journal article·2020-12-21Open access

Four-Dimensional (Bio-)printing: A Review on Stimuli-Responsive Mechanisms and Their Biomedical Suitability

Pedro Morouço, Bahareh Azimi, Mario Milazzo, Fatemeh Mokhtari, Cristiana Fernandes, Diana Reis, Serena Danti

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 24

Abstract

The applications of tissue engineered constructs have witnessed great advances in the last few years, as advanced fabrication techniques have enabled promising approaches to develop structures and devices for biomedical uses. (Bio-)printing, including both plain material and cell/material printing, offers remarkable advantages and versatility to produce multilateral and cell-laden tissue constructs; however, it has often revealed to be insufficient to fulfill clinical needs. Indeed, three-dimensional (3D) (bio-)printing does not provide one critical element, fundamental to mimic native live tissues, i.e., the ability to change shape/properties with time to respond to microenvironmental stimuli in a personalized manner. This capability is in charge of the so-called “smart materials”; thus, 3D (bio-)printing these biomaterials is a possible way to reach four-dimensional (4D) (bio-)printing. We present a comprehensive review on stimuli-responsive materials to produce scaffolds and constructs via additive manufacturing techniques, aiming to obtain constructs that closely mimic the dynamics of native tissues. Our work deploys the advantages and drawbacks of the mechanisms used to produce stimuli-responsive constructs, using a classification based on the target stimulus: humidity, temperature, electricity, magnetism, light, pH, among others. A deep understanding of biomaterial properties, the scaffolding technologies, and the implant site microenvironment would help the design of innovative devices suitable and valuable for many biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polytechnic of Leiria, 2400 Leiria, Portugal

Interuniversity National Consortiums of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), 50121 Firenze, FL, Italy

Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia

Research and Development Department, Iber-Oleff, 3500 Pombal, Portugal

Funding

MISTI · European Union H2020

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Miyoshi, H. (2016). Smart Design of Materials for Tissue Engineering. Smart Materials for Tissue Engineering: Fundamental Principles, The Royal Society of Chemistry.10.1039/9781782626756-00001 ↗
2. Langer, R., and Vacanti, J.P. (1993). Tissue engineering. Science, 920–926.10.1126/science.8493529 ↗
3. Chan, B.P., and Leong, K.W. (2008). Scaffolding in tissue engineering: General approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur. Spine J., 17.10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 ↗
4. Stimuli-responsive polymers: Biomedical applications and challenges for clinical translation10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.004 ↗
5. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials10.1038/nmat2614 ↗
6. The Pathway to Intelligence: Using Stimuli-Responsive Materials as Building Blocks for Constructing Smart and Functional Systems10.1002/adma.201804540 ↗
7. Sears, N.A., Seshadri, D.R., Dhavalikar, P.S., and Cosgriff-Hernandez, E. (2016). A Review of Three-Dimensional Printing in Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev.10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0464 ↗
8. Morouço, P.G. (2018). The Usefulness of Direct Digital Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications. Intensification of Biobased Processes, The Royal Society of Chemistry.10.1039/9781788010320-00478 ↗
9. Hull, C.W. (1993). Method of and Apparatus for Production of Three Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. (No 5,236,637), U.S. Patent.
10. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::AID-JBM1007>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
11. Selective laser melting: A regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications10.1002/jbm.b.31219 ↗
12. Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014110 ↗
13. Current developments in multifunctional smart materials for 3D/4D bioprinting10.1016/j.cobme.2017.04.002 ↗
14. Additive Manufacturing Approaches for Hydroxyapatite-Reinforced Composites10.1002/adfm.201903055 ↗
15. 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing10.1080/17452759.2015.1097054 ↗
16. 4D bioprinting: The next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001 ↗
17. Advances and future perspectives in 4D bioprinting10.1002/biot.201800148 ↗
18. In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells, by laser-assisted bioprinting, for in vivo bone regeneration applications10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x ↗
19. Liu, F., and Wang, X. (2020). Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing. Polymers (Basel), 12.10.3390/polym12081765 ↗
20. Vijayavenkataraman, S., Fuh, J.Y.H., and Lu, W.F. (2017). 3D printing and 3D bioprinting in pediatrics. Bioengineering, 4.10.3390/bioengineering4030063 ↗
21. Biofabrication: Reappraising the definition of an evolving field10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
22. Current status of 4D printing technology and the potential of light-reactive smart materials as 4D printable materials
23. Mandon, C.A., Blum, L.J., and Marquette, C.A. (2017). 3D-4D printed objects: New bioactive material opportunities. Micromachines, 8.10.3390/mi8040102 ↗
24. 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.004 ↗
25. Four-dimensional bioprinting as a new era for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine10.3389/fbioe.2017.00061 ↗
26. A review of 4D printing10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.068 ↗
27. A perspective on 4D bioprinting10.18063/IJB.2016.01.003 ↗
28. Biofabrication: A guide to technology and terminology10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 ↗
29. Smart hydrogels for 3D bioprinting10.18063/IJB.2015.01.005 ↗
30. 3D printing of methylcellulose-based hydrogels10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00024 ↗
31. Three-dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab56f9 ↗
32. Transplantation: 3D printing of the liver in living donor liver transplantation10.1038/nrgastro.2013.195 ↗
33. 3D printed cardiovascular models for surgical planning in complex congenital heart diseases10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P196 ↗
34. Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1 ↗
35. Mechanobiology of tendon10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011 ↗
36. Mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils upon transient loads10.1021/acsnano.0c02180 ↗
37. Wave propagation and energy dissipation in collagen molecules10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01742 ↗
38. Ekwueme, E.C., Patel, J.M., Freeman, J.W., and Danti, S. (2017). Applications of bioresorbable polymers in the skeletal systems (cartilages, tendons, bones). Bioresorbable Polymers for Biomedical Applications, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100262-9.00017-3 ↗
39. A high modulus hydrogel obtained from hydrogen bond reconstruction and its application in vibration damper10.1039/C7RA08272J ↗
40. A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites
41. Future perspectives and recent advances in stimuli-responsive materials10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.008 ↗
42. Four-Dimensional Bioprinting for Regenerative Medicine: Mechanisms to Induce Shape Variation and Potential Applications
43. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels: Theory, modern advances, and applications10.1016/j.mser.2015.04.001 ↗
44. Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105 ↗
45. Chang, C.C., Boland, E.D., Williams, S.K., and Hoying, J.B. (2011). Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater.10.1002/jbm.b.31831 ↗
46. Woodfield, T., Lim, K., Morouço, P., Levato, R., Malda, J., and Melchels, F. (2017). Biofabrication in Tissue Engineering. Comprehensive Biomaterials II, Springer International Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10221-8 ↗
47. Humidity-responsive bilayer actuators based on a liquid-crystalline polymer network10.1021/am400681z ↗
48. Photogated humidity-driven motility10.1038/ncomms8429 ↗
49. Multi-stimulus-responsive shape-memory polymer nanocomposite network cross-linked by cellulose nanocrystals10.1021/am5081056 ↗
50. A hydrogel-forming liquid crystalline elastomer exhibiting soft shape memory10.1002/polb.23892 ↗
51. Humidity-responsive actuation of programmable hydrogel microstructures based on 3D printing10.1016/j.snb.2017.12.053 ↗
52. Lv, C., Xia, H., Shi, Q., Wang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, L., and Sun, H. (2017). Sensitively Humidity-Driven Actuator Based on Photopolymerizable PEG-DA Films. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 4.10.1002/admi.201601002 ↗
53. Bio-Origami Hydrogel Scaffolds Composed of Photocrosslinked PEG Bilayers10.1002/adhm.201200458 ↗
