journal article·2023-01-13Open access

Blockchain Integrated IoT for Food Supply Chain: A Grey Based Delphi-DEMATEL Approach

Rubee Singh, Shahbaz Khan, Jacinta Dsilva, Piera Centobelli

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

The Food Supply Chain (FSC) can be made more efficient, resilient, and transparent by implementing industry 4.0 technologies. In this context, blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) become a panacea for several FSC problems. As a result of FSC complexity and their specific needs, the adoption of Blockchain integrated IoT (B-IoT) in FSC is challenging, and further investigation is required. Therefore, this study aims to explore the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for the adoption B-IoT in FSC. To achieve this objective, a literature review is conducted to identify the CSFs of B-IoT adoption and then a grey Delphi is conducted on finalised CSFs. Ten CSFs finalised that faceplate for the adoption of B-IoT in FSC. Further, these CSFs were analysed through a grey Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to determine the importance and causal relationships among them. A grey DEMATEL analysis also categorised these factors into influencing and influenced groups. The findings showed that “top management support”, “knowledge management”, “technology hardware readiness”, “skilled personnel”, and “high investment” were the influencing factors that needed to be addressed for the effective adoption of B-IoT. The FSC partners could benefit from the findings of this study by focusing on high-priority CSFs. The causal relationship among CSFs also helps the managers achieve optimal utilisation of resources. Further, this study encourages the FSC stakeholders to adopt the B-IoT in their supply chain to improve their performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Digital Transformation in Industry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India

Center of Research in Built Environment, SEE Institute, The Sustainable City, Dubai 251153, United Arab Emirates

