Agricultural Entrepreneurship in the European Union: Contributions for a Sustainable Development
Source abstract
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is sometimes seen as a glimmer of hope which may bring about some contribution towards improving economic dynamics and performance, specifically in the creation of employment by young people, in general, with further educational training, greater flexibility and who are better prepared for working with new technologies. However, entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector is, in certain circumstances, viewed as being something incompatible or, at least, difficult to implement. More scientific studies in these fields could provide interesting contributions on the road to highlighting new ideas inside the farming sector. In this framework, the objective of this study is to explore the entrepreneurship dimensions within the European Union agriculture towards a more sustainable sector. In fact, without an economic dimension in farm management, its sustainability in the medium and long run may be compromised, increasing the abandonment of farming, namely in more disadvantaged regions. For this, the literature which is available on the platform Web of Science relating to the following three topics was initially analysed: entrepreneurship, agriculture, and the European Union. This literature was clustered through the VOSviewer software, an interesting tool for performing bibliometric analysis. Secondly, statistical information related to European Union agricultural entrepreneurship considering empirical approaches was also explored. The analysis carried out shows that the realities across European Union countries are, in fact, different, where the instruments from the common agricultural policies, for example, may play a crucial role in promoting more farming entrepreneurship in a more sustainable way.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Agricultural Innovations and Practices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Agricultural School (ESAV) and CI&DETS, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu (IPV), 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
Centre for Transdisciplinary Development Studies (CETRAD), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · I would like to thank the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union, the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Portugal, and the University of Burgos, Spain
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Output Impacts of the Single Payment Scheme in Portugal: A Regression with Spatial Effects10.5367/oa.2015.0203 ↗
2. (2018, June 07). VOSviewer—Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. Available online: http://www.vosviewer.com/.
3. (2018, May 23). Web of Science [v.5.29]. Available online: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/UA_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E5zQKcA9bhGgk28itCg&preferencesSaved=.
4. Interrelationships between renewable energy and agricultural economics: An overview10.1016/j.esr.2018.11.002 ↗
5. European experience in development of agricultural entrepreneurship
6. A World of Entrepreneurs: The Establishment of International Agribusiness During the Spanish Pork and Poultry Boom, 1950-2000
7. ZvirbuleBerzina, A. (2012). Agriculture Funding Measures in Lithuania: Demand and Opportunities. Economic Science for Rural Development: Rural Business and Finance: 1. Rural Business Economics and Administration, 2. Finance and Taxes, Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists.
8. Food knowhow and entrepreneurial dynamics of rural women. Case study in the Peloponnese (Greece)
9. Rural women in local agrofood production: Between entrepreneurial initiatives and family strategies. A case study in Greece10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.004 ↗
10. Female agriculture in the short food supply chain: A new path towards the sustainability empowerment
11. The Growth of Rural Entrepreneurship in the Context of the Implementation of the Rural Development Programme in 2007–2013
12. Entrepreneurship in the rural areas of Romania. The impact of the 2007-2013 EU funding programmes10.1515/picbe-2017-0116 ↗
13. Jakusonoka, I. (2008). Factors Impeding the Start of Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas. Economic Science for Rural Development: Rural and Regional Development, Latvia University of Agriculture.
14. Agricultural multifunctionality and farmers’ entrepreneurial skills: A study of Tuscan and Welsh farmers10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.002 ↗
15. Jakusonoko, I. (2008). Resource Use and Entrepreneurship on Dairy Farms in South Ostrobothnia (Finland). Economic Science for Rural Development: Primary and Secondary Production, Consumption, Latvia University of Agriculture.
16. Bokelmann, W. (September, January 29). Changing external conditions require high levels of entrepreneurship in agriculture. Proceedings of the XV International Symposium on Horticultural Economics and Management, Berlin, Germany.
17. Moving beyond entrepreneurial skills: Key factors driving entrepreneurial learning in multifunctional agriculture10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.06.001 ↗
18. Seben Zatkova, T. (2014, January 6–10). The new VET Professionals—Entrepreneurship Trainers for VET. Proceedings of the IX International Conference on Applied Business Research (ICABR 2014), Talca, Chile.
