Variable Speed Limit and Ramp Metering for Mixed Traffic Flows: A Review and Open Questions
Source abstract
Abstract
The trend of increasing traffic demand is causing congestion on existing urban roads, including urban motorways, resulting in a decrease in Level of Service (LoS) and safety, and an increase in fuel consumption. Lack of space and non-compliance with cities’ sustainable urban plans prevent the expansion of new transport infrastructure in some urban areas. To alleviate the aforementioned problems, appropriate solutions come from the domain of Intelligent Transportation Systems by implementing traffic control services. Those services include Variable Speed Limit (VSL) and Ramp Metering (RM) for urban motorways. VSL reduces the speed of incoming vehicles to a bottleneck area, and RM limits the inflow through on-ramps. In addition, with the increasing development of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and Connected AVs (CAVs), new opportunities for traffic control are emerging. VSL and RM can reduce traffic congestion on urban motorways, especially so in the case of mixed traffic flows where AVs and CAVs can fully comply with the control system output. Currently, there is no existing overview of control algorithms and applications for VSL and RM in mixed traffic flows. Therefore, we present a comprehensive survey of VSL and RM control algorithms including the most recent reinforcement learning-based approaches. Best practices for mixed traffic flow control are summarized and new viewpoints and future research directions are presented, including an overview of the currently open research questions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, Vukelićeva Street 4, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Funding
European Regional Development Fund (DATACROSS)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Dadić, I., Kos, G., and Ševrović, M. (2014). Teorija Prometnog Toka, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet Prometnih Znanosti, Zavod za Prometno Planiranje. (In Croatian).
2. Hegyi, A. (2004). Model Predictive Control for Integrating Traffic Control Measures. [Ph.D. Thesis, Design, Engineering and Production, TU Delft].
3. Estimation of Capacity Drop in Highway Merging Sections10.3141/2286-13 ↗
4. Breton, P., Hegyi, A., De Schutter, B., and Hellendoorn, H. (2002, January 6). Shock wave elimination/reduction by optimal coordination of variable speed limits. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Singapore.
5. Elefteriadou, L.A. (2016). Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis, Transportation Research Board, The National Academies Press.10.17226/24798 ↗
6. Papageorgiou, M., Kosmatopoulos, E., and Papamichail, I. (2008). Effects of Variable Speed Limits on Motorway Traffic Flow. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 37–48.10.3141/2047-05 ↗
7. Optimal Motorway Traffic Flow Control Involving Variable Speed Limits and Ramp Metering10.1287/trsc.1090.0314 ↗
8. Local Feedback-Based Mainstream Traffic Flow Control on Motorways Using Variable Speed Limits10.1109/TITS.2011.2156792 ↗
9. The City Brain: Practice of Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence in the Real World10.1049/iet-smc.2019.0034 ↗
10. Connected Vehicles: Solutions and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2014.2327587 ↗
11. Evolutionary V2X Technologies Toward the Internet of Vehicles: Challenges and Opportunities10.1109/JPROC.2019.2961937 ↗
12. Variable speed limit: An overview10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000053 ↗
13. Review of Variable Speed Limits and Advisories10.3141/2423-03 ↗
14. Gregurić, M., Ivanjko, E., Korent, N., and Kušić, K. (2016, January 4). Short Review of Approaches for Variable Speed Limit Control. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Science and Transport Development (ZIRP 2016), Zagreb, Croatia.
15. Abdel-Aty, M., and Yu, R. (2013, January 14–18). State-of-practice of variable speed limit systems. Proceedings of the 20th ITS World Congress, Tokyo, Japan.
16. Tafti, M. (2008, January 16–20). An investigation on the approaches and methods used for variable speed limit control. Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America’s 2008 Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA.
17. Kušić, K., Ivanjko, E., Gregurić, M., and Miletić, M. (2020). An Overview of Reinforcement Learning Methods for Variable Speed Limit Control. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10144917 ↗
18. Hadi, M. (2009, January 6–10). Coordinated traffic responsive ramp metering strategies—An assessment based on previous studies. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.
19. Literature Review of Advancements in Adaptive Ramp Metering10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.117 ↗
20. The use of cooperative approach in ramp metering
21. Review of ramp metering methodologies for urban expressway10.1007/978-981-13-7542-2_12 ↗
22. Review of freeway on-ramp metering methodologies
23. Ramp Metering on Urban Motorways10.1007/978-3-319-90893-9_39 ↗
24. Gregurić, M., Mandžuka, S., and Vujić, M. (2012, January 22–26). Intelligent ramp metering. Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Vienna, Austria.
25. Wang, X., Gao, G., Wen, S., and Miyagi, T. (2010, January 4–8). Reinforcement learning on-ramp metering with or without complete information. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, Beijing, China.10.1061/41127(382)164 ↗
26. Freeway ramp metering: An overview10.1109/TITS.2002.806803 ↗
27. Harmonization with Variable Speed Limits on Motorways10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.056 ↗
28. Safety effects of dynamic speed limits on motorways10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.013 ↗
29. Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.010 ↗
30. Evaluation of variable speed limits to improve traffic safety10.1016/j.trc.2006.06.002 ↗
31. Heuristic Ramp-Metering Coordination Strategy Implemented at Monash Freeway, Australia10.3141/2178-02 ↗
32. ALINEA: A local feedback control law for on-ramp metering
33. Speed limitation on freeways: Traffic-responsive strategies10.1016/B978-0-08-036203-8.50106-1 ↗
34. Smulders, S. (, 1992). Control by Variable Speed Signs-The Dutch Experiment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, London, UK.
