journal article·2022-05-12Open access

An Accurate Multiple Sclerosis Detection Model Based on Exemplar Multiple Parameters Local Phase Quantization: ExMPLPQ

Gulay Macin, Burak Tasci, Irem Tasci, Oliver Faust, Prabal Datta Barua, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer, Ru-San Tan, U. Rajendra Acharya

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 10

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating condition characterized by plaques in the white matter of the central nervous system that can be detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Many deep learning models for automated MS detection based on MRI have been presented in the literature. We developed a computationally lightweight machine learning model for MS diagnosis using a novel handcrafted feature engineering approach. The study dataset comprised axial and sagittal brain MRI images that were prospectively acquired from 72 MS and 59 healthy subjects who attended the Ozal University Medical Faculty in 2021. The dataset was divided into three study subsets: axial images only (n = 1652), sagittal images only (n = 1775), and combined axial and sagittal images (n = 3427) of both MS and healthy classes. All images were resized to 224 × 224. Subsequently, the features were generated with a fixed-size patch-based (exemplar) feature extraction model based on local phase quantization (LPQ) with three-parameter settings. The resulting exemplar multiple parameters LPQ (ExMPLPQ) features were concatenated to form a large final feature vector. The top discriminative features were selected using iterative neighborhood component analysis (INCA). Finally, a k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm, Fine kNN, was deployed to perform binary classification of the brain images into MS vs. healthy classes. The ExMPLPQ-based model attained 98.37%, 97.75%, and 98.22% binary classification accuracy rates for axial, sagittal, and hybrid datasets, respectively, using Fine kNN with 10-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, our model outperformed 19 established pre-trained deep learning models that were trained and tested with the same data. Unlike deep models, the ExMPLPQ-based model is computationally lightweight yet highly accurate. It has the potential to be implemented as an automated diagnostic tool to screen brain MRIs for white matter lesions in suspected MS patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Konya 42001, Turkey

Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya 44100, Turkey

Department of Engineering and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK

School of Business (Information System), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia

Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia

Department of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey

Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 599489, Singapore

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore

Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Singapore 599489, Singapore

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Technology, SUSS University, Singapore 599491, Singapore

