journal article·2017-07-28Open access

The Performance and Fouling Control of Submerged Hollow Fiber (HF) Systems: A Review

Ebrahim Akhondi, Farhad Zamani, Keng Tng, Gregory Leslie, William Krantz, Anthony Fane, Jia Chew

Applied Sciences· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

The submerged membrane filtration concept is well-established for low-pressure microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) applications in the water industry, and has become a mainstream technology for surface-water treatment, pretreatment prior to reverse osmosis (RO), and membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Compared to submerged flat sheet (FS) membranes, submerged hollow fiber (HF) membranes are more common due to their advantages of higher packing density, the ability to induce movement by mechanisms such as bubbling, and the feasibility of backwashing. In view of the importance of submerged HF processes, this review aims to provide a comprehensive landscape of the current state-of-the-art systems, to serve as a guide for further improvements in submerged HF membranes and their applications. The topics covered include recent developments in submerged hollow fiber membrane systems, the challenges and developments in fouling-control methods, and treatment protocols for membrane permeability recovery. The highlighted research opportunities include optimizing the various means to manipulate the hydrodynamics for fouling mitigation, developing online monitoring devices, and extending the submerged HF concept beyond filtration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Singapore Membrane Technology Center, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Young Researchers and Elite Club, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1469669191, Iran

