journal article·2021-09-08Open access

Microbial Spoilage of Plant-Based Meat Analogues

András J. Tóth, Anna Dunay, Márton Battay, Csaba Bálint Illés, András Bittsánszky, Miklós Süth

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 18

Abstract

Plant-based meat analogues (i.e., plant-based meat alternatives or substitutes, or vegan meats) are becoming more and more popular. The quality of the available products is constantly increasing therefore their consumption is also increasing. The primary role of meat analogues is to replace the meat component in meals while appropriate nutrient content and hedonic value will be provided as well. The food safety aspects of these newly emerging food products are less investigated. The aim of this study is to compare the microbial spoilage of identical meals prepared with meat and meat analogues to evaluate the food safety risk of meat analogues. In this work, raw protein materials were tested. Moreover, three pairs of meals prepared with or without meat were microbiologically examined during a storage experiment. Microbial contaminants were low in raw protein sources. In the case of hot meals, the microbial proliferation was faster in samples containing meat analogue, especially if the meals were not cooled. The food safety risk of meals prepared with meat analogues is slightly higher than their meat-containing counterparts, therefore more attention needs to be paid to the preparation, processing, and storage of these foods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Meat and Animal Product Quality

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indere Institute for Food System Research and Innovation Nonprofit Ltd., Zodony u. 3, 1203 Budapest, Hungary

Soreca Ltd., Munkácsy u. 16, 2040 Budaörs, Hungary

Digital Food Chain Education Research Development and Innovation Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, 1078 Budapest, Hungary

Institute of Business Economics, Leadership and Management, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. u. 1, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary

Department of Exotic Animal and Wildlife Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, 1078 Budapest, Hungary

Funding

Ministry for Innovation and Technology · National Research, Development and Innovation Office

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Meat alternatives: An integrative comparison10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018 ↗
2. #FakeMeat: How big a deal will animal meat analogs ultimately be?10.1093/af/vfy011 ↗
3. OECD/FAO (2019). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028, OECD Publishing.
4. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., and Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling Climate Change through Livestock—A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
5. Livestock and climate change: Impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies10.1093/af/vfy034 ↗
6. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8 ↗
7. Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow-calf system by the life cycle assessment method10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00457.x ↗
8. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 ↗
9. Human appropriation of land for food: The role of diet10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.005 ↗
10. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change10.1073/pnas.1523119113 ↗
11. Public health implications of meat production and consumption10.1079/PHN2005727 ↗
12. Red and processed meat consumption and cancer outcomes: Umbrella review10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129697 ↗
13. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977 ↗
14. Froggatt, A., and Wellesley, L. (2019). Meat Analogues: Considerations for the EU, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House.
15. Kamila, A.Y. (2015). Millennials lead food industry toward greener territory. Portl. Press Her., Available online: https://www.pressherald.com/2015/09/09/vegetarian-kitchen-millennials-lead-food-industry-toward-greener-territory.
16. ProVeg International (2021, August 16). European Consumer Survey on Plant-Based Foods—Describing the Product Landscape and Uncovering Priorities for Product Development and Improvement, Available online: https://proveg.com/what-we-do/corporate-engagement/proveg-consumer-survey-report-download/.
17. Eating like there’s no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011 ↗
18. Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004 ↗
19. A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 ↗
20. More room for legume—Consumer acceptance of meat substitution with classic, processed and meat-resembling legume products10.1016/j.appet.2019.104412 ↗
21. Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use?10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.001 ↗
22. Emergent food proteins—Towards sustainability, health and innovation10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108586 ↗
23. Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732 ↗
24. Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.006 ↗
25. Identification of new food alternatives: How do consumers categorize meat and meat substitutes?10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.01.008 ↗
26. Galanakis, C.M. (2019). Plant-Based Meat Analogues, Elsevier Inc.
27. Modification of plant proteins for improved functionality: A review10.1111/1541-4337.12688 ↗
28. Cheatham, R. (2013). Protein: A Plant-Based Look at This Power Macronutrient, Virgo Publishing LLC.
29. Drivers, opportunities, and challenges of the European risk-based meat safety assurance system10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107870 ↗
30. (2021, May 10). International Organization for Standardization 4833-2:2013 Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms—Part 2: Colony Count at 30 °C by the Surface Plating Technique. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59509.html.
31. (2021, May 10). International Organization for Standardization 21527-1:2008 Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Yeasts and Moulds—Part 1: Colony Count Technique in Products with Water Activity Greater than 0,95. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/38275.html.
32. (2021, May 10). International Organization for Standardization 21527-2:2008 Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Yeasts and Moulds—Part 2: Colony Count Technique in Products with Water Activity Less than or Equal to 0,95. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/38276.html.
33. (2021, May 10). International Organization for Standardization 21528-2:2017 Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae—Part 2: Colony-Count Technique. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/63504.html.
34. The Vegetarian Butcher: On its way to becoming the world’s biggest ‘meat’ producer?10.22434/IFAMR2018.0051 ↗
35. Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes10.1080/10408398.2014.939739 ↗
36. Comparing structuring potential of pea and soy protein with gluten for meat analogue preparation10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.04.022 ↗
37. Food quality and safety––Consumer perception and public health concern10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.06.001 ↗
38. Nychas, G.-J.E., and Panagou, E. (2011). Microbiological spoilage of foods and beverages. Food and Beverage Stability and Shelf Life, Elsevier.10.1533/9780857092540.1.3 ↗
39. Microbiological quality of vegetable proteins during the preparation of a meat analog
40. Studies on physico-chemical properties and shelf life of developed chicken meat analogue rolls
41. The evolution of a plant-based alternative to meat: From niche markets to widely accepted meat alternatives
42. Lianou, A., Panagou, E.Z., and Nychas, G.-J.E. (2016). Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages. The Stability and Shelf Life of Food, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100435-7.00001-0 ↗
43. Food safety behaviour in the home10.1108/00070709710168932 ↗
44. Baylis, C., Uyttendaele, M., Joosten, H., and Davies, A. (2011). The Enterobacteriaceae and their significance to the food industry. ILSI Eur. Rep. Ser., 9–12.
45. Health Protection Agency of United Kingdom (2021, May 10). Guidelines for Assessing the Microbiological Safety of Ready-to-Eat Foods Placed on the Market, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/363146/Guidelines_for_assessing_the_microbiological_safety_of_ready-to-eat_foods_on_the_market.pdf.
46. A comparison of physicochemical characteristics, texture, and structure of meat analogue and meats10.1002/jsfa.9438 ↗