journal article·2017-01-25Open access

Wetting Resistance of Commercial Membrane Distillation Membranes in Waste Streams Containing Surfactants and Oil

Lies Eykens, Kristien De Sitter, Chris Dotremont, Wim De Schepper, Luc Pinoy, Bart Van Der Bruggen

Applied Sciences· Volume 7· Issue 2

Abstract

Water management is becoming increasingly challenging and several technologies, including membrane distillation (MD) are emerging. This technology is less affected by salinity compared to reverse osmosis and is able to treat brines up to saturation. The focus of MD research recently shifted from seawater desalination to industrial applications out of the scope of reverse osmosis. In many of these applications, surfactants or oil traces are present in the feed stream, lowering the surface tension and increasing the risk for membrane wetting. In this study, the technological boundaries of MD in the presence of surfactants are investigated using surface tension, contact angle and liquid entry pressure measurements together with lab-scale MD experiments to predict the wetting resistance of different membranes. Synthetic NaCl solutions mixed with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were used as feed solution. The limiting surfactant concentration was found to be dependent on the surface chemistry of the membrane, and increased with increasing hydrophobicity and oleophobicity. Additionally, a hexadecane/SDS emulsion was prepared with a composition simulating produced water, a waste stream in the oil and gas sector. When hexadecane is present in the emulsion, oleophobic membranes are able to resist wetting, whereas polytetrafluoretheen (PTFE) is gradually wetted by the feed liquid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

VITO—Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium

Department of Chemical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

Department of Chemical Engineering, Cluster Sustainable Chemical Process Technology, KU Leuven, Gebroeders Desmetstraat 1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Direct contact membrane distillation with heat recovery: Thermodynamic insights from module scale modeling10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.016 ↗
2. Economic analysis of desalination technologies in the context of carbon pricing, and opportunities for membrane distillation10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.033 ↗
3. Desalination and Reuse of High-Salinity Shale Gas Produced Water: Drivers, Technologies, and Future Directions10.1021/es401966e ↗
4. Treatment of high salinity solutions: Application of air gap membrane distillation10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.056 ↗
5. Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation—A pilot study10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.026 ↗
6. Membrane fouling and wetting in a DCMD process for RO brine concentration10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.017 ↗
7. High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.003 ↗
8. Treatment of dye solutions by vacuum membrane distillation10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.014 ↗
9. Integrated direct contact membrane distillation for olive mill wastewater treatment10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.014 ↗
10. Preparation and characterization of highly hydrophobic poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Clay nanocomposite nanofiber membranes (PVDF-clay NNMs) for desalination using direct contact membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.012 ↗
11. Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.038 ↗
12. Scaling and fouling in membrane distillation for desalination applications: A review10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.031 ↗
13. Fouling mechanisms of dairy streams during membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.043 ↗
14. Fouling and its control in membrane distillation—A review10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.042 ↗
15. Fouling of dairy components on hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.057 ↗
16. Fouling analysis and control in a DCMD process for SWRO brine10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.039 ↗
17. Membrane fouling and cleaning in long term plant-scale membrane distillation operations10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.064 ↗
18. Membrane distillation operated at high seawater concentration factors: Role of the membrane on CaCO3 scaling in presence of humic acid10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.044 ↗
19. A scaling mitigation approach during direct contact membrane distillation10.1016/j.seppur.2011.05.013 ↗
20. Wetting Study of Hydrophobic Membranes via Liquid Entry Pressure Measurements with Aqueous Alcohol Solutions10.1006/jcis.2000.7106 ↗
21. Influence of morphology of PVDF capillary membranes on the performance of direct contact membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.044 ↗
22. Concentration of NaCl solution by membrane distillation integrated with crystallization10.1081/SS-120014442 ↗
23. Shrinkage, defect and membrane distillation performance of composite PVDF membranes10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.015 ↗
24. Fabrication and characterization of polyvinylidenefluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) electrospun membranes for direct contact membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.061 ↗
25. Wetting criteria for the applicability of membrane distillation10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80288-4 ↗
26. Omniphobic Membrane for Robust Membrane Distillation10.1021/ez500267p ↗
27. Composite Membrane with Underwater-Oleophobic Surface for Anti-Oil-Fouling Membrane Distillation10.1021/acs.est.5b05976 ↗
28. Novel membrane surface modification to enhance anti-oil fouling property for membrane distillation application10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.053 ↗
29. Antifouling grafting of ceramic membranes validated in a variety of challenging wastewaters10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.057 ↗
30. Preparation and Characterization of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membranes for Membrane Distillation10.1021/ie010553y ↗
31. Characterization and performance evaluation of commercially available hydrophobic membranes for direct contact membrane distillation10.1016/j.desal.2016.04.006 ↗
32. Influence of membrane thickness and process conditions on direct contact membrane distillation at different salinities10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.037 ↗
33. Surface Tension of Aqueous Solutions of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate from 20 °C to 50 °C and pH between 4 and 1210.1021/je9800149 ↗
34. Measurement of the dynamic surface tension by the maximum bubble pressure method. IV. Surface tension of aqueous solutions of sodium dodecyl sulfate10.1016/0021-9797(72)90081-1 ↗
35. The dynamic surface tension of sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions10.1016/0021-9797(69)90134-9 ↗
36. Full-scale Direct Contact Membrane Distillation (DCMD) model including membrane compaction effects10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.044 ↗
37. Desalination using membrane distillation: Experimental studies on full scale spiral wound modules10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.030 ↗