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Napoli, Italy

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Software architecture for farm management information systems in Precision Agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2009.08.013 ↗
2. Integrated blockchain and internet of things in the food supply chain: Adoption barriers10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102589 ↗
3. Krithika, L.B. (2022). Survey on the applications of Blockchain in Agriculture. Agriculture, 12.10.3390/agriculture12091333 ↗
4. Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121031 ↗
5. Supply Chain Coordination of fresh agri-products based on value loss10.1007/s12063-020-00162-z ↗
6. Kouhizadeh, M., and Sarkis, J. (2018). Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10103652 ↗
7. Are distributed ledger technologies the panacea for food traceability?10.1016/j.gfs.2019.02.002 ↗
8. Wu, H., Cao, J., and Jiang, S. (2022). High-efficiency Blockchain-based Supply ChainTraceability. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
9. Food quality traceability prototype for restaurants using blockchain and food quality data index10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118021 ↗
10. How can smart technologies contribute to sustainable product lifecycle management?
11. The components of a food traceability system10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.004 ↗
12. Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011 ↗
13. Transparency in food supply chains: A review of enabling technology solutions10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.024 ↗
14. World Economic Forum (2019). Innovation with a Purpose: Improving Traceability in Food Value Chains through Technology Innovations, World Economic Forum.
15. Traceability implementation in food supply chain: A grey-DEMATEL approach
16. Integration of IoT based routing process for food supply chain management in sustainable smart cities10.1016/j.scs.2021.103448 ↗
17. Visconti, P., de Fazio, R., Velázquez, R., Del-Valle-Soto, C., and Giannoccaro, N. (2020). Development of Sensors-Based Agri-Food Traceability System Remotely Managed by a Software Platform for Optimized Farm Management. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20133632 ↗
18. Unlocking adoption challenges of IoT in Indian Agricultural and Food Supply Chain10.1016/j.atech.2022.100035 ↗
19. The internet of things in the food supply chain: Adoption challenges10.1108/BIJ-07-2020-0371 ↗
20. IoT-Blockchain driven traceability techniques for improved safety measures in food supply chain
21. Khan, S., Singh, R., Haleem, A., Dsilva, J., and Ali, S. (2022). Exploration of Critical Success Factors of Logistics 4.0: A DEMATEL Approach. Logistics, 6.10.3390/logistics6010013 ↗
22. Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology
23. Banking with blockchain-ed big data
24. Foth, M. (December, January 28). The promise of blockchain technology for interaction design. Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
25. Khan, S., Kaushik, M.K., Kumar, R., and Khan, W. (2022). Investigating the barriers of Blockchain Technology Integrated Food Supply Chain: A BWM approach. Benchmarking Int. J.10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489 ↗
26. Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supplychain provenance10.1002/isaf.1424 ↗
27. Blockchain-based soybean traceability in agricultural supply chain10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918000 ↗
28. Blockchain technology in Agri-Food Value Chain Management: A synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002 ↗
29. Malik, S., Dedeoglu, V., Kanhere, S.S., and Jurdak, R. (2019, January 14–17). Trust Chain: Trust management in blockchain and iot supported supply chains. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00032 ↗
30. Jiang, S., Cao, J., Wu, H., Yang, Y., Ma, M., and He, J. (2018, January 18–20). BlocHIE: A BLOCkchain-Based Platform for Healthcare Information Exchange. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), Taormina, Italy.10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2018.00073 ↗
31. Malik, A., Gautam, S., Abidin, S., and Bhushan, B. (2019, January 5–6). Blockchain technology-future of IOT: Including structure, limitations and various possible attacks. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT), Kannur, India.10.1109/ICICICT46008.2019.8993144 ↗
32. IoT-based tracking and tracing platform for prepackaged food supply chain10.1108/IMDS-11-2016-0489 ↗
33. Javaid, U., Aman, M.N., and Sikdar, B. (2018, January 4). Block Pro: Blockchain based data provenance and integrity for secure IoT environments. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Blockchain-Enabled Networked Sensor Systems, Shenzhen China.10.1145/3282278.3282281 ↗
34. Virtualization of food supply chains with the internet of things10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.009 ↗
35. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., and Papamanthou, C. (2016, January 22–26). Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2016.55 ↗
36. Guizani. Privacy-Preserving Support Vector Machine Training Over Blockchain-Based Encrypted IoT data in smart cities10.1109/JIOT.2019.2901840 ↗
37. When Internet of Things Meets Blockchain: Challenges in Distributed Consensus10.1109/MNET.2019.1900002 ↗
38. Management 4.0: Concept, applications and advancements10.1016/j.susoc.2022.10.002 ↗
39. Blockchain mechanisms for IoT security10.1016/j.iot.2018.05.002 ↗
40. The Blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges
41. Blockchain’s adoption in IoT: The challenges, and a way forward10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.019 ↗
42. Survey on blockchain for Internet of Things10.1016/j.comcom.2019.01.006 ↗
43. Blockchain and the industrial internet of things fit analysis10.1108/JEIM-06-2018-0140 ↗
44. On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046 ↗
45. Blockchain-driven IoT for food traceability with an integrated consensus mechanism10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940227 ↗
46. Alsuwaidan, L. (2020). Validating the adoption of heterogeneous internet of things with blockchain. Future Internet, 12.10.3390/fi12060107 ↗
47. Hong, H., Hu, B., and Sun, Z. (2019). Toward secure and accountable data transmission in Narrow Band Internet of Things based on blockchain. Int. J. Distribut. Sens. Netw., 15.10.1177/1550147719842725 ↗
