journal article·2023-10-18Open access

Digital Twin-Driven Framework for TBM Performance Prediction, Visualization, and Monitoring through Machine Learning

Kamran Latif, Abubakar Sharafat, Jongwon Seo

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 20

Abstract

The rapid development in underground infrastructure is encouraging faster and more modern ways, such as TBM tunneling, to meet the needs of the world. However, tunneling activities generate complex and heterogeneous data, which makes it difficult to visualize the performance of a project. Advancements in information technology, such as digital twins and machine learning, provide platforms for digital demonstration, visualization, and system performance monitoring of such data. Therefore, this study proposes a digital twin-driven framework for TBM performance prediction through machine learning, visualization, and monitoring. This novel approach integrates machine learning and real-time performance data to predict, visualize, and monitor the status of the tunnel construction progress. A digital twin virtual model of TBM was constructed based on TBM design parameters, the input parameter, boring energy, RPM, torque, thrust force, speed, gripper pressure, total revolution, and Q-value provided to SVR and ANN models to predict the TBM AR and PR, and TBM daily progress was visualized continuously. The predictive performance indices R2 (0.97) and RMSE (0.011) were estimated for AR prediction, showing the accuracy of the proposed model. To demonstrate the proposed framework, this study shows the its effectiveness. By implementing this framework, stakeholders can minimize the risk associated with the cost and schedule of a tunneling project by simultaneously visualizing and monitoring the performance of TBMs through digital twin and machine learning algorithms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

School of Architectural, Civil, Environment and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (National Research for Smart Construction Technology) (MSIT) · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) · Korean government (MEST)

