journal article·2023-03-09Open access

Identifying Malignant Breast Ultrasound Images Using ViT-Patch

Hao Feng, Bo Yang, Jingwen Wang, Mingzhe Liu, Lirong Yin, Wenfeng Zheng, Zhengtong Yin, Chao Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

Recently, the Vision Transformer (ViT) model has been used for various computer vision tasks, due to its advantages to extracting long-range features. To better integrate the long-range features useful for classification, the standard ViT adds a class token, in addition to patch tokens. Despite state-of-the-art results on some traditional vision tasks, the ViT model typically requires large datasets for supervised training, and thus, it still face challenges in areas where it is difficult to build large datasets, such as medical image analysis. In the ViT model, only the output corresponding to the class token is fed to a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) head for classification, and the outputs corresponding to the patch tokens are exposed. In this paper, we propose an improved ViT architecture (called ViT-Patch), which adds a shared MLP head to the output of each patch token to balance the feature learning on the class and patch tokens. In addition to the primary task, which uses the output of the class token to discriminate whether the image is malignant, a secondary task is introduced, which uses the output of each patch token to determine whether the patch overlaps with the tumor area. More interestingly, due to the correlation between the primary and secondary tasks, the supervisory information added to the patch tokens help with improving the performance of the primary task on the class token. The introduction of secondary supervision information also improves the attention interaction among the class and patch tokens. And by this way, ViT reduces the demand on dataset size. The proposed ViT-Patch is validated on a publicly available dataset, and the experimental results show its effectiveness for both malignant identification and tumor localization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610000, China

School of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325000, China

Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

College of Resource and Environment Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China

LIRMM, UMR 5506, University of Montpellier-CNRS, 34095 Montpellier, France

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Zheng, W., Yang, B., Xiao, Y., Tian, J., Liu, S., and Yin, L. (2022). Low-Dose CT Image Post-Processing Based on Learn-Type Sparse Transform. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22082883 ↗
2. Quantitative Evaluation of an Automated Cone-Based Breast Ultrasound Scanner for MRI–3D US Image Fusion10.1109/TMI.2021.3050525 ↗
3. Sparse Angle CBCT Reconstruction Based on Guided Image Filtering10.3389/fonc.2022.832037 ↗
4. Brosch, T., and Tam, R. (2013, January 22–26). Manifold Learning of Brain MRIs by Deep Learning. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Nagoya, Japan.
5. Plis, S.M., Hjelm, D.R., Salakhutdinov, R., and Calhoun, V.D. (2013). Deep learning for neuroimaging: A validation study. arXiv.10.3389/fnins.2014.00229 ↗
6. Wu, G., Munsell, B.C., Zhan, Y., Bai, W., Sanroma, G., and Coupé, P. (2017). Breast Tumor Detection in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-67434-6 ↗
7. Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H.R., and Xu, D. (2022, January 4–8). UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00181 ↗
8. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. arXiv.
9. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An Image is Worth 16 × 16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
10. Touvron, H., Cord, M., Douze, M., Massa, F., Sablayrolles, A., and J’egou, H. (2020, January 13–18). Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Virtual.
11. Wang, W., Xie, E., Li, X., Fan, D.P., Song, K., Liang, D., Lu, T., Luo, P., and Shao, L. (2021). Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutions. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00061 ↗
12. TD-Net:unsupervised medical image registration network based on Transformer and CNN10.1007/s10489-022-03472-w ↗
13. A vision transformer for emphysema classification using CT images10.1088/1361-6560/ac3dc8 ↗
14. Gao, X., Qian, Y., and Gao, A. (2021). COVID-VIT: Classification of COVID-19 from CT chest images based on vision transformer models. arXiv.10.1109/NextComp55567.2022.9932246 ↗
15. Gao, Y., Zhou, M., and Metaxas, D. (2021). UTNet: A Hybrid Transformer Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-87199-4_6 ↗
16. Peiris, H., Hayat, M., Chen, Z., Egan, G., and Harandi, M. (2021). A Robust Volumetric Transformer for Accurate 3D Tumor Segmentation. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-16443-9_16 ↗
17. Yan, X., Tang, H., Sun, S., Ma, H., Kong, D., and Xie, X. (2021). AFTer-UNet: Axial Fusion Transformer UNet for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00333 ↗
18. Gheflati, B., and Rivaz, H. (2021). Vision Transformer for Classification of Breast Ultrasound Images. arXiv.10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871809 ↗
19. Shamshad, F., Khan, S., Waqas Zamir, S., Haris Khan, M., Hayat, M., Shahbaz Khan, F., and Fu, H. (2022). Transformers in Medical Imaging: A Survey. arXiv.10.1016/j.media.2023.102802 ↗
20. Tu, Z., Talebi, H., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Milanfar, P., Bovik, A., and Li, Y. (2022). MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-20053-3_27 ↗
21. A local–global transformer for distributed monitoring of multi-unit nonlinear processes10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.12.007 ↗
22. Yuan, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Yu, W., Shi, Y., Jiang, Z., Tay, F.E., Feng, J., and Yan, S. (2021). Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNet. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00060 ↗
23. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
24. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv.
25. Wang, Q., Li, B., Xiao, T., Zhu, J., Li, C., Wong, D.F., and Chao, L.S. (2019). Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P19-1176 ↗
26. Baevski, A., and Auli, M. (2018). Adaptive Input Representations for Neural Language Modeling. arXiv.
27. Dataset of breast ultrasound images10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863 ↗
28. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
29. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
30. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2015). Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
31. Liu, S., and Deng, W. (2015, January 3–6). Very deep convolutional neural network based image classification using small training sample size. Proceedings of the 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ACPR.2015.7486599 ↗
32. Han, K., Xiao, A., Wu, E., Guo, J., Xu, C., and Wang, Y. (2021). Transformer in Transformer. arXiv.
33. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J. (2015). Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. arXiv.