (2018). A Study on the Analysis of CO2 Emissions of Apartment Housing in the Construction Process. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10020365 ↗