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. BIM-Based Tunnel Information Modeling Framework for Visualization, Management, and Simulation of Drill-and-Blast Tunneling Projects10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000955 ↗
2. A Support Vector Regression Model for Predicting Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rates10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.09.012 ↗
3. An ANN to Predict Ground Condition Ahead of Tunnel Face Using TBM Operational Data10.1007/s12205-019-1460-9 ↗
4. Optimization of Support Vector Machine through the Use of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Forecasting TBM Advance Rate10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104015 ↗
5. Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2021, January 21–26). Risk Assessment of TBM Advanced Rate in the Difficult Ground Using Event Tree Analysis (ETA). Proceedings of the KSCE, Virtual.
6. Controlled Blasting in Underground Construction: A Case Study of a Tunnel Plug Demolition in the Neelum Jhelum Hydroelectric Project10.1016/j.tust.2019.103098 ↗
7. Application of Several Optimization Techniques for Estimating TBM Advance Rate in Granitic Rocks10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.002 ↗
8. Development of Hybrid Intelligent Models for Predicting TBM Penetration Rate in Hard Rock Condition10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.009 ↗
9. Latif, K., Sharafat, A., and Seo, J. (2021, January 21–26). Predicting TBM Advanced Rate in Difficult Ground Conditions Based on the Artificial Neural Network Using Different Training Functions. Proceedings of the KSCE, Virtual.
10. Latif, K., Sharafat, A., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2022, January 20). Digital Twin-Based Hybrid Approach to Visualize the Performance of TBM. Proceedings of the KSCE, Busan, Republic of Korea.
11. Forecasting Rock Trencher Performance Using Fuzzy Logic
12. Modeling Tunnel Boring Machine Performance by Neuro-Fuzzy Methods10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00055-9 ↗
13. Predicting Penetration Rate of Hard Rock Tunnel Boring Machine Using Fuzzy Logic10.1007/s10064-013-0497-0 ↗
14. Application of Various Optimization Techniques and Comparison of Their Performances for Predicting TBM Penetration Rate in Rock Mass10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.019 ↗
15. Performance Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine through Developing a Gene Expression Programming Equation10.1007/s00366-017-0526-x ↗
16. Modelling TBM Performance with Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.tust.2004.02.128 ↗
17. Hybrid Support Vector Machine Optimization Model for Prediction of Energy Consumption of Cutter Head Drives in Shield Tunneling10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000833 ↗
18. Prediction of the Penetration Rate and Number of Consumed Disc Cutters of Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—Case Study: Beheshtabad Water Conveyance Tunnel in Iran10.3233/AJW190006 ↗
19. Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rate Using Ant Colony Optimization, Bee Colony Optimization and the Particle Swarm Optimization, Case Study: Sabzkooh Water Conveyance Tunnel10.33271/mining14.02.075 ↗
20. A Digital Twin-Based Decision Analysis Framework for Operation and Maintenance of Tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2021.104125 ↗
21. “Digital Twin” Based Approach to Patient Specific Diagnosis and Therapy of OSA10.1016/j.sleep.2019.11.124 ↗
22. Digital Twins to Personalize Medicine10.1186/s13073-019-0701-3 ↗
23. A Digital Factory Platform for the Design of Roll Shop Plants10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.04.007 ↗
24. Part Data Integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: Mobile and Cloud Technologies to Enable a Manufacturing Execution System10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.02.002 ↗
25. Digital Twin-Based Smart Production Management and Control Framework for the Complex Product Assembly Shop-Floor10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6 ↗
26. Digital Twin Driven Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.011 ↗
27. Data-Driven Ship Digital Twin for Estimating the Speed Loss Caused by the Marine Fouling10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.045 ↗
28. Using Augmented Reality to Build Digital Twin for Reconfigurable Additive Manufacturing System10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.005 ↗
29. Digital Twin–Driven Aero-Engine Intelligent Predictive Maintenance10.1007/s00170-021-06976-w ↗
30. Digital Twin-Driven Optimization of Gas Exchange System of 2-Stroke Heavy Fuel Aircraft Engine10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.002 ↗
31. An Application Framework of Digital Twin and Its Case Study10.1007/s12652-018-0911-3 ↗
32. Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2022, January 20). Digital Twin-Driven Optimization of Blast Design for Underground Construction. Proceedings of the KSCE, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
33. Kim, J., and Kim, S.-A. (2020). Lifespan Prediction Technique for Digital Twin-Based Noise Barrier Tunnels. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072940 ↗
34. Prediction of Highway Tunnel Pavement Performance Based on Digital Twin and Multiple Time Series Stacking10.1155/2020/8824135 ↗
35. Sharafat, A., Khan, M.S., Latif, K., Tanoli, W.A., Park, W., and Seo, J. (2021). BIM-GIS-Based Integrated Framework for Underground Utility Management System for Earthwork Operations. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125721 ↗
36. Enabling Technologies and Tools for Digital Twin10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001 ↗
37. Towards a Semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for Future Research10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179 ↗
38. A BIM-Data Mining Integrated Digital Twin Framework for Advanced Project Management10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564 ↗
39. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication
40. Richnák, P. (2022). Current Trend of Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Transformation of Logistics Processes Using Digital Technologies: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic. Logistics, 6.10.3390/logistics6040079 ↗
41. Pech, M., and Vrchota, J. (2020). Classification of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises Based on the Level of Industry 4.0 Implementation. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155150 ↗
42. Tubis, A.A., and Grzybowska, K. (2022). In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15228595 ↗
43. Glaessgen, E., and Stargel, D. (2012, January 23–26). The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles. Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.2514/6.2012-1818 ↗
44. Digital Twin Shop-Floor: A New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069 ↗
45. Digital Twin-Driven Supervised Machine Learning for the Development of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Manufacturing10.1080/0951192X.2020.1747642 ↗
46. Predicting Tunnel Boring Machine Performance through a New Model Based on the Group Method of Data Handling10.1007/s10064-018-1349-8 ↗
47. Estimating and Optimizing Safety Factors of Retaining Wall through Neural Network and Bee Colony Techniques10.1007/s00366-018-0642-2 ↗
48. Machine Learning Based Digital Twin Framework for Production Optimization in Petrochemical Industry10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020 ↗
49. Digital Twin-Driven Product Design Framework10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229 ↗
50. Umair, M., Sharafat, A., Lee, D.-E., and Seo, J. (2022). Impact of Virtual Reality-Based Design Review System on User’s Performance and Cognitive Behavior for Building Design Review Tasks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12147249 ↗
51. Gao, Y., Qian, S., Li, Z., Wang, P., Wang, F., and He, Q. (August, January 15). Digital Twin and Its Application in Transportation Infrastructure. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI), Beijing, China.
52. Development and In-Situ Application of a Real-Time Monitoring System for the Interaction between TBM and Surrounding Rock10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.018 ↗
53. Application of Two Non-Linear Prediction Tools to the Estimation of Tunnel Boring Machine Performance10.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.007 ↗
54. TBM Performance Estimation in Rock Using Q(TBM)
55. Development of a Rock Mass Characteristics Model for TBM Penetration Rate Prediction10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.003 ↗
56. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support10.1007/BF01239496 ↗
57. Rock Mass Classification and Support Design using the Q-System10.1007/s12594-019-1336-0 ↗
58. Support Vector Machines Approach to Mean Particle Size of Rock Fragmentation Due to Bench Blasting Prediction10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61195-3 ↗
59. Predicting Tunnel Convergence Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline and Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.tust.2013.07.023 ↗
60. Prediction of Tunnel Convergence Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.tust.2011.11.002 ↗
61. Risk Analysis of TBM Tunneling Projects Based on Generic Bow-Tie Risk Analysis Approach in Difficult Ground Conditions10.1016/j.tust.2021.103860 ↗
62. Yavari, M., and Mahdavi, S. (2005, January 19–23). Prediction of Penetration Rate of TBM Using ANN. Proceedings of the National Mining Conference, Breckenridge, CO, USA.
63. Utilising of Linear and Non-Linear Prediction Tools for Evaluation of Penetration Rate of Tunnel Boring Machine in Hard Rock Condition10.1504/IJMME.2013.053172 ↗
64. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rate