35. Smulders, S.A., and Helleman, D.E. (1998, January 21–23). Variable speed control: State-of-the-art and synthesis. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, UK.10.1049/cp:19980174 ↗
36. Li, D., and Ranjitkar, P. (2015). A fuzzy logic-based variable speed limit controller. J. Adv. Transp., 49.10.1002/atr.1320 ↗
37. Methodology for Variable Speed Limit Activation in Active Traffic Management10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.240 ↗
38. Effects of Weather-Controlled Variable Speed Limits and Warning Signs on10.3141/1689-08 ↗
39. Optimal coordination of variable speed limits to suppress shock waves10.1109/TITS.2004.842408 ↗
40. Nonlinear optimization for freeway control using variable-speed signaling10.1109/25.806796 ↗
41. Yang, X., Lu, Y.C., and Chang, G.L. (2013, January 13–17). Proactive Optimal Variable Speed Limit Control for Recurrently Congested Freeway Bottlenecks. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
42. Toll Plaza Merging Traffic Control for Throughput Maximization10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(67) ↗
43. Distributed Controller Design Approach to Dynamic Speed Limit Control against Shockwaves on Freeways10.3141/2086-11 ↗
44. Feedback-Based Mainstream Traffic Flow Control for Multiple Bottlenecks on Motorways
45. Traffic flow optimization: A reinforcement learning approach10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.001 ↗
46. Li, Z., Liu, P., Xu, C., Duan, H., and Wang, W. (2017). Reinforcement Learning-Based Variable Speed Limit Control Strategy to Reduce Traffic Congestion at Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 1–14.10.1109/TITS.2017.2687620 ↗
47. Accounting for dynamic speed limit control in a stochastic traffic environment: A reinforcement learning approach10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.014 ↗
48. Gregurić, M., Kušić, K., Vrbanić, F., and Ivanjko, E. (2020, January 14–15). Variable Speed Limit Control Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Possible Implementation. Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia.10.1109/ELMAR49956.2020.9219031 ↗
49. Jacobson, L., Stririak, J., Nelson, L., and Saliman, D. (2006). Ramp Management and Control Handbook.
50. Modelling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of Boulevard Peripherique in Paris: Part II: Coordinated on-ramp metering10.1016/0191-2607(90)90048-B ↗
51. Minnesota’s New Ramp Control Strategy: Design Overview and Preliminary Assessment10.3141/1867-09 ↗
52. Traffic-Responsive Linked Ramp-Metering Control10.1109/TITS.2007.908724 ↗
53. Bogenberger, K., and May, A. (1999). Advanced Coordinated Traffic Responsive Ramp Metering Strategies, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley. Working Papers.
54. Expert Level Control of Ramp Metering Based on Multi-Task Deep Reinforcement Learning10.1109/TITS.2017.2725912 ↗
55. Rezaee, K., Abdulhai, B., and Abdelgawad, H. (2012, January 16–19). Application of reinforcement learning with continuous state space to ramp metering in real-world conditions. Proceedings of the 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338837 ↗
56. Faresx, A., and Gomaay, W. (2014, January 18–20). Freeway ramp-metering control based on Reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), Taichung, Taiwan.10.1109/ICCA.2014.6871097 ↗
57. Selvaraj, H., Zydek, D., and Chmaj, G. (2015). Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Control for Ramp Metering. Progress in Systems Engineering, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-08422-0 ↗
58. Deng, F., Jin, J., Shen, Y., and Du, Y. (2019, January 27–30). Advanced Self-Improving Ramp Metering Algorithm based on Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand.10.1109/ITSC.2019.8916903 ↗
59. Beurteilung verkehrsabhängiger Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen auf Autobahnen
60. Cremer, M. (1979). Der Verkehrsfluss auf Schnellstrassen: Modelle, Überwachung, Regelung, Springer.
61. Control of freeway traffic flow by variable speed signs10.1016/0191-2615(90)90023-R ↗
62. Effectiveness of Automatic Section Speed Control System Operating on National Roads in Poland
63. Comparing Methods of Ramp Metering for On-Ramps to Improve the Operational Conditions at Peak Hours
64. Shehada, M.K., and Kondyli, A. (2019). Evaluation of Ramp Metering Impacts on Travel Time Reliability and Traffic Operations through Simulation. J. Adv. Transp., 12.10.1155/2019/8740158 ↗
65. Integrated Ramp Metering and Variable Speed Limit Control of Motorway Traffic Flow10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.02384 ↗
66. Hadj-Salem, H., Lebacque, J.P., and Mammar, S. (2013, January 4–6). Theoretical analysis of the efficiency of ramp metering, speed management based on Braess-like paradoxes. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the EWG on Transportation, Porto, Portugal.