48. When blockchain meets Internet of Things: Characteristics, challenges, and business opportunities
49. Badulescu, Y., and Cheikhrouhou, N. (2021). A Framework Integrating Internet of Things and Blockchain in Clinical Trials Reverse Supply Chain. Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-85902-2_11 ↗
50. Fuzzy set theory-based comparative evaluation of cloud service offerings: An agro-food supply chain case study10.1080/09537325.2020.1850673 ↗
51. The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034 ↗
52. A framework of disruptive sustainable innovation: An example of the Finnish food system10.1080/09537325.2018.1550254 ↗
53. Managing food security through food waste and loss: Small data to big data10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.007 ↗
54. An effective yield estimation system based on blockchain technology10.1109/TEM.2020.2978829 ↗
55. Technology assessment of blockchain-based technologies in the food supply chain10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122193 ↗
56. Wu, H., Cao, J., Yang, Y., Tung, C.L., Jiang, S., Tang, B., Liu, Y., Wang, X., and Deng, Y. (August, January 29). Data Management in Supply Chain Using Blockchain: Challenges and a Case Study. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), Valencia, Spain.
57. Hyperleadger (2023, January 06). Case Study: How Walmart Brought Unprecedented Transparency to the Food Supply Chain with Hyperledger Fabric. Available online: https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/publications/walmart-case-study.
58. Kaur, A., Singh, G., Kukreja, V., Sharma, S., Singh, S., and Yoon, B. (2022). Adaptation of IoT with blockchain in Food Supply Chain Management: An analysis-based review in development, benefits and potential applications. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218174 ↗
59. Exploiting Parts-of-Speech for effective automated requirements traceability10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.009 ↗
60. Analysing the Interactions Among the Barriers of Supply Chain Performance Measurement: An ISM with Fuzzy MICMAC Approach10.1177/0972150917713283 ↗
61. Evaluation of barriers in the adoption of halal certification: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach10.1108/JM2-03-2018-0031 ↗
62. Critical Factors for Blockchain Technology Implementation: A Supply Chain Perspective
63. Evaluating food supply chain performance using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique10.1016/j.spc.2019.03.004 ↗
64. Prioritising the risks in Halal food supply chain: An MCDM approach10.1108/JIMA-10-2018-0206 ↗
65. Control Problems of Grey Systems10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X ↗
66. Contextual and organisational factors in sustainable supply chain decision making grey relational analysis and interpretative structural modeling10.1007/s10668-020-01157-3 ↗
67. General Grey numbers and their operations10.1108/20439371211273230 ↗
68. Liu, S., Yang, Y., and Forrest, J. (2016). Grey numbers and their operations. Computational Risk Management, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-1841-1_3 ↗
69. Singh, R., Khan, S., and Dsilva, J. (2022). A framework for assessment of critical factor for Circular Economy Practice Implementation. J. Model. Manag.10.1108/JM2-06-2021-0145 ↗
70. An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 ↗
71. Exploring the best policy scenario plan for the dairy supply chain: A DEMATEL approach10.1108/JM2-08-2019-0185 ↗
72. Risk management in Halal supply chain: An integrated fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach10.1108/JM2-09-2019-0228 ↗
73. Liu, S., and Forrest, J.Y.L. (2010). Grey Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.
74. Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.044 ↗
75. A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.011 ↗
76. Internet of things (IOT) based coordination system in Agri-Food Supply Chain: Development of an efficient framework using DEMATEL-ism10.1007/s12063-020-00164-x ↗
77. Impact of ambidexterity of blockchain technology and social factors on new product development: A supply chain and Industry 4.0 perspective10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120819 ↗
78. Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309 ↗
79. Three-level supply chain coordination of fresh agricultural products in the Internet of Things10.1108/IMDS-06-2016-0245 ↗
80. gricultural traceability model based on IoT and Blockchain: Application in industrial hemp production
81. An Internet of Things (IoT)-based risk monitoring system for managing cold supply chain risks10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0384 ↗
82. Internet of Things adoption barriers in the Indian healthcare supply chain: An ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach10.1002/hpm.3331 ↗
83. Digitalization within food supply chains to prevent food waste. Drivers, barriers and collaboration practices10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.005 ↗
84. Review of IoT applications in agro-industrial and environmental fields10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.015 ↗
85. Blockchain in the operations and supply chain management: Benefits, challenges and future research opportunities10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102064 ↗
86. Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: Architecture and technology aspects10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.07.017 ↗
87. A Delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in China10.1080/03088839.2017.1327726 ↗
88. Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.020 ↗
89. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 ↗
90. Manickam, S., and Kooy, A. (2022). Internet of Things for Smart Cities: Challenges, Security and Privacy Issues. SSRN Electron. J.
91. Blockchain technology applications for Industry 4.0: A literature-based review10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100027 ↗
92. Conceptualising a framework linking halal supply chain management with sustainability: An India centric study10.1108/JIMA-07-2019-0149 ↗
93. EC-ElGamal and genetic algorithm-based enhancement for lightweight scalable blockchain in iot domain10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013282 ↗
94. High-performance Edwards curve aggregate signature (HECAS) for nonrepudiation in IOT-based applications built on the blockchain ecosystem