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. An update on immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of multiple sclerosis10.1002/brb3.362 ↗
2. Multiple sclerosis under the spotlight10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00170-8 ↗
3. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70064-8 ↗
4. Personal and societal costs of multiple sclerosis in the UK: A population-based MS Registry study
5. Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review10.1007/s40273-021-01032-7 ↗
6. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: A review10.1001/jama.2020.26858 ↗
7. Update on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis10.1136/jim-2016-000339 ↗
8. Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: A population-based study10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182270402 ↗
9. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 ↗
10. MR in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: An overview10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.044 ↗
11. Chemical pathology of acute demyelinating lesions and its correlation with disability10.1002/ana.410380610 ↗
12. Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: Practical guidelines10.1093/brain/awz144 ↗
13. FLAIR*: A combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins10.1148/radiol.12120208 ↗
14. The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis10.1097/01.nrl.0000254705.39956.34 ↗
15. 1H MR spectroscopy of inflammation, infection and ischemia of the brain10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.033 ↗
16. Central nervous system disease in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: The role of magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.07.005 ↗
17. Applications of deep learning techniques for automated multiple sclerosis detection using magnetic resonance imaging: A review10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104697 ↗
18. Ranschaert, E.R., Morozov, S., and Algra, P.R. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Opportunities, Applications and Risks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-94878-2 ↗
19. A deep learning approach to diagnosing multiple sclerosis from smartphone data10.1109/JBHI.2020.3021143 ↗
20. Tousignant, A., Lemaître, P., Precup, D., Arnold, D.L., and Arbel, T. (2021, January 7–9). Prediction of disease progression in multiple sclerosis patients using deep learning analysis of MRI data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, Lübeck, Germany.
21. Storelli, L., Azzimonti, M., Gueye, M., Vizzino, C., Preziosa, P., Tedeschi, G., De Stefano, N., Pantano, P., Filippi, M., and Rocca, M.A. (2022). A Deep Learning Approach to Predicting Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Investig. Radiol.10.1097/RLI.0000000000000854 ↗
22. Multiple sclerosis identification in brain MRI images using wavelet convolutional neural networks10.1002/ima.22492 ↗
23. De Oliveira, M., Piacenti-Silva, M., Rocha, F.C.G.d., Santos, J.M., Cardoso, J.d.S., and Lisboa-Filho, P.N. (2022). Lesion Volume Quantification Using Two Convolutional Neural Networks in MRIs of Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12020230 ↗
24. Deep learning for predicting enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis from noncontrast MRI10.1148/radiol.2019191061 ↗
25. RimNet: A deep 3D multimodal MRI architecture for paramagnetic rim lesion assessment in multiple sclerosis10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102412 ↗
26. Deep learning with diffusion basis spectrum imaging for classification of multiple sclerosis lesions10.1002/acn3.51037 ↗
27. Vogelsanger, C., and Federau, C. (2021). Latent space analysis of vae and intro-vae applied to 3-dimensional mr brain volumes of multiple sclerosis, leukoencephalopathy, and healthy patients. arXiv.
28. Classification of Pituitary Tumor and Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesions through Convolutional Neural Networks10.1088/1757-899X/1049/1/012014 ↗
29. Automatic and robust segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks
30. Afzal, H.R., Luo, S., Ramadan, S., Lechner-Scott, J., and Li, J. (2018, January 29–31). Automatic prediction of the conversion of clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis using deep learning. Proceedings of the 2018 the 2nd International Conference on Video and Image Processing, Hong Kong, China.10.1145/3301506.3301526 ↗
31. Local phase quantization for blur-insensitive image analysis10.1016/j.imavis.2012.04.001 ↗
32. K-nearest neighbor10.4249/scholarpedia.1883 ↗
33. Neighbourhood components analysis
34. Coarse to fine K nearest neighbor classifier10.1016/j.patrec.2013.01.028 ↗
35. Powers, D.M. (2020). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv.
36. On the equivalence of Cohen’s kappa and the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index10.1007/s00357-008-9023-7 ↗
37. Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I., and Courville, A. (2017). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
38. Deep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: A review10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.005 ↗
39. Transfer learning techniques for medical image analysis: A review10.1016/j.bbe.2021.11.004 ↗
40. Impact of dataset size and variety on the effectiveness of deep learning and transfer learning for plant disease classification10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.013 ↗
41. Deep learning and its applications in biomedicine10.1016/j.gpb.2017.07.003 ↗
42. Meniscal Tear and ACL Injury Detection Model Based on AlexNet and Iterative ReliefF10.1007/s10278-022-00581-3 ↗
43. Demir, F., and Taşcı, B. (2021). An Effective and Robust Approach Based on R-CNN+ LSTM Model and NCAR Feature Selection for Ophthalmological Disease Detection from Fundus Images. J. Pers. Med., 11.10.3390/jpm11121276 ↗
44. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
45. Redmon, J., and Farhadi, A. (2017, January 21–26). YOLO9000: Better, faster, stronger. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 ↗
46. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
47. Zoph, B., Vasudevan, V., Shlens, J., and Le, Q.V. (2018, January 18–23). Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00907 ↗
48. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
49. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
50. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A.A. (2017, January 4–10). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
51. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
52. Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., and Sun, J. (2018, January 18–23). Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00716 ↗
53. Chollet, F. (2017, January 21–26). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ↗
54. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.-C. (2018, January 18-23). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
55. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
56. Iandola, F.N., Han, S., Moskewicz, M.W., Ashraf, K., Dally, W.J., and Keutzer, K. (2016). SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50× fewer parameters and <0.5 MB model size. arXiv.
57. Tan, M., and Le, Q. (2019, January 9–15). Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, CA, USA.
58. Multiple sclerosis identification by 14-layer convolutional neural network with batch normalization, dropout, and stochastic pooling10.3389/fnins.2018.00818 ↗
59. Plati, D., Tripoliti, E., Zelilidou, S., Vlachos, K., Konitsiotis, S., and Fotiadis, D.I. (2022, January 11–15). Multiple Sclerosis Severity Estimation and Progression Prediction Based on Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871213 ↗
60. Uncovering convolutional neural network decisions for diagnosing multiple sclerosis on conventional MRI using layer-wise relevance propagation10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102003 ↗
61. Calimeri, F., Marzullo, A., Stamile, C., and Terracina, G. (2018, January 25–27). Graph based neural networks for automatic classification of multiple sclerosis clinical courses. Proceedings of the ESANN, Bruges, Belgium.
62. Classification of multiple sclerosis clinical profiles via graph convolutional neural networks10.3389/fnins.2019.00594 ↗