19. Empirical evidences regarding the relationship between innovation and performance in the agriculture of European Union
20. Strategic implications of benchmarking for agricultural cooperatives and farmer-controlled enterprises in Wales10.5367/000000002101294164 ↗
21. Business strategies, profitability and efficiency of production10.5424/sjar/2013111-3093 ↗
22. Innovation implementation strategies for consumer driven fruit supply chains10.1108/00070701211234336 ↗
23. Searching for entrepreneurs among small business ownermanagers in agriculture10.1016/j.njas.2013.12.001 ↗
24. Development of labour market and entrepreneurial spirit in rural areas10.30638/eemj.2013.085 ↗
25. Farmers’ managerial thinking and management process effectiveness as factors of financial success on Finnish dairy farms10.23986/afsci.8147 ↗
26. What is the importance of social capital in Czech agriculture? An analysis of selected components
27. Success factors for small rural tourism units: An exploratory study in the Portuguese region of Serra da Estrela10.54055/ejtr.v17i.298 ↗
28. Canavari, M., Fritz, M., and Schiefer, G. (2016). E-commerce and ICT adoption in the Spanish agri-food sector: Looking for key factors performance in e-food markets. Food Supply Networks: Trust and E-Business, CAB International.10.1079/9781845936396.0000 ↗
29. Current European agribusiness opinion on biotech market and technology issues
30. Development of nanotechnology in agriculture for small northern European country
31. A historical study of the traditional livestock merchants of Alsace10.1108/00070700610676398 ↗
32. The role of agricultural entrepreneurship in Dutch agriculture of today10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00373.x ↗
33. Dependent self-employed workers in Europe
34. Turismo rural, empreendedorismo e gênero: Um estudo de caso na comunidade autônoma da Galiza10.1590/S0103-20032012000200010 ↗
35. Unravelling the strands of “patriarchy” in rural innovation: A study of female innovators and their contribution to rural Connemara10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002 ↗
36. Tomsik, K. (2017, January 13–15). Challenges and opportunities for rural Slovak women in agribusiness. Proceedings of the Agrarian Perspectives XXVI Competitiveness of European Agriculture and Food Sectors, Prague, Czech Republic.
37. Multifunctional farming in Emilia-Romagna region: An analysis through agricultural census data
38. Confronting Social Constructions of Rural Criminality: A Case Story on “Illegal Pluriactivity” in the Farming Community10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00580.x ↗
39. Liontakis, A., and Tzouramani, I. (2016). Economic Sustainability of Organic Aloe Vera Farming in Greece under Risk and Uncertainty. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8040338 ↗
40. Welcome home in a crisis: Effects of return migration on the non-migrants’ wages and employment10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.003 ↗
41. Two sides of the same coin: Dutch rural tourism entrepreneurs and countryside capital in Sweden10.1080/10371656.2016.1152033 ↗
42. Selling ruralities: How tourist entrepreneurs commodify traditional and alternative ways of conceiving the countryside10.1080/10371656.2016.1255475 ↗
43. Lynggaard, K. (2006). Conflicts Over Meaning and Policy Entrepreneurship within the CAP (1986–1992). The Common Agricultural Policy and Organic Farming: An Institutional Perspective on Continuity and Change, Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International.10.1079/9781845931148.0120 ↗
44. Lynggaard, K. (2006). The Formation of a Policy Field: Organic Farming Within the CAP (1993–2005). The Common Agricultural Policy and Organic Farming: An Institutional Perspective on Continuity and Change, Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International.10.1079/9781845931148.0144 ↗
45. Multifiinctional agriculture through creative diversification—A taxonomic study in the middle and south of Germany
46. Entrepreneurs and producers: Identities of Finnish farmers in 2001 and 200610.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.06.001 ↗
47. Investigating the limits of multifunctional agriculture as the dominant frame for Green Care in agriculture in Flanders and the Netherlands10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.011 ↗
48. An assessment of the economic contribution of EU aquaculture production and the influence of policies for its sustainable development10.1007/s10499-016-9992-1 ↗
49. Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy systems in Sweden and Denmark10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.049 ↗
50. Organization of straw-to-energy systems in Ukraine and Scandinavia10.1002/bbb.311 ↗
51. Triticale for Bioenergy Production
52. Wood energy production, sustainable farming livelihood and multifunctionality in Finland10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.06.003 ↗
53. Multiple business ownership in the farm sector: Assessing the enterprise and employment contributions of farmers in Cambridgeshire10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00004-2 ↗
54. Farmers’ motives for diversifying their farm business—The influence of family10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.002 ↗
55. Small and Medium Entrepreneurship in Agriculture: International Experience and Perspectives in Russia
56. Entrepreneurship and diversification on English farms: Identifying business enterprise characteristics and change processes10.1080/08985620802261559 ↗
57. The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.006 ↗
58. Determinants of recognition of TRACES certification as valuable opportunity at the farm level in São Paulo, Brazil10.1590/0103-6513.146513 ↗
59. The development of social farming in Italy: A qualitative inquiry across four regions10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.006 ↗
60. Asymmetric relationships in networked agricultural innovation processes10.1108/BFJ-05-2014-0183 ↗
61. Environmental Entrepreneurship in Organic Agriculture in Jarna, Sweden10.1080/10440046.2011.620225 ↗
62. Ecological entrepreneurship: Sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.008 ↗
63. Moral Entrepreneurship: Resource Based Ethics10.1007/s10806-012-9383-1 ↗
64. Pursuing collective impact: A novel indicator-based approach to assessment of shared measurements when planning for multifunctional land consolidation10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.040 ↗
65. Port Wine Landscape: Railroads, Phylloxera, and Agricultural Science10.3098/ah.2011.85.2.157 ↗
66. Stress and Burnout Among Finnish Dairy Farmers10.1080/1059924X.2016.1178611 ↗
67. Stress among Finnish farm entrepreneurs
68. Mental symptoms among Finnish farm entrepreneurs
69. Legal form of agricultural entities as a factor in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture
70. Innovative concepts towards sustainability in organic horticulture: Testing a participatory technology design10.3763/ijas.2008.0353 ↗
71. Methorst, R., Roep, D., Verstegen, J., and Wiskerke, J.S.C. (2017). Three-Fold Embedding: Farm Development in Relation to Its Socio-Material Context. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9101677 ↗
72. Bokelmann, W. (September, January 29). Analysis and development of entrepreneurship in agriculture. Proceedings of the XV International Symposium on Horticultural Economics and Management, Berlin, Germany.
