Show source-provided references
2. Investigation of the filtration characteristics of pilot-scale hollow fiber submerged mf system using cake formation model and artificial neural networks model
10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.013 ↗3. Li, N.N., Fane, A.G., Ho, W.S.W., and Matsuura, T. (2008). Submerged membranes. Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications, John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 10.
10.1002/9780470276280 ↗7. Submerged hollow fiber ultrafiltration as seawater pretreatment in the logic of integrated membrane desalination systems
10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.051 ↗8. Modeling and experimental verification of pilot-scale hollow fiber, direct flow microfiltration with periodic backwashing
10.1021/es9610040 ↗12. Drioli, E., and Giorno, L. (2009). Fouling in membrane processes. Membrane Operations, Innovative Separations and Transformations, Wiley-VCH. Chapter 6.
10.1002/9783527626779 ↗13. Improvement of microfiltration performance in water treatment: Is critical flux a viable solution?
10.2166/wst.2000.0669 ↗16. Filtration of biomass with laboratory-scale submerged hollow fibre modules—Effect of operating conditions and module configuration
10.1002/jctb.675 ↗19. Radjenović, J., Matošić, M., Mijatović, I., Petrović, M., and Barceló, D. (2008). Membrane bioreactor (MBR) as an advanced wastewater treatment technology. Emerging Contaminants from Industrial and Municipal Waste, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-540-79210-9_2 ↗21. The influence of bubble characteristics on the performance of submerged hollow fiber membrane module used in microfiltration
10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.019 ↗22. Air bubbling for alleviating membrane fouling of immersed hollow-fiber membrane for ultrafiltration of river water
10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.026 ↗25. Methods employed for control of fouling in mf and uf membranes: A comprehensive review
10.1081/SS-200068409 ↗26. Effects of operating conditions on submerged hollow fibre membrane systems used as pre-treatment for seawater reverse osmosis
10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.038 ↗27. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review of mechanical cleaning by scouring agents to control membrane fouling
10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.144 ↗28. Membrane bioreactors—A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, lca and market prospects
10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010 ↗29. Ultrafiltration as an alternative membrane technology to obtain safe drinking water from surface water: 10 years of experience on the scope of the aquapot project
10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.035 ↗31. Ray, C., and Jain, R. (2014). Low Cost Emergency Water Purification Technologies: Integrated Water Security Series, Butterworth-Heinemann.
37. Interaction mechanisms associated with organic colloid fouling of ultrafiltration membrane in a drinking water treatment system
10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.001 ↗38. Comparison of dmf and uf pre-treatments for particulate material and dissolved organic matter removal in swro desalination
10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.005 ↗40. Pre-treatment of swro pilot plant for desalination using submerged mf membrane process: Trouble shooting and optimization
10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.064 ↗42. Microbial relevant fouling in membrane bioreactors: Influencing factors, characterization, and fouling control
10.3390/membranes2030565 ↗43. Fouling characteristics and cleaning strategies in a coagulation-microfiltration combination process for water purification
10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90040-3 ↗46. Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment
10.1021/es0260418 ↗48. Ultrafiltration membrane pre-treatment benefits for reverse osmosis process in seawater desalting. Quantification in terms of capital investment cost and operating cost reduction
10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.022 ↗49. Pretreatment options for large scale swro plants: Case studies of of trials at kindasa, saudi arabia, and conventional pretreatment in spain
10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.127 ↗56. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: Linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization
10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.001 ↗58. Judd, S., and Judd, C. (2006). The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier. [1st ed.].
62. Impact of reactor configurations on the performance of a granular anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment
10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.03.021 ↗63. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations
10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036 ↗71. A concentration polarization model for the filtrate flow in cross-flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions
10.1080/00986448608911751 ↗74. Peinemann, K.V., and Pereira, N.S. (2010). Membrane Technology: Volume 4: Membranes for Water Treatmen, Wiley-VCH.
10.1002/9783527631407 ↗75. Unified membrane fouling index for low pressure membrane filtration of natural waters: Principles and methodology
10.1021/es071043j ↗76. Incorporating pore blocking, cake filtration, and eps production in a model for constant pressure bacterial fouling during dead-end microfiltration
10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.027 ↗77. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration
10.1006/jcis.2000.7231 ↗78. Membrane pore blocking during cake formation in constant pressure and constant flux dead-end microfiltration of very dilute colloids
10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.052 ↗81. Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling in low pressure membrane filtration —Effect of membranes and operation modes
10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.021 ↗85. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater
10.1021/es062052f ↗86. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes
10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3 ↗88. Application of a backwashing strategy based on transmembrane pressure set-point in a tertiary submerged membrane bioreactor
10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.069 ↗89. De Souza, N.P., and Basu, O.D. (2012, January 4–8). Relaxation: A beneficial operational step for the reduction of fouling in hollow fiber membranes for drinking water treatment. Proceedings of the Water Quality Technology Conference and Exposition 2012, Toronto, ON, Canada.
90. Evaluation of fouling deposition, fouling reversibility and energy consumption of submerged hollow fiber membrane systems with periodic backwash
10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.031 ↗93. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor
10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.004 ↗98. The relationship between critical flux and fibre movement induced by bubbling in a submerged hollow fibre system
10.2166/wst.2005.0629 ↗