journal article·2021-06-03Open access

Knee Osteoarthritis Classification Using 3D CNN and MRI

Carmine Guida, Ming Zhang, Juan Shan

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and can often occur in the knee. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely used to study medical images, the application of a 3-dimensional (3D) CNN in knee OA diagnosis is limited. This study utilizes a 3D CNN model to analyze sequences of knee magnetic resonance (MR) images to perform knee OA classification. An advantage of using 3D CNNs is the ability to analyze the whole sequence of 3D MR images as a single unit as opposed to a traditional 2D CNN, which examines one image at a time. Therefore, 3D features could be extracted from adjacent slices, which may not be detectable from a single 2D image. The input data for each knee were a sequence of double-echo steady-state (DESS) MR images, and each knee was labeled by the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade of severity at levels 0–4. In addition to the 5-category KL grade classification, we further examined a 2-category classification that distinguishes non-OA (KL ≤ 1) from OA (KL ≥ 2) knees. Clinically, diagnosing a patient with knee OA is the ultimate goal of assigning a KL grade. On a dataset with 1100 knees, the 3D CNN model that classifies knees with and without OA achieved an accuracy of 86.5% on the validation set and 83.0% on the testing set. We further conducted a comparative study between MRI and X-ray. Compared with a CNN model using X-ray images trained from the same group of patients, the proposed 3D model with MR images achieved higher accuracy in both the 5-category classification (54.0% vs. 50.0%) and the 2-category classification (83.0% vs. 77.0%). The result indicates that MRI, with the application of a 3D CNN model, has greater potential to improve diagnosis accuracy for knee OA clinically than the currently used X-ray methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Bone and Joint Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, New York, NY 10038, USA

School of Computing and Data Science, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis10.1016/j.cger.2010.03.001 ↗
2. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: A Cochrane systematic review10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424 ↗
3. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study10.1002/art.1780300811 ↗
4. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.010 ↗
5. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: Insight into risk factors and microstructural changes10.1186/ar4405 ↗
6. Current interventions in the management of knee osteoarthritis10.4103/0975-7406.106561 ↗
7. Summary of the OA biomarkers workshop 2009—Biochemical biomarkers: Biology, validation, and clinical studies10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.014 ↗
8. Rheumatoid arthritis treatment: The earlier the better to prevent joint damage10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000057 ↗
9. Imaging of cartilage and bone: Promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.023 ↗
10. The role of radiography and MRI for eligibility assessment in DMOAD trials of knee OA10.1038/s41584-018-0010-z ↗
11. Current status of functional MRI of osteoarthritis for diagnosis and prognosis10.1097/BOR.0000000000000674 ↗
12. The osteoarthritis initiative: Report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.016 ↗
13. MRI of osteoarthritis: The challenges of definition and quantification10.1055/s-0032-1329895 ↗
14. LeCun, Y., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Farabet, C. (June, January 30). Convolutional networks and applications in vision. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Paris, France.10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537907 ↗
15. Antony, J., McGuinness, K., O’Connor, N.E., and Moran, K. (2016, January 4–8). Quantifying radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity using deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Cancún, Mexico.10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899799 ↗
16. Antony, J., McGuinness, K., Moran, K., and O’Connor, N.E. (2017, January 15–19). Automatic detection of knee joints and quantification of knee osteoarthritis severity using convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition, New York, NY, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-62416-7_27 ↗
17. Górriz, M., Antony, J., McGuinness, K., Giró-i-Nieto, X., and O’Connor, N.E. (2019). Assessing Knee OA Severity with CNN attention-based end-to-end architectures. arXiv.
18. Wahyuningrum, R.T., Anifah, L., Purnama, I.K.E., and Purnomo, M.H. A New Approach to Classify Knee Osteoarthritis Severity from Radiographic Images based on CNN-LSTM Method. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST), Morioka, Japan, 23–25 October 2019.10.1109/ICAwST.2019.8923284 ↗
19. Qi, C.R., Su, H., Nießner, M., Dai, A., Yan, M., and Guibas, L.J. (July, January 26). Volumetric and multi-view cnns for object classification on 3d data. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
20. Dey, R., Lu, Z., and Hong, Y. (2018, January 4–7). Diagnostic classification of lung nodules using 3D neural networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363687 ↗
21. Wang, T., Leung, K., Cho, K., Chang, G., and Deniz, C.M. (2019, January 8–10). Total Knee Replacement prediction using Structural MRIs and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning—Extended Abstract Track, London, UK.
22. 3D convolutional neural networks for detection and severity staging of meniscus and PFJ cartilage morphological degenerative changes in osteoarthritis and anterior cruciate ligament subjects10.1002/jmri.26246 ↗
23. Automatic deep learning assisted detection and grading of abnormalities in knee MRI studies10.1148/ryai.2021200165 ↗
24. Raj, A., Vishwanathan, S., Ajani, B., Krishnan, K., and Agarwal, H. (2018, January 4–7). Automatic knee cartilage segmentation using fully volumetric convolutional neural networks for evaluation of osteoarthritis. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363705 ↗
25. Multi-scale 3D convolutional neural networks for lesion segmentation in brain MRI
26. Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3 ↗
27. Ripley, B.D. (2007). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press.
28. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (July, January 26). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
29. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
30. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (July, January 26). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
31. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A. (2016). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. arXiv.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
32. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