An Enhanced Adaptive Perturb and Observe Technique for Efficient Maximum Power Point Tracking Under Partial Shading Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we propose enhanced adaptive step size Perturb and Observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with properly organized comparison sequences which lead to achieving the actual maximum power point (MPP) effectively in the presence of partial shading conditions, taking into account the optimization of all aspects of high-performance MPPT to be novel, simpler, fast, and accurate, with the best efficiency reaching up to almost 100%. In this study, the proposed algorithm, along with a boost converter, was designed and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink to validate the performance of the suggested technique. Four different levels of partial shading conditions were considered for system examination: weak, moderate, and two different levels of strong shading. Each case was applied separately first and then combined in a sequence arrangement to provide robust and comprehensive testing which can provide a guaranteed assessment of the proposed algorithm. The performance of the suggested technique is discussed and compared with that of conventional P&O and conventional incremental conductance (IC) MPPT techniques. The failure of the conventional techniques to work efficiently in the presence of partial shading conditions was observed from the simulation results. Meanwhile, the success of the proposed technique and its high performance were clearly confirmed under partial shading conditions with no increase in complexity or convergence time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · solar cell performance optimization · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia
Advanced Lightning, Power and Energy Research (ALPER) Centre, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia
Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Modified Perturb and Observe MPPT algorithm for partial shading conditions
2. Continuous photocatalytic, electrocatalytic and photo-electrocatalytic degradation of a reactive textile dye for wastewater-treatment processes: Batch, microreactor and scaled-up operation10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.017 ↗
3. Modeling of a Photovoltaic Array in MATLAB Simulink and Maximum Power Point Tracking Using Neural Network
4. Bjelajac, A., Kopač, D., Fecant, A., Tavernier, E., Petrović, R., Likozar, B., and Janaćković, D. (2020). Micro-kinetic modelling of photocatalytic CO2 reduction over undoped and N-doped TiO2. Catal. Sci. Technol.10.1039/C9CY02443C ↗
5. The impact of ZnO load, stability and morphology on the kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation of caffeine and resazurin10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.016 ↗
6. Design, simulation, and hardware implementation of novel optimum operating point tracker of PV system using adaptive step size10.1007/s00170-018-2977-7 ↗
7. Fuzzy logic controller with MPPT using line-commutated inverter for three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic systems10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.039 ↗
8. A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202294 ↗
9. Maximum power point tracking using a variable antecedent fuzzy logic controller10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.008 ↗
10. A New MPPT-based ANN for Photovoltaic System under Partial Shading Conditions10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.255 ↗
11. An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-Based MPPT for PV with Reduced Steady-State Oscillation10.1109/TPEL.2012.2185713 ↗
12. Afzal Awan, M., and Mahmood, T. (2018). A Novel Ten Check Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for a Standalone Solar Photovoltaic System. Electronics, 7.10.3390/electronics7110327 ↗
13. A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.076 ↗
14. Lukasik, S., and Kowalski, P.A. (2015). Study of Flower Pollination Algorithm for Continuous Optimization. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems IS’2014, Warsaw, Poland, 24–26 September 2014, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-11313-5_40 ↗
15. Power tracking techniques for efficient operation of photovoltaic array in solar applications—A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.015 ↗
16. The performance of Perturb and Observe and incremental conductance maximum power point tracking method under dynamic weather conditions10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.054 ↗
17. Qichang, D., Jiajun, L., Pan, D., Bei, H., and Mingxuan, M. (2015, January 26–27). An Improved Variable Step PO and Global Scanning MPPT Method for PV Systems under Partial Shading Condition. Proceedings of the 2015 7th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, Hangzhou, China.
18. Aashoor, F.A.O., and Robinson, F.V.P. (2012, January 4–7). A variable step size Perturb and Observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking. Proceedings of the 2012 47th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), London, UK.10.1109/UPEC.2012.6398612 ↗
19. Modified Perturb and Observe MPPT Algorithm for Drift Avoidance in Photovoltaic Systems10.1109/TIE.2015.2407854 ↗
20. Implementation of a modified P&O-MPPT algorithm adapted for varying solar radiation conditions10.1007/s00202-016-0457-3 ↗
21. Global Maximum Power Point Tracking (GMPPT) of Photovoltaic array using the Extremum Seeking Control (ESC): A review and a new GMPPT ESC scheme10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.221 ↗
22. A novel adaptive variable step size p&o mppt algorithm
23. A method for obtaining the I-V curve of photovoltaic arrays from module voltages and its applications for MPP tracking10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.013 ↗
24. Experimental evaluation of a partially shaded photovoltaic system with a fuzzy logic-based peak power tracking control strategy10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0098 ↗
25. Choudhury, S., and Rout, P.K. (2015, January 17–20). Comparative study of M-FIS FLC and modified P&O MPPT techniques under partial shading and variable load conditions. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), New Delhi, India.10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443305 ↗
26. AI-based global MPPT for partial shaded grid connected PV plant via MFO approach10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.109 ↗
27. Bataineh, K., and Eid, N. (2018). A hybrid maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic systems for dynamic weather conditions. Resources, 7.10.3390/resources7040068 ↗
28. MPPT of PV Systems Under Partial Shaded Conditions Through a Colony of Flashing Fireflies10.1109/TEC.2014.2298237 ↗
29. Design Analysis of DC-DC Converters Connected to a Photovoltaic Generator and Controlled by MPPT for Optimal Energy Transfer throughout a Clear Day10.4236/jpee.2014.21004 ↗
30. Erickson, R.W., and Maksimovic, D. (2001). Fundamentals of Power Electronics, Springer.10.1007/b100747 ↗
31. Hayat, A., Faisal, A., Javed, M.Y., Hasseb, M., and Rana, R.A. (2016, January 11–12). Effects of input capacitor (cin) of boost converter for photovoltaic system. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computing, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (ICE Cube), Quetta, Pakistan.10.1109/ICECUBE.2016.7495257 ↗
32. Selection criteria of dc-dc converter and control variable for MPPT of PV system utilized in heating and cooking applications10.1080/23311916.2017.1363357 ↗
33. DC-DC boost converter design for fast and accurate MPPT algorithms in stand-alone photovoltaic system
34. Hart, D.W. (2011). Power Electronics, Tata McGraw-Hill.
35. A comprehensive MATLAB Simulink PV system simulator with partial shading capability based on two-diode model10.1016/j.solener.2011.06.008 ↗
36. A Novel Adaptive P&O MPPT Algorithm Considering Sudden Changes in the Irradiance10.1109/TEC.2014.2320930 ↗
37. A proposed maximum power point tracking algorithm based on a new testing standard10.1016/j.solener.2012.11.022 ↗