Vehicle Acceleration Prediction Based on Machine Learning Models and Driving Behavior Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Driving behavior is one of the most critical factors in traffic accidents. Accurate vehicle acceleration prediction approaches can promote the development of Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS) and improve traffic safety. However, few prediction models consider the characteristics of individual drivers, which may overlook the potential heterogeneity of driving behavior. In this study, a vehicle acceleration prediction model based on machine learning methods and driving behavior analysis is proposed. First, the driving behavior data are preprocessed, and the relative distance, relative speed, and acceleration of the subject vehicle are selected as feature variables to describe the driving behavior. Then, a finite Mixture of Hidden Markov Model (MHMM) is used to divide the driving behavior semantics. The model can divide heterogeneous data into different behavioral semantic fragments within different time lengths. Next, the similarity of different behavioral semantic fragments is evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In total, 10 homogenous drivers are classified as the first group, and the remaining 20 drivers are classified as the second group. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) are used to predict the vehicle acceleration for both groups. The prediction results show that the proposed method in this study can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of vehicle acceleration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Traffic and Road Safety · Vehicle emissions and performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 3135 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Miyaji, M., Danno, M., and Oguri, K. (2008, January 4–6). Analysis of driver behavior based on traffic incidents for driver monitor systems. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1109/IVS.2008.4621130 ↗
2. Perception for collision avoidance and autonomous driving10.1016/S0957-4158(03)00047-3 ↗
3. Integrated Vehicle Accident Detection and Location System10.12928/telkomnika.v12i1.13 ↗
4. Sato, T., and Akamatsu, M. (2012). Understanding driver car-following behavior using a fuzzy logic car-following model. Fuzzy Logic—Algorithms, Techniques and Implementations, Book on Demand.10.5772/36126 ↗
5. Wang, W., Wei, Z., Li, D., Hirahara, K., and Ikeuchi, K. (2004, January 14–17). Improved action point model in traffic flow based on driver’s cognitive mechanism. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Parma, Italy.
6. Agamennoni, G., Nieto, J.I., and Nebot, E.M. (2011, January 5–9). A Bayesian approach for driving behavior inference. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany.10.1109/IVS.2011.5940407 ↗
7. Traffic speed prediction for urban transportation network: A path based deep learning approach10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.002 ↗
8. Vehicle Speed Prediction by Two-Level Data Driven Models in Vehicular Networks10.1109/TITS.2016.2620498 ↗
9. Angkititrakul, P., Miyajima, C., and Takeda, K. (2012, January 3–7). An improved driver-behavior model with combined individual and general driving characteristics. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IVS.2012.6232177 ↗
10. Harkous, H., Bardawil, C., Artail, H., and Daher, N. (2018, January 14–16). Application of Hidden Markov Model on Car Sensors for Detecting Drunk Drivers. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Multidisciplinary Conference on Engineering Technology (IMCET), Beirut, Lebanon.10.1109/IMCET.2018.8603030 ↗
11. Vitali, W., Ronja, F., Yannis, P., Iris, P., Norman, W., and Jérémie, B. (2014). Using Hidden Markov Models to Improve Quantifying Physical Activity in Accelerometer Data—A Simulation Study. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0114089 ↗
12. Fu, R., Zhang, Z., and Li, L. (2016, January 11–13). Using LSTM and GRU neural network methods for traffic flow prediction. Proceedings of the 2016 31st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Wuhan, China.10.1109/YAC.2016.7804912 ↗
13. An introduction to Hidden Markov models
14. Dynamic Analysis on Simultaneous iEEG-MEG Data via Hidden Markov Model10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117923 ↗
15. Mixture of Hidden Markov models for accelerometer data
16. Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains10.1214/aoms/1177699147 ↗
17. mixtools: An R Package for Analyzing Mixture Models10.18637/jss.v032.i06 ↗
18. Short-term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network10.1109/TSG.2017.2753802 ↗
19. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
20. A novel deep learning ensemble model with data denoising for short-term wind speed forecasting10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112524 ↗
21. Wind power forecasting—A data-driven method along with gated recurrent neural network10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.119 ↗
22. Fitch, G.M., and Hanowski, R.J. (2012). Using Naturalistic Driving Research to Design, Test and Evaluate Driver Assistance Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_21 ↗
23. Bau, D. (1997). Numerical Linear Algebra: Numerical Linear Algebra, SIAM.
24. Driving Style Analysis Using Primitive Driving Patterns With Bayesian Nonparametric Approaches10.1109/TITS.2018.2870525 ↗
25. Risky driving behavior among university students and staff in the Sultanate of Oman10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.021 ↗
26. Ahmed, K.I. (1999). Modeling Drivers’ Acceleration and Lane Changing Behavior. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
27. Using Neural Networks to Identify Driving Style and Headway Control Behavior of Drivers10.1080/00423119808969557 ↗
28. A Probabilistic Approach to Measuring Driving Behavior Similarity With Driving Primitives10.1109/TIV.2019.2955372 ↗
29. Stochastic Similarity For Validating Human Control Strategy Models10.1109/70.678453 ↗
30. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A., and Chicken, E. (2008). Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
31. Adam optimization algorithm for wide and deep neural network10.17977/um018v2i12019p41-46 ↗
32. The real-time big data processing method based on LSTM or GRU for the smart job shop production process10.1177/1748302620962390 ↗