54. Bio-inspired polymer composite actuator and generator driven by water gradients10.1126/science.1230262 ↗
55. Moisture-responsive films of cellulose stearoyl esters showing reversible shape transitions10.1038/srep11011 ↗
56. Actuator and generator based on moisture-responsive PEDOT: PSS/PVDF composite film10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.125 ↗
57. Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations10.1038/srep07422 ↗
58. Biomimetic 4D printing10.1038/nmat4544 ↗
59. Photo and Humidity Responsive Mesoporous Poly (ionic Liquid) Membrane for Selective Dye Adsorption10.1002/slct.201601934 ↗
60. EPA, U.S. (2001). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Qual. Assur. Guid. Doc. Qual. Assur. Proj. Plan PM Ambient Air, 2, Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/qa/Final%20Handbook%20Document%201_17.pdf.
61. Biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers: Characterization and their use as drug carriers for a controlled delivery system10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00207-2 ↗
62. AndrÃ, J.-C. (2017). From Additive Manufacturing to 3D/4D Printing: Breakthrough Innovations: Programmable Material, 4D Printing and Bio-Printing, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119451501 ↗
63. Optically-and thermally-responsive programmable materials based on carbon nanotube-hydrogel polymer composites10.1021/nl201503e ↗
64. Intelligent non-colorimetric indicators for the perishable supply chain by non-wovens with photo-programmed thermal response10.1038/s41467-020-19676-y ↗
65. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications in nanomedicine10.1007/s13758-011-0009-3 ↗
66. 4D Printing with Mechanically Robust, Thermally Actuating Hydrogels10.1002/marc.201500079 ↗
67. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-4 ↗
68. Transitional Suspensions Containing Thermosensitive Dispersant for Three-Dimensional Printing10.1021/acsami.5b07913 ↗
69. Engineered polymers for advanced drug delivery10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.021 ↗
70. Self-folding all-polymer thermoresponsive microcapsules10.1039/c1sm05109a ↗
71. Gradient porous elastic hydrogels with shape-memory property and anisotropic responses for programmable locomotion10.1002/adfm.201503434 ↗
72. Xu, X., Liu, Y., Fu, W., Yao, M., Ding, Z., Xuan, J., Li, D., Wang, S., Xia, Y., and Cao, M. (2020). Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-based thermoresponsive composite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel), 12.10.3390/polym12030580 ↗
73. Polyglycol-templated synthesis of poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) microgels with improved biocompatibility10.1007/s00396-009-2144-7 ↗
74. Assessment of cytotoxicity of (N-isopropyl acrylamide ) and Poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide )—Coated surfaces10.1186/1559-4106-8-19 ↗
75. Enhanced hepatic functions of genetically modified mouse hepatoma cells by spheroid culture for drug toxicity screening10.1002/biot.201700274 ↗
76. Cancer tissue engineering-new perspectives in understanding the biology of solid tumours-a critical review10.13172/2052-9643-1-1-607 ↗
77. Chew, S.A., Moscato, S., George, S., Azimi, B., and Danti, S. (2019). Liver cancer: Current and future trends using biomaterials. Cancers (Basel), 11.10.3390/cancers11122026 ↗
78. Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) co-polymer films as potential vehicles for delivery of an antimitotic agent to vascular smooth muscle cells10.1016/S1054-8807(02)00165-5 ↗
79. Synthesis and thermally responsive characteristics of dendritic poly (ether-amide) grafting with PNIPAAm and PEG10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.052 ↗
80. Cytotoxicity of thermosensitive polymers poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and amphiphilically modified poly(N-vinylcaprolactam)10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.008 ↗
81. Recent advances in PEG-PLA block copolymer nanoparticles
82. Relationship between the affinity of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers for biological membranes and their cellular effects10.1007/s11095-012-0716-6 ↗
83. Ethoxysilane-capped PEO–PPO–PEO triblocks: A new family of reverse thermo-responsive polymers10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.057 ↗
84. Thermosensitive poly-(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide)-block-poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly-(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) hydrogels for multi-drug delivery10.3109/1061186X.2014.931406 ↗
85. Stimuli-responsive microjets with reconfigurable shape10.1002/ange.201308610 ↗
86. The potential of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)(PNIPAM)-grafted hyaluronan and PNIPAM-grafted gelatin in the control of post-surgical tissue adhesions10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.002 ↗
87. Thermo and pH sensitive fluorescent polymer sensor for metal cations in aqueous solution10.1002/pat.986 ↗
88. Thermosensitive multilayer hydrogels of poly (N-vinylcaprolactam) as nanothin films and shaped capsules10.1021/cm301657q ↗
89. Biodegradable thermo-sensitive nanoparticles from poly (L-lactic acid)/poly (ethylene glycol) alternating multi-block copolymer for potential anti-cancer drug carrier10.1016/j.ejps.2005.08.012 ↗
90. PEO—PPO—PEO-based poly (ether ester urethane) s as degradable reverse thermo-responsive multiblock copolymers10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.035 ↗
91. Controlled sequential shape changing components by 3D printing of shape memory polymer multimaterials10.1016/j.piutam.2014.12.021 ↗
92. Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers10.1038/srep31110 ↗
93. Thermo-responsive properties of methylcellulose hydrogels for cell sheet engineering10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.023 ↗
94. A review of integrating electroactive polymers as responsive systems for specialized drug delivery applications10.1002/jbm.a.34869 ↗
95. Polythiophenes in biological applications10.1166/jnn.2014.9111 ↗
96. Polystyrene sulfonate is a safe and effective candidate topical antimicrobial for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases10.1203/00006450-199904020-00968 ↗
97. Multistimuli-responsive hydrogels of poly (2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid) containing graphene10.1007/s00396-013-2978-x ↗
98. An electrically modulated drug delivery device: I10.1023/A:1015815931739 ↗
99. An electrically conductive 3D scaffold based on a nonwoven web of poly (l-lactic acid) and conductive poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)10.1002/jbm.a.35408 ↗
100. Duc, C., Vlandas, A., Malliaras, G.G., and Senez, V. (2017, January 18–22). Study of the electro-responsiveness and surface texturing of PEDOT: PSS for smart MEMS interface applications. Proceedings of the 2017 19th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), Kaohsiung, Taiwan.10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2017.7994317 ↗