73. Mazure, G. (2011). Significance of Connections with the Environment of Agricultural Farms in Poland for their Production and Economic Situation. Economic Science for Rural Development: Production and Taxes, Latvia University of Agriculture.
74. Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Kaufmann, H.R., and Tarba, S. (2010, January 4–5). Business efficiency of the agricultural cooperatives: The case of the saffron producers’ cooperative of Kozani. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Euromed Conference of the Euromed Academy of Business: Business Developments across Countries and Cultures, Nicosia, Cyprus.
75. Vac, C.S., and Fitiu, A. (2017). Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9112042 ↗
76. Profession and identity. The case of family farming in Spain10.1111/1467-9523.00187 ↗
77. Sustainability and multifunctionality of protected designations of origin of olive oil in Spain10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.017 ↗
78. Social entrepreneurship in rural development of Lithuania10.15544/mts.2017.12 ↗
79. Enriching the multi-level perspective by better understanding agency and challenges associated with interactions across system boundaries. The case of care farming in the Netherlands: Multifunctional agriculture meets health care10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.018 ↗
80. Multifunctional Agriculture Meets Health Care: Applying the Multi-Level Transition Sciences Perspective to Care Farming in the Netherlands10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00579.x ↗
81. Social farming in Catalonia: Rural local development, employment opportunities and empowerment for people at risk of social exclusion10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.015 ↗
82. Are Farmers in Alternative Food Networks Social Entrepreneurs? Evidence from a Behavioral Approach10.1007/s10806-015-9562-y ↗
83. Zvirbule Berzina, A. (2012). Development Possibilities of Farms in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development: Rural Business and Finance: 1. Rural Business Economics and Administration, 2. Finance and Taxes, Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists.
84. Chova, L.G., Martinez, A.L., and Torres, I.C. (2014, January 7–9). Learning through gardening: The Hortis experience. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies EDULEARN14, Barcelona, Spain.
85. Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses10.1007/s13593-016-0355-0 ↗
86. Taking the leap and sustaining the journey: Diversification on the Irish family farm
87. On the nature of virtuous change in cultural landscapes: Exploring sustainability through qualitative models10.1080/01426390600783517 ↗
88. Ogier, J.P. (2000, January 12–15). A concept of modern entrepreneurship in Dutch horticulture. Proceedings of the XIV International Symposium on Horticultural Economics, Guernsey, UK.
89. A conceptual business model for an agroforestry consulting company10.1007/s10457-015-9848-0 ↗
90. Innovation for sustainable egg production: Realigning production with societal demands in The Netherlands10.1017/S0043933913000305 ↗
91. Mazure, G. (2014). Innovations in the equine sector in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development: Marketing and Sustainable Consumption—Rural Development and Entrepreneurship—Home Economics, Latvia University of Agriculture.
92. Sustainable development through agriculture entrepreneurship opportunities: Introducing internet consulting for market places
93. Inertia and change related to sustainability—An institutional approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.035 ↗
94. (2018, June 19). Eurostat Home. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
95. (2018, June 19). Eurostat NUTS. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-statistical-units/nuts.
96. QGIS (2018, June 19). Welcome to the QGIS Project!. Available online: https://qgis.org/en/site/.
97. (2018, June 19). GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Spatial@UChicago. Available online: https://spatial.uchicago.edu/geoda.
98. A Theory of Production
99. Efficiency, total factor productivity and returns to scale in a sustainable perspective: An analysis in the European Union at farm and regional level10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.040 ↗
100. Cropland rental market and farm technical efficiency in rural Vietnam10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.007 ↗