Machine Learning Approach in Heterogeneous Group of Algorithms for Transport Safety-Critical System
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents a machine learning approach in a heterogeneous group of algorithms in a transport type model for the optimal distribution of tasks in safety-critical systems (SCS). Applied systems in the working area identify the determination of their parameters. Accordingly, in this article, machine learning models are implemented on various subsets of our transformed data and repeatedly calculated the bounds for 90 percent tolerance intervals, each time noting whether or not they contained the actual value of X. This approach considers the features of algorithms for solving such important classes of problem management as the allocation of limited resources in multi-agent SCS and their most important properties. Modeling for the error was normally distributed. The results are obtained, including the situation requiring solutions, recorded and a sample is made out of the observations. This paper summarizes the literature review on the machine learning approach into new implication research. The empirical research shows the effect of the optimal algorithm for transport safety-critical systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Data Processing Techniques · Economic and Technological Systems Analysis · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Korea
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 124167 Moscow, Russia
Solbridge International School of Business, Daejeon 34613, Korea
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Arenas-Garcia, J., Meng, A., Petersen, K.B., Lehn-Schioler, T., Hansen, L.K., and Larsen, J. (2006, January 6–8). Unveiling Music Structure via PLSA Similarity Fusion. Proceedings of the 2006 16th IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, Maynooth, Ireland.10.1109/MLSP.2007.4414343 ↗
2. Suncion, A., and Newman, D. (2007). UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California, School of Information and Computer Science.
3. Baumgartner, D., and Serpen, G. (2009, January 13–16). Large experiment and evaluation tool for WEKA classifiers. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Data Mining, DMIN 2009, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
4. A design heuristic for hybrid ensembles10.3233/IDA-2012-0521 ↗
5. A Comparison of Decision Tree Ensemble Creation Techniques10.1109/TPAMI.2007.250609 ↗
6. Multiple classifier systems for robust classifier design in adversarial environments10.1007/s13042-010-0007-7 ↗
7. On diversity and accuracy of homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles
8. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
9. Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.004 ↗
10. Caruana, R., Niculescu-Mizil, A., Crew, G., and Ksikes, A. (2004, January 4). Ensemble selection from libraries of models. Proceedings of the Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning-ICML ’04, Banff, AB, Canada.10.1145/1015330.1015432 ↗
11. Caruana, R., and Niculescu-Mizil, A. (2004, January 22–25). Data mining in metric space. Proceedings of the the 2004 ACM SIGKDD International Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/1014052.1014063 ↗
12. Investigating the influence of the choice of the ensemble members in accuracy and diversity of selection-based and fusion-based methods for ensembles10.1016/j.patrec.2006.09.001 ↗
13. Cawley, G., and Talbot, N. (2020, March 20). Miscellaneous Matlab Software. Available online: http://theoval.sys.uea.ac.uk/*gcc/matlab/default.html.
14. Energy efficiency as a way to ecological safety: Evidence from russia10.32479/ijeep.7903 ↗
15. Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning
16. Multiple comparisons among means10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 ↗
17. Is Combining Classifiers with Stacking Better than Selecting the Best One?10.1023/B:MACH.0000015881.36452.6e ↗
18. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R. (1996, January 3–6). Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on machine learning, Bari, Italy.
19. A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of m rankings10.1214/aoms/1177731944 ↗
20. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry10.1145/138859.138867 ↗
21. Gorodetsky, V., Samoylov, V., and Serebryakov, S. (September, January 31). Ontology–based context–dependent personalization technology. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.254 ↗
22. Local Versus Global Models for Classification Problems10.1198/0003130031423 ↗
23. Approximations of the critical region of the fbietkan statistic10.1080/03610928008827904 ↗
24. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH RESOURCE SAVING INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES10.32479/ijeep.7740 ↗
25. Assessment of Russian banking system performance and sustainability10.21511/bbs.14(3).2019.17 ↗
26. Priorities of russian energy policy in russian-chinese relations10.32479/ijeep.8507 ↗
27. Energy efficient development model for regions of the russian federation: Evidence of crypto mining10.32479/ijeep.7759 ↗
28. Fair market value of bitcoin: Halving effect
29. Machine Learning10.1146/annurev.cs.04.060190.002221 ↗
30. Thrun, S. (2007, January 7–9). Self-Driving Cars-An AI-Robotics Challenge. Proceedings of the FLAIRS Conference, Key West, FL, USA.
31. Abdi, H. (2007). The method of least squares. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, SAGE Publishing.
32. Context-Aware Recommender Systems
33. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1007/BF00153759 ↗
34. Ahmed, A., Kanagal, B., Pandey, S., Josifovski, V., Pueyo, L.G., and Yuan, J. (2013, January 4–8). Latent factor models with additive and hierarchically-smoothed user preferences. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference, Rome, Italy.10.1145/2433396.2433445 ↗
35. Neural expert networks for faster combined collaborative and content-based recommendation
36. DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY COOPERATION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND CHINA10.32479/ijeep.8509 ↗
37. Apte, C. (2010, January 21–24). The role of machine learning in business optimization. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML10), Haifa, Israel.