XG Boost Algorithm to Simultaneous Prediction of Rock Fragmentation and Induced Ground Vibration Using Unique Blast Data
Source abstract
Abstract
The two most frequently heard terms in the mining industry are safety and production. These two terms put a lot of pressure on blasting engineers and crew to give more while consuming less. The key to achieving the optimum blasting results is sophisticated bench analysis, which must be combined with design blast parameters for good fragmentation and safe ground vibration. Thus, a unique solution for forecasting both optimum fragmentation and reduced ground vibration using rock mass joint angle and blast design parameters will aid the blasting operations in terms of cost savings. To arrive at a proper understanding and a solution, 152 blasts were carried out in various mines by adjusting blast design parameters concerning the measured joint angle. The XG Boost, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Random Forest algorithms were evaluated, and the XG Boost outputs were shown to be superior in terms of Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Co-efficient of determination (R2) values. Using XG Boost, the decision-tree-based ensemble Machine Learning algorithm that uses a gradient-boosting framework and a simultaneous formula was developed to predict both fragmentation and ground vibration using joint angle and the same set of parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining Engineering, IIT (ISM) Dhanbad, Dhanbad 826004, India
Department of Mining Engineering, Malla Reddy Engineering College, Hyderabad 500100, India
Mai-Nefhi College of Engineering and Technology, Mai-Nefhi P.O. Box 5230, Eritrea
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Aziznejad, S., and Esmaieli, K. (2015, January 24–26). Effects of joint intensity on rock fragmentation by Impact. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Sydney, Australia.
2. Ash, R.L. (1973). The Influence of Geological Discontinuities on Rock Blasting. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota].
3. The effect of discontinuity frequency on ground vibrations produced from bench blasting: A case study10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.11.006 ↗
4. Relationship of the discontinuities and the rock blasting results
5. Propagation characteristics of blast-induced shock waves in a jointed rock mass10.1016/S0267-7261(98)00030-X ↗
6. Effects of joint orientation and rock mass quality on tunnel blasting10.1016/0013-7952(94)90059-0 ↗
7. Influence of Geological Discontinuities Upon Fragmentation by Blasting
8. Rock fragmentation control in opencast blasting10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.10.005 ↗
9. Effect of Geological Condition on Degree of Fragmentation in a Simpang Pulai Marble Quarry10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.072 ↗
10. Singh, D.P., Apparao, V., and Saluja, S.S. (1980, January 28–30). A laboratory study on effect of joints on rock fragmentation. American rock mechanics association. Proceedings of the 21st U.S. Symposium of Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Rolla, MO, USA.
11. Structure as a Control in Rock Fragmentation Coal Lake Iron Ore Deposited
12. Design of a model blasting system to measure peak p-wave stress10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00018-6 ↗
13. Mohanty, B. (1996). Influence of discontinuities on presplitting effectiveness. Rock Fragmentation by Blasting: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, FRAGBLAST-5, CRC Press.
14. Worsey, P.N., and Qu, S. (1987, January 5). Effect of joint separation and filling on pre-split blasting. Proceedings of the 3rd Mini Symposium on Explosives and Blasting Research, Miami, FL, USA.
15. Fracture Mechanics Applied to Rock Fragmentation due to blasting
16. Analysis of blast wave interaction with a rock joint10.1007/s00603-009-0062-0 ↗
17. An Investigation into the Effect of Rockmass Properties on Mean Fragmentation
18. Firing Patterns and Its Effect on Muckpile Shape Parameters and Fragmentation in Quarry Blasts
19. Sasaoka, T., Takahashi, Y., Hamanaka, A., Wahyudi, S., and Shimada, H. (2019). Effect of Delay Time and Firing Patterns on the Size of Fragmented Rocks by Bench Blasting. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection—MPES 2019, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-33954-8_51 ↗
20. Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.156 ↗
21. Simulation of blasting—Induced air overpressure by means of artificial intillegene neural networks
22. Predicting rock size distribution in mine blasting using various novel soft computing models based on meta-heuristics and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.005 ↗
23. Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting in Gol-E-Gohar iron mine using fuzzy logic10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.005 ↗
24. Sensitivity of total charge and maximum charge per delay on ground vibration10.1080/19475705.2010.488352 ↗
25. Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system10.1007/s00366-016-0486-6 ↗
26. Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting using artificial neural network10.1007/s00366-010-0187-5 ↗
27. A comparative study on the application of various artificial neural networks to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and back break10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.05.007 ↗
28. Peak particle velocity prediction using support vector machines: A surface blasting case study10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n7a10 ↗
29. Prediction and optimization of back-break and rock fragmentation using an artificial neural network and a bee colony algorithm10.1007/s10064-015-0720-2 ↗
30. Simultaneous prediction of fragmentation and flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.008 ↗
31. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗
32. Comparisons of random forest and support vector machine for predicting blasting vibration characteristic parameters10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2366 ↗
33. Developing an XGBoost model to predict blast-induced peak particle velocity in an open-pit mine: A case study10.1007/s11600-019-00268-4 ↗
34. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
35. Stochastic gradient boosting10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
36. XGBoost-Based Algorithm Interpretation and Application on Post-Fault Transient Stability Status Prediction of Power System10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2893448 ↗
37. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors)10.1214/aos/1016218223 ↗
38. Chen, T., and He, T. (2022, April 12). Xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting; R Package Version 04-2; 2015. Available online: https://cran.microsoft.com.
39. Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.024 ↗
40. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
41. Random forests: A machine learning methodology to highlight the volatile organic compounds involved in olfactory perception10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.008 ↗
42. Partial multidividing ontology learning algorithm10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.049 ↗
43. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