67. Sisiopiku, V.P. (2001, January 4–7). Variable speed control: Technologies and practice. Proceedings of the ITS America 11th Annual Meeting and Exposition, ITS: Connecting the Americas, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
68. Assessment of dynamic speed limit management on metropolitan freeways10.1080/15472450.2012.719455 ↗
69. Agency, H. (2004). M25 Controlled Motorways. Safe Roads, Reliable Journeys, Informed Travelers. Summary Report Issue 1-November.
70. Evaluation of the impact of advisory variable speed limits on motorway capacity and level of service10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.433 ↗
71. Air pollution impacts of speed limitation measures in large cities: The need for improving traffic data in a metropolitan area10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.013 ↗
72. Punzo, V., Cascetta, E., and Bonnel, P. (2012, January 16–22). Impact on vehicle speeds and pollutant emissions of a fully automated section speed control scheme on the Naples urban motorway. Proceedings of the 19th Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress, Vienna, Austria.
73. Effects of the 80km/h and variable speed limits on air pollution in the metropolitan area of Barcelona10.1016/j.trd.2013.04.005 ↗
74. Pasquale, C., Sacone, S., and Siri, S. (2014, January 24–27). Ramp metering control for two vehicle classes to reduce traffic emissions in freeway systems. Proceedings of the 2014 European Control Conference (ECC), Strasbourg, France.10.1109/ECC.2014.6862454 ↗
75. An evaluation of the ramp metering effectiveness in reducing carbon dioxide emissions10.1177/0037549712453166 ↗
76. Guériau, M., and Dusparić, I. (2020, January 20–23). Quantifying the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic efficiency and safety in mixed traffic. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294174 ↗
77. Ye, L., and Yamamoto, T. (2019). Evaluating the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic safety. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl., 526.10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.245 ↗
78. Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles10.1080/15472450.2017.1404680 ↗
79. Lu, Q., and Tettamanti, T. (2018, January 17–19). Impacts of autonomous vehicles on the urban fundamental diagram. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure, CETRA 2018, Zadar, Croatia.10.5592/CO/CETRA.2018.714 ↗
80. Wang, Q., Li, B., Li, Z., and Li, L. (2017, January 20–22). Effect of connected automated driving on traffic capacity. Proceedings of the 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8242845 ↗
81. Characteristic Analysis of Mixed Traffic Flow of Regular and Autonomous Vehicles Using Cellular Automata
82. Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007 ↗
83. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., and Winner, H. (2016). The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic. Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8 ↗
84. Wu, Y., Tan, H., Qin, L., and Ran, B. (2020). Differential variable speed limits control for freeway recurrent bottlenecks via deep actor-critic algorithm. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 117.10.1016/j.trc.2020.102649 ↗
85. Integrated variable speed limits and lane-changing control for freeway lane-drop bottlenecks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981658 ↗
86. Rongsheng, C., Zhang, T., and Levin, M.W. (2020). Effects of Variable Speed Limit on Energy Consumption with Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Roads Using Modified Cell-Transmission Model. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst., 146.10.1061/JTEPBS.0000379 ↗
87. Optimal Control for Speed Harmonization of Automated Vehicles10.1109/TITS.2018.2865561 ↗
88. Yu, M., and ’David’ Fan, W. (2019). Optimal variable speed limit control in connected autonomous vehicle environment for relieving freeway congestion. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst., 145.10.1061/JTEPBS.0000227 ↗
89. Li, D., and Wagner, P. (2019). Impacts of gradual automated vehicle penetration on motorway operation: A comprehensive evaluation. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 11.10.1186/s12544-019-0375-3 ↗
90. Vinitsky, E., Parvate, K., Kreidieh, A., Wu, C., and Bayen, A. (2018, January 4–7). Lagrangian Control through Deep-RL: Applications to Bottleneck Decongestion. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569615 ↗
91. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.025 ↗
92. Cooperative Mainstream Traffic Flow Control on Freeways
93. Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.014 ↗
94. Trajectory optimization of connected and autonomous vehicles at a multilane freeway merging area10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.016 ↗
95. Optimal Vehicle Trajectory Planning with Control Constraints and Recursive Implementation for Automated On-Ramp Merging10.1109/TITS.2018.2874234 ↗
96. Lane density optimisation of automated vehicles for highway congestion control
97. Gáspár, P., and Nemeth, B. (2019). Control Strategy of the Ramp Metering in the Mixed Traffic Flow. Adv. Ind. Control., 121–132.10.1007/978-3-030-04116-8_7 ↗
98. Wang, Z., Wu, G., and Barth, M. (2018). Distributed Consensus-Based Cooperative Highway On-Ramp Merging Using V2X Communications. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/2018-01-1177 ↗
99. On the Impact of Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles in Improving Freeway Merging: A Modified Intelligent Driver Model-Based Approach
100. Automated and Cooperative Vehicle Merging at Highway On-Ramps10.1109/TITS.2016.2587582 ↗