School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637459, Singapore

UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

School of Chemical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0424, USA

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Status after 10 years of operation—Overview of uf technology today10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X ↗
2. Investigation of the filtration characteristics of pilot-scale hollow fiber submerged mf system using cake formation model and artificial neural networks model10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.013 ↗
3. Li, N.N., Fane, A.G., Ho, W.S.W., and Matsuura, T. (2008). Submerged membranes. Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications, John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 10.10.1002/9780470276280 ↗
4. Fouling mechanisms of alginate solutions as model extracellular polymeric substances10.1016/j.desal.2004.09.019 ↗
5. Drinking water treatment by using ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes10.1016/S0011-9164(96)00092-6 ↗
6. A numerical approach to study the impact of packing density on fluid flow distribution in hollow fiber module10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.011 ↗
7. Submerged hollow fiber ultrafiltration as seawater pretreatment in the logic of integrated membrane desalination systems10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.051 ↗
8. Modeling and experimental verification of pilot-scale hollow fiber, direct flow microfiltration with periodic backwashing10.1021/es9610040 ↗
9. Influence of backwashing, flux and temperature on microfiltration for wastewater reuse10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.030 ↗
10. Slow colloidal aggregation and membrane fouling10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.001 ↗
11. Colloidal interactions and fouling of nf and ro membranes: A review10.1016/j.cis.2010.10.007 ↗
12. Drioli, E., and Giorno, L. (2009). Fouling in membrane processes. Membrane Operations, Innovative Separations and Transformations, Wiley-VCH. Chapter 6.10.1002/9783527626779 ↗
13. Improvement of microfiltration performance in water treatment: Is critical flux a viable solution?10.2166/wst.2000.0669 ↗
14. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00246-1 ↗
15. Fibre movement induced by bubbling using submerged hollow fibre membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.024 ↗
16. Filtration of biomass with laboratory-scale submerged hollow fibre modules—Effect of operating conditions and module configuration10.1002/jctb.675 ↗
17. Analysis of flux enhancement at oscillating flat surface membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.011 ↗
18. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019 ↗
19. Radjenović, J., Matošić, M., Mijatović, I., Petrović, M., and Barceló, D. (2008). Membrane bioreactor (MBR) as an advanced wastewater treatment technology. Emerging Contaminants from Industrial and Municipal Waste, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-79210-9_2 ↗
20. Membrane bioreactors and their uses in wastewater treatments10.1007/s00253-010-2885-8 ↗
21. The influence of bubble characteristics on the performance of submerged hollow fiber membrane module used in microfiltration10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.019 ↗
22. Air bubbling for alleviating membrane fouling of immersed hollow-fiber membrane for ultrafiltration of river water10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.026 ↗
23. Fouling control of submerged hollow fibre membranes by vibrations10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.031 ↗
24. Anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment10.1021/es1027103 ↗
25. Methods employed for control of fouling in mf and uf membranes: A comprehensive review10.1081/SS-200068409 ↗
26. Effects of operating conditions on submerged hollow fibre membrane systems used as pre-treatment for seawater reverse osmosis10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.038 ↗
27. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review of mechanical cleaning by scouring agents to control membrane fouling10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.144 ↗
28. Membrane bioreactors—A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, lca and market prospects10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010 ↗
29. Ultrafiltration as an alternative membrane technology to obtain safe drinking water from surface water: 10 years of experience on the scope of the aquapot project10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.035 ↗
30. The application of membrane technology for water disinfection10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00212-7 ↗
31. Ray, C., and Jain, R. (2014). Low Cost Emergency Water Purification Technologies: Integrated Water Security Series, Butterworth-Heinemann.
32. Emergency water supply: A review of potential technologies and selection criteria10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.030 ↗
33. Feasibility assessment of surface water disinfection by ultrafiltration10.2166/ws.2014.003 ↗
34. Virus removal by ultrafiltration: Understanding long-term performance change by application of bayesian analysis10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.057 ↗
35. Application and challenges of membrane in surface water treatment10.3923/jas.2010.380.390 ↗
36. Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment—A review10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.030 ↗
37. Interaction mechanisms associated with organic colloid fouling of ultrafiltration membrane in a drinking water treatment system10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.001 ↗
38. Comparison of dmf and uf pre-treatments for particulate material and dissolved organic matter removal in swro desalination10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.005 ↗
39. A short review on reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.017 ↗
40. Pre-treatment of swro pilot plant for desalination using submerged mf membrane process: Trouble shooting and optimization10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.064 ↗
41. Pretreatment of seawater: Results of pilot trials in singapore10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90075-0 ↗
42. Microbial relevant fouling in membrane bioreactors: Influencing factors, characterization, and fouling control10.3390/membranes2030565 ↗
43. Fouling characteristics and cleaning strategies in a coagulation-microfiltration combination process for water purification10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90040-3 ↗
44. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: A review10.1021/es802473r ↗
45. Direct-flow microfiltration of aquasols: II. On the role of colloidal natural organic matter10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.007 ↗
46. Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment10.1021/es0260418 ↗
47. Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: Effects of ph and ionic strength10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00218-5 ↗
48. Ultrafiltration membrane pre-treatment benefits for reverse osmosis process in seawater desalting. Quantification in terms of capital investment cost and operating cost reduction10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.022 ↗
49. Pretreatment options for large scale swro plants: Case studies of of trials at kindasa, saudi arabia, and conventional pretreatment in spain10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.127 ↗
50. The case for UF/MF pretreatment to RO in seawater applications10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.011 ↗
51. UF/MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: A comparison of energy costs10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.029 ↗
52. Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00343-0 ↗
53. UF/MF as RO pre-treatment: The real benefit10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.129 ↗
54. An experiment with different pretreatment methods10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00324-2 ↗
55. Pretreatment in reverse osmosis seawater desalination: A short review10.4491/eer.2011.16.4.205 ↗
56. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: Linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.001 ↗
57. Optimization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration process for seawater pretreatment10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.021 ↗
58. Judd, S., and Judd, C. (2006). The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier. [1st ed.].
59. Membrane bioreactors: Two decades of research and implementation10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.063 ↗
60. Fouling reduction using adsorbents/flocculants in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.022 ↗
61. Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.022 ↗
62. Impact of reactor configurations on the performance of a granular anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.03.021 ↗
63. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036 ↗
64. Effect of imposed flux on fouling behavior in high rate membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.107 ↗
65. Removal of trace organics by anaerobic membrane bioreactors10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.026 ↗
66. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Applications and research directions10.1080/10643380600678146 ↗
67. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: Performance and biomass characteristics10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.014 ↗
68. Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration—Effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.019 ↗
69. Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: A critical review10.1016/S0011-9164(01)85005-0 ↗
70. Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90020-1 ↗
71. A concentration polarization model for the filtrate flow in cross-flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions10.1080/00986448608911751 ↗
72. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: A critical review10.1081/SS-120039343 ↗
73. Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00143-X ↗
74. Peinemann, K.V., and Pereira, N.S. (2010). Membrane Technology: Volume 4: Membranes for Water Treatmen, Wiley-VCH.10.1002/9783527631407 ↗
75. Unified membrane fouling index for low pressure membrane filtration of natural waters: Principles and methodology10.1021/es071043j ↗
76. Incorporating pore blocking, cake filtration, and eps production in a model for constant pressure bacterial fouling during dead-end microfiltration10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.027 ↗
77. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration10.1006/jcis.2000.7231 ↗
78. Membrane pore blocking during cake formation in constant pressure and constant flux dead-end microfiltration of very dilute colloids10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.052 ↗
79. Modeling of fouling and foulant attachments on heterogeneous membranes in ultrafiltration of latex solution10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.014 ↗
80. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4 ↗
81. Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling in low pressure membrane filtration —Effect of membranes and operation modes10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.021 ↗
82. Two-phase flow in membrane processes: A technology with a future10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.072 ↗
83. A review of fouling and fouling control in ultrafiltration10.1016/0011-9164(87)87013-3 ↗
84. Validation of a simple fouling model for a submerged membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.031 ↗
85. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater10.1021/es062052f ↗
86. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3 ↗
87. A review on modeling of pore-blocking behaviors of membranes during pressurized membrane filtration10.1080/07373937.2012.683123 ↗
88. Application of a backwashing strategy based on transmembrane pressure set-point in a tertiary submerged membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.069 ↗
89. De Souza, N.P., and Basu, O.D. (2012, January 4–8). Relaxation: A beneficial operational step for the reduction of fouling in hollow fiber membranes for drinking water treatment. Proceedings of the Water Quality Technology Conference and Exposition 2012, Toronto, ON, Canada.
90. Evaluation of fouling deposition, fouling reversibility and energy consumption of submerged hollow fiber membrane systems with periodic backwash10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.031 ↗
91. Influence of dissolved air on the effectiveness of cyclic backwashing in submerged membrane systems10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.053 ↗
92. Effect of periodic backwash in the submerged membrane adsorption hybrid system (SMAHS) for wastewater treatment10.1016/j.desal.2005.09.010 ↗
93. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.004 ↗
94. Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00260-6 ↗
95. Modeling of fouling of cross-flow microfiltration membranes10.1080/03602549208021420 ↗
96. Aeration and hydrodynamics in submerged membrane bioreactors10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.004 ↗
97. Distribution of surface shear stress for a densely packed submerged hollow fiber membrane system10.1016/j.desal.2014.11.014 ↗
98. The relationship between critical flux and fibre movement induced by bubbling in a submerged hollow fibre system10.2166/wst.2005.0629 ↗
99. Modeling and optimizing submerged hollow fiber membrane modules10.1002/aic.690481011 ↗
100. Defining critical flux in submerged membranes: Influence of length-distributed flux10